British Airways announces Johannesburg as the next A380 route

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

• James67 says:

  2 Aug2 August 06:48

  BAs a380 route network seems aeems to lack strategy xompared to other airlines but I am sure it soes have some rationale for BA. I suppose one of the plus loints for them is that having uniform products across their longhaul fleet they can easily interchange 777s 744s and a380s without causing passenger grumbles about inconsistent products in certain market areas. Still, aa much as I like CW as a solo traveller, I remain disappointed BA appears to be falling behind the competition rather than taking the opportunity to introduce a step change with the a380. Nonetheless, I hope this apparently haphazard route deployment means there are more BA a380 orders to come because the quietness and space make it a pleasure to fly. Just wish the would up their game and introduce a new more spacious CW and a F cabin that is worth the difference between F and J.

  • where2travel says:

    2 Aug2 August 07:12

    What makes you think the route choices are “haphazard”? I’m not surprised by any of the three (LAX, HKG, JNB) so far but then I don’t really know a lot about the underlying reasons and what drives all this.

    • James67 says:

      2 Aug2 August 07:33

      Just in the sense they are spread out wheras other airlines have tended to focus on one or two market areas and/or operate all or most of their daily rotations to a single destination with the a380. But as I said BA does not need to do that due to a uniform product over all aircraft types. I am sure BA is putting the a380 on routes it knows can support the extra capacity. I am hoping that means their once daily Bangkok srvice will get a380 soon as along with HKG is my main deztination.

      • Mark says:

        2 Aug2 August 08:42

        No chance on Bangkok any time soon. That’s getting a 3 class 777-200 from later this year.

        The terminating Singapore service could well be in line for A380 service though.

        • James67 says:

          2 Aug2 August 09:03

          Oh thats bad news. I dislike 777s and the smaller aircraft probably meand even less award availability than usual. Seems like gulf carriers are really hurting everybody else into BKK these days. Word is the terminating SIN will be having a short hop to Jakarta so unlikely that will ger an a380.

• signol says:

  2 Aug2 August 08:47

  I don’t think it is airport restrictions keeping planes on the ground in JNB all day, more that the business market is such that no or minimal time difference mean overnight each way is preferable for premium passengers. KLM are the one that bucks the trend, flying south in daylight with a 2h turnaround heading back overnight.

  • Rob says:

    2 Aug2 August 13:49

    Yes, sorry, that is what I meant – or, more precisely, I meant that for much of the day you cannot turn a plane around immediately because it will land when the airport is closed

• flibbly says:

  2 Aug2 August 12:16

  JNB is my most frequent destination for work, so it’ll be interesting to try the new bird out. I’m with-holding an opinion until I have done so though, as I’m still rather fond of the old Jumbos currently on this route, especially when I can bag a seat on the upper deck.

  • James67 says:

    2 Aug2 August 12:28

    Jumbos are lovely and I will be sad to see them go. However, the a380 is a nicer and much quieter airplane but you will miss the feel of smallee 744 upper deck. For me it was not an issue as I liked the space of main deck better. What I will miss is the feeling of sitting in nose of a 744 in first, just something about that I like, except on BA where I dislike F cabin ambiance.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.