Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Claiming compensation for flight delays

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

A few weeks ago I wrote about the ‘Huzar vs Jet2’ legal case.  This has brought substantial clarity to the rules covering ‘EC261’ compensation for delayed flights.

As a reminder, you are due the following compensation if your flight from an EU airport on any airline, or to an EU airport on an airline licensed to fly within the EU, is delayed:

Flights under 1,500 km with a delay of 2 hours or more are entitled to €250

Flights between 1,500 km and 3,500 km (or any flight over 1,500km within the EU) with a delay of at least 3 hours are entitled to €400

Flights of 3,500 km or more (unless entirely within the EU) and a waiting time of 4 hours are entitled to €600

Where rerouting is offered and results in the passenger arriving within 2, 3 or 4 hours of the scheduled arrival time, depending on distance, the compensation payable is halved

Delays lasting more than 5 hours give passengers the option to withdraw from the flight altogether and be flown back to their original destination

Wikipedia has a long article on EC261 if you want to go into it in more detail.

The Huzar case clarified that airlines are NOT allowed to use ‘mechanical failure’ as an excuse to avoid payment.  The Court of Appeal has now ruled that this does not count as an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ which allows an airline to avoid compensation payments.

If you are due compensation, you need to decide whether to pursue the claim yourself or to outsource it to a third party.

What I did not mention when I wrote about the Huzar case, and as a press release last week reminded me, a number of groups have sprung up over the last year or so to help reclaim money you may be due.

Flightright, for example, will handle the process on your behalf in return for a 25% fee.  Given that the compensation figures are not huge (from €250 per person) this is arguably not a bad deal in return for getting the entire process off your shoulders.

euclaim offers a similar service, albeit with a slightly higher fee.  An online search will bring up some other alternatives.

You can also try the DIY approach.  MoneySavingExpert has a guide to making your own claim if you want to go through the process yourself, although that won’t help if the airline refuses to pay and you need to use the Small Claims Court.  I don’t have any personal experience of claiming EC261 compensation, luckily, so I don’t know how drawn out the process could be.

In theory, ‘Huzar vs Jet2’ should mean that more airlines begin to settle claims directly.  It will take a few months to find out if this is actually the case in reality.

Comments (37)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • richie says:

    this is what refund me have sent me regarding my case and current status:

    OnJune 11 2014, the Court of Appeal ruled that airlines could not claim normal technical problems as ‘extraordinary circumstances’ to escape paying compensation for flight delays. The case was brought by a passenger, Ron Huzar, who suffered a 27-hour delay on a Jet2 flight from Malaga to Manchester in 2011.

    This decision means under the terms of regulation EU261 airlines must pay compensation to passengers for delays of more than three hours.

    However, Jet2.com have since filed an application to the Supreme Court, the highest Court in England and Wales, seeking permission to appeal the judgment. The Supreme Court must now decide whether or not they wish to grant leave (permission) to appeal. A decision is anticipated in October 2014.

    Unfortunately the result for you is more waiting. Currently all cases affected by Huzar v Jet2.com are stayed (on hold).

  • joe says:

    Am I lucky or unlucky?
    From 2012-2013, four long haul delays and 2,400 Euros, each claim was made direct through BA.Com and settled in six weeks. Always ensure you get information from from BA staff about the reasons, one example, December last year 8 hour delay from PVG-LHR, Captain said the delay was due to minor damage to the hold when the aircraft was loaded at Heathrow and had to be repaired there. This was mentioned in the claim and no quibble from BA.
    But so many PAX are just not informed by BA that they are entitled to this, I think in future I will make some special cards …200 x 600 x 25%….just a joke ..!!

    • Volker says:

      I had one case so far: BA, claim on BA.com, cheque arrived within weeks. Straight forward and simple, therefore I would try again in a future case before giving part of my money to a third party.

    • Saurabh says:

      Hi Joe, Volker,
      My flight got delayed very recently (around 4th July). After returning from my vacations, i filed a complaint on BA.com on 8th. I did get an auto mailer, however did not receive anything further. I have tried to chase it up twice quoting the same complaint number but no response so far.
      Did you guys send any posts as well or call them up? Not sure what else to do.

  • Frenske says:

    I hope this will not lead to situations where the decision whether a plane with a mechanical fault should fly or not is being rushed to save in the order of 25000 euros.

    • GP says:

      Safety is clearly being overlooked in favour of the compensation culture with this. This is of a great deal of concern to me and I hope to all travellers.

  • Sam Wardill says:

    I have had three cases. In all three cases the airline refused payment and I had to lodge a court claim. Two of the claims were in UK (air France and Swiss air) and were settled before the court date. They were easy. The third against aer Arran has to be lodged in an eu court as aer Arran don’t have a uk address. Also with the third the Irish regulator (incorrectly I believe) denied my claim. Therefore I am using the folks at EUDELAY. They will earn their money with this case but they have not complained. I can’t fault them to date. Incidentally they agree with me the the Irish regulator incorrectly denied my claim.

    To the point made by Frenske, I think it is highly unlikely that the regulation will lead to airlines operating unsafely. The potential cost of operating unsafely is already far too high. The regulation should, however, eventually result in airlines operating more reliably. I think we are already seeing some of the benefits. It has been a long slog because the airlines have spent their energy fighting the law rather than complying with it.

  • James says:

    I wonder where you would stand with ATC delays into busy airports? One could argue that extended holds at LHR for example are not unexpected and therefore diverts resulting from such holds shouldn’t really happen where the weather etc is good.

    • TimS says:

      ATC holds are usually outside the control of the airline though.

      Unavailable/insufficient gates, priority inbounds from other airlines etc. None of those things are within the operating airline’s control and therefore could not be reasonably foreseen.

      I am aware of a few occasions of crew intentionally taking ages to taxi to stand but this is rar and almost never at the airline’s instruction.
      (One FO i know took 20 mins from landing to stand at DEL and was going so slowly that the tower twice asked if everything was OK and if he needed assistance!)

      • Sam Wardill says:

        The law doesn’t say that compensation is not due if the failure was due to a cause that was not within the airlines operation control. The law states “if it can prove that the cancellation is caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken”. The reasonable measures that might need to have been taken could be by the airport or by air traffic control. It is up to the airline to contract with their suppliers (such as airports and air traffic control) to ensure that these suppliers take all reasonable measures to avoid flight cancellation and delay.

        • TimS says:

          It isn’t as simple as that. Airlines cannot contract with ATC and airports in the way you suggest.

          Major carriers don’t even have that sort of control on a macro level, let alone a specific flight/micro level.

          Given the volume of movements happening every hour, it would be impossible for ATC to consider bespoke contracts for each airline! Their interest is getting everyone up and down safely and efficiently, not prioritising metal based on revenue factors.

          • Sam Wardill says:

            Ok. But look at the wording of the law. If ATC cause a delay because of a SNAFU can this really be described as an “extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken”? Compensation can clearly not be avoided because an ATC SNAFU does not fall under this exception.

            Regardless of any specific contract term the ATC would be likely to be in breach of of a general contractual duty to provide its service with reasonable care and skill. I don’t know the wording of the contracts but there must be some sort of obligation and, if there is not, then the airlines can lobby EU governments to introduce one (rather than lobbying to change EU261). Assuming there was a general breach of contract then airlines would be entitled to pursue the ATC for the loss incurred as a result of that.

            If I had a delay under such a situation I would certainly pursue a claim. My view is that it it only when ATCs start to be held to account for the cost of their failures they will start to take actions to reduce them. This is the whole intent of this (EU261) law and why I personally feel so passionately about it.

  • Lucy says:

    I wrote to BA twice about the 7 hour delay we had from JFK to LHR (all sitting on the tarmac waiting for a spare part). They denied my claim both times citing extraordinary circumstances. I have handed the claim over to Bott & Co to avoid the hassle. Unlikely to see any movement on this for a while as the airlines are asking for leave to appeal again……

  • Aoife says:

    Per the flyertalk thread, it seems that BA only tend to pay out if the delay is above 3 hours. Thats always confused me.

  • Ashley says:

    We had a delay from Humberside to Larnaca in Oct 2010 of about 16-18 hours. We were given a letter at the time but no longer have it. How do I trace details of this flight to claim for the 4 tickets purchased?

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.