Bits: Avis £9.99 one-way rentals, Zipcar one-way rentals, Hilton Visa / Uber deal

Links on Head for Points may pay us an affiliate commission. A list of partners is here.

News in brief:

£9.98 one-way Avis car rentals to London

Regular readers will remember our article last year on Europcar offering £1 one-way car rentals to London.  Europcar uses this to cheaply reposition cars that need to be taken back to London – letting you rent them for £1 is cheaper than hiring a transporter!

Avis is now offering a similar deal, but only for the period around Easter.  You pay a flat £9.98 for a Group B or Group E car and need to drop it in London between 10th and 13th April.

Full details are on the Avis website here.  Thanks to Daniel.

Avis 350

Zipcar trialling new ‘one way’ car scheme in London

I am a fan of the Zipcar car club in London as I wrote here.  It got even better when Zipcar became a British Airways Executive Club partner, as I now earn 50 Avios every time I take a car out.

With the nearest car parked 30 seconds from our front door, and another 5 cars within a 10 minute walk, there is never any trouble finding a vehicle.  The only downside is that, because you pay by the hour, a relatively short drive – followed by a wait before you return – can get expensive.

Zipcar is now trialling a new scheme in Wandsworth called Zipcar Flex.  50 cars have been allocated for one-way rentals, as long as you drop them within Wandsworth.   You only pay for the car by the minute, and you can reserve it for 15 minutes via your smartphone to give you time to get to it before any other user grabs it!

This is an interesting idea.  The question for me is what benefit this has over taking an Uber or a black cab, both of which are more convenient and presumably cheaper.  They will pick you up at your door and drop you where you need to be without the trouble of finding a parking space.  Since you can’t guarantee that your Zipcar Flex car will still be where you parked it when you want to return home, it doesn’t even offer you the certainty of having a vehicle available.

You can learn more about Zipcar Flex here.


From April 2018, please use our new Uber sign-up code UBERHEADFORPOINTS via this link, or download the app and add the code via the promo code box on the ‘Payment’ tab.  This gets you £3 off your first ride.

New Barclaycard / Uber offer

If you are a heavy Uber user, Barclaycard has launched an interesting offer for you.  It runs until the end of the year and could work out to be quite valuable.

If you charge your Uber rides to a Barclaycard, every 11th ride you take will be free (up to £15).  If your 11th ride costs more than £15, you receive a £15 credit to your card statement.

Full details are here on the Barclaycard site.

You can take advantage of this offer as many times as you like and it is guaranteed to run for the rest of the year.

The Hilton Honors Platinum Visa card, issued by Barclaycard, is included in this offer so it will be of interest to many HFP readers.  Thanks to Richard for this.

(Want to earn more miles and points from credit cards?  Click here to visit our dedicated airline and hotel travel credit cards page or use the ‘Credit Cards Update’ link in the menu bar at the top of the page.)

How to save on UK Hilton Hotels using Tesco Clubcard vouchers
InterContinental trialling 'Club InterContinental Experience' at non-lounge hotels

Click here to join the 15,000 people on our email list and receive the latest Avios, miles and points news by 6am.

Amazon ad
Get points worth 15,000 Avios as a sign-up bonus!
15,000 Avios with Capital on Tap Mastercard
About Head for Points

We help business and leisure travellers maximise their Avios, frequent flyer miles and hotel loyalty points. Visit every day for three new articles or sign up for our FREE emails via this page or the box to your right.


  1. TGLoyalty says:

    Love Uber it’s so easy when you are on holiday or in a city you don’t know.

    Driver takes advantage or drives you half way round the city you have proof rather than getting the wool pulled over your eyes. Only issue is places where data costs an arm and a leg.

  2. Jchand says:

    When uber stop the slave wages, start paying U.K. Tax , and have fleet insurance rather than relying on a guy earning 60p a mile paying for his own expensive hire and reward insurance then maybe I will use. Not until then.

    • I can’t see them holding a gun to anyone’s head to work for them.
      But hey, don’t let that stop your rant

    • To be fair, the driver gets 80%+ of the money and the driver is paying tax and NI. Uber wouldn’t be paying tax anyway, even if it didn’t funnel the money offshore, due to its massive losses.

      Same with Amazon – it loses so much money that it is actually irrelevant where it books (sic) its revenue.

      There is a whole generation who are growing up without experiencing the joys of smoke-filled minicab offices with dodgy clapped out cars and drivers who often didn’t turn up. Which is good news. I would be very surprised if those guys were earning more than they would via Uber (what cut does a minicab firm take? More or less than Uber’s 20%?) and the drivers can’t log in and off as they please. These guys also paid for their own insurance etc as they do with Uber.

      • RussellH says:

        Uber have lost their case in the industrial tribunal, though, implying that their drivers are not, as they claim, self-employed.

        If Uber are happy to lose so much money, surely they could afford emploers NI, holiday pay, maternity leave etc too?

        • Do many of the drivers want to be employees with the inflexibility that that involves?

          • RussellH says:

            Clearly the ones who took Uber to the industrial tribunal do want the advantages of holiday pay, maternity leave, redundancy right etc. Plenty of people like the security and reliability of income of being an employee.

            Other Uber drivers I heard being interviewed at the time liked it just the way it is, but I suspect that they cannot have been wholely dependent on Uber for their income.

        • Did not a similar tribunal rule that a supplier to Pimlico Plumbers was entitled to employee benefits although he provided his own van etc. and was registered for VAT?
          Do they operate in a parallel universe?

      • Amazon are opening a warehouse where I live. So they will be paying business rates and employing a bucket load of people, who will all be earning and paying tax. It’s easy to complain about Megaglobalcorp not paying tax, but they still provide employment. If Amazon don’t pay as much as all the other local logistics warehouses, they won’t get the staff.

        • TGLoyalty says:

          Surely if UBER didnt earn the driver the same as a Black or Mini Cab they wouldn’t work for them either?

          My take on it is its a free market and people are free to offer their services to those that offer them the best package.

          These tribunals are interesting as the self employed are happy to do it when times are good, as take home wages are usually higher, but when the sh*t hit the fan they want to claim being an employee.

          In my experience you can’t have the remuneration and the benefits there’s always a trade off.

        • Jchand says:

          Maybe so but how do companies that pay their tax in the U.K. Compete . It is not a level playing field.

          Was there not an article in the FT ( or another) saying that Uber subsidies rides in the U.K. Around the 50% mark. .

  3. RussellH says:

    O/T but interesting:

    An article in The Week, quoting The Guardian, saying that UK based airlines could not only be forced to move their legal base to an EU country if/when the UK leaves the EU, but that they may have to force some UK shareholders to sell up. Apparently, to be allowed to fly between two different EU countries, an airline must have both a significant base on EU territory and a majority of their capital shares must be EU-owned.This even affects Ryanair, as once UK shareholders are excluded, only 40% of shareholders are EU entities. EasyJet could be better off at 49% EU owned, if they are allowed to include Stelios (UK + Cypriot nationality apparently).

    • On Brexit I would regard the Guardian to be as even-handed as the BBC.

      • What about Swissair and Norwegian?

        • TGLoyalty says:

          The EU in this context is actually the EU, EEA members plus Swiss as they are part of the common market / free trade of people.

          The current plan for Brexit seems to be for us to leave all of that and be wholly independent and control our own borders/trade policies.

          Ofcourse there’s a negotiation process and all of this is probably open to discussion

        • Norwegian also has an Irish AOC (Norwegian Air International) and a UK AOC (Norwegian Air UK), and is in the process of seeking an Argentinian AOC as well (Norwegian Air Argentina).

          However, Norwegian & Swissair are included in EASA as, in addition to the member states of the EU, the countries that are part of part of EFTA (i.e. Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and Iceland), have been granted participation under Article 66 of the Basic Regulation.

        • RussellH says:

          I cannot comment on Norway (though others have below), but I do know about Switzerland, being a Swiss National.

          CH / EU relationships are governed by a huge number of bilaterals, which in theory are separate, but in practice if one agreement breaks down, there is potential for the whiole thing to collapse. For the last two years the Swiss Government has been tied up in knots trying to reconcile the constitutional change voted through over two years ago banning ‘mass immigration’. This is clearly completely incompatible with the bilateral agreement with the EU guaranteeing free movement. There will be two new referendums on the matter soon, one to re-inforce the banning clause and one to completely remove it from the constitution.

          I do not imagine that our beloved UK government is expecting anything like this in their negotiations with the EU, but perhaps they should be.

  4. the real harry1 says:

    Laptop ban:

    Shashank Joshi, senior research fellow at security think-tank the Royal United Services Institute, said: ‘This risks being seen as a form of pointless ‘security theatre’ which causes great disruption with little benefit to aviation security.’

  5. WilliamPH says:

    O/T – Has there been any update on the integration of Fairmont and Raffles Hotels into the Accor Hotels loyalty program? I’m looking at booking some of the deluxe Rocky Mountain hotels (Banff, Jasper, Lake Louise), and the site tells me I won’t get any points or benefits from my Accor membership. If I’m lobbing out 400 pounds a night, I’d like some benefits back. I’m wondering whether to enroll in Fairmont’s Presidents Club – has it got much longer to go?

  6. They just changed the rules! I had a look at this to pick up on Thursday evening before Easter and drop in London on Good Friday lunchtime. Anoyingly they have now said that pick up AND drop off have to be before Good Friday, ruined my plans!

  7. Jchand says:

    Read today article about Uber and our courupt politicians. One sexual assault in an Uber ever 11 days. Disgraceful

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment.