Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Who did you pick as the best Premium Economy and Economy long-haul airline?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

In January and March we ran two market research surveys on Head for Points, dressed up as competitions.  As I didn’t think of the original idea, I am free to say that the concept was very clever.

An airline approached us to get an understanding of who people would choose to fly with if price, airline miles, status benefits and other perks not included in the ticket price were stripped out.  The easiest way to do this was to create exactly such a situation.  Not a hypothetical situation, but a real one.  We asked readers to name the airline they would choose to fly to New York with if they could pick any carrier.  The winner would get flights to New York, flying the very same airline that they picked.

Today I want to share the results with you.

Who is your favourite economy carrier?

We had 11,934 entries.  The results were:

  • Virgin Atlantic  55%
  • British Airways 29%
  • American Airlines 6%
  • Norwegian 5%
  • Delta 3%
  • United 1%

Well done Virgin Atlantic!  Whilst I did predict this order before we started, I was surprised by the scale of their win.

Why did people pick Virgin Atlantic?  The top reason was ‘Brand reputation’ (41%) which shows that all of their marketing, customer experience and PR efforts have paid off.  ‘Previous experience’ came 2nd at 29% – so people who fly it are happy to fly it again – followed by ‘Crew and service’ with 18%.  As a reminder, you could only pick one reason so there is probably some crossover between the 2nd and 3rd reasons.

Why did people pick British Airways?  ‘Previous experience’ was the winner here with 43%.  ‘Brand reputation’ was surprisingly strong – given BA’s recent issues – with 36%.  15% picked ‘Crew and service’.

Virgin Atlantic

Looked at from the other angle:

  • ‘Brand reputation’ was the most important factor for those people who picked Virgin Atlantic, closely followed by Norwegian
  • Virgin had the best score for ‘Crew and service’
  • ‘Food and beverage’ and ‘In-flight entertainment’ were rarely mentioned by anyone as the key factor.  Norwegian obviously scored highest on wi-fi.

I should mention that we plugged the competition via Facebook and it was picked up via some competition websites, so the results are not exclusively driven by our readers and include the broader travelling public.

Who is your favourite premium economy carrier?

We had 14,746 entries – clearly the lure of the bigger seat encouraged more entries!  The results were very similar to the Economy competition:

  • Virgin Atlantic  56%
  • British Airways 29%
  • American Airlines 7%
  • Norwegian 8%

Well done Virgin Atlantic (again) with a very similar score.

Now, I need to be honest here.  Before we started, I predicted that Norwegian would win.  Because – without a shadow of a doubt – Norwegian has the best premium hard product.  Anika even reviewed it on Head for Points last Autumn.  The seat is far bigger and you get lounge access with Norwegian Premium.

And yet …. either the Norwegian message has not got through, or people have an issue over flying with them. Remember that the winner of the competition got to fly the airline they picked.  I am guessing that it was the former and that Norwegian needs to take a serious look at their marketing efforts.

Why did people pick Virgin Atlantic?  The top reason, again, was brand reputation (37%).  ‘Previous experience’ came 2nd at 27%.  ‘Seat comfort’ came 3rd this time, with 12%.

Why did people pick British Airways?  ‘Previous experience’ was the winner here with 41%.  ‘Brand reputation’ was again strong with 30%.  ‘Seat comfort’ was exceptionally low at just 5%.  This is a surprise, because what this implies is that people are choosing to fly BA World Traveller Plus even though they know the seat is not the best.

Whilst not many people chose Norwegian, those that did, did so primarily due to ‘Seat comfort’ (37% picked this) which is arguably the ‘correct’ answer.  21% picked ‘Brand reputation’ and 14% chose ‘Previous experience’.  12% picked ‘On-ground benefits’ – it was the only airline which picked up a lot of votes for this feature, not surprisingly as only Norwegian Premium gives lounge access.

Looked at from the other angle:

  • ‘Brand reputation’ was the most important factor for Virgin, followed (quite a way behind) by American and Norwegian.  It is a remarkably powerful thing when so many people will choose to fly with you simply because they believe it will be good.
  • ‘Previous experience’ was a big driver of the BA vote compared to everyone else, although there could be an element of ‘better the devil you know’ given that almost no-one picked BA primarily on the basis of its seat
  • ‘Food and beverage’, ‘In-flight entertainment’ and wi-fi were rarely mentioned as the key factor.  Even Norwegian, which offers wi-fi across its long haul fleet, did not pick up many votes primarily for this reason.

We added an extra question to our Premium Economy competition – your age.

The findings here were interesting.  There was very little difference between the age groups in people who chose Virgin Atlantic, Norwegian or American Airlines.  However, those who picked British Airways as their choice of airline were substantially more likely to be aged over 55 and substantially less likely to be aged under 44.

And Virgin Atlantic said …..

I sent these results to Virgin Atlantic for comment.  Daniel Kerzner, VP Customer Experience, said:

“Sir Richard Branson founded Virgin Atlantic with the purpose to create a better and differentiated passenger journey.  We remain a challenger brand, always innovating to provide irresistible, great value experiences that our customers love. We’re also fortunate to have the most fabulous crew who bring our brand to life across every cabin.”

I thought it best not to ask for a comment from any of the other airlines ….

What can we draw from this?

There are a few key elements to take away from this, I think:

The Virgin Atlantic marketing, customer experience and PR machines do their jobs well, with the reputation of the airline being a key reason why people choose to fly it.  They also ‘walk the talk’ and, once people have tried it, the high scores for ‘Previous experience’ show that people are happy to go back.

British Airways, despite offering an arguably inferior product, is chosen because people are familiar with it and take comfort from that, even though the low seat scores show that people are fully aware what they are getting.

Norwegian scores well in areas where it clearly does excel – seat comfort and on-ground benefits in Premium, and wi-fi across all classes.  The low score for ‘Previous experience’ is probably driven by the fact that far fewer people have flown it long-haul than BA or Virgin.  If the airline did a better job of promoting its strong points it may do better.  For now I am worried that it is not getting the message across.

No-one seems to put much importance on IFE or food and beverage (or they decided there was little to choose between carriers) – and only a relatively small number of people chose to reward Norwegian’s big investment in wi-fi.

Congratulations to our two winners, Nick G for Economy and Helen F for Premium Economy.  Both chose Virgin Atlantic as their preferred carrier and will soon be heading off with them to New York.

Comments (130)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • ChampagneSocialist says:

    @Mike G and Mr(s) Entitled, agree – low rating for Norwegian probably reflects market share more than anything else. Plus Norwegian is the youngest airline out of the lot, not to mention BA and VS have wayyyyy more PE routes between them that people are more likely to have ever flown them than Norwegian. I for one would have voted Virgin, last time I went to the States Norwegian was an option but I had VS miles to burn.
    @James Plenty of folk fly BA J and prefer it despite any number of other airlines having superior hard and/or soft products…

  • eBungle says:

    I have flown all three (Norwegian, Virgin and BA) so my not selecting Norwegian wasn’t because I hadn’t known them it was because whilst their seat was better I found the airline hard to deal with. They are stretched so thin that when things go wrong (As they have done about 60% of the time) it is never resolved quickly.

    Both Virgin and BA have denser schedules and so when things go worng (As I am sure they must just as much as Norwegian – or maybe even more due to older fleets) They seem to be resolved quicker. As your research shows, the seat isn’t everything. For me I want to know I will get there on time. That is why I selected previous experience as my reason, it wasn’t the experience with the airline I picked as much as my experience with Norwegian counting them out.

    Therefore I was faced then with the choice of Virgin or BA who I regard both very highly (Despite the normal feelings in the HFP comments sections) so I went for BA as I have propbably flown them more and have a higher affinity for them (Even though I am under 44 so I guess I should have picked another airline)

    • Sussex Bantam says:

      Exactly this for me.

    • Bagoly says:

      An illuminating question for future runs (E.g. if they do do from US) would be “Which of these have you flown in the relevant class in the last five years?”
      My instinct on seeing Norwegian scoring low for Premium was that most people are not aware that it is like a 1980s Business Class without the fancy food and decent wine.
      So amongst those of us who have flown it I would expect it to win by a mile.
      But these two comments suggest it may not be as simple as that.

      Even if Norwegian were not the payers for this, they have gained some valuable lessons about marketing (assuming that relevant HfP information reaches them somehow)
      Conspiracy reading would be that it was commissioned by IAG to drive down the price they offer to buy Norwegian!

  • Gary Riches says:

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the results were skewed by people from the more broad public community on the competition websites not voting for Norwegian because they were confusing it with their short haul offering.

  • Neil says:

    One thing that was missed was flight times.

    When looking for my next flight to NYC I realised that the Norwegian flight times were not that convenient (cheaper slots I guess). Even thought the economy price was cheap, it didn’t really suit me for a quick visit.

    So I ended up on BA (the Avios tax/charges cost for Club was more than the economy ticket for Norwegian).

    No issues with Norwegian in general though. Have flown them to Orlando and would again – although that flight got in quite late too.

    • Chris says:

      This is a valid point – flight times have worsened further since last year – Friday lunchtime return flight arrives after 1am (scheduled 00.45 but always late)

  • Ash says:

    Interesting. I personally chose virgin for both but then it was based on my precious experiences. I would fly virgin more if they offered the companion voucher to non gold members with their new CC. I know little to nothing about Norwegian but it sounds like I need to get educated on them!

  • Chris says:

    Well ditto the comments on Norwegian really. Flown several legs on this route and with the exception of the Hi-Fly replacement (and even then only the seat was a disappointment) I’ve been most impressed, it’s my go to choice when CW isn’t an option.

    And who knew they had Wi-fi? Certainly not me!

  • Js says:

    I voted virgin for PE. I knew nothing about the Norwegian PE product, but I did know the economy product was low cost including charging for food/blankets etc. This distaste for the economy product clearly spilled across to their more premium product, and is something that I imagine will cost them unless they improve their marketing – I wouldn’t have even bothered researching it as I would have assumed their Premium Economy would have been similarly petty and penny-pinching. Actually now I have heard what it is, I would consider flying the product.

  • Crafty says:

    It’s an “interesting” set of results, but having adjusted for neither awareness nor trial, ultimately pretty meaningless other than as a very broad barometer of generalised brand reputation.

    If you or the client would like some advice on how to do the next round more robustly, my email address is attached to my screen name.

    • ankomonkey says:

      +1

      The sample of people surveyed was not representative of the general public and would have been skewed heavily by the HfP readership typology. And the questions were too simple and restrictive. I voted VS on both, but would have been happy to fly Norwegian (and others) in either case. The airline choice question should have either been a ranking (first choice, second choice, etc.) or an apportionment of 100 points across the brands to measure the degree to which the first choice airline was favoured. Finally, the reasons why options were too restrictive.

      As others have said, the results can be used as a very rough indicator at best.

      • Rob says:

        No, because – unlike 99% of other surveys – this one had real consequences. We offered you a free flight to NY on whoever you wanted, and you said Virgin for choice. That’s all we needed to know.

        • Mr(s) Entitled says:

          I think you are putting too much store in real world consequences. For a start, the chance of winning was remote and even if I won my taking up of the tickets was not guaranteed because my is time finite and valuable. Further, general elections and referendums have real world consequences and how do the polls do there?

          A fun exercise, and I’ll be entering if you do it again, but as funding CEO I wouldn’t be adjusting my business model.

          All of which is overly critical. The exercise was harmless, two people have free flights, and no one died. Seems okay to me.

          • Rob says:

            Doesn’t matter, does it? You had to tick a box. You would, for a split second, have realised that you (and a friend / partner) may end up flying the airline you picked so you would have gone for one you were happy with. Which is all we wanted.

        • Mr(s) Entitled says:

          But there in lies the rub. I picked one I was happy to fly. This does not make them my “preferred” (heading) carrier nor my “favourite” (sub heads). The results are over sold.

        • ankomonkey says:

          +1 Mr(s) Entitled 16:22

          To be honest, I’d have taken the prize from any of the listed carriers. But that doesn’t mean I’d spend my own cash on any of them if I needed to fly that route. It was a very restricted list of airlines. No research methodologist would accept that data. Sorry!

    • Rob says:

      Don’t say that. The CEO of the paying airline has sat through a presentation on these surveys 🙂

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.