Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Who won ‘Best Hotel Loyalty Scheme’ at the 2019 Head for Points Awards?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Over Christmas and New Year, we are unveiling the winners of the inaugural Head for Points Travel & Loyalty Awards.  Today is Day 8 and we have moved onto the hotel awards, which in general were much tighter votes.  For New Year’s Day we are looking at which is the best hotel loyalty scheme?

This was the closest vote of all 12 categories.

The Head for Points Travel & Loyalty Awards 2019 are a great opportunity to recognise the cream of the crop when it comes to UK premium business and leisure travel. A lot of the areas we are covering, such as airport lounges and travel credit cards, are ignored by other awards because they are too niche – but for our readers, they are very important and appreciated.

Over 4,500 HFP readers voted over three weeks in November. There were 12 categories in total. As well as giving an award to each category winner, we are also giving out a number of ‘Editor’s Choice’ awards for products and services which we personally admire.

Each winner will receive a trophy which we will be presenting at a special dinner in January.

What is the best UK Airport Lounge

Today we are announcing the winner of ‘Best Hotel Loyalty Scheme’.

We have split this category into the reader’s vote and an Editor’s Choice.

Let’s start, as we should, with the reader vote.  The winner is….

Hilton Honors

This was tight, with Hilton’s 21.2% just seeing off IHG Rewards Club with a very credible 19.4%.  Marriott Bonvoy was third and then, surprisingly, Hotels.com Rewards came in fourth.

This means that Hotels.com Rewards beat Accor Live Limitless / Le Club AccorHotels, Radisson Rewards and World of Hyatt.  This must be especially galling for Accor, which has a huge UK footprint – Radisson and, especially, Hyatt have got an excuse.

Hilton best hotel loyalty programme

Why you like Hilton Honors

Hilton Honors has spent the last couple of years resetting itself after the last set of major changes.  These removed the popular (but expensive to the programme) ‘miles and points’ option and even removed all redemption charts.  Hotels still have a points cap, however, which in most cases is the same as the cap when the charts were in place.

Here are some of the things we like about the programme:

Redemptions are now cheaper when the hotel is selling cheaply for cash – this means that you are guaranteed to get fair value for your points whenever you choose to use them.  There is still extra value in saving them for stays in expensive cities, when the points cap means you can get outsized value, but if you prefer to ‘earn and burn’ as you go then you will still do OK.

Hilton’s long-running status match scheme makes it easy to switch over without losing your existing benefits at other chains

New features such as Points Pooling (transfers between individuals for free) make it easier to pick up points

Bonus point promotions are simple and straightforward

Hilton Honors Gold remains the best mid-tier hotel status by far, due to the free breakfast benefit

Hilton Honors Diamond brings guaranteed lounge access – IHG does not offer this to elite members, and as Diamond requires as little as 30 stays it is more achievable than Marriott Bonvoy Platinum Elite

Slowly but surely, Hilton is increasing the number of luxury hotels it operates, allowing you to redeem in style.  The Curio brand is bringing in a lot of impressive independent luxury hotels whilst LXR gives it a new high-end brand to sit alongside Conrad and Waldorf Astoria.

With such a small margin separating Hilton Honors from IHG Rewards Club, however, it can’t rest on its laurels.

Hilton Paris Opera

I also decided to give an Editor’s Choice award in this category.  This is potentially the most controversial Editor’s Choice award of the six we are giving out, but I will explain.

The Editor’s Choice award for Best Hotel Loyalty Scheme goes to:

Marriott Bonvoy

Officially launched in February 2019, Marriott Bonvoy is both an impressive achievement and – importantly – is potentially shaping the future of hotel loyalty schemes.

I know that some readers will be banging their head on their desks at this point.  There were a number of well publicised IT issues with the integration of Marriott Rewards and Starwood Preferred Guest, which left some people with incorrect points or account data, often for a long time.

From my perspective, however, I want to acknowledge what Marriott has achieved this year.

Firstly, Marriott Bonvoy is a far, far better programme than any of us expected.  Marriott Rewards was, frankly, of very little interest unless you stayed the 75 nights per year required to hit Platinum Elite status.  Even if you earned the points, your luxury redemption options were slim.

When Marriott bought Starwood, everyone feared the worst. If Marriott felt it could get away with a pretty rubbish loyalty scheme when it had 5,500 hotels, how bad was it going to be when it had 7,000 hotels?  When you have a Marriott property on every corner, do you have to try that hard?

And yet, and yet …. look where we are now.  Marriott Bonvoy has most of the best bits of Starwood Preferred Guest, with the additional clout of a further 5,500 Marriott Rewards hotels to earn at.

If you are more concerned about status than points, you’re still a winner.  Platinum Elite – the minimum needed for lounge access and/or free breakfast at most brands – now requires just 50 nights instead of 75 nights.  This is despite the fact that there are 30% more hotels globally to stay at.

Starwood brought Marriott a raft of luxury hotels via St Regis and The Luxury Collection.  People forget that, whilst Starwood had a disproportionate number of luxury hotels, redemptions at the top end were unaffordable.  You were looking at 35,000 SPG points per night (the equivalent of 105,000 Marriott Bonvoy points) and those points were hard to earn given the small SPG footprint.

Those same hotels, under Bonvoy, cost either 70,000, 80,000 or 100,000 points per night depending on whether they are off-peak, standard or peak nights.  Even on peak dates they are cheaper than under Starwood (on off-peak dates they are 33% cheaper) and more importantly you have an additional 5,500 hotels globally at which you can earn the points.

Gritti Palace Venice

I also want to pick up one factor about Marriott Bonvoy which a lot of people have not yet noticed.  Marriott is trying to make Marriott Bonvoy the name that consumers see.  The loyalty programme is becoming the brand.

Look at the Marriott website or any of its advertising and you would think that the company was called Bonvoy.  This is the new Marriott strategy – with 7,000 hotels, they think they can be a mini-Hotels.com.  If you need a hotel somewhere, irrespective of budget, Marriott hopes to have something to meet your needs.

The idea is that people will automatically gravitate towards booking all of their hotels on marriott.com because they value the Bonvoy points and the various hotel and lifestyle rewards they bring.  Marriott Bonvoy is big enough to give you options, but not overwhelming in the way that Hotels.com can be.

This obviously isn’t any different to what Head for Points readers have been doing for years, but Marriott believes that it can convince the wider public to act in the same way.  Accor is following a similar model with the new Accor Live Limitless.  Other programmes, in particular IHG Rewards Club, risk getting left behind if this model works.

I look forward to giving Hilton and Marriott their awards at our winner’s dinner on 13th January.  Tomorrow we give our final hotel award – who ran the best hotel loyalty promotion in 2019?

Comments (117)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Chai says:

    It is at this point that I lost faith in headforpoints.
    Marriot Bonvoy? Seriously?

    I’m out.

    • BJ says:

      Don’t think you need to be taking it that seriously but I get your drift. While there is a lot of truth in what Rob has to say about Bonvoy, I couldn’t help but feel that this was too much. The kindest interpretation I can make is that this reads like an effort to curry favour with Marriott. There is no balance, for all the positive things mentioned, the article does not address the many reasons why this scheme could do no better than third with the readers.

      • Brian says:

        They’re sponsoring the party – I doubt there would have been a repeat of that without the award.

        • Rob says:

          Party sponsorship was agreed back in May! They did both as a package. Peanuts compared to Marriott, IHG and Hilton’s ad spend with us – and IHG gets virtually nothing.

          • Brian says:

            One good thing about Bonvoy that you’ve mentioned before, but not in this article (I think, unless I missed it) is the ability to book a standard room for points and upgrade with cash.

          • Rob says:

            Good point.

    • Rob says:

      Give me one example, apart from travel packages, of why Bonvoy is worse than MR.

      What you’re saying is that a programme which cut Plat qualification nights by 33%, added free breakfast, added decent experiences redemptions, added 1500 high end hotels and then reduced the cost of redeeming at those hotels is not improved …..

      I don’t give a monkeys what SPG was like because Marriott bought SPG and would have been within its rights to close it and keep nothing from it.

      • Marcw says:

        IT

      • BJ says:

        One example – points advance.

        I was not saying any of that as you will note from a latter comment. I was just expressing the way the justification for Editor’s Choice read to me. It was pitch, not facts I took exception to, and as I pointed out to OP, I didn’t think the issue should be taken too seriously.

        • TGLoyalty says:

          But they’ve changed it to stop people booking inventory then releasing it late when they’ve decided what their plans are.

          I’m sure they have the facts on how many customers booked then cancelled stays so hotels went empty and a genuine customer who might have booked walked away.

          Not locking in the rate is a negative change but who else allows you to book stays when you don’t have the points? There has to be balance for both programme and the members as a whole.

        • Rob says:

          Points Advance still exists, just without the rate guarantee. No-one else offers anything similar. Not exactly a big change unless you are fearing devaluation.

          • Freddy says:

            Even without a devaluation I’ve seen some points advance bookings move in and out of peak point pricing on a regular basis

      • Pangolin says:

        1) MR had rollover nights; Bonvoy doesn’t.

        2) MR allowed you to buy back Platinum status if you missed the cut; Bonvoy doesn’t.

        3) MR gave 10 qualifying nights for a meeting; Bonvoy capped that to 10 nights for the first meeting only, and now they’ve scrapped it altogether.

        4) My personal experience as someone who has been Platinum for 6 years (without buying back status or getting it through meetings): service recovery and CS is vastly worse than what it was pre-integration. Upgrades are worse and SNAs are denied more often than not.

        • Rob says:

          1. Fair point
          2. We don’t actually know that won’t happen yet
          3. This is a bit niche to put it mildly

  • OG says:

    Hello – does anyone know if there is any plan for Marriott to issue UK credit cards soon (with 15 elite night credits similar to Chase credit cards issued in the US)?

    • Peter K says:

      Not a chance with free night credits.

    • memesweeper says:

      You can get the SPG branded Amex, which is a great way to earn Bonvoy points. I have no idea if it will eventually close, or a proper Bonvoy card will be launched. It’s an anomaly for now, and I’m happy to use it.

  • Alex W says:

    How can you give Marriott an award after the shambles they made of 2019. The scheme factors/changes quoted in your reasoning seem to benefit Mariott and not the frequent traveller. We don’t care about branding etc. For a long term SPG loyalist I can understand your enthusiasm/relief but most of the rest of us have been shafted one way or another.

    It’s not just the IT breaches, there was the way “SPG matched gold” holders were treated, redemption prices have been increased, and let’s not forget the best redemptions in the entire travel industry (hotel + air travel packages) were devalued by 50%.

    If you reward this kind of treatment of customers they will keep doing it. If you give them anything, give them a wooden spoon!

  • TripRep says:

    “I know that some readers will be banging their head on their desks at this point” – Not today, not at work and my head hurts enough lol. But I did need to make sure it’s 1st January and not April.

    Sounds like Rob is hoping Marriott follow Hilton and sponsor the site?

    Seriously I would have expected the Editor’s choice to be Hilton (reasons as stated in the article) or IHG (for Ambassador privilege or Accelerate offers). Fair enough to make a comment on MB needing to up their game to compete with the top two but definitely not worthy of an award.

    “The loyalty programme is becoming the brand.”
    Errr, why exactly does this make it a more valuable loyalty scheme to a HFP reader???

    • Lady London says:

      As Rob has commented previously, the big hotel groups mostly own very few properties now. They don’t even run them with in-house management now anything like as much as before. So the big hotel groups are just brands now. They vary in their standards (Hilton tightest I would say) and in the ability to enforce a uniform set of standards (IHG probably thinks getting adherence to standards is like herding ferrets).

      So given hotel groups are really just brands now not owning the assets and maybe not even supplying the management team, of course a loyalty scheme that works can really reinforce the brand and help all participants.

      I don’t blame Rob for pointing out the new things Marriott is doing this year. But let’s see if they can come up with something next year.

      I think Accor earned their rightful place which hopefully will send them a message. We might see them popbup tomorrow though.

      More on some neglected smaller schemes would be nice too going forward – is there a case for a separate award for smaller schemes sometime in the future?

  • TripRep says:

    OT but Hilton related, just a brief reminder to avoid holiday season at resorts.

    Heard last night’s “Compulsory Celebration” NYE dinner at the WA Maldives was nearly a thousand dollars a head and did not include alcohol…

    • Anna says:

      Hi TR, I clicked through to the Conrad thread on FT yesterday and found it quite entertaining. I would be gutted if I spent that much money and had some of the experiences mentioned to, think I’ll stick with mid-range accommodation! (And also destinations where you can hop in the car and drive to a plethora of alternative dining options if you feel like it).

    • Alex W says:

      OUCH!

  • Anna says:

    Happy New Year!
    I’m actually very happy with Marriott/Bonvoy – I’ve got 7 nights booked on points coming up this year (5 at the Westin Resort Grand Cayman and 2 at The Langley), which would cost well over £4k at the cash prices.

    • TGLoyalty says:

      I agree I can’t see what exactly what some above are moaning about.

      “The way SPG gold matched members were treated” – you got gold in the combined programme which is exactly what AMEX were offering you anyway. Just because you used a loophole to be given some free time with better benefits doesn’t mean you are owed anything when the loophole is closed.

      “Some of the best value Redemption prices increased” – none of this was a shock it was well publicised for about 2 years and that’s far more notice than Hilton or IHG give before changing rates on individual hotels. There’s still value to be had just exploit it while you can rather than worrying about those things you can no longer do.

      If the reason you voted Hilton is because of all the changes made to Bonvoy then you’ve done this wrong because it should be all the benefits Hilton offer vs all the benefits Bonvoy offer and I for one can’t think of a single thing Hilton do better than IHG or Bonvoy other than free breakfast as a gold (it’s not even a good breakfast at most UK properties)

      • Mr(s) Entitled says:

        So that’s one mark for Hilton. What does Bonvoy do better?

        • TGLoyalty says:

          – Free breakfast for 2 kicks in at 50 nights+ (Hilton Gold takes 40 nights or 20 stays)
          – Far more luxury hotels to redeem points at
          – 5x Suite night awards when you hit platinum and titanium to guarantee an upgrade when you really need it
          – Guaranteed 4pm late checkout as Plat or above and I always managed to get 2pm as a gold unlike Hilton where you have to fight for 1pm

          Plus for IHG
          – better targeted promotions Leading to high earn rate
          – CP and Indigo have a better UK footprint and are generally better than anything Hilton and Marriott offer outside of London.

          • Mr(s) Entitled says:

            Seem to be jumping around tier levels but three for Hilton:

            – diamond get a guaranteed room within 48hrs notice (very useful)
            – 5th night free on status bookings
            – Guaranteed Lounge Access (although lounges can vary considerably)

            However, when push comes to shove, the free breakfast at Gold (and the ease of obtaining such) will elevate the program above it’s peers for most people.

            I think what the voting shows with a relatively even distribution is that people gravitate towards the one that works best for them.

          • TGLoyalty says:

            Marriott also offers 5th night free to all Elites and lounge access to Plat+

            I guess the real plus for Hilton here is that WA came on board the free breakfast and now it’s offered by all brands across the portfolio.

      • Capt Hammond says:

        Spot on. I switched from IHG to Marriott a couple of years ago and once I got to Platinum, it’s been very worthwhile. Hilton is ok but quality of hotels is too inconsistent. A lot of people on here whining over perceived injustices like the SPG Gold matching when in reality it was always going to be a short lived bonus. But fun to listen to the usual moaners like Trip Rep!

      • BJ says:

        The problem for me was not the facts, it was the pitch. I would have been ok with the Editor’s Choice had the pitch been along the lines ‘Despite a complex merger plagued with technical difficulties, management failings and poor customer relations, a new more settled loyalty scheme has emerged that retains much of what was good about both MR and SPG albeit with some losses and devaluations’. That would have been more realistic and still positive for Marriott as it would have acknowledged that they were emerging from the challenges and delivering something good and solid. I don’t think Marriott could have been disappointed with that as it recognises and reward their efforts and achievements. The problem is that what we got was something that came over, to me at least, as an effort to paint Marriott as being on par with, or better than, the winner.

        • Alan says:

          Agree. The IT fiasco was appalling. I wasted quite a few hours resolving issues and only eventually got an acceptable resolution after escalating to the CEOs office. The stays to date have been underwhelming and in the case of their London properties much more expensive than competitors (only made them due to Amex offers).

  • The Streets says:

    I’ve still got Platinum Elite status from an Amex Platinum Card a couple of years ago. I’ll be gutted when I lose this

    • Alex W says:

      You’re very lucky as everyone else got downgraded to Gold.

      • TGLoyalty says:

        It wasn’t a downgrade. SPG/Amex offered Gold and you have Gold.

        • Alex W says:

          Gold status was devalued to take away any useful benefits, which for all intents and purposes is a downgrade. If Mariott had communicated this plan from the start it wouldn’t have been so bad. If they’d said “you’ll get free lounge access but only for the next X months” that would have been far better than having the rug pulled from under our feet.

          • Kai says:

            Not sure what you are talking about. Amex Platinum had no liaison with Marriott – it only offered SPG gold which you used to match to Marriott Gold. Why is Amex held responsible for what Marriott did?

          • TGLoyalty says:

            You didn’t have lounge access or breakfast as an SPG Gold (the actual status Amex and SPG promised you)

            You exploited a loophole in the fact that Gold was a better tier in the old Marriott programme and was obviously going to end. Be glad you exploited it while you could.

          • Alex W says:

            But one does at least get free breakfast as a Hilton Gold. It was not a loophole, it was something Marriott freely offered off their own back. Hilton Gold gets breakfast so no reason not to believe that Marriott had levelled the playing field by offering a benefit giving you free breakfast at the same tier. Yes, it did seem generous and as a result, many people booked extra stays with Marriott in good faith, only to have their free breakfast taken away at a later date. There was no warning that this would happen.

          • Rob says:

            This was only for those who got SPG Gold via Amex.

            Of course, some people did nicely. I used my SPG Gold to get myself accepted for the Marriott Plat Challenge. Did my 9 nights. 2 years later I am still Titanium in Bonvoy. If I get a soft landing I get another year of lounge or free brekky next year. Benefits have included 5 nights in full suites at St Regis NYC in reward stays which cost me 60k points vs 105k in SPG days.

          • Alex W says:

            If you’re already Platinum Elite or above in Marriott I can see why the scheme would be more attractive. For those starting out now, Hilton Gold is a much easier target.

          • TGLoyalty says:

            Alex you are comparing the names not what it takes to get them

            Hilton takes 40 nights or 20 stays to reach Gold and Bonvoy takes 25 nights to reach Gold or 50 nights to reach Platinum.

            Bonvoy May add stays to their targets in the future but right now you aren’t comparing apples with apples.

            If you get Gold via Amex Platinum then I can understand why you value Hilton but personally the free breakfast doesn’t do anything to sway me towards 1 hotel vs another I’ll keep focusing on which looks like the nicer place to stay and meets my needs.

          • Alex W says:

            If you do mostly short stays then it is basically the same number of nights. Do 25 nights at Hilton, mostly one nighters, perhaps with a few longer stays, and you will get free breakfast at Hilton. Do 25 nights at Marriotts and you don’t get free breakfast. You need to do double the amount of nights to get that.
            You may not value the free breakfast but many do. Mrs W gets a bee in her bonnet about having to eat breakfast in the hotel.

  • Alan says:

    Agree with Hilton but unsurprisingly disagree with Bonvoy – I’ve had only bad experiences so far with stays at their properties, minimal elite recognition (Gold via Amex) and still find them very much overpriced for what they are.

    ALL also seem to be making it much harder to redeem points for stays, no obvious option at checkout on the new website…

    • Anna says:

      I may be misunderstanding your last comment – you tick the box for points rates when you search for your hotel and go from there.

      • TGLoyalty says:

        By ALL he means the new Accor programme? They give a cash value to points which just get deducted from the rate?

        • Alan says:

          Yep I mean the new Accor Live Limitless (or whatever they call it!). Was booking room for my folks to stop their points expiring and despite the hotel participating in the scheme I couldn’t see any option on their new website to use points to reduce the cost. I remember doing it fine a year or so ago.

          • Lady London says:

            The Accor site got revamped very recently for the ALL rebranding. Perhaps its just an IT failure on the new website.

            Accor UK call centre can book rooms by phone and did for me in the past deducting points. Why not call them?

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.