Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

BA forced by the courts to refund £5,000 of non-refundable tickets – unreasonably?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

I am generally very pro Which? magazine, although in my mind I tend to think of it as peaking in importance in the 1980s and becoming less relevant and less ‘part of the conversation’ as the years moved on. I may be wrong, and I do believe that there is a need for a totally unbiased consumer publication.

In the last few days, Which? has been getting media coverage for the help it gave a reader in securing a £5,000 flight refund from British Airways.

Which? magazine and British Airways refund

Let me simplify the story for you. Remember that this all took place in 2019, pre covid.

  • man buys two £2,500 non-refundable, non-changeable business class flights to Hawaii
  • man tries to change his flight and is told to take a hike
  • man gets Which? to sue BA on his behalf
  • Court tells BA to refund his £5,000

British Airways seems to have been badly treated here

In general, the airline world works like this:

  • fully flexible business class passengers subsidise leisure passengers
  • putting restrictions on cheap tickets is actually beneficial for leisure passengers, because otherwise such tickets couldn’t be so cheap – airlines can’t take the risk of business passengers being able to trade down

When you buy something, certain ‘norms’ are implicitly accepted in the contract. You can’t walk out of Waitrose with your food and pop back later to pay the bill. If you are arrested after walking out of Waitrose with unpaid-for food, you cannot give as your excuse the fact that ‘there are no signs up saying that I can’t pop back and pay later’.

Is it now implicitly understood that the purchase of a flight ticket is non-refundable and non-changeable? I would say that, yes, it is. Customers have been trained by 20 years of low cost carriers to understand that your sale is ‘final’ unless you are told otherwise.

The reason that BA lost the case, however, was that the judge did not believe that the non-refundable, non-changeable rules were highlighted prominently.

I accept that this case has two caveats:

  • they were business class tickets, and potentially the public may mistakenly believe that business class tickets have flexibility built-in which economy tickets do not, and
  • there were £2,500 tickets, and potentially the public may mistakenly believe that a £2,500 flight ticket would have flexibility built-in – although regular business travellers would know that a fully flexible ticket would cost nearer £5,000 than £2,500

Neither of these are given as reasons for the courts decision, however. It is purely down to the lack of prominence given to the change and refund rules.

This make a mockery of another recent BA case …..

We recently covered the story of a HfP reader who took BA to arbitration to get his seat reservation fees refunded.

He had cancelled his flight due to covid restrictions and expected to be refunded for over £400 of Club World seat reservation fees. BA refused and the arbitrator found in favour of the airline, even though the seats had never been occupied.

This is despite the fact that:

  • the small print re non-refundability of seat reservation fees is really hidden away – far more so than the rules on ‘no refunds’ on ticket sales
  • I believe that ‘Mr Average’ would expect that his seat reservation fees would be refundable if he cancelled his flight and that if they were not then it should be made very clear

My personal belief is that BA’s actions here may even breach the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

However, the reader lost his £400.

Conclusion

Whilst there may be extenuating circumstances in play (the fact that the tickets were in business class and cost £2,500 each), it was odd in 2020 to have a court decide that a flight ticket should, by default, be refundable and changeable unless significant and obvious warnings are given to the purchaser before they click ‘Buy’.

I am guessing that this was a Small Claims Court case and that the judgement will therefore not be binding on future cases.


How to earn Avios from UK credit cards

How to earn Avios from UK credit cards (April 2024)

As a reminder, there are various ways of earning Avios points from UK credit cards.  Many cards also have generous sign-up bonuses!

In February 2022, Barclaycard launched two exciting new Barclaycard Avios Mastercard cards with a bonus of up to 25,000 Avios. You can apply here.

You qualify for the bonus on these cards even if you have a British Airways American Express card:

Barclaycard Avios Plus card

Barclaycard Avios Plus Mastercard

Get 25,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £10,000 Read our full review

Barclaycard Avios card

Barclaycard Avios Mastercard

5,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £20,000 Read our full review

There are two official British Airways American Express cards with attractive sign-up bonuses:

British Airways American Express Premium Plus

25,000 Avios and the famous annual 2-4-1 voucher Read our full review

British Airways American Express

5,000 Avios for signing up and an Economy 2-4-1 voucher for spending £15,000 Read our full review

You can also get generous sign-up bonuses by applying for American Express cards which earn Membership Rewards points. These points convert at 1:1 into Avios.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 20,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express

40,000 bonus points and a huge range of valuable benefits – for a fee Read our full review

Run your own business?

We recommend Capital on Tap for limited companies. You earn 1 Avios per £1 which is impressive for a Visa card, along with a sign-up bonus worth 10,500 Avios.

Capital on Tap Business Rewards Visa

Huge 30,000 points bonus until 12th May 2024 Read our full review

You should also consider the British Airways Accelerating Business credit card. This is open to sole traders as well as limited companies and has a 30,000 Avios sign-up bonus.

British Airways Accelerating Business American Express

30,000 Avios sign-up bonus – plus annual bonuses of up to 30,000 Avios Read our full review

There are also generous bonuses on the two American Express Business cards, with the points converting at 1:1 into Avios. These cards are open to sole traders as well as limited companies.

American Express Business Platinum

40,000 points sign-up bonus and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Click here to read our detailed summary of all UK credit cards which earn Avios. This includes both personal and small business cards.

Comments (124)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Harry T says:

    I struggle to find sympathy for someone who spends five grand without reading the terms and conditions. But maybe that’s because I consider five grand to be a non trivial amount of money!

  • Aston100 says:

    I for one am glad that organisations like Which? exist.

  • MT says:

    To try and get an opinion on this I just went over the process and as someone who is experienced with BA’s website and also travelling I found the fact that I could not get a refund to be reasonably obvious. I would also say however it certainly gave me the impression I would be able to change my ticket for a fee and didn’t give me any information what that fee would be and as the ticket was approx £4k it would be reasonable to think the fee would not be much as I am already paying a lot.

    I would say however that there was far more focus on trying to sell me care hire or a hotel which was front and centre, I actually had to scroll past the agree button to find out that it was non refundable, so not exactly in your face.

    I feel BA hide it as much as they feel they legally can and use prominent space to try and sell more, the judge in this case felt BA was pushing things to far and it is certainly possible to say BA could make it much more obvious than they do and its clearly a choice that they do not, so they certainly have some responsibility in my mind.

    So I guess I am on the fence, valid points on both sides, so could go either way. Which actually tips me off the fence and says BA got what it deserves as it certainly could easy not give those valid points to the other side but chooses to not be as forthcoming and obvious as it could be.

    • Callum says:

      When I do it, it tells me the exact change fee directly after the quote?

  • Sharka says:

    I suggest this shows how use of an arbitration service like CEDR is very different than a court. In many cases, it would likely be better for claimants to use the courts (the quantum would fall within the small claims procedure).

  • Jack says:

    The difference in outcomes for these two cases makes perfect sense. Your article on the seat reservation fees makes clear “the arbitrator is not allowed to consider whether these terms are ‘fair’ under UK contract law. Only a court can decide this”. Here a court was used, they considered fairness and ruled in a different way to the arbitrator!

    Side note: It would be the CRA, not UCTA that would be relevant for the seat reservation case (I’m assuming that the bookings weren’t made for a trade/business).

  • Sam says:

    I’m surprised that you would show empathy to a business who has been notorious in forcing people to receive vouchers even those most are eligible for cash refund within the law, and putting up an threshold to four hours on involuntary flight changes is unacceptable, again you seemed to have ignored these unethical behaviours in the first place. I don’t think this empathy is necessary.

    • Callum says:

      They haven’t ignored them, it’s been discussed many times… They simply have a different opinion to you (and in the context of a crippling global pandemic, I hardly think that behaviour is particularly grotesque).

      • Sam says:

        Well. Pandemic is not an excuse to unethical behaviours (and surprisingly many big businesses do seem to blame many things to the pandemic). If we want to support business during the difficult times it’s one thing, but businesses using this as an excuse and exploit consumer rights is another thing.

        • Callum says:

          It’s not remotely surprising that businesses would blame anything and everything on the pandemic!

          BA was haemorrhaging money. I’m not aware of them ever refusing to refund flights they’ve cancelled as you claimed they did (I’d agree that’s wrong), but promoting vouchers over cash is hardly villainous.

          4 hours would be perfectly acceptable pandemic or not. Plenty of other countries/airlines have far stricter requirements than that.

    • Rod says:

      I was one of those persons that was denied. Money refund for two two tickets..I was giving a voucher with not option to ask for my money back.. I did ask for my money back and the airline Iberia ignored it.. even though they cancelled my flights due to covid.. and tickets normal ones. Not with special not refundable. Iberia still has got my money.. I still have got the useless piece of paper that have giving me..and keep ignoring all my emails and requests of a refund . should I take them to court?? I hope. The courts. Act with an strong hand. With all the bad companies ..well done to the courts..

      • kitten says:

        go to your payment card and get them to charge back against Iberia but do it quickly as usually there is a time limit to request this set by the card

  • Jon says:

    The judge pointed out that BA does a terrible job telling you your options regarding changes. Other airlines present choices with change fees clearly laid out in the table where you select your fare rather than in a small print footnote or impenetrable Ts and Cs

  • Roger S says:

    Re: seat refunds.
    My story. Booked (using Avios 241 x 2) and paid £528 for seats in WT+ for four of us to Antigua on 1st December. BA cancelled this flight, I assume due to timetable rationalisation, as they were able to rebook us for the flight on the 2nd.

    In October the 50% reduction in Avios deal was about to end. As it was looking increasingly likely that the December 2nd flight would also eventually be cancelled. I looked at availability and found Avios seats available in March (8th). I therefore booked these using my wife’s 241 at the reduced Avios and called BA to cancel the December flight. That’s when I was informed that I could either take a voucher or a refund of the tax/supplement BUT would forfeit the cost of the seats. I guess I should have read the small printing seat refunds but thought that the “book with confidence” pledge would override that condition; especially as I wasn’t asking for the cash back, just a transfer to the March flights. I’ve since learned that if BA cancelled the flight the seats are refunded.
    (As it happened BA have subsequently cancelled the March flights and fortunately did agree to move the bookings to December 21 even though this was more than 12months after the October booking date).

    Any thoughts greatly appreciated!??

    • Harry T says:

      You voluntarily cancelled the flights? You seat fees are lost, I’m afraid. BA do indeed refund the seat fees if they cancel, but you have to do a separate form.

      • Dubious says:

        As per this article and comments you’d need to take it to court to get a refund if the seat fees.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.