Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

“How we built the first business case for the award-winning Qatar Airways Qsuite”

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

This is a guest post by Oliver Ranson, who runs the fascinating Airline Revenue Economics blog on Substack (free to subscribe, click ‘Let me read it first’ to skip the sign-up page).

He published this article a few weeks ago and I thought it was worth sharing, given how well regarded the Qatar Airways Qsuite business class seat is with HfP readers.

You can sign up to receive Oliver’s future articles by email here. There is no charge. Over to him …..

Qatar Qsuite

“At eight o’clock on a bright February morning nearly ten years ago, I settled in to seat 7E on Qatar Airways’ 777 number A7-BAB. The Captain powered up the engines and launched us on our way to New York.

It was to be a momentous trip. Twenty four hours later I was sleeping at the Marriott in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, ready to attend a workshop at the facilities of B/E Aerospace, the seat and galley manufacturer now known as Collins.

The good folks at B/E presented us five or six ideas for our next business class seat. The concepts shown were some things very much like:

  • the Singapore Airlines A380 first class seat
  • the current Delta One A350 business class seat
  • the current Emirates A380 business class seat

They all had flat beds. They all had the ability to be customised. They all had large in-flight entertainment screens. But they did not have the wow factor.

Then B/E’s people put up a slide showing what became the award-winning Qsuite.

It looked quite different to what you see today, with plain white and grey colours only, but the basic footprint was there – a seat with doors that offered privacy to single travellers as well as the flexibility to accommodate groups of two, three or four in a social space. It was stunning and well worth our attention. When I arrived back in Doha a few days later it was our top priority.

I had the privilege of building the first business case to evaluate whether or not this seat was a good option for us and it turned out that was (and still is) perfect. This article explains how we did it.

Pricing problems

It is important to remember that Qatar is probably the richest country in the world, though unequal. Demand and willingness to pay for premium cabin travel is unconstrained if not unlimited.

The pricing strategy of the national airline (which I developed in 2009 and seems to have been in effect ever since) is simply to be incredibly expensive for travel to and from Qatar but excellent value for money elsewhere.

This strategy allows the airline to monetise the wealthy Qatari nationals and expats while building brand awareness and loyalty elsewhere. The result was – at the time we were planning our new seat – that about 25% to 35% of the airline’s passengers originated or turned around in Qatar but the home market accounted for up to 60% of the revenue.

One problem with this approach was that there was a lot of opposition at home to Qatar Airways being perceived as “expensive”, with regular negative comment in the press and a string of moaning letters and e-mails flowing to head office. It did not matter though – we had upwards of 90% market share in business class to most key markets no matter what we charged.

But fundamentally I felt that this was unfair – people paying high fares should be happy to do so. They should feel they are getting excellent value for money and not being ripped off, even if the price of a seat is $5k, $10k, $15k or more with no corporate or volume discount of any kind. We knew from market research that travelling together either as part of a family or with business colleagues was important to Qatari nationals. We also knew that privacy and personal space is highly prized in a culture that celebrates modesty in dress and appearance.

This was the first ingredient that made the Qsuite stand out for us and made us realise how big the potential could be. This seat would give the people we were demanding enormous fares of something that no other airline could offer. Something that would surprise and delight them. Something that they really wanted. Something that really was worth paying for.

Qsuite

Nuanced network

After I had inspected Qsuite’s associated willingness to pay and value for money, the next step was to consider how closely the seat’s value proposition was aligned with the network. Remember that Qsuite offers privacy for the single traveller and a social space for groups of two, three or four. It turned out that Qatar Airways’ network has three interesting characteristics, driven by geography, that made Qsuite the perfect product for the network:

  • most flights are long enough that Qsuite will make a difference – there are really not that many regional flights compared to most airlines, and of course there are no domestic services within Qatar
  • a high proportion of itineraries involve at least one daylight sector where the ability to socialise will come in useful
  • longer routes are associated with higher willingness to pay in the critical Qatari segment, who pay the highest fares to reach super-premium destinations like Paris, London, the United States and Australia, while in the mean time transit passengers will actively seek out this product, even at higher fares, too – this makes Qsuite highly profitable.

Postscript

At six o’clock on a dark and foggy December morning nearly nine years ago I woke up in seat 12A on British Airways’ 777 number G-VIIF. The Captain was announcing our imminent arrival into London Heathrow. I had submitted my resignation to Qatar Airways 90 days before and was returning to the UK to start my business.

As part of that business, from time to time I meet people who worked at British Airways when the Club World flat bed was launched. They often tell me about what they did to make that product happen because at the time it was a game-changer – the first flat bed in business class. I flew back home in their Club World, but I knew that my Qsuite was on the way.

Now that Qsuite is established it seems to have been favourably received by the market and considered a game-changer just like Club World was 20 years ago.

Club World. Qsuite. Club Suite .… Maybe it’s no co-incidence the BA product now has doors and has suite in the name…”

Comments (30)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Mikeact says:

    Fascinating background to this story..

  • Tom says:

    The current Singapore Airlines A380 first class doesn’t have wow factor, so you went with a slightly cramped box instead? Whether you actually mean the previous generation, which takes up the space of about 2 Qsuites, or the current one which is more like 3+, me thinks a massive typo there.

    Otherwise super interesting, thanks!

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      The SQ-like product (I am not sure who actually supplies the SQ seat) was an interesting one. It certainly did not have the panache we see today. At the time it was marketed as a bed and an office with a chair at a desk rather than a bed and a sitting room. As shown it was not a good fit with the market due to the high premium leisure focus. Thanks for reading.

  • Brian says:

    Nice story!

    The Q suite is interesting. Fundamentally the geometry is similar to Club World ying-yang. Which gets endless criticism for being 2-4-2. I imagine Q-Suite a pretty space efficient seat when all is told. It would be nice to see some of that covered!

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      Qsuite isn’t quite as dense as Club World, but you are right it is the same geometry so has a reasonable efficiency. This was remarked on by both QTR and B/E teams in the original meeting.

      However I believe that Qsuite is super-heavy, much heavier than Club World. I am a bit or a rarity among airline managers in the sense that to a point I don’t really care how much something costs if I can earn enough revenue with it to compensate. Others think differently…

      Glad you enjoyed it.

  • Rich says:

    So many parallels with how BA yield from UK based customers v. those in transit! The difference is the lack of product quality.

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      One big difference between the BA and Qatar Airways demand profile for premium cabins is that I understand BA expects massive corporate discounts to apply on the higher fares (F, J, C, D, R, W and to some extent E) and sets the price with that in mind. Hardly anyone actually pays £8k to go to America.

      Every year the corporate customers demand bigger discounts and every year the sticker prices go up to compensate. It is common to see £8k sticker prices but what happens at the end is that big rebates come to the buyer when they meet a volume target (e.g. buy 2,000 Club World seats get 50% back).

      Meanwhile at Qatar Airways ex-Doha the top fares are generally set as what-you-see-is-what-you-get. Wealthy Qataris and Qatar residents do indeed pay $10k to go to London or Paris for the summer break.

  • The Savage Squirrel says:

    Interesting about their revenue model; as many Qataris on the plane as possible being gouged; then increase frequency or viability of the route using modestly fared connecting passengers to fill the rest of the seats. I wonder how similar BA (and pretty much all other legacy airlines) are in model, given the disparity between exEU fares and fares originating from home base. I suspect they’re all a very similar profit split?

    • marcw says:

      That’s how it works (traditional airlines, especially long haul). travellers pay a premium for non-stop flights.

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      Yes indeed, and it’s subtly different to the Emirates model. Emirates actively positions itself as the leading airline OUT of Europe while Qatar Airways (while I was there) was more interested in travel INTO Europe, hence the better ex-EU deals on Qatar Airways. Thanks for reading.

      • Blenz101 says:

        EK still charge higher fares out of a return ex-DXB ensuring Emiratis and expats pay a lot more than those outside of the region.

        True of any business I guess, they charge what the local market will bear.

  • TeesTraveller says:

    This is a really interesting story and let have more of this stuff on HfP from time to time. I would rather read this sort of thing instead of articles about Hilton offering the opportunity to buy points which all end up telling us that it is a bad deal unless you need to top up,

    • BlueHorizonUK says:

      😂

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      Thanks for the feedback TeesTraveller. I am glad that you enjoyed it! 🙂

      Please feel free to sign up for my blog (linked in the article) for more. I promise it isn’t all about inventory management and dynamic pricing – for example I’ve got an article coming soon about the many different ways airlines earn revenue from wine.

  • Phil W says:

    Back in 2005 I was working for bmi in their Procurement team. In about early April 2005 somebody realised that their new A320s would be going into production in Spring 2006 and you needed to give Airbus 12 months notice of which seats were to be installed. Cue a highly accelerated sourcing exercise to select the seats. Luckily the Aircraft interiors Expo in Hamburg was 2 weeks way. We got the RFP out to the manufacturers in rapid fashion and hoped over to Hamburg.
    It was an excellent experience. We ended up with bids ranging from $150k – $220k for a full set of seats for an aircraft, we needed ten sets.

    In the end we selected the most expensive but the TCO was less. We factored additional weight and consequential fuel burn into the TCO. We even used length of the manufacturer warranty as a proxy for reliability.

    While at the Expo some of the manufacturers were showing us business class seating, we were considering a refresh of the A330 product. One manufacturer even then was talking about a “suite concept” but it was purely hypothetical at that time and bmi weren’t maverick enough to be the lead client.

    • His Holyness says:

      bim were cool with the onboard chef, only LH First Class and bmi could prepare freshly scrambled eggs onboard

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      That’s a cool story. And it reminds me…

      I’ve seen quite a few interesting procurement projects where Total Cost of Ownership showed quite different results to the up-front costs. One good example was a premium cabin chinaware analysis I helped an airline with.

      The crockery they chose in the end was much more expensive than the lowest cost, but due to weight/fuel burn and also breakage rates in the washing machine the second highest up-front cost item won in the end. The highest up-front cost was much more expensive in TCO.

      They had recently secured a Contract with one of the ME3 and the head of procurement remarked that the price they quoted to my customer was probably the price the ME3 carrier had paid! Suffice to say it was crazy!

  • Catalan says:

    So could it said that the Q Suite was inspired by, or even an evolution of the original Club World seat?

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      The basic design was already in place by the time it was shown to my colleagues and I. But the similarity was remarked on in the meeting. My guess is that you are spot on. Thanks for reading.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.