Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

SOLD OUT: Heathrow tells all airlines to stop selling ANY flights until 11th September

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

The Summer air travel situation took a surprising turn on Tuesday when Heathrow effectively stopped airlines from selling any further seats for flights this Summer.

In an open letter, Heathrow CEO John Holland-Kaye said that the airport had realised that it was, effectively, no longer possible for it to offer the level of service it wanted this Summer and that something had to give. This is especially true for ground handling staff – albeit these are not employed by the airport – which are still chronically below the number required.

Kaye’s solution is to cap Heathrow passenger numbers at 100,000 per day for the Summer period, which they are specifying as ending on 11th September.

This would be fine, except that airlines have already sold an average of 101,500 tickets per day and seats are still on sale.

Effectively immediately, Heathrow has requested:

  • the closure for sale of all flights departing from the airport until 11th September
  • a reduction in the expected passenger numbers from 101,500 to 100,000 per day

Whilst airlines are not legally bound to follow this, Heathrow will respond by forcing airlines to cancel additional flights if they do not do so.

One way or another, only 100,000 people per day are flying from the airport this Summer.

Whilst not discussed in this letter, the airport is also believed to be considering restrictions on checked luggage and, as it did yesterday for same-day rebooking, banning airlines from rebooking passengers whose flights are cancelled, since this does not nothing to reduce passenger numbers in total.

Heathrow tells BA (and other airlines) to stop selling tickets for the Summer period

Here is the full statement:

The global aviation industry is recovering from the pandemic, but the legacy of COVID continues to pose challenges for the entire sector as it rebuilds capacity.  At Heathrow, we have seen 40 years of passenger growth in just four months. Despite this, we managed to get the vast majority of passengers away smoothly on their journeys through the Easter and half term peaks. This was only possible because of close collaboration and planning with our airport partners including airlines, airline ground handlers and Border Force.   

We started recruiting back in November last year in anticipation of capacity recovering this summer, and by the end of July, we will have as many people working in security as we had pre-pandemic. We have also reopened and moved 25 airlines into Terminal 4 to provide more space for passengers and grown our passenger service team.    

New colleagues are learning fast but are not yet up to full speed. However, there are some critical functions in the airport which are still significantly under resourced, in particular ground handlers, who are contracted by airlines to provide check-in staff, load and unload bags and turnaround aircraft. They are doing the very best they can with the resources available and we are giving them as much support possible, but this is a significant constraint to the airport’s overall capacity. 

However, over the past few weeks, as departing passenger numbers have regularly exceeded 100,000 a day, we have started to see periods when service drops to a level that is not acceptable: long queue times, delays for passengers requiring assistance, bags not travelling with passengers or arriving late, low punctuality and last-minute cancellations. This is due to a combination of reduced arrivals punctuality (as a result of delays at other airports and in European airspace) and increased passenger numbers starting to exceed the combined capacity of airlines, airline ground handlers and the airport.  Our colleagues are going above and beyond to get as many passengers away as possible, but we cannot put them at risk for their own safety and wellbeing.   

Last month, the DfT and CAA wrote to the sector asking us all to review our plans for the summer and ensure we were prepared to manage expected passenger levels safely and minimise further disruption. Ministers subsequently implemented a slot amnesty programme to encourage airlines to remove flights from their schedules with no penalty. We held off putting additional controls on passenger numbers until this amnesty process concluded last Friday and we had a clearer view of the reductions that airlines have made.    

Some airlines have taken significant action, but others have not, and we believe that further action is needed now to ensure passengers have a safe and reliable journey.  We have therefore made the difficult decision to introduce a capacity cap with effect from 12 July to 11 September. Similar measures to control passenger demand have been implemented at other airports both in the UK and around the world.  

“Our assessment is that the maximum number of daily departing passengers that airlines, airline ground handlers and the airport can collectively serve over the summer is no more than 100,000. The latest forecasts indicate that even despite the amnesty, daily departing seats over the summer will average 104,000 – giving a daily excess of 4,000 seats. On average only about 1,500 of these 4,000 daily seats have currently been sold to passengers, and so we are asking our airline partners to stop selling summer tickets to limit the impact on passengers.   

“By making this intervention now, our objective is to protect flights for the vast majority of passengers at Heathrow this summer and to give confidence that everyone who does travel through the airport will have a safe and reliable journey and arrive at their destination with their bags. We recognise that this will mean some summer journeys will either be moved to another day, another airport or be cancelled and we apologise to those whose travel plans are affected.   

“The airport will still be busy, as we are trying to get as many people away as possible, and we ask you to bear with us if it takes a little longer to check in, go through security or collect your bag than you are used to at Heathrow.  We ask passengers to help, by making sure they have completed all their COVID requirements online before they come to the airport, by not arriving earlier than 3 hours before their flight, by being ready for security with laptops out of bags and liquids, aerosols and gels in a sealed 100ml plastic bag, and by using e-gates in immigration where eligible. We are all recruiting as fast as we can and aim to return to the excellent service you should expect from the UK’s hub airport as soon as possible.”   

Comments (292)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • sayling says:

    Remind me – and others – of the compensation due for ticket cancellations made more than 14 days before departure…

    There isn’t any, is there?

  • David S says:

    I don’t get a sense that HAL have looked into the root causes of all aspects of the customer journey through LHR. If it all flows smoothly and there aren’t Airline delays it works. Look at all the pinch points – why can’t everyone be limited to one piece of luggage temporarily (we arrived back at the same time as 2 Virgin flights from India recently and it was mind boggling how much luggage people had). Can flights be spread out to avoid bottlenecks, Can HAL work with Airlines and incentivise them to do things differently. Personally, I would rip out the bulk of the luxury shops at LHR. They might pay a nice rent but they are always empty and benefit a minute number of passengers.

    • MattB says:

      I think certain destinations in India, Pakistan (& maybe others) get double the usual allowance for economy.

      • Lady London says:

        ….and perfectly reasonable. This is a strong Friends & Family trip with people making maybe once in a lifetime trips or at least many many years apart, to see relatives they’ve not seen for years.

        Let them have the luggage that matches this, in both directions.

        For a lot of people flying is once in a lifetime or very rarely if their circumstances allow. Even to see family. Not everyone gets on and off planes and buses like we do.

        • Mikeact says:

          So what exactly is in all this excess baggage that has to be carried on family visits ?

          • David S says:

            Exactly and putting a restriction in place for eight weeks is a good measure to help everyone

          • Lady London says:

            Probably a combination of gifts for family or things requested by family in both diections. Probably often exacerbated by inexperience at travellig and packing, and quite reasonably think it’s a long journey so pack more. Also used to be seen with Americans at T3 who often seemed relatively, to carry a lot of luggage. Whereas frequent travellers are more likely to know the place they’re going. So they don’t pack toiletries they can buy there, rely on washing stuff so pack less, wear stuff they plan to throw away, etc.,and generally more experienced in paring down luggage.

            When I travel to see family I’m using most of 2x32kg Not much of that is mine. Almosr all of it stays there and loads back, of different stuff, are at least similar kiloage.

          • Brian78 says:

            No idea. Weird question

          • Niall says:

            I sympathise with this completely! I live in London and have family in Belfast. I frequently have a baggage allowance with BA. The main time I use baggage and the only time I take full advantage of my 2x32Kg is when transporting stuff for people (with the frequent problem of companies not shipping to NI) or actually when I moved permanently.

  • Jake says:

    I am due to fly out of LHR on 20th September and am wondering if I would be better off changing my trip to be ex MAN instead! Crystal ball time…

  • Tim says:

    Just had a Heathrow to Manchester leg of a transatlantic flight cancelled with BA for 31st August. Fortunately managed to shift it back a few hours. Lets hope none of the other bits get cancelled

  • Patrick C says:

    While prescribing this, Heathrow still charges exorbitant fees and distributes tons of cash to shareholders. Airlines should have the right to get compensation from Heathrow for the mess and taxes should be lowered to the previous level and declining going forward.
    The heads I win and tails I win as well needs to stop.

    • Richie says:

      Airlines can afford very good legal services.

    • JDB says:

      I’m not sure how you can describe Heathrow charges of say £30/pax as “exorbitant” in the context of long haul APD around £180 or BA long haul surcharges c. £300/sector. The country has decided that the airport has to operate on a ‘passenger pays’ basis so the charges you refer to include police, fire, security, the largest single site business rates bill in the country as well as building new infrastructure all around the airport all in addition to the basic operations and maintenance . Re dividends, there was a small one declared pre covid in 2020; not sure when shareholders will next see one. Are companies really not allowed to pay dividends in your world? How will your (private) retirement be funded if companies can’t pay shareholders a return? Should Tesco be selling food at cost for the greater good?

      • Lady London says:

        Still exorbitant JDB in light of the volumes of passengers at the charge levels of Heathrow even pre-Covid.To say nothing of the large increases since.Covid won’t always be there at the levels of 2020-2021 but those charges will.

        And let’s not omit Heathrow’s other sources of revenue including massive shop rent costs and taking a very decent % on the revenue earned by those shops, various other fees to airlines and we haven’t even started on freight.

        • JDB says:

          The commercial revenues, including shop base/turnover rents go towards reducing passenger charges unlike most other European airports as I am quite sure you are aware, although you have raised the matter before. This is all published and there is full transparency for the regulator and airlines.

          The simple fact is that in this country passengers are expected to pay for use of the facilities whereas in many countries it is paid for out of general taxation or if private receives direct and indirect subsidies. Our system seems much fairer and I don’t think £30 is a lot in the context of a long haul ticket; I really don’t think in saying it is exorbitant you can have the slightest clue what happens behind the scenes to provide the services you expect or the actual cost of providing them. What would you be cutting to reduce the charges?

          Also, whatever criticisms you have of LHR it is considered, in the global airport world, to be exceptionally well run and has secondees from the top ME and Asian airports to learn best practices.

          You say that there have been large increases since covid but I’m not sure where you get that from.

          • Lady London says:

            JDB the comments the last time Heathrow’s charge increases were covered in an article here on HfP brought many interesting commentsv and references to sources some of which I followed up. Apparently Heathow’s margins earned have a wide gap ahead of the rest of the world. I don’t drink the Kool-Aid about shop charges offsetting passenger charges that’s just a complete sop. Setting the Covid shock aside, and every other business in the UK has had to deal with that, Heathrow is a business generating monopoly rents off the back of customers.

          • JDB says:

            @Lady London the charges to which you are referring, also covered in an article here were temporary and no longer applicable. There is a regulatory settlement currently in force pending a longer term one for next year to be announced in the autumn although the final proposals were published a couple of weeks ago.

            You make so many good comments that your ‘kool aid’ one re commercial revenues (shops, parking etc) is really quite bizarre and simply incorrect. LHR is regulated unlike many airports on a ‘single till’ basis as preferred by IATA but not practised by many European airports who are allowed to keep commercial revenues separate (dual till). If you don’t understand this basic principle it is quite inappropriate to post comments about Heathrow charges that suggest otherwise.

      • Track says:

        £30/pax is exorbitant!

        Most of it goes into gold plating of facilities already in place. Including management salaries, bonuses and accumulation of the new ripe dividend for shareholders to be paid in 2023-24.

        And when Heathrow will really need funds for capital investments (eg digging the tunnels), they’ll load it with more debt and hike charges further.

    • Lady London says:

      Yes as @will and @bagoly were saying here yesterday.

      I hope the government remembers that airports, airlines, and contracted providers such as for security and baggage are private sector businesses run for profit and does not interfere or offer any protection against the claims they will have against each other for failure to provide service according to whatever contracts they have with each other.

      Me?As a passenger I expect my airline to provide all that I’m entitled to which is a flght and duty of care at a minimum, and compensation where applicable as well. I don’t care if Heathrow, security, baggage handlers, ground handlers or toilet cleanerd are not achieving contracted throughput : that is down to my airline to be covered for or to cover themselves when the airline pays me my due costs and compensation.

      • Mikeact says:

        All we ask nowadays of any airline is..Please, just get us there, safely.

  • Alastair says:

    At around hour 20 of the first of two boat trips, and drive, from Helsinki to North Yorkshire I was wondering if I’d made the right choice… It would now seem that it was not such a crazy scheme as we first thought!

  • Ruralite says:

    Peel Group who run Doncaster Airport have today announced a review of operations as they say not enough passengers use it to make it commercially viable. Perhaps a case for airlines like BA moving back to the regions and implementing some of the Levelling Up we keep getting promised – I’d be inclined to use them more if I didn’t have to trek to LHR/connect via Man – LHR! 🤣

    • Mike says:

      +1 for more BA international departures from Doncaster airport

    • Mike says:

      Doncaster is a really smooth run airport, has a premium lounge where I quote ……….“When you arrive, you will be handed a complimentary glass of fizz and be shown around our stylish Premium Lounge so that you can discover all it has to offer. You will then be taken to your reserved table and handed a menu”

  • Magic Mike says:

    Just got an mail from BA offering that I can “rebook onto a British Airways operated service free of charge to any date within the next 12 months of your original date of travel, subject to availability.”, or get a FTV.

    “subject to availability” sounds weaselly, xmas or new year maybe not…

    For flights going before 25th July.

    • sayling says:

      You can’t expect them to rebook on to a full flight, can you?

      • Magic Mike says:

        I need my flight next week so I’m not going to check, but I expect it to be more weaselly than that. “Subject to availability in the same booking class” perhaps…

        There is no small print in the email but BA are not famous for being upfront about such things.

        • meta says:

          This is BA seeking volunteers. This is the second email this week my partner got for a flight on Sunday. I suspect if not enough people rebook, they’ll be sending cancellation emails.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.