Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

UK airlines warned by CAA and CMA over customer rights

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

This may or may not be a coincidence, but just a few hours after British Airways attempted to stitch up passengers booked to Bangkok this Winter, the Civil Aviation Authority and Competition & Markets Authority issued a joint threat to UK airlines – respect the legal rights of your customers or else.

You can see the letter sent to the airlines yesterday by clicking here (gov.uk, PDF).

UK airlines warned by CAA and CMA over customer rights

The letter implies that many airlines are failing to meet their legal requirements when dealing with customers. To quote:

We are concerned that some airlines may not be doing everything they could to avoid engaging in one or more harmful practices, including:

  • selling more tickets for flights than they can reasonably expect to supply and failing to warn consumers about the ensuing risk of cancellation;
  • not always fully satisfying obligations to offer consumers re-routing (including with alternative carriers where necessary) in the event of cancellation; and/or
  • failing to give consumers sufficiently clear and upfront information about their rights on cancellation, and/or to provide adequate and appropriate support and care where flights are cancelled or disrupted.

Anyone who booked a British Airways flight to Bangkok for this Winter may be having a wry smile at this point.

British Airways Bangkok flight cancellations

What has happened with British Airways flights to Bangkok?

As we reported on 9th April, British Airways decided over three months ago that it would not operate flights to Bangkok during the Winter season which starts on 29th October.

All flights were removed from sale in early April. However, passengers who had booked on these services were not told that they were cancelled.

Our article on 9th April caused a lot of concern for people who had British Airways tickets booked to Bangkok. People who called BA were told that they could not be rebooked because their seats had not been officially cancelled.

I was prepared to give BA the benefit of the doubt here. We are talking about many thousands of customers needing to be rerouted, and it made sense to wait until the call centre was running efficiently.

This week, BA finally emailed people with a Bangkok flight booking for this Winter.

Passengers were told, effectively, that their flight was cancelled and that they qualified for a refund. There was no attempt to offer them a rerouting, despite their legal right to one.

Even worse, when passengers called British Airways, they were refused a rerouting on the grounds that British Airways did not have any commercial arrangements in place. When pushed, agents said that they thought something might appear in the next week or so.

British Airways Bangkok flight cancellations

What Head for Points readers had to say

Here are some examples from emails I received this week:

“Was on hold for an hour to be told only option is a refund. I assume they’re legally obliged to switch to another airline even tho it’s a way off?”

“BA finally emailed us tonight to cancel our flights to Bangkok in Feb 2023. We went into Manage Your Booking as they suggested and there were no flight alternatives. We phoned BA and after 1 hour of call queuing we finally got through to a lady who told us that there are no alternative flights (even though BA are selling the Qatar flights on their website) and our only option is a refund. We quoted article 8 of EU regulation 261/2004 but to no avail!!”

“My flight to Bangkok was just cancelled (jan-23). Called BA and they said they don’t have any agreements in place with other airlines to book me an alternative flight and I should call in few weeks. Are they just trying to get me get a refund? I insisted that EU reg says they need to book me on an alternative flight (not my problem if they have no agreements in place). The lady said she can’t do anything and terminated the call. Shall I call and insist I want an alternative flight regardless if they have agreements?”

“Just called against the Executive Club and they said no reward availability with Qatar / Finnair and try to call commercial team as they can only book Avios seats. Is that true? Being sent back and forth between British Airways call centres.”

Agent said he can’t help me and he can’t comment on what the EU law says about my rights. Looks like they have been advised not to reroute. Unbelievable! Is there somewhere where I can report this?”

This one arrived late on Thursday evening:

“Just got off the phone with BA on the American number. The agent said they’ve had a new directive today stating “under no circumstances can they change companion vouchers to other airlines for the cancelled BKK flights” so only option is a refund or look for other Avios availability in same zone (not that anywhere close is in the same zone). Surely Illegal?”

(For clarity, yes, this is against EC261 which clearly states: “This Regulation …. shall apply to passengers having tickets issued under a frequent flyer programme or other commercial programme by an air carrier or tour operator“)

Why this is not acceptable

Now …. if a route is cancelled at short notice you could excuse BA for not being able to put a rerouting deal together quickly. However:

  • British Airways has been rerouting Bangkok passengers for almost two years now – Rhys on our team was rerouted on Qatar Airways when he went to Bangkok earlier this year on a 2-4-1 Avios ticket
  • BA removed Winter 2022 flights from sale in April – it has had over three months to put alternative arrangements in place (and these arrangements were already in place anyway, as Rhys found in February)

As the CAA and CMA say in their letter:

When cancelling a flight, airlines must offer re-routing, either using their own flights or if they cannot offer a timely replacement with another carrier. We consider that professional diligence requires airlines to have in place reasonably appropriate organisation and support staff to source replacement flights and complete the booking if consumers wish to take up this offer.

Just because BA has not been able to agree a cheap deal with Qatar Airways or another carrier to take Bangkok passengers does not change its legal liability – it will simply have to pay more for those seats.

My best guess is that British Airways has been deliberately encouraging passengers to take a refund. It has had over three months to put rerouting deals in place so getting call centre agents to say ‘it may take us a week or so to sort something out’ simply doesn’t cut it.

I reckon, in a week or so when most passengers have taken a refund and rebooked by themselves for (presumably) a higher fare, British Airways will magically turn up with a rerouting deal for those people who are determined to push for their legal right.

(EDIT: In the last few hours there have been reports of successful rebooking on Qatar Airways.)

We are happy to pass on these reader emails to the CAA and CMA if they want to know more.

The CAA and CMA letter to the airlines is here.

Comments (311)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Ian M says:

    BA are a complete disgrace. I hope this gets picked up by a lot of the media and does real damage to what’s left of BA’s rep

  • Pete M says:

    Speaking as an airline, I am absolutely terrified of the CAA. I shall change all my underhand tactics immediately. British regulators are truly a force to contend with a I wouldn’t want to cross them.

    • G says:

      Like being savaged by a dead sheep.

      • ianM says:

        Not at all, CMA have impressive powers and fining capability linked to global turnover. Stupid comment.

        • PeteM says:

          Please show me when these “impressive powers” have been used, ianM. Particularly against an airline. Both the CMA and CAA love making bombastic statements which make it appear like they want to / can do something, only to back down and do nothing.

          • dougzz99 says:

            This.
            My first thought on reading article was BA replied “Or else what….” Because the behaviour they indulge in is calculated to save them money. Until ignoring the rules has consequence the rules are meaningless.

          • Paul says:

            Agreed, when was any carrier fined for abusing their position. My sons slept on the floor of LGW last week having sat on board for 3 hours then dumped in the terminal and waited 2 hours for bags. Police the only staff on hand handing out premium rate numbers for the passengers affected ( not BA) but the issue of wanton disregard for the regulations is endemic and I suspect U.K. 261 regs might bite the dust in the bonfire if EU regs the Tories promise

  • Gordon says:

    Received an email from BA yesterday informing me my flight to LAX in November has been cancelled, It’s been moved a few hours forward.On the upside side it’s now a 777 with club suite instead of the old layout. There’s plenty of time so I’m waiting for a few more changes yet….

    • Gordon says:

      Famous last words. Just received a further email to say return flight has moved forward 5 hours to 20:50….

      • Mike says:

        Gordon if your flight is in November- I doubt those will be your last words on the subject !

      • Lady London says:

        I think you may find the flight number has changed? meaning it’s a cancellation, if so

    • Lady London says:

      Be careful. BA appears to be deliberately only offering to put passengers on earlier flights and apparently lies that seats are not available on flights near to the cancelled flight but later.

      In a lot of cases if the person agrees to take an earlier flight (and you don’t have to and many reasons why people couldn’t) this means the airline has the right to reduce any cancellatiom compensation to 50% of the full amount.

      Note that whether compensation is due or not, duty of care always applies even if they cancel far, far ahead. Duty of care is your right to reroute/rebook if you wish, and also requires the airline to either provide or pay hotel, transportto and from hotel, internet and all meals during any extra time before a reroute can be provided if you choose the option to still travel as near as poss to the original timings.

      • Gordon says:

        Yes flight number has changed, So both legs are cancelled
        Outbound is 2.5 hours later and inbound is 5 hours later. So if understand this correctly if I accept the later flights NA have offered I can claim for a hotel to stay in because of the later inbound flight now 20:50 from 15:40 and food etc.

  • Judith Kaplan says:

    We had business class flights booked to Bangkok for February 2023 using our 241 Amex voucher which we were told this week have been cancelled. Happy to say We made one fairly quick call and our flights were changed to Qatar airways via Doha with no extras to pay and in the same Cabin – let’s home they don’t cancel those.

    • Paul Hickey says:

      You’ve done well there!
      I wonder if there is any way I can you use as a reference when trying again.
      I’m the person quoted in Robs blog re being told Qatar not accepting 241 and refund only option.

  • Ian says:

    Useful information, thanks Rob, though why anyone would choose BA over QR in the first place (apart from it being a direct flight) is beyond me.

    • Paul Hickey says:

      241 voucher + AVIOS = £1500 for 2 adults + baby.
      Same flights on Qatar = £7k. That’s why. But otherwise completely agree.

  • Paul says:

    Post this. If you are looking to make a new booking for next year Is there any way to fly to BKK and use companion vouchers /avios?

    • Rob says:

      No, BA has virtually no flights to Asia now except Singapore, and those are always booked out by those heading to Australia as it is actually the first half of the Sydney flight.

      • Gordon says:

        Yes we flew SIN last month and the club world cabin was full as it continued to Sydney.We booked a year in advance on a 2-4-1 and surprised we got 2 seats….

      • meta says:

        Erm, they do still sell Tokyo, Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, several Indian cities and Islamabad. These are all in Asia.

        • Rob says:

          But you can’t travel there ….

          Amusingly the main thrust of the CAA letter is airlines selling flights they have no intention of flying to get cash in.

          • Brian78 says:

            You can’t travel to India?

          • Rob says:

            India’s not in Asia (as Asia is generally understood) as I am guessing you are aware ….

          • Brian78 says:

            “India isn’t in Asia”

            Er what?

          • meta says:

            But you can transit via Hong Kong once again since a few weeks ago and they’re discussing further relaxation. Chinese citizens are also travelling with special permissions to exit/enter.

      • Niall says:

        ‘India’s not in Asia (as Asia is generally understood) as I am guessing you are aware‘.

        I agree with Brian78! What? Never heard anything quite like this…

        • Rob says:

          If you ask 100 people to name a country in Asia, I doubt more than 2 would say India …..

          I also doubt any HfP reader looking to holiday in ‘Asia’ is considering Delhi as an option.

          • Brian78 says:

            What’s that got to do with whether India is in Asia?!

          • Brian78 says:

            “If you ask 100 people to name a country in Asia, I doubt more than 2 would say India ”

            If you ask 100 people to name a country in Europe, I doubt more than 2 would say Andorra but that doesn’t mean it’s not in Europe!

          • meta says:

            You do also realise that Delhi can serve as a transit hub for Southeast Asia.

            Maldives is also another in Asian destination that BA flies to… I mean statement that BA has virtually no flights to Asia is simply not true.

          • Chas says:

            If you ask 100 people to name a country in Europe, I doubt more than 2 would say Andorra either. But that doesn’t mean that Andorra isn’t in Europe…..

          • ChrisC says:

            You are Richard Osman and I claim by £5 prize

            Pointless statement.

            What next the UK isn’t in Europe?

          • Niall says:

            This is just not true. In the U.K. 2 in 100 are in the ‘Indian ethnic group’ alone and are very much Asian! I am not Asian and I would still think India. I hope the average person is not so ignorant.

          • Brian says:

            “If you ask 100 people to name a country in Asia, I doubt more than 2 would say India …..”

            Very bizarre.
            I just think this is wrong, my guess is China and India would be in the top 2 responses.

          • Brian78 says:

            “Very bizarre.
            I just think this is wrong, my guess is China and India would be in the top 2 responses.”

            It doesn’t matter. India is in Asia! Indian people/people of Indian origin are often referred to as Asian in the U.K. too!

            (America is different, where “Asian” generally means someone from China or a nearby country)

  • Phil G says:

    We paid £1400 in business from London to BKK with Finnair for our flight in March. This fare may still be available

  • G says:

    One night in Bangkok and the world’s your oyster… not much between despair and ecstasy!

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.