Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

UK airlines warned by CAA and CMA over customer rights

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

This may or may not be a coincidence, but just a few hours after British Airways attempted to stitch up passengers booked to Bangkok this Winter, the Civil Aviation Authority and Competition & Markets Authority issued a joint threat to UK airlines – respect the legal rights of your customers or else.

You can see the letter sent to the airlines yesterday by clicking here (gov.uk, PDF).

UK airlines warned by CAA and CMA over customer rights

The letter implies that many airlines are failing to meet their legal requirements when dealing with customers. To quote:

We are concerned that some airlines may not be doing everything they could to avoid engaging in one or more harmful practices, including:

  • selling more tickets for flights than they can reasonably expect to supply and failing to warn consumers about the ensuing risk of cancellation;
  • not always fully satisfying obligations to offer consumers re-routing (including with alternative carriers where necessary) in the event of cancellation; and/or
  • failing to give consumers sufficiently clear and upfront information about their rights on cancellation, and/or to provide adequate and appropriate support and care where flights are cancelled or disrupted.

Anyone who booked a British Airways flight to Bangkok for this Winter may be having a wry smile at this point.

British Airways Bangkok flight cancellations

What has happened with British Airways flights to Bangkok?

As we reported on 9th April, British Airways decided over three months ago that it would not operate flights to Bangkok during the Winter season which starts on 29th October.

All flights were removed from sale in early April. However, passengers who had booked on these services were not told that they were cancelled.

Our article on 9th April caused a lot of concern for people who had British Airways tickets booked to Bangkok. People who called BA were told that they could not be rebooked because their seats had not been officially cancelled.

I was prepared to give BA the benefit of the doubt here. We are talking about many thousands of customers needing to be rerouted, and it made sense to wait until the call centre was running efficiently.

This week, BA finally emailed people with a Bangkok flight booking for this Winter.

Passengers were told, effectively, that their flight was cancelled and that they qualified for a refund. There was no attempt to offer them a rerouting, despite their legal right to one.

Even worse, when passengers called British Airways, they were refused a rerouting on the grounds that British Airways did not have any commercial arrangements in place. When pushed, agents said that they thought something might appear in the next week or so.

British Airways Bangkok flight cancellations

What Head for Points readers had to say

Here are some examples from emails I received this week:

“Was on hold for an hour to be told only option is a refund. I assume they’re legally obliged to switch to another airline even tho it’s a way off?”

“BA finally emailed us tonight to cancel our flights to Bangkok in Feb 2023. We went into Manage Your Booking as they suggested and there were no flight alternatives. We phoned BA and after 1 hour of call queuing we finally got through to a lady who told us that there are no alternative flights (even though BA are selling the Qatar flights on their website) and our only option is a refund. We quoted article 8 of EU regulation 261/2004 but to no avail!!”

“My flight to Bangkok was just cancelled (jan-23). Called BA and they said they don’t have any agreements in place with other airlines to book me an alternative flight and I should call in few weeks. Are they just trying to get me get a refund? I insisted that EU reg says they need to book me on an alternative flight (not my problem if they have no agreements in place). The lady said she can’t do anything and terminated the call. Shall I call and insist I want an alternative flight regardless if they have agreements?”

“Just called against the Executive Club and they said no reward availability with Qatar / Finnair and try to call commercial team as they can only book Avios seats. Is that true? Being sent back and forth between British Airways call centres.”

Agent said he can’t help me and he can’t comment on what the EU law says about my rights. Looks like they have been advised not to reroute. Unbelievable! Is there somewhere where I can report this?”

This one arrived late on Thursday evening:

“Just got off the phone with BA on the American number. The agent said they’ve had a new directive today stating “under no circumstances can they change companion vouchers to other airlines for the cancelled BKK flights” so only option is a refund or look for other Avios availability in same zone (not that anywhere close is in the same zone). Surely Illegal?”

(For clarity, yes, this is against EC261 which clearly states: “This Regulation …. shall apply to passengers having tickets issued under a frequent flyer programme or other commercial programme by an air carrier or tour operator“)

Why this is not acceptable

Now …. if a route is cancelled at short notice you could excuse BA for not being able to put a rerouting deal together quickly. However:

  • British Airways has been rerouting Bangkok passengers for almost two years now – Rhys on our team was rerouted on Qatar Airways when he went to Bangkok earlier this year on a 2-4-1 Avios ticket
  • BA removed Winter 2022 flights from sale in April – it has had over three months to put alternative arrangements in place (and these arrangements were already in place anyway, as Rhys found in February)

As the CAA and CMA say in their letter:

When cancelling a flight, airlines must offer re-routing, either using their own flights or if they cannot offer a timely replacement with another carrier. We consider that professional diligence requires airlines to have in place reasonably appropriate organisation and support staff to source replacement flights and complete the booking if consumers wish to take up this offer.

Just because BA has not been able to agree a cheap deal with Qatar Airways or another carrier to take Bangkok passengers does not change its legal liability – it will simply have to pay more for those seats.

My best guess is that British Airways has been deliberately encouraging passengers to take a refund. It has had over three months to put rerouting deals in place so getting call centre agents to say ‘it may take us a week or so to sort something out’ simply doesn’t cut it.

I reckon, in a week or so when most passengers have taken a refund and rebooked by themselves for (presumably) a higher fare, British Airways will magically turn up with a rerouting deal for those people who are determined to push for their legal right.

(EDIT: In the last few hours there have been reports of successful rebooking on Qatar Airways.)

We are happy to pass on these reader emails to the CAA and CMA if they want to know more.

The CAA and CMA letter to the airlines is here.

Comments (311)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • slidey says:

    BA are currently issuing me an involuntary refund for a flight that was booked 11 months ago having first refused to rebook it and then ignored my request to not issue a refund.

    Theyre disgusting.

    • meta says:

      You can still take them to MCOL over it. Just make sure you tell them you don’t accept a refund!

    • Lee says:

      Completely agree, I filed my MCOL a few months ago and after BA saying they’ll defend the claim and I’m now just waiting for a court date.

    • Chris Baker says:

      I was in a similar position when BA cancelled my 2for1 avios Sydney First Class return during covid. I started the BA complaints procedure and then escalated to the resolution route through CEDR when BA had failed to respond and offer alternative flights after six weeks. You need to keep screenshots of all correspondance with BA as their complaints procedure does not furnish you with a copy. I found flight quotes for cash for alternative flights with other airlines and used this as the basis for my claim although I had to reduce it to £10k as this is the maximum compensation you can claim through CEDR. It takes patience, resolve and a belief that in the end your legal rights will be met. BA all but exhaused the CEDR process and just days before CEDR was to rule on my claim. BA customer services emailed to say that two first class avios seats had mysteriously appeared and I was offered them for dates similar to those I had requested. I accepted the outward flight and insisted on a different date for the return. These avios flights also mysteriously appeared (although for the day before). So I have my booking reinstated for later flights that are acceptable for me. Noticeably BA never once admitted that this was a result of my legal rights. The new dates were not those that I requested where cash flights were available but close enough for me to end the hassle and BA will no doubt say that these were new avios flights replacing cancelled avios booking. So all I can say is percevere and follow Spike Milligans mantra – “Don’t let the bastards win”.

  • IPC says:

    I have just got off the telephone to BA, I can see J9 / C9 seats for sale on the Qatar flights to BKK but they will not rebook me.

    • BJ says:

      Some reports in the forum that those managing to get rebooked on Qatar subsequently had their bookings cancelled anyway so it is still all a bit uncertain.

  • Richie says:

    How many plaintiffs are required for a class action?

  • Bob Cohen says:

    Got a question

    My Avantis train from Birmingham yesterday was late by 20 mins and they automatically sent me an email to claim an estimated 9 pounds compensation.
    How come flight operators are not subject to similar rules – on my recent Wizair flight to Tel Aviv I was only offered a kitkat and a bottle of water as compensation…

  • MKB says:

    While I’d normally jump at the chance to switch to Qatar, unfortunately, their timings don’t work for me. I need non-stop flights at comparable times or I can’t make my trip fit in with other arrangements, so I’m going to be insisting on a switch to the Thai Airways flights that are at almost identical times to my cancelled BA flights. No doubt, BA will refuse, and I’ll be going the MCOL route to enforce.

    My other option is to delay the whole trip for a year, but, aside from the fact that BA will cite ticket validity rules, there’s no guarantee BA will start serving Bangkok by then.

    • JDB says:

      I would be rather wary of pursuing this option unless you are happy to wear the cost. You are not entitled to a rerouting on a flight of your choice and if you refuse the airline’s offered rerouting you may entirely compromise your rights and/or have to argue ‘comparable conditions’ which do envisage connections. You should read section 4.2 of the Interpretative Guidelines very carefully before making this decision.

      • meta says:

        This is not true. Indirect flights flights are not comparable transport conditions, especially with long layovers. You can refuse it and indeed I have rebooked myself several times and was successful in getting it enforced at MCOL. Airlines responsibility it is to get you to the destination as close as possible to original timings. I doubt that will be the case with indirect routings.

        • JDB says:

          That simply isn’t what the EC guidelines say, so the OP is best to read them and then decide.

          • PQTR says:

            The interpretive guidelines do require that “reasonable efforts are to be made to avoid additional connections”.

            If (as in this case) another flight exist thats would involve no additional connections, but an airline re-routes with additional connections, in what sense have the airline complied with the requirement in the interpretive guidance to make reasonable efforts to avoid an additional connection? Particularly in light of the earlier interpretive guidance that “re-routing should be offered at no additional cost to the passenger, even where passengers are re-routed with another air carrier”.

          • JDB says:

            @PQTR the quote at the beginning of your post isn’t a ‘requirement’, it’s stated as being a recommended good practice; these are very different things.

            Section 4.2 bears reading in its entirety if people are going to risk their own money buying tickets and hoping to recoup the cost at MCOL. Paraphrasing or misquoting the legislation or IG’s doesn’t help anyone.

          • PQTR says:

            Thanks for avoiding the question as to whether you think the airline would have made reasonable efforts to avoid additional connections in those circumstances. That added value.

            As you point out, it is stated to be a recommended good practice – so I am unclear on what you think would, in the case-by-case analysis suggested, justify departing from that good practice. It’s clearly the EC view on what airlines should do to ensure comparable conditions.

            To your broader point – I don’t think it’s zero risk and absolutely sensible to read in the round and come to your own view. I think most people would arrive at the conclusion that “comparable conditions” doesn’t include “a flight that goes somewhere else first, where you have to get off the plane, wait somewhere else for a while and then get back on it”.

          • meta says:

            Well, the judges and the airlines in now what is probably dozen of successful cases I had disagree with you. And it isn’t just in case of BA, I had this across at least five different airlines. All either paid up before hearing or had a ruling against them.

            If you book a direct flight, indirect flight is not the same if it causes significant delay, for example 4h+.

            Most recently BA, tried to put me on a Iberia flight to Porto with 5hr wait in Madrid when there was direct TAP fligtht departing at almost the same time. They caved in after LBA and paid for TAP flight.

    • numpty says:

      If considering delaying the trip there is also the option of taking the QR flight and moving the date to next year. BA should be more clued up on ticket validity rules by now, if not ask (insist) the agent to go speak to their supervisor.

      • meta says:

        @JDB

        Rusu vs Blue Air (2019)

        “3. Article 4(3) of Regulation No 261/2004, read in conjunction with Article 8(1) of that regulation, is to be interpreted as requiring the operating air carrier to present the passengers concerned with comprehensive information on all the options set out in the second of those provisions, with the passengers in question being under no obligation to contribute actively to seeking information to that end.”

        4. Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 261/2004 is to be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of that provision, the burden of proving that the re-routing was performed at the earliest opportunity rests with the operating air carrier.”

        The airline is required to present the passenger with comprehensive information about all re-routing options, not just the ones that suit them.

        • JDB says:

          Yes, none of that contradicts what I have said, namely that you are taking a large financial risk if you choose to rebook yourself on that perfect flight vs the one offered by the airline as it is not at all certain you will win at MCOL. It will come down to the specific facts of each case.

          You are very gung-ho, I am more cautious and all I am saying is that before people take the plunge, read EC261 and the Intepretative Guidelines very carefully rather than relying on any comment. We have already seen quite a number of misquotes and incorrect paraphrasing here today.

  • Colin MacKinnon says:

    What annoys me are the Press.

    All the time on the radio and the BBC web site, the reporters say:

    Passengers have been offered alternative flights on ( put in name of airline that is being discussed) or a full refund.

    Usually prefixed with “ an airline/airport spokesman said”.

    Why don’t they add “or a reroute on another airline if the original doesn’t help”.

  • Annoyed says:

    BA is currently trying to tell me that I am not eligible for a Future Travel Voucher for a flight in September booked well before the 7/8 June policy change.

    • Blair Waldorf Salad says:

      Similarly I have them refusing me a FTV for a flight booked in March and cancelled in March that took place in March. Call centre bloody useless so I’ve gone down the officious letter route to HQ

  • NigelthePensioner says:

    Rob – How about contacting Calum Laming and asking him for an explanation, not just a comment?!!
    He is the “current” head of Customer experience at BA and in the perfect position to explain how (allegedly) breaking the law will win BA more Customers and aid its recovery…..

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.