Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Bare-bones vs IMAX in the sky: the future of business class seats is diverging

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Comments about new airline business class seat launches on Head for Points often suggest that “all business class seats” are the same and that “innovation is over”.

That’s not entirely wrong. In the last decade or so, we’ve seen the vast majority of airlines and seat manufacturers adopt standard features such as direct aisle access, doored suites, 4K screens and Bluetooth connectivity.

The days of substantial differences in business class cabins, when some airlines offered direct aisle access whilst others stacked passengers eight abreast, are largely over. Less competitive seats are being phased out by airlines such as British Airways, Emirates and Lufthansa, albeit perhaps not as quickly as passengers would like. (Don’t expect the British Airways Gatwick fleet to get decent seats until the aircraft are scrapped.)

MAYA Collins Aerospace

Look down any business class cabin and you’ll likely see one of two configurations – herringbone seats angled towards the window or alternating staggers. That’s because these are the most efficient use of cabin space, maximising both seat density and personal space in a world where direct aisle access is essential, rather than optional.

That’s not to say the seatmakers aren’t innovating. At Aircraft Interiors Expo in Hamburg this year, Collins Aerospace and Stelia Aerospace displayed two very different future seat types showcasing how they are trying to give airlines more choice when it comes to business class seating.

IMAX in the sky

At one end of the spectrum you have a new seat concept called MAYA developed by Collins Aerospace and in-flight entertainment supplier Panasonic Avionics.

Whilst not yet a fully certificated seat – so it does not have the necessary safety clearances to be installed – the two were pitching it as an advanced concept that could be brought to market within a year or two.

Billed as the “future of premium air travel”, the most visible innovation is the curved, 45″ OLED display from Panasonic. This 21:9 aspect ratio screen would allow ultrawide CinemaScope films to fill the full screen with no black bars, a first on board an aircraft.

MAYA seat from Collins Aerospace

In order to accommodate the huge screen, Collins invited Panasonic to join design discussions from the outset rather than simply pulling them in as a supplier further along the design stage.

Ed Dryden, president of Interiors at Collins Aerospace, says that

“Historically, and currently, products are designed in isolation. At Collins Aerospace Interiors we have been focused on shifting that paradigm and actually developing solutions rather than just products.”

All too often, in-flight entertainment screens look tacked-on to a business class seat design, a bit like plonking a TV on a table. With MAYA, the seat was designed around the unique curved screen to deliver an experience more akin to going to the cinema.

According to Ken Sain of Panasonic Avionics:

“It is seamlessly integrated into a reverse herring-bone business suite. Its three-times larger than today’s typical business class screens.”

The sheer size of the screen means you can also use it for multi-tasking. You could watch content in a 16:9 aspect ratio, with the remainder of the screen used for things such as the in-flight map, aircraft cameras or even gaming.

Whilst the seat itself is a more conventional herringbone, MAYA is clearly a fully specced flagship product designed to wow. It could find a home at an airline where customer experience is king.

Opera Essential seat

On the other hand ….. the bare necessities

At the other end of the spectrum you have the Opera Essential seat, on offer from Airbus-owned Stelia Aerospace and pictured above.

As the name suggests, this is a bare-boned lie-flat business class seat that it is calling “the lightest seat offering premium passenger experience”.

Why is ‘lightest’ a selling point? With an increasing focus on sustainability and fuel burn, airlines are keen to reduce the weight of business class seats that can often weigh into the hundreds of kilos. Over the lifetime of an aircraft, every kilo saved can save hundreds if not thousands of tons of fuel and, as a result, CO2 emissions.

We’re already seeing weight play a part in airline seat selection. Finnair’s new no-recline AirLounge seat saves a substantial amount of weight by removing all electrically actuated mechanical parts. It opts instead for a larger flat-bed seat that you can ‘recline’ through the use of pillows, as you would at home on the sofa.

So just how light can a seat get? Stelia is targetting a weight of 65kg per seat – 30% lighter than the standard Opera business class seat for single aisle aircraft.

A number of compromises are made to achieve this weight. For a start, the Essential ditches the door and in-flight entertainment screen altogether. According to independent aviation journalist John Walton this saves “1.5 tonnes of wiring and other associated weight that comes with them.” Doors can add eight to ten kilos each.

(Are passengers really willing to go without IFE? Probably not. In reality these seats are offered to airlines as a basic model but with the option to add back any features which are required.)

Further weight savings are achieved by removing the electronic recline system and replacing it with a manually actuated lever. Some of the heaviest components in an aircraft seat are electrical motors, capable of reclining and unreclining a seat with an adult human still sitting on it. Removing these hardwearing items not only saves on weight but also simplifies maintenance, further reducing costs.

Opera Essential seat

Unlike Finnair’s AirLounge, Stelia has retained the recline mechanism but turned it into a manual system. Pull a lever – a bit like on a car – and the seat will slide forward and flatten. As John Walton writes,

“It’s a matter of pulling up on the lever to slide the seat to the reclined (or fully flat) position you desire, then releasing the lever. Returning to the seated position from flat, there’s a bit of a pilates core muscle trick to finding the precise point at which to place your body weight on the seat in order to activate the slide of the kinematics, but this took only a couple of tries and then we had it down pat.”

Conclusion

The MAYA and Opera Essential aren’t competitors: both are solutions to problems at vastly different ends of the market, with Collins targetting premium, full-service airlines and Stelia the cost-conscious low(er) cost carriers.

It’s easy to imagine a world where both are flying regularly. The Opera Essential could be perfect for an increasing number of long haul low cost airlines such as IndiGo. It has recently announced its intention to launch long haul flights from India with the A350.

It will be interesting to watch which airlines – if any – decide to adopt one of these new seats.

Comments (75)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Talay says:

    Yeah, pull a lever, see how that works in reality with chopped off fingers and chaos from flight attendants.

    The argument about weight though is getting serious. They want to penalise a 45kg woman for being 1kg overweight on her hand luggage whereas a 200kg “influencer” cannot even squash her lard ass into a first class seat.

    • AJA says:

      Many people cope quite well with manual adjustment of car seats. If the lever is positioned in a sensible place which is easy to reach then it shouldn’t cause any injuries.

      The thing I got from the article is that you have to use your body to make the seat go back up from lie flat. I can see that being more of a problem than the lever.

      Mind you that would probably help the 200kg lard ass with doing some exercise….

      • TGLoyalty says:

        And actually electric seats in cars make more sense because they generally have less than a handful or user so the memory functions come in useful and can be used to set positions.

        While actually on a plane where the position is different for every person based on individual use cases then manual makes far more sense as long as it work smoothly

      • Bagoly says:

        Based on my experience of car seats, I prefer rotating wheels rather than levers, which as said, tend to require getting the knack right.
        The wheels may take slightly longer, but there is no stress about “will it work? why won’t it work?”.

    • BJ says:

      Almost 5h has passed and nobody has called you out on “her” yet; the HfP readership must have changed.

  • Richie says:

    The B777X has a very wide cabin, will the J passenger enjoy wider aisles or wider foot cubby holes compared to an A350?

  • Andrew. says:

    Why go to all the effort to render a new seat, then use a picture of an anaemic croissant to dress it? It just makes it extra grey.

  • r* says:

    Given that airlines are stripped out as much room from economy, the galley and toilets as they possibly can the next logical step is that the business class seats are going to be hit next.

  • Novice says:

    Finnair seat is fine for lounging but if you can’t sleep full flat in the air then it’s horrendous. I didn’t enjoy trying to get in a lounge position for sleep. If given the option I would always choose a seat that reclines.

    • Rhys says:

      It does go full flat.

      • Novice says:

        I know it does. That is what I am saying that I don’t sleep full flat up in the air because for some weird reason every time I have tried; I sleep fine but when I wake up I have a panic attack because for a few minutes I get claustrophobic and it’s disorienting so I prefer the recliner seats where I am not fully flat.

        • Barry Graham says:

          For me the fully reclining seats are the ones that give me the best sleep. I’ve flown first class on red eyes domestically where they didn’t have flat seats and I avoid those flights as much as I can

  • dst87 says:

    I’d have guessed that an increasing number of people want to bring their own entertainment in the form of an iPad, laptop, Nintendo Switch / SteamDeck, eReader, iPhone etc. I generally just use my own devices for entertainment when travelling, but I assume I’m in the minority; airlines must do that research.

    Personally, though, I’ll take the basic seat. So long as I can recline / lay flat and don’t have to sit shoulder to shoulder with someone else I’m more or less happy.

    • Bagoly says:

      I never use the IFE – I read from paper/Kindle/laptop.
      I understand the idea of providing a big screen for people to connect their own devices, but I do like the idea of saving all that weight by having neither screens nor associated wiring.
      Given how often it seems to be the electrics which cause problems and so delays, the less electrics the better for reliability of flights.

      • BJ says:

        I just sleep as much as U can. On a flight departing around 23:00 there’s no way I’m eating, reading or watching movies in the subsequent hours.

    • CJD says:

      Yeah it’s possibly the result of mainly travelling economy on LCCs within Europe in my adult life but IFE is something I’ve learned to provide for myself.

      I also suffer from motion sickness which is exacerbated by reading and looking at screens – generally I can read on planes, but frankly I’m not going to take the risk that watching a film might bring on a bout of sickness and ruin the rest of the flight.

      • TravelsWithMyHP says:

        Ditto. The scale of sensory overload from a screen that size that’s so close to your face would almost certainly induce a bout of motion sickness regardless of any turbulence. Give me a sensibly sized high def screen that’s not in my face and I’ll be happy. Like others I’m increasingly beginning to prefer bringing my own entertainment on board, at least I’m pretty certain about what I’m going to get then!

  • NW says:

    I’ve increasingly used less and less of the IFE on most airlines (apart from JL and CX, JAL because they have some pretty hard to find Japanese films, and CX because their IFE selection is quite extensive).
    With the fortune of having a very nice gaming laptop, I use that for most of the entertainment (either with WiFi or pre-loaded) – the issue I have is sometimes the planes don’t supply enough power via their outlets.

  • David S says:

    I find it ironic the lengths suppliers go to in order to develop a super light seat when the flyers on some routes bring luggage that must weigh many times more than the seat. If you want to cut the overall weight, reduce baggage allowances to say 2 bags max, but I’m guessing that is profitable business for the airlines. It would also make checking in much faster.

    • Harry T says:

      I will surrender my carryon allowance when other people shed their pounds 🙂

      • BJ says:

        If they give me
        hundred pounds I’ll happily surrender mine too.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.