Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Austrian Airlines tests low cost short haul flights to Dubai – will customers go for it?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Would you fly to Dubai on the same short haul aircraft that takes you to Amsterdam or Berlin?

The lines between budget and full service airlines are blurring as legacy airlines resort to increasingly innovative ways to compete.

Austrian Airlines – which is part of Lufthansa Group, together with SWISS, Brussels Airlines et al – has just announced a new, seasonal winter trial.

Starting on 1st December, it will operate flights to Dubai five times a week. Rather than use the long haul twin aisle aircraft you would expect on this route, Austrian will operate a short haul configured A320neo.

Austrian Airlines tests low cost short haul flights to Dubai

Note that this is not the ‘Long Range’ variant of the A321neo, which many airlines are now flying with special long haul cabins.

These are standard short haul aircraft that feature the standard narrow seat pitch (leg room) and lightly padded seats with no in-flight entertainment – all things seen as acceptable on the shorter routes they typically fly.

The Dubai flights, which will operate on Mondays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays and Sundays, will take between 5:30 and 6:30 hours depending on the direction. Flights arrive into Dubai at 3.40am with the return leaving at an equally unfriendly 6.05am.

In a self-aware move, Austrian is calling these flights the ‘Dubai Deal’ as it seeks to attract budget-conscious travellers and differentiate it from the rest of its longhaul network.

Return fares are being marketed from €314 in hand baggage-only economy or €374 with a checked bag. Eurobusiness class is priced at €699 return – less than half of what you’d expect to pay in a sale for a flat bed on this route.

The trial is an attempt to make better use of Austrian’s fleet. Austrian Airlines CEO Annette Mann says it will “deploy an aircraft that would otherwise be idle during winter.” With airline schedules typically busiest during the summer, winter marks a less efficient utilisation of aircraft.

“An aircraft in the air is always better than one on the ground – and at the same time, we want to offer our guests a compelling deal. We understand this route comes with strong and very comfortable competition.”

Austrian Airlines tests low cost short haul flights to Dubai

The new service blurs the boundaries between full service and low cost carriers. Up until now, it has largely been ultra low cost carriers such as Wizz Air that have launched long haul routes using short haul configured aircraft, such as its flights between London and Saudia Arabia.

Austrian Airlines is widely regarded as a full service legacy carrier and is not known for its low-cost services.

Rather than pitching these flights under a different brand (perhaps budget sister airline Eurowings?) Austrian is choosing to operate the Dubai service under it’s own name, potentially muddling its reputation.

It’s an interesting choice. Despite the upfront messaging it is still likely to confuse many passengers.

Will other airlines follow suit? Virtually all European carriers have a quieter winter season which is when scheduled maintenance is prioritised. As we’ve seen with the adoption of ’empty middle seat’ Eurobusiness class, where one airline leads many will follow.

Austrian Airlines will have to compete with Emirates with its ‘proper’ long haul economy, premium economy and business class cabins.

Will cheap fares make this trial a success? Dubai, after all, is very expensive if you want a beach resort during the peak winter months, and if you can afford the hotel, you can probably afford to fly on a long haul aircraft. The 3.40am arrival and 6.05am departure times are also far from ideal.

Comments (65)

  • TD says:

    “ Dubai, after all, is very expensive if you want a beach resort during the peak winter months, and if you can afford the hotel, you can probably afford to fly on a long haul aircraft.”

    Not sure you can make or substantiate that statement. I suspect for many the saving on the airfare will be the make or break as to whether they can afford the trip.

    • Johnbb says:

      The sentence is beyond ridiculous.

    • JDB says:

      @TD – as you suggest, this statement in the article seems to run counter to the narrative found in comments and the forum, that it’s ‘fine’ to fly eg to/from US east coast or to ME in economy even when luxury hotels are involved. Others say it’s a waste of money to fly in a premium cabin for shorter flights variously because they can’t sleep anyway, that you can’t benefit from the bed on a daytime flight or the cabin service, F&B etc, on a night time flight. I wouldn’t agree, but it seems quite a common line, so I suspect these flights might be quite popular.

    • CJD says:

      Or the saving gets you either a nicer hotel, a better room in the hotel you’re in, or gets added to the spending money pot allowing you to do more when you’re on holiday.

    • BlairWaldorfSalad says:

      Having moved from the northwest to London, I do think it reveals something of the income disparity within England. If this conversation played out in my (City) office, the line of argument would be around what’s the sense of paying top dirham for a nice hotel in the European winter if you’re going to fly there in discomfort. The holiday starts at the airport, etc.

      • Tom says:

        Even as an airplane geek, I am increasingly of the opinion ‘who cares?’ when it comes to flying in airline premium cabins unless it’s something genuinely impressive like Emirates First. This is the market you’re taking about, I think.

        I’ve done maybe 250+ longhaul flights in J/F in the last 10 years and most flights at this point in premium cabins post-COVID are very expensive for what they are with mediocre crew. Even in F the service will still never compare to staff at a good luxury hotel like a Mandarin Oriental. You can spent £2.5K per person for a couple upgrading to Club World for six hours each way or you can spend that £5K on four nights in a suite at the Mandarin Oriental rather than some Marriott. One of those propositions is very much better value for money than the other to me. Of course, there are also those who don’t have to choose between those two who are partially driving the airline pricing at the moment.

  • Throwawayname says:

    There’s really nothing new about this type of service. Aegean already fly to DXB, AUH and RUH in standard European configurations, and Eurobusiness similarly features on long flights to the Azores, Canaries, Cabo Verde, Dakar etc.

    However, the pricing is very attractive as €699 is cheaper than premium economy on the competition.

    • Mark Janes says:

      That’s an interesting comparison. Premium economy giving a better seat than a standard Eurobusiness one in a more spacious, probably quieter wide-body aircraft with higher cabin pressure and bigger windows. Or Business with an inferior seat in a more cramped cabin but withh all the on-ground benefits of fast track, lounge access, etc. (Assuming one doesn’t have status).
      I flew TUI from LGW to the Gambia (6 hours) on a 737 Max 8 a while ago. Daytime flight out was tolerable. Overnight return was brutal!

      • Throwawayname says:

        Plus the associated ground services and business class on any European connecting flight (though I suspect they’re still figuring out how they’ll price those).

        Having said that, the timing of the return flight is brutal indeed.

  • SteveJ says:

    Not that big a deal? It’s only 5 hours in the air from Vienna to DXB, not much different to a flight from Northern Europe to the Canaries, which already successfully operate on short haul aircraft.

    • KS says:

      Assuming it is Vienna? Not sure it says in the article.

    • BlairWaldorfSalad says:

      Flip it the other way, we should have higher expectations of routes to the Canaries. For many years Aer Lingus has run widebodies to Faro, Malaga and the Canaries. One just needs to know which flight in the schedule is the widebody one.

  • The Savage Squirrel says:

    Consider that many families will buy 4 plane seats each way but only one hotel room. Suddenly the idea that the flight cost is relatively trivial compared to the hotel cost isn’t quite so well thought out…

  • Tim says:

    If we move the focus off the premium cabin loved by hFP readership, this is actually an upgrade for the majority in economy. The seats in an a320 are noticeably wider, and the cabin is smaller and boarding is quicker. Loss of IFE is literally the ONLY aspect where economy travellers loose out and for several hundred quid, I’d settle for reading a book instead

    • BlairWaldorfSalad says:

      There’s also a hard to quantify loss of cabin movement, which can be important to overcome the restrictiveness of long haul economy. Widebodies have the two aisles in which to stretch and move. On narrowbodies you are stuffed if a trolley is in the aisle. My last economy long haul flight was back in 2017 when I was rebooked from an AF A380 to a DL 757. Enough to put me off for good.

    • Rhys says:

      Although you might think long haul and short haul economy seats are the same, most seat makers actually offer different variants for each and you wouldn’t necessarily want to be stuck on a short haul seat for many hours.

  • CamFlyer says:

    Credit to Austrian for properly marketing the product. Compare it to BA, who run short haul aircraft on flights to Amman, Cairo, Tel Aviv, Tbilisi, and others. In economy–which is what most passengers fly–this is no different than any other flight. Austrian also aren’t alone in flying a short haul aircraft with European business to the Middle East; LOT, airBaltic and others do similarly, and I believe that Finnair did historically (and may still).

  • tuktuktukan says:

    Well, both Wizz and Etihad flight from Vienna to Abu Dhabi with pricetag starting deeply under 200 euro return (even in the main season, Etihad with widebody aircraft), so I can´t see Austrian attempt to last for very long.

  • Londoner 79 says:

    I wish Austrian well with this. I’d apply the same personal rule as I always apply on a 4h+ flight in a narrowbody – pre-book a seat in the exit row so that I have somewhere to put my legs and it’d be fine. The business offering would be a tougher sell for me, I’d probably take premium economy on another flight for the better seat.

Leave a Reply to PabloF Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.