Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Hilton Honors devalues its luxury hotels, now as high as 250,000 points

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Hilton Honors has quietly pushed out a devaluation of its top hotels. This is, astonishingly, the third such devaluation in the last 12 months following changes in December 2024 and May 2025.

As with the previous changes, members have not been notified.

Astonishingly, the points price of Hilton’s top properties has jumped from 50,000 points to 250,000 points over 12 years. There is an old article on HfP about the blowback when top hotels went from 50,000 points to 95,000 points per night, a price which looks a clear bargain now.

Hilton devalues its luxury hotels

There have been no major changes in how you earn points in those 12 years, although the elite status bonus for Gold and Diamond members has increased.

There has also been a major slowing of promotions. The summer offer was exceptionally weak – just 1,000 bonus points per stay – and there is no offer at all at present. This is the first time in a long time that Hilton has not run a back-to-back offer.

What’s changed? What’s changed is the volume of free points dished out to the US credit card market, which is fuelling inflation in the system. What is really driving it is the number of free night certificates, valid anywhere, which are being issued with US Hilton credit cards.

If a US credit card holder redeems a free night certificate at Waldorf Astoria New York when the hotel is over 95% full and the cash rate is $2,000 per night, Hilton is on the hook for $2,000, give or take. It has to earn that money back somehow, and you are paying the price.

Here are a few of the changes pushed through on Tuesday:

  • Waldorf Astoria Maldives – 190,000 points to 250,000 points
  • Waldorf Astoria The Palm Dubai – 80,000 points to 100,000 points
  • Waldorf Astoria Amsterdam – 120,000 points to 150,000 points
  • Conrad Tokyo – 100,000 points to 130,000 points
  • Conrad Maldives – 140,000 points to 180,000 points

To be fair, you should remember that all elite members of Hilton Honors get ‘5 nights for the points of 4’ on redemptions. This pulls down the average, although 520,000 points for five nights at Conrad Tokyo is still not a bargain if you are earning points from ‘heads in beds’.

After all, even for a Diamond Elite member, it would require $26,000 of base spending, before taxes, to earn 520,000 Hilton Honors points for five nights at Conrad Tokyo, pictured below.

Hilton devalues its luxury hotels

On the other hand, as a poster on Loyalty Lobby said yesterday – I have edited slightly:

‘If a casual card churner like me can rack up one million Hilton points from US card sign up bonuses very quickly, approving me and my partner willy nilly even after we just freshly dumped the cards in question, and then allowing us to combine the points for free, then anyone else can also do it’

These changes are very much impacting the top end. There is the odd 5,000 and 10,000 point increase further down the brand hierarchy but nothing major. A lot of these hotels saw increases in the December 2024 and May 2025 devaluations though.

Across all 7,000 hotels, the average value of a Hilton Honors points is probably unchanged from the 0.33p we claim. However, for HfP readers who are more likely than most to redeem at luxury properties, the impact will be harder.

I genuinely struggle to understand the logic. The only reason Hilton did its deal with Small Luxury Hotels was that members were pulling stays from cheaper Hilton brands because of the lack of luxury redemption options. Those SLH properties are now so expensive that they are out of reach of anyone who earns from ‘heads in beds’ and not US card sign-ups.

What about the alternatives?

I’ve seen a few comments from people saying that ALL Accor is suddenly looking good to them. When we started HfP 13 years ago, 1 Accor point got you 2 Eurocents off a hotel room. Hilton, meanwhile, wanted 50,000 points for a Waldorf Astoria free night.

Jumping forward to 2025, 1 Accor point still gets you 2 Eurocents off a hotel room – albeit that room will be more costly than in 2012. Hilton now wants up to 250,000 points for the same Waldorf Astoria free night.

You can also redeem your Accor points for any room at any hotel on any day, albeit suites need a big balance when you only get 2 Eurocents per point. Hilton is still only allowing redemptions into base level rooms. Marriott and Hyatt got it right here, with many hotels allowing you to upgrade a reward night at the time of booking for a flat fee.

Of course, unless you are converting credit card points, a hotel loyalty programme should be considered as a whole. It’s not just about what your points will get you but also what your elite member benefits are when you stay.

Hilton’s problem is that it also falls down here. Marriott guarantees 4pm check-out to Platinum and above (resorts excluded), Hilton does not. Marriott gives Nightly Upgrade Award vouchers to Platinum and above to lock in suite upgrades, Hilton does not. Marriott offers full breakfast at most brands, whilst Hilton’s F&B credit in North America doesn’t even come close to covering the cost.

Even IHG One Rewards became a real contender when it introduced Milestone Rewards a couple of years ago. Stay 20 nights and get a suite upgrade voucher. Stay 40 nights and get free lounge access for the rest of the year and all of the following year.

Something will have to give somewhere.

Comments (104)

  • Nate1309 says:

    ⚰️ 📌 🔨

  • BJ says:

    Both hotel and airline loyalty schemes have become increasingly farcical. They are now a hostage to status and cheap or ‘free’ points. The direction of travel will continue unless the industry as a whole has a seismic shift and abandons status in favour of redeemable points and miles only or makes it substantially more difficult to earn, and the only meaningful way to earn points and miles is restricted to heads on beds and bums on seats. Guests and passengers need to get what they pay for and they need to get rewarded for what they pay for. Instead what they get are experiences diluted by fake or cheap elites and points and miles vomit. The schemes themselves and the members have become victims of their own success. I’m fully aware that many of the schemes are extremely successful but the direction of travel must surely be moving towards a tipping point, it looks very much like a house of cards to me.

    • JDB says:

      The hotel schemes in particular not only seem to limit ones choices of hotel but push people into expensive choices for the sake of a night or a few points. As a free agent you have choice, get real cash off towards stays while enjoying all the supposed benefits.

      • BJ says:

        This was the year I abandoned loyalty and with no regrets. Hotel groups year to date: ALL, HIilton, IHG and Marriott 0 nights each, Rad 6 night. Airlines, admittedly I’m focused on Qatar, not because I particularly rate it but because all things considered it clearly best suits our needs.

        • BSI1978 says:

          No Hyatt as yet BJ?

          • BJ says:

            The only Hyatt stays I’ve made recently were in the USA where I roughly halved my hotel bill by buying the points. I stayed with them more back when I was still working and I wasn’t footing the bill personally.

      • Tom says:

        Exactly, as I’ve posted here before hotel loyalty and airline loyalty are very different games and I don’t get why others approach them as being the same thing.

        Being based in London, there are many routes where BA is the only non-LCC flying non-stop and so, despite my relatively poor view of BA overall, I continue to fly them and maintain Gold Guest List as they have a quasi-monopoly position on many useful routes. I’d rather slightly overpay for a direct BA flight to Malaga than mess around connecting on a sub-three hour flight or to have to trek out to Gatwick / Luton / Stansted to fly with a LCC, for example. In contrast, there is hardly anywhere I travel where a Hilton is the best / most convenient hotel in town, let alone the only hotel, so why I’d feel locked in to only staying at Hiltons unless the loyalty programme was truly spectacular I have no idea…

        • JDB says:

          @Tom – I agree with you but from comments and forum posts a remarkable number of people are still tethered by a chain rather than choosing the right hotel.

        • BJ says:

          The fundamentals are the same, the strategiare of both are infinitely variable. I’m not sure how you got to that opening remark from my comment or JDB reply. One or both of us were missing something.

    • Dace says:

      I think the biggest problem is that the game is so well known and pushed now. Social media has a lot to do with this. You get a lot of people pushing their ‘redemptions’ or ‘status’ and then outline the best way to get it, or the quickest way to get it.

      This was always going to happen at some point. The game simply has too many easy ‘in’s’ (US credit cards in particular) and has too much exposure.

      For me, I have pulled back on my points activities. Radisson and Hilton have both been dropped and the points balances liquidated. BA is on the same path. IHG is now really my only play but even then, that is because I focus on status with them – although they do still do reasonable points offers.

      For me, the good old days are pretty much gone. They won’t be coming back as it simply became overwhelmed. For sure, there are some options here and there, but equally you these are becoming hard to find/obtain and the net is closing with revenue based earning.

      • Throwawayname says:

        I thought this is still largely a US phenomenon. As with the Accor points in the article, airlines with limited exposure to that country won’t be feeling massive amounts of pressure to water down elite benefits and devalue their loyalty currencies. The risk with those is a Flying Blue-style pivot away from the core non-US customer in an attempt to court the lucrative American credit card market.

      • BJ says:

        Interesting, I’m not really into social media and hadn’t thought much about its role beyond blogs. I think the game could sustain social media impacts if the rest if the structure was fine.i blame the scheme managers for becoming hostages to status and being seduced by the easy cash from credit card companies etc. Failing to tackle the issue of the USA versus the Rest is also a big problem.

      • David says:

        @Dace. I’m getting more points than ever before organically and ms. It’s certainly not dying as evidenced the amount of people pushing to use MRs on M&S/Amazon. “We” would travel faster on the cart if more people leave so I guess it’s in our benefit that “you” get off. Cheers.

        • BJ says:

          It’s not a question of dying but rather of the direction of travel in relation to value of the rewards for effort invested. Fir the industry to be sustainable Joe Bloogs needs to be convinced the effort is worthwhile. The lijes of us will always find value someplace because even as some doors close others open.

  • Paul (another one) says:

    I too have already largely given up on HH after them being my “go to” brand for about a decade. For me, it’s always been the free breakfast that I value as a reward for loyalty but as I am one of those who gets it through Amex not stays (sorry all), I’m really driven by the price. Having got a paid stash of HH points for a reward stay I ended up having cancelled, I now use them “as cash” as I already realised the “aspirational” hotels aren’t my sort of place. I’m gradually seeing that stash decline as I find places to stay where the points ratio is better than cash (or where the ability to cancel might be important).

    Ergo, like others have said, it’s pretty clear that hotels, like airlines, are seeing points as a currency not as a loyalty perk.

  • NorthernLass says:

    I commented yesterday but this has made me wonder if there’s any connection. Quite a few upscale properties seem to be leaving Hilton, or pulling out of the relationship, including Resorts World Bimini, the new Bermudiana Beach Resort and potentially the GCM Kailani Curio (opening delayed again for the 6th year!) The lovely SLH Carmo’s Boutique Hotel, where I stayed last month, is showing no availability at all on the Hilton website beyond the end of the year.

    But when some Hampton Inns are now 85k points pn you have to ask what Hilton is playing at!

  • memesweeper says:

    Any devaluation on SLH? I was looking a few weeks ago and there seemed good options in Europe. Would be sad if they’re gone too.

    • Ken says:

      I’ve got a booking in a SLH for Rome next May, and it appears that rates haven’t changed.
      However there was a SLH devaluation early this year and I think it was slightly later than the main brand devaluation.
      I also think that many SLH only offer 1 room for redemption at the standard rate.

  • Nick G says:

    I still like HH but I’m always cautious of this happening at any time. I think Hyatt is so underrated in terms of value to be obtained from points upgrades

    • budva says:

      I’d stay at Hyatt properties more but their presence in UK has always looked limited to me. I think I remember Hyatt Regency Birmingham being the only one but looking now after reading this comment there are a lot more properties but mainly Mr&Mrs Smith but there are now more business-oriented properties from the looks of it that I will check out

      • Pangolin says:

        Just as an example of how paltry the Hyatt footprint is in relation to some of the other chains:

        Number of Accor hotels in Poland: 86
        Number of Hyatt hotels: 2

  • Pat says:

    a huge change is reimbursement of SLH is very expensive for HH and that has to be paid for

    • John says:

      Yes – but that would be achieved by increasing SLH redemption prices and leaving the cheap hotels alone

      • Pat says:

        what “cheap” hotels? most properties haven’t changed at all.
        where’s the blogger outrage that myway hasn’t changed for 20 years

  • Lloyd says:

    I think this is just indicative of how the US credit card market has and is ruining the points and loyalty schemes of so many organisations. I recall a CEO of one of the airline schemes saying how they had decided to focus on the US market (could have been Virgin?) where there were so many opportunities for them to dish out points. Subsequently we see US cards with massive sign up bonuses that we in Europe can only dream of, and the numbers of points required for a redemption reflect this. There surely comes a point that loyalty schemes are only relevant in the US. Surely the key should be in the name. Loyalty schemes should reward a person regularly giving their business to that organisation, not someone who takes out a card, earns a huge number of points by doing so, ditches the card and then does it again, moving on to the next scheme when they have finished with the first one. Maybe there should be two levels of redemption, one for US residents and one for everybody else!
    The old adage of if everyone has status, then no-one has status seems particular true of Hilton in this instance.

    • Rob says:

      This is how it used to be, of course, when BA and Virgin charged far higher surcharges on redemptions which started in the US. This ended for BA when RFS came in.

Leave a Reply to Paul Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.