Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Hilton Honors devalues its luxury hotels, now as high as 250,000 points

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Hilton Honors has quietly pushed out a devaluation of its top hotels. This is, astonishingly, the third such devaluation in the last 12 months following changes in December 2024 and May 2025.

As with the previous changes, members have not been notified.

Astonishingly, the points price of Hilton’s top properties has jumped from 50,000 points to 250,000 points over 12 years. There is an old article on HfP about the blowback when top hotels went from 50,000 points to 95,000 points per night, a price which looks a clear bargain now.

Hilton devalues its luxury hotels

There have been no major changes in how you earn points in those 12 years, although the elite status bonus for Gold and Diamond members has increased.

There has also been a major slowing of promotions. The summer offer was exceptionally weak – just 1,000 bonus points per stay – and there is no offer at all at present. This is the first time in a long time that Hilton has not run a back-to-back offer.

What’s changed? What’s changed is the volume of free points dished out to the US credit card market, which is fuelling inflation in the system. What is really driving it is the number of free night certificates, valid anywhere, which are being issued with US Hilton credit cards.

If a US credit card holder redeems a free night certificate at Waldorf Astoria New York when the hotel is over 95% full and the cash rate is $2,000 per night, Hilton is on the hook for $2,000, give or take. It has to earn that money back somehow, and you are paying the price.

Here are a few of the changes pushed through on Tuesday:

  • Waldorf Astoria Maldives – 190,000 points to 250,000 points
  • Waldorf Astoria The Palm Dubai – 80,000 points to 100,000 points
  • Waldorf Astoria Amsterdam – 120,000 points to 150,000 points
  • Conrad Tokyo – 100,000 points to 130,000 points
  • Conrad Maldives – 140,000 points to 180,000 points

To be fair, you should remember that all elite members of Hilton Honors get ‘5 nights for the points of 4’ on redemptions. This pulls down the average, although 520,000 points for five nights at Conrad Tokyo is still not a bargain if you are earning points from ‘heads in beds’.

After all, even for a Diamond Elite member, it would require $26,000 of base spending, before taxes, to earn 520,000 Hilton Honors points for five nights at Conrad Tokyo, pictured below.

Hilton devalues its luxury hotels

On the other hand, as a poster on Loyalty Lobby said yesterday – I have edited slightly:

‘If a casual card churner like me can rack up one million Hilton points from US card sign up bonuses very quickly, approving me and my partner willy nilly even after we just freshly dumped the cards in question, and then allowing us to combine the points for free, then anyone else can also do it’

These changes are very much impacting the top end. There is the odd 5,000 and 10,000 point increase further down the brand hierarchy but nothing major. A lot of these hotels saw increases in the December 2024 and May 2025 devaluations though.

Across all 7,000 hotels, the average value of a Hilton Honors points is probably unchanged from the 0.33p we claim. However, for HfP readers who are more likely than most to redeem at luxury properties, the impact will be harder.

I genuinely struggle to understand the logic. The only reason Hilton did its deal with Small Luxury Hotels was that members were pulling stays from cheaper Hilton brands because of the lack of luxury redemption options. Those SLH properties are now so expensive that they are out of reach of anyone who earns from ‘heads in beds’ and not US card sign-ups.

What about the alternatives?

I’ve seen a few comments from people saying that ALL Accor is suddenly looking good to them. When we started HfP 13 years ago, 1 Accor point got you 2 Eurocents off a hotel room. Hilton, meanwhile, wanted 50,000 points for a Waldorf Astoria free night.

Jumping forward to 2025, 1 Accor point still gets you 2 Eurocents off a hotel room – albeit that room will be more costly than in 2012. Hilton now wants up to 250,000 points for the same Waldorf Astoria free night.

You can also redeem your Accor points for any room at any hotel on any day, albeit suites need a big balance when you only get 2 Eurocents per point. Hilton is still only allowing redemptions into base level rooms. Marriott and Hyatt got it right here, with many hotels allowing you to upgrade a reward night at the time of booking for a flat fee.

Of course, unless you are converting credit card points, a hotel loyalty programme should be considered as a whole. It’s not just about what your points will get you but also what your elite member benefits are when you stay.

Hilton’s problem is that it also falls down here. Marriott guarantees 4pm check-out to Platinum and above (resorts excluded), Hilton does not. Marriott gives Nightly Upgrade Award vouchers to Platinum and above to lock in suite upgrades, Hilton does not. Marriott offers full breakfast at most brands, whilst Hilton’s F&B credit in North America doesn’t even come close to covering the cost.

Even IHG One Rewards became a real contender when it introduced Milestone Rewards a couple of years ago. Stay 20 nights and get a suite upgrade voucher. Stay 40 nights and get free lounge access for the rest of the year and all of the following year.

Something will have to give somewhere.

Comments (110)

  • HH says:

    Taking 5 nights (for the price of 4) in the Maldives as an example, the Hilton / Conrad / SLH properties are now all 700k+ per stay. This puts them on par with Marriott’s dynamic pricing – JW Marriott and W c.550k, St Regis c.650k and Ritz-Carlton c.800k.

    Previously, Marriott redemptions looked pricey in comparison but now I’m tempted to make use of the Amex transfer offer and redeem there instead.

  • Will says:

    Amingiri appears to have gone from circa 100k points per night to 175k per night.

    Glad I cashed out a bunch on Oasis at Wembley now.

  • BBbetter says:

    Tbf, there were plenty of signs, in hindsight though.

    Read the threads on the Hilton Maldives properties and it’s full of Americans eager to use the free nights and credit card signup bonuses while getting shocked at the F&B costs. Of course the hotels have to recover the costs and the easiest way would be to keep pushing up F&B prices.

    The chain can be renamed as Hilton US credit card society.

  • Bob says:

    The Nepalese are so angry about the devaluation they’ve torched their Hilton.

  • Simon says:

    Rob, you say something will have to give – and I agree – but what? Would be interested in an article with your views on the different ways out of this. All the ones I can think of (interchange fees going back up here, interchange fee cut in the US (would only happen with Democrats and even then I doubt it), inflating US-based redemptions, agentic AI driving hotels to drop out of the brands and advertise direct) seem unlikely to happen anytime soon. Am sure there are others that I’ve missed too.

    • JDB says:

      @Simon – this is (currently) a Hilton problem, so I don’t think there’s the vaguest prospect of interchange fees in Europe being increased to help out the tiny % of rewards credit card holders!

    • Rob says:

      Who knows? We don’t know how much money Hilton gets from US Amex, but Delta will get $8 BILLION this year for selling miles, plus its share of annual fees.

      Hilton gets to pocket some of this as profit too, because the difference between the ‘fair value’ used by the loyalty scheme and whatever Amex pays can go into the P&L (the rest has to go into the system fund and be spent).

      As it is legally banned from making a profit running Hilton Honors but CAN make a profit selling points to Amex, nothing is going to shift.

      • BBbetter says:

        Not really ‘legally’ no? Just a contractual agreement with hotel management groups?

        • Rob says:

          You don’t know anything about franchise law I suspect. Following various scandals over the years, US (and most other national) franchise laws are very clear. The brand must charge one fee for the use of the brand (which is 100% profit). All other services provided by the brand, including fees for accessing the loyalty scheme, must be provided at cost and must not make a profit, with franchisees able to access the financials to prove it.

      • Pat says:

        yeah so when you’re paying SLH practically full whack it’s unsustainable

    • BBbetter says:

      If you are not based in US or Singapore or any high interchange fee economies, you need to set really low expectations for loyalty at these chains. Period.

  • BBbetter says:

    Problem with Accor is fewer good mid range options. They seem to have barbell approach- heavily weighted towards both luxury and budget segments but less appealing in the middle.

    • Throwawayname says:

      I’m happy with my Ibis Styles, Novotels, Moevenpicks and Grand Mercures (the non-Grand ones are a bit of a gamble)- if anything, I think that Accor is the best of the lot in the midscale/lower upscale segments.

      • meta says:

        If have the right subscription purchased at the right time you can get a permanent discount of 20-40% for any hotel.

      • Richard says:

        I really wouldn’t have put Ibis Styles in the mid-range bucket! So it’s interesting that you do – maybe it suggests there are good ones and bad ones, or perhaps that it varies by country.

        Totally agree on Novotel. And I’d add Pullman – I’ve only had a couple of stays at those, but both times I thought I got quite a lot of benefit for a fairly modest extra spend (compared to a Novotel).

        • Throwawayname says:

          Most Ibis Styles are too good to be called budget hotels, their rooms may be minimalist in design but they’re rarely cramped. I recently stayed at the one on the outskirts of Barnsley (!) and it was phenomenal value and a better hotel overall than virtually any Mercure in the North. Some of them also have premium room categories. I fully agree on Pullmans, too- the ones in places like CDG and IFEMA (Madrid expo centre) are likely better than the Hilton/Sheraton equivalents while usually charging significantly lower rates.

        • Pangolin says:

          Ibis Styles properties are usually a lot better than plain Ibis, especially the newer ones, and it’s often a sweet spot where you can find a really good rate but the hotel is still easily nice enough for a stay of more than one night (which I can’t handle at an Ibis or Moxy).

          • captaindave says:

            Had a 3 night stay at the Edinburgh Ibis Styles back in January, thought it was decent, don’t remember it being especially cheap, but around peak time for Scotland.

  • paul says:

    The Greed pushing so many changes in 1 year. I wont be using Hilton anymore the only way to stop these companies is vote with your feet .

  • Hilda M says:

    Wow – so glad I locked in a 400,000 points 5 for 4 at the Conrad Tokyo for (hopefully) Sakura time next April. Had been searching for ages for a reasonable value redemption where the standard room wouldn’t be a shoebox.

    • meta says:

      Rooms there need refurbishment. There are plenty non-shoebox places, you should have consulted the forum with many suggestions rather than search for ages.

Leave a Reply to Rui N. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.