Forums › Other › Flight changes and cancellations help › Lost at CEDR with BA – what next? › Reply To: Lost at CEDR with BA – what next?
Hi Jerry. I have gone to CEDR twice before, once against TUI and once against BA and was successful on each occasion. I am aware that CEDR say there is no right to appeal but on the BA case which was to do with downgrading from First to Club on a 2-4-1 reward flight, CEDR found in my favour but then made a hash of calculating the 75% reimbursement due. This included some real schoolboy errors in the reimbursement calculation and their decision that the companion voucher passenger was not due any reimbursement! I successfully got CEDR to review the adjudication decision and they rectified their errors and I was fully 75% reimbursed for the downgrade. My case was definitely helped by the schoolboy error in the calculations. So, if you think they have made an error in their decision then it would do no harm to try to challenge it with them. Good luck!
@Magarathea Thank you for this information. Prompted by you I see that CEDR will entertain complaints (made within 2 months) based on the criteria below (apologies for formatting errors, original link below).
I would probably have to argue (f) to complain. Is it irrational to adjudicate that the airline’s T&C over-ride the legislation?
CEDR Complaint issues suitable for review:
a) Where the process followed in your case was not in line with the process as provided for in the CEDR Aviation Adjudication Scheme Rules;
b) WhereyourcasehasbeenwithdrawnfromtheSchemeforareasonotherthanthose permitted by the CEDR Aviation Adjudication Scheme Rules (e.g. your case has been deemed ‘out of scope’ by CEDR when it should be ‘in scope’);
c) Where the quality of service by CEDR staff has been unsatisfactory (e.g. timeframes have been outside those set out in the Scheme Rules, treatment by CEDR staff has been unsatisfactory);
d) OthermattersatthediscretionofCEDRortheCivilAviationAuthority;
e) Inreachingthedecisioninyourcase,theadjudicatorignoredrelevantinformation
and/or took into account irrelevant information;
f) In reaching the decision in your case, the adjudicator made an irrational
interpretation of the law.
https://www.cedr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Aviation-Complaint-review-process-oct-21.pdf
The Adjudicator’s name is on the Adjudication. CEDR doesn’t claim it’s adjudicators are lawyers.
New to Head for Points?
Welcome! We’re the UK’s most-read source of business travel, Avios, frequent flyer and hotel loyalty news. Let us improve how you travel. Got any questions? Ask them in our forums. New to Avios? Read this article first.
Latest Forum Posts
-
Wiseoldman on Mystery Curve refund
-
Wiseoldman on United – refund for refundable bookings as credits?
-
ChasP on Debit card points?
-
Skywalker on United – refund for refundable bookings as credits?
-
JDB on Lost baggage – how best to claim
-
iaink on Is it worth combining upgraded outward leg and normal return (for baggage)?
-
JDB on Albania suggestions
-
Peggerz on Lounge swap for Qatar Airways out of Edinburgh ….
-
AJA on Combining redemption and paid flights on one booking
-
Harrier25 on Mystery Curve refund
SPECIAL OFFER: Get 80,000 bonus points (worth 80,000 Avios) and £400 of dining credit with The Platinum Card!
Check reward flight availability instantly for free!
Booking a luxury hotel?
Our luxury hotel booking service offers you GUARANTEED extra benefits over booking direct. Works with Four Seasons, Mandarin Oriental, The Ritz Carlton, St Regis and more. We've booked £1.7 million of rooms to date. Click for details.