Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Heathrow Terminal 5 security staff strike to disrupt British Airways flights for 10 days

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Unite, the trade union, has announced that over 1,400 security guards employed by Heathrow have rejected a 10% pay increase and voted in favour of strike action. According to Unite, the entry-level salary for security guards at Heathrow is c. £24,000.

The action will begin on Friday 31st March and end on Sunday 9th April. This coincides with the peak Easter holiday period, with the intention of causing maximum disruption to holidaymakers.

This is not airport-wide. Only security guards at Heathrow Terminal 5 will go on strike, which means this will largely affect British Airways passengers. Campus security guards who check cargo will also strike.

Heathrow security

What impact will this have?

Terminal 5 is Heathrow’s busiest terminal, so this strike has the potential to cause vast amounts of disruption.

No mitigation measures have been announced. I’m not sure if Heathrow is able to redeploy security guards from one terminal to another, although that would simply spread the disruption across the entire airport.

Heathrow has said recently that it has appropriate plans in place for such a strike, although these plans are designed for the benefit of the airport and not passengers. It is likely to involve the airport forcing British Airways to cancel flights even if the airline wants to plough on.

Historically, during periods of disruption, British Airways tries to keep long haul flights going as much as possible, with short haul bearing the brunt of cancellations. Nuremberg, Pisa and Valencia flights have already moved over to Gatwick during Easter to ease pressure at the airport and other flights could follow, if slots and gates are available.

Anyone with flights during the strike period (and I am one of them!) should wait for British Airways to make a formal announcement on any flexibility it is willing to offer. You are unlikely to be able to change flights without penalty until this happens. The key is to then move quickly before the phone lines are swamped and the few alternative options are booked up.

That said ….

Heathrow security

Will this strike even go ahead?

Heathrow and other airports have been beset by a number of strikes in the past six months, from baggage handlers to UK Border Force.

Many of those strikes have been settled by the time they are supposed to start. For example, a last-minute Christmas strike by baggage handlers employed by Menzies Aviation was called off at the last minute.

(The exception to this seems to be strikes called in the public sector, such as by Border Force over Christmas and New Year. Rishi Sunak appears to be a lot less willing to negotiate than his commercial counterparts.)

I wouldn’t be surprised to see something similar happen here, with a potential rapprochement or further negotiations delaying or cancelling the strike action. I don’t think British Airways would be very happy for Heathrow to walk into a 10-day strike over Easter without trying its very best to avoid it.

Personally, I am not hugely concerned yet. With just under two weeks until the first strike is scheduled, Heathrow and Unite still have plenty of time come to an amicable agreement. If they don’t, things are going to get messy.

Comments (137)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Keely says:

    To give a bit more context here, pay cuts of 20% were imposed in 2021 (take it or lose your job with 2 weeks to decide) . So this pay increase may seem generous but will not even reinstate the wages to 2021 levels. With a backdrop of Heathrow currently being the fastest growing airport in the world….

    • Thegasman says:

      Don’t be bringing facts & context into the debate, it’ll hinder people’s ability to get on their soap boxes & pronounce judgment on situations they know nothing about 😉

    • bafan says:

      Any normal person supports the right of the working man (or woman) to improve their working conditions. Too many people in these comments are no doubt working class but have thrown their lot in with the conservatives for reasons beyond me.

      • Catalan says:

        because a certain PM allowed them to buy their council house that’s why!

      • Mike says:

        If you think the Labour party has any love for the working class then you’re 20 years out of date (at least). The Labour party utterly hates working class people.

        A good read on the topic is Despised by Paul Embery.

  • Spare says:

    You support other strikes but not the one that disrupts your precious avios redemption flight.

  • slidey says:

    Would this affect iberia flights from t5?

    • Rob says:

      Yes

      • Aisak says:

        Are there IB flights from T5?? I thought all was moved back to T3…

        • G says:

          Madrid is the only regular T5 service for IB. All other IB services (and oneworld) are at T3.

          • Cat says:

            Madrid now appears to be at T3…

          • Aisak says:

            Ok. You seem confident about your answer.
            Glad to discover that there are other IB services at LHR apart from MAD. And that Qatar, Royal Air Maroc and Malaysian are all housed at T3. Thx

  • NFH says:

    I’m not surprised that many of them have such a bad attitude when they’re paid so badly. They are often less focussed on security and more focussed on annoying passengers as much as possible, for example by shouting instructions at the queue in breach of paragraph 4.8 of the Heathrow bylaws. Many of them are on a power trip and try to justify their existence by finding problems that don’t exist because they don’t know the rules.

    It’s always a far more pleasant experience in some other European countries where airport security is performed by the public sector, typically the same organisation that carries out customs controls, presumably because they are skilled in searching baggage.

    • Andrew. says:

      It’s also performed by the public sector in the USA isn’t it?

      Everyone looks forward to their encounter with TSA. Their friendly attitude, courteous demeanour, and firm but softly spoken instruction is the absolute highlight of every trip through JFK.

      • NFH says:

        Despite the TSA’s poor reputation, every encounter that I’ve had with them has been delightful. I almost mentioned them as another example of better public service airport security, but decided not to because of their poor reputation.

    • Bagoly says:

      Berlin TXL was always one of the worst, and I expect they were public sector.
      At BER they seem nothing like as bad, which could be either because the airport environment is so much nicer (less cramped) which prompts better behaviour, or because they changed all the staff during Covid.

      • His Holyness says:

        Private security in Germany, outsourced to the usual scumsters.

  • Chris W says:

    Nothing gets H4P readers quite as riled up as minimum wage discussions.

    I don’t know why anyone would choose to do this job during a period of low unemployment. Using the Pret comparison, if the pay is so low for these sort of jobs wouldn’t you choose the role with the most sociable hours and least stress?

    • No longer Entitled says:

      Where you not here for the oft repeated expert discussions on vaccines, and before that, Brexit?

      Some people devote their entire life to the study of one subject. Others come to HfP comments to read from those who have filled in the gaps themselves.

    • Londonsteve says:

      I’m actually quite pleased the subject engages H4P readers. The demographic on the site is at the upper end of the socio-economic spectrum and yet a lot of people appear to demonstrate real empathy with those that are struggling. We should also be glad that some people are willing to accept the low pay and shift work with unsocial hours otherwise the queues at all airport would be three time as long. It cannot be that wage levels are solely dictated by how acute the shortage of candidates is, that’s why advanced economies have collective bargaining agreements.

  • letBAgonesbe says:

    I always support every strike action, provided it doesn’t cause an inconvenience to me.

    • TGLoyalty says:

      So true! Luckily I’m not flying from T5 during these strikes.

      Crack on strikers.

  • Eoc says:

    Just to give another perspective..
    I was rolling my case thru the T5 Sofitel on Monday en route to the car park and caught up with a guy wearing a Heathrow hi-vis jacket pushing an empty wheelchair towards reception. He was walking really slowly and in the lift down to reception, he opined that it was really good money at T5 for really not much work and all his mates agreed. Nobody pushed them on productivity (or speed!) , they were so understaffed that they daren’t sack anyone. Just another point of view…

    • Andrew. says:

      That happens in every firm, steady paced individuals.

      Besides, if there was a crumbly in the wheelchair, you can imagine the stroppy complaints from the relatives if the pusher was sprinting through the terminal telling the old dear to “scream if you want to go faster”.

  • David says:

    I have a flight on very first day of strike. Oh boy. LHR-AMS. Plan A at the moment is arriving 6 hours early.

    • AJA says:

      But that doesn’t help if everyone does the same as you. Also if it really does become an issue getting through security expect to be housed outside the check in a HAL tent until 3 hours before your scheduled check in time.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.