Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Monarch is returning to the UK skies – but can it succeed?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

I was more than a little surprised to see the revival of UK airline Monarch in my social media feeds over the weekend.

It seems to be true though. A team is in place to return Monarch to the skies.

But does it stand a chance?

Monarch airline relaunching

It’s all about the brand

This is really a story about brands, and the power of brands.

If (and I don’t mean this unfairly) a team of people who had never run major UK airlines got together and announced they wanted to start one, competing with easyJet, Ryanair, Tui and Jet2, I’m not sure it would go very far.

However, buy the rights to the Monarch name and logo and suddenly, it seems, people are willing to take you seriously.

This is despite the fact that the original Monarch went bust in 2017, leaving behind substantial debts (The Times put these at £466 million yesterday) and requiring ‘the biggest ever peacetime repatriation’ by the Civil Aviation Authority to get 110,000 people home. Does the brand even come with a lot of goodwill behind it?

The new company is currently using the less-than-catchy ‘letsmonarch.co.uk’ (click here to see the holding page) with ‘flymonarchairlines.co.uk’ being used for emails.

Very little is known about what is planned

Funding has come ‘via an investor in Luxembourg’ which could mean anything, since most investment funds route money via Luxembourg holding companies for tax reasons.

It is reported that talks are underway with lessors for a fleet of second hand aircraft, but – with large backlogs for new short-haul aircraft from Airbus and Boeing – are there many spares sitting around? A separate report has suggested a potential fleet of 15 x A320 aircraft, which compares with the 35 aircraft operated by ‘old’ Monarch at the time of its demise.

‘Old’ Monarch was based at Luton Airport with additional operations from Gatwick, Leeds Bradford, Manchester and Birmingham. It would seem logical that any relaunch would follow a similar pattern, if only because the brand will be better known in the catchment area of those airports.

Airline Monarch to relaunch in 2024

Who is the target market?

It is reported that the new Monarch is going “premium”, targetting “the higher end of the UK all-inclusive market”. I suspect that ‘all-inclusive’ means ‘package’ and not ‘all you can eat and drink’.

This is the model which has worked well for Jet2, with a high proportion of seats sold via the in-house package holiday operation. Whilst Jet2 does sell ‘seat only’ tickets too, this is very much a mopping up exercise because every seat sold on its own means one less package to market.

easyJet is rapidly trying to catch up with Jet2’s success via easyJet Holidays.

Can you make this ‘premium’? What even is ‘premium’? On short-haul a lot is about schedule which needs peak hour slots. There is no value in a premium flight which lands too early or too late.

Fast track security and lounges are available at most airports already for those who want to pay. Offering more legroom throughout the aircraft has never worked as a model. Meals need to be very high quality before passengers appreciate them, even if free.

Who is behind it?

The man behind the relaunch is Daniel Ellingham.

His LinkedIn profile shows previous aviation experience as an ‘advisor’ to Austrian Airlines (2003-2005) and Swissair (1991-1999). His most recent role is given as a member of the Supervisory Board at hygiene services and commercial cleaning group PHS from 2013 to 2016.

The CEO of Monarch at the time of its bankruptcy, Andrew Swaffield, has just stood back from his role as CEO of Virgin Red, although this does not seem to be connected.

Let’s see ….

This is very much a work in progress, with the airline yet to apply for an Air Operator’s Certificate or indeed get its hands on any aircraft.

The market has moved on since 2017, with Jet2 in particular filling the gaps that Monarch left. Is there still enough space for a holiday-driven airline (with the inherent seasonality that brings) from UK regional airports? We will see.

If you want to know more, I recommend this article from Airways magazine which had the exclusive on the relaunch.

Comments (80)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Mike says:

    The Monarch name is pretty irrelevant I feel. A lot of people shop on cost, particularly those with families.

    Look at the market currently, if they follow the JET2 model, destinations and chuck in the high desirables – e.g. Lapland, Iceland, I don’t see why it wouldn’t succeed.

  • Tarmohamed says:

    Scheduling is more important. We’d rather arrive at our destination in the morning so we don’t need lose a day or have to pay for a night we don’t really use.

    • Danny says:

      Not really. Not everyone wants to pay £100 for an airport taxi / hotel just so they can get the 6:05am FlyLo flight to Zante.

      • Rob says:

        No-one wants 6.05 if hotel check in is 3pm. Sweet spot for me to Europe is 10-11am.

        • Ryan says:

          And who wants to fly at 0600 with a 0400 check in, then factoring travel to airport.

          Rob alluded to it earlier, mid morning departure and back on the UK based aircraft for the return journey.

          For me, as a parent with children, this is probably the most important as exit seats no good to us.

  • Richie says:

    SOUthampton airport is looking for A320s for its extended runway. Some easyJet flights from SouthENd airport are poorly timed.

  • Jeff says:

    I do wonder whether Chief Execs and associated entourage of failed airlines should stick to the golf course rather than wasting everybody’s time, where the business endgame is a foregone conclusion.

    • No longer Entitled says:

      But while you are building your failing company you can pay yourself a handsome wage and bleed your investors dry. For many, that is the goal.

  • LittleNick says:

    I wonder who will take off first? Monarch or Global?

    • Rob says:

      Monarch should be a lot easier. Getting CAA approval and an AOC for an A380 service (ie proving you have the facilities, staff etc to operate safely) is going to be tough. No-one except BA has ever even had to write the necessary manuals for the UK authorities for an A380 service. A320 stuff should be a doddle BUT you can be pretty sure substantial amounts of money will be required in bond to cover the cost of a future repatriation if it goes down.

      Overall though, like all businesses you’re facing the fact that an investor can stick their money in the bank now and get 5% so investing in a start-up is far riskier than it was in the 1% days.

      • LittleNick says:

        Thanks for this insight, I forget all the other things that happen in the back to make an airline work. Appreciated.

      • Will says:

        I think the attempt to sell the ROI is that this is a blip and we’ll be back to zero rates in no time.

        Which by the way if you actually believed you’d be filling your boots with 5/10 year gilts now.

        • Rob says:

          You’re better on short term gilts because of the tax treatment, eg Jan 2025. 5%+ yield and virtually no tax as almost all gain is in the tax free redemption premium.

          • Will says:

            It’s not my field but surely if you were buying now at around 5% on the prediction that we’ll see them back closer to 0% within a few years you want as long left on the bond as possible (ie more years at 5% on your old bond vs new issue @ 0), while balancing the fact that longer term bonds tend not to go as close to zero as short terms.

            Tax is zero on the actual gain upon sale of a gilt isn’t it?

          • Rob says:

            Or gain on redemption.

            Not sure what the yield (taxable) Vs redemption gain is on a 5 year.

          • will says:

            Excuse me being dim witted but whats the gain on redemption if you just hold the gilt till end of term?

          • Rob says:

            The Jan 2025 gilt sells for 93p and yields a whopping 0.25%. In Jan 2025 it is redeemed for £1.

            The 7p per gilt capital gain you make is tax free due to a weird tax rule that says gilt gains are not liable to CGT.

            So … buy this now for 18 months and you’ll get 0.375p of coupons (taxable) and 7p of capital gain in January 2025, for a total return of 7.375p on your invested 93p. This is a return of 8% over 18 months so, roughly, 5.3% per year.

            However, because this is effectively all tax free (apart from tax on the 0.375p of coupon), it is the equivalent – for a 45% taxpayer – of getting 9.6% per annum of taxable bank interest.

          • will says:

            Had not even considered that, so effective tax free interest regardless of your income status. Very interesting quirk of Gilt tax treatment.

  • David says:

    What happens to the debts accumulated by Monarch previously? Do they just get to call themselves “Monarch V2” and get to start with a clean slate? Much like your local Bob and Co LTD company that just fold with debts and no repercussions?

    • LittleNick says:

      Could be wrong but I think so (assuming who new business) as the new business has bought the assets from the old business with the debts. So payment of those assets I guess may pay off any creditors from the old business but I think the new business starts a clean otherwise.

    • Dubious says:

      It is possibly that they have bought the rights to the name and brand rather than buying the old company.

    • Londonsteve says:

      It’s actually a common mistake to think you can fold one company and open another, wiping the debts of the old one. This is called phoenixing and is illegal, your creditors can pursue you through the courts if a transfer of company assets isn’t done by the book ensuring the old company has reserves to settle its debts. It goes on in practice because it’s far too easy to open and close UK companies with very little regulatory oversight and enforcement of illegal conduct. The grifters know this and take liberal advantage.

  • ADS says:

    “‘Old’ Monarch was based at Luton Airport with additional operations from Gatwick, Leeds Bradford, Manchester and Birmingham. It would seem logical that any relaunch would follow a similar pattern, if only because the brand will be better known in the catchment area of those airports.”

    Hopefully they will start off with just one or two home bases … and see if their business model actually works !

  • Londonsteve says:

    I’m surprised the Monarch name is deemed by anyone to hold such potential. To my ears it was a byword for charter flights from Luton to bucket and spade destinations, like Britannia. Zero glamour. I suppose there is some merit in starting with a brand name that has some recognition but I can’t imagine many people book flights with an airline just because they’ve ‘heard of them’. Price, departure airport and time counts for a lot more. There is also a case to be made for starting with a new identity that generates curiosity and (hopefully) excitement to ‘give them a whirl’. New is always more appealing than old, unless we’re talking about a national institution that Monarch certainly wasn’t.

    • tony says:

      But did you ever fly them? I only did a few times but the extra legroom up front and a well timed departure and/ or knock down pricing made for a great combo.

      I’d put them on a par with Jet Blue (aside from Mint…)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.