Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

ULEZ comes to Heathrow on 29th August – you may need to pay £12.50 to drive to the airport

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) is expanding to cover all of Greater London on 29th August.

This includes Heathrow.

From 29th August, you will need to pay £12.50 to drive your car, van or motorcycle to the airport if it is not ULEZ compliant. This is ON TOP of the £5 terminal drop-off fee charged by Heathrow or any Heathrow parking fee.

If you live in Central London and are driving to Heathrow then nothing changes, since Central London is already a ULEZ zone and your vehicle will already be ULEZ compliant (unless you have very deep pockets).

It is most likely to catch out anyone driving to Heathrow from elsewhere, especially as such people are less likely to understand the ULEZ rules.

It is easy to be confused by ULEZ at Heathrow. Take a look at the map above (click to expand).

As you can see, the stretch of the M4 which passes Heathrow is NOT included in ULEZ for some reason. However, as soon as you turn onto the Heathrow slip road, towards Bath Road, you DO need to pay.

For Terminal 5 users it is a similar situation. The M25 is outside the ULEZ zone, but as soon as you turn off towards T5 it will be triggered. If you need a hotel with car parking, you may find that you can avoid ULEZ by staying at properties such as Hilton Terminal 5, which is to the west of the M25 and outside the zone.

Which vehicles need to pay the ULEZ fee?

There is a vehicle checker, based on your car registration, on the TfL ULEZ site here.

Basically, you are compliant if your car meets the following European pollution standards:

  • Euro 3 for motorcycles, mopeds, motorised tricycles and quadricycles (L category)
  • Euro 4 (NOx) for petrol cars, vans, minibuses and other specialist vehicles
  • Euro 6 (NOx and PM) for diesel cars, vans and minibuses and other specialist vehicles

If you have a petrol vehicle under 16 years old or diesel vehicle under six years old then it is highly likely that it meets the required standards.

When does ULEZ operate?

ULEZ will operate 24 / 7 / 364. The only day you can drive a heavily polluting car to Heathrow for free will be Christmas Day.

How do you pay the ULEZ charge?

Details of how to pay the ULEZ charge can be found here.

You have until midnight on the third day after you have driven into the ULEZ zone to pay. Remember that, if you are parking overnight at Heathrow, you will also have to pay for the day you drive home. You do not pay for days your car is parked but not moved, even if parked on a road.

If you are doing ‘meet and greet’ then you MUST set up auto-pay because you will not know on which days your car is moved to/from the pick up and drop off area. This will add to the ULEZ fees for your trip.

You can find out more about the ULEZ expansion on the TfL website here.

PS. For clarity, ULEZ does not apply to Gatwick Airport. The M25 is outside the ULEZ zone so even if you are approaching Gatwick from the west you will not trigger it.

Comments (221)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Alekun says:

    Wasn’t it the Department of Transport that mandated that the bailout of the TfL depended on the ULEZ having to be expanded earlier than previously stated, so I don’t understand why all the bashing of Mr Khan if his hands are tied by the paymasters holding the strings to the purse to keep London afloat due to the pandemic.

    • Adam says:

      It’s almost like the criticisms aren’t based on fact

    • CarpalTravel says:

      Amazed this took so long to be mentioned.

      Did they mandate it, or is just that ULEZ is the chosen method by which to raise the cash to pay it back? Genuine question, I don’t know the answer.

    • JohnG says:

      That’s because the Tory political position used to be to do just about enough that they didn’t appear completely uncaring about the environment and now it’s to be anti- anything that could conceivably considered woke.

  • Kelvin K says:

    We can have the cleanest air in the world but until countries like China are addressed, our “clean” air will disappear. It’s a pointless expertise and just a money grab by a bunch of suits

    • Also says:

      So just because China are polluting, we shouldn’t bother doing anything? Got it.

    • George K says:

      Excellent whatabout-ism. We’ll have to wait for China to reduce its pollution, before we do anything about ours.

      Makes sense

    • Rich says:

      Fairly sure that I don’t breathe in Beijing’s particulates in Camden.

    • Rui N. says:

      That’s just f*****g stupid. This about local air pollution. Very few pollutants can travel from China into the UK. None in meaningful quantities to matter.

    • Adam says:

      Ignoring the fact that this is besides the point, the global north outsources the majority of its manufacturing to China and then yells at it for being a major source of emissions.

      China has more solar power generation capacity than the rest of the world combined, and built more wind power last year than the rest of the world combined. Per capita emissions are comparable to ours here in the UK. We’re the ones dragging our heels and being left behind.

    • Will says:

      When it comes to carbon, I agree. No point prioritising it at great expense only for China and India to continue to pump it into the atmosphere.

      When it comes to localised pollution killing people, I think the motive there is clear.

      As radical as it seems, a total combustion engine ban in London would improve the quality of life massively.

      I was hoping self driving taxis would make transport cheap and ubiquitous by now but alas it seems they are still further away.

    • Wasabi Peas says:

      Wowsers. It feels like I am reading the comments section of the Daily Fail here. The ignorance on here is shocking. If something goes wrong in the UK, get jealous and mad at China and blame them for everything right?

      Adam is totally correct about the outsourcing of pollution. The reason why the UK’s rivers and air are “clean” is because China is polluting their backyard so you can get your abundance of manufactured goods.

      I would like to add, in addition to keeping the UK’s air cleaner, China has also kept manufactured goods prices lower in the UK and in western countries. Don’t understand what I am talking about? Look at adverts for prices of goods (like toys) back in the 80s/90s and see how expensive things were.

      I guess the same ignorant people here totally forgot about that air quality event during Dec 1952 in London. So why did that event happen? Are you going to blame China for that event as well?

      Oh oh.. almost forgot, visit any major Chinese city now and see how many EVs or electric scooters they have on the roads. At least the Chinese are doing something about it. Do motorbike owners here care? Nah, the motorbike owners here are more concerned about how their bike sounds (revving the sh*t out of it on public roads) and don’t care about the nasty fumes they produce that us pedestrians have to breathe in.

  • Gordon says:

    There’s people against it and for it, I’m not sure how many posters have been to Bangkok city and Chiang Mai for example. The pollution is terrible, I would not like London to get like that!

    Spoiler alert!
    Once the new Blackwell Silvertown tunnel is completed, Sadiq Khan is imposing a toll for both tunnels starting in 2025.
    Just to make people grumpier still….

    • Brian says:

      The majority of the pollution in Chiang Mai comes from people burning forests to clear land for agriculture, rather than from cars.

      • Gordon says:

        I am aware of the issues with deforestation in Chiang Mai, but there is still issues with pollution from vast amount of vehicles and motorcycles there, Bangkok is a different story though, That can’t be blamed on deforestation….

  • Tony says:

    So how much do aircraft have to pay?!

  • Travel Strong says:

    Tbh I just don’t want to pay £25 to take my car to heathrow if choose to use my older car to leave in a grotty car park for a week 🤷‍♂️
    This desire is not invoked by a social media conspiracy. And my older car is 4 x cleaner in emissions terms than my newest one.

    • TGLoyalty says:

      Well it’s probably definitely not.

      CO2 isn’t the gauge of emissions

    • Travel Strong says:

      I don’t care enough to argue whether a 6.2L with wide tyres and small sports cats is more or less environmentally damaging than a 1.6L lightweight thing. Point is, I haven’t seen anything on ‘social media’ on this – I just ran my cars through TfLs checker and begrudge paying £25 to take the small efficient one on the long journey to LHR!

  • AJA says:

    The arguments expressed in the comments to this article has just displayed the usual for and against and the it’s the Tories fault and the opposing what an idiot Khan is. None of this is relevant. Whether we are for or against the Ulez its here to stay. Whether it really results in lower emissions or removes the 10% most polluting cars off the roads is also largely irrelevant. Statistics will be used to justify its introduction, whether we believe them or not. It’s a political decision and Khan will take any advantage he can from it. Likewise the Tories will do the same in the other direction. I can’t help thinking that including Heathrow given the emissions that aircraft emit is a bit daft but since London City Airport is also caught by the Ulez it was probably a political decision as well. It’s not going to stop me flying from either airport besides I already have a car that is compliant. Not that I use it to drive to either airport or indeed LGW anyway. Same thing with the drop off charge. I just pay it on top of my taxi fare.

    • Sam Wardill says:

      Wasn’t the pollution from traffic the main argument against the third runway?

    • Sam Wardill says:

      It was actually a Tory (Boris ) that introduced ULEZ

  • Carol says:

    I wanted to add a tip about the ability to ‘Auto Pay’, which takes out the hassle of remembering / being able to pay in time re LHR but also the danger of crossing into the zone on other trips unknowingly. As a courtesy, I wanted to check to see if anyone else had aleady posted on that but I’m afraid I do not have time to go through several pages of comments, mostly about the politics of pollution! So, just to say, that the info about Auto Pay is on the same page as the info originally posted:
    Auto Pay
    Auto Pay bills you automatically every month for any Congestion Charges, ULEZ and/or LEZ charges you may owe. There are no registration or renewal fees. Set up Auto Pay.

  • NorthernLass says:

    Interesting comments from “Mr Loophole” Nick Freeman about the ULEZ charge being unenforceable on roads where there are no warning signs. From personal experience, councils are usually pretty hopeless at doing their due diligence on this kind of thing; I was once “charged” £25 for displaying my expired gym car park pass instead of the new one. I did have a valid pass but they refused to waive the charge so I read the 60-page document with all the regulations they have to comply with in respect of issuing such charges and they hadn’t done any of it so I told them I’d see them in court. They dropped the charge immediately!

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      What’s his view of Surrey and Kent County Councils who are refusing TFL permission to put up said warning signs?

      • Londonsteve says:

        It’s utterly negligent of these councils to not permit warning signs on approach to the zone. It’s worse, it’s petty and immature. It will simply result in people being fined for accidentally straying into the zone and the fines will be enforceable as the motorist passed a road sign that informed them they were entering the zone without then paying the fee before the payment deadline passes. Had the signs been erected they might have been able to perform a u-turn or plan an alternative route in time before it’s too late. The borders are positioned in a location where the motorist is presented with a choice, even if that means undertaking a u-turn at a roundabout; there is always an escape route that doesn’t involve having to stop dead and perform a u-turn on the spot.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.