Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Route news: Norse drops two US routes from Gatwick, SAS launches Bergen from Heathrow

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

News in brief:

Norse Atlantic pulls two US routes

Norse Atlantic had a plan. It would offer low cost flights between London Gatwick and the United States (with easily the best Premium Economy cabin in the sky) during the summer, and then trim schedules in the winter. The aircraft freed up were to be reallocated to ‘winter sun’ routes such as the Caribbean.

It hasn’t worked well so far. As we have covered in multiple articles, Winter 2023 routes from Gatwick were delayed and in some cases cancelled before they even launched.

Norse Atlantic pulls two US routes from Gatwick

Two weeks ago we covered the sharp cuts that were being made to the Winter 2024 network:

  • Barbados will be cut to one flight per week (currently five)
  • Montego Bay will be cut to one flight per week (currently four)
  • The season will only run from December to March

Norse has now started to trim its US network.

London Gatwick to Boston and London Gatwick to Washington Dulles have been removed from sale for the summer season. They had already been suspended over the winter, until the end of March, but tickets had been on sale from 1st April.

London Gatwick to Los Angeles was previously dropped to 3-6 flights per week, down from daily.

On the upside a 2nd daily London Gatwick to New York JFK flight has been added. It’s not exactly attractive though, with a 20.40 departure from Gatwick (lands 23.30) and a 01.30 departure from New York (lands 13.30).

Of course, Norse Atlantic is not a UK carrier. It has a lot of choices about where to fly – it has just announced Athens to New York, for example. Dropping routes from London Gatwick does not necessarily mean that the airline is in trouble, and there are plenty of big European cities which do not have as many daily US flights as London.

Hat-tip to Sean Moulton and James Pearson for some of the data above.

Moxy Bergen

SAS adds London Heathrow flights to Bergen

Scandinavian airline SAS has announced flights from London Heathrow to Bergen.

There will be three flights per week (Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday) from 27th June over the summer season.

They will depart from Terminal 2. SAS is a Star Alliance member – at least for now, given its intention to join SkyTeam – so you will be able to earn or redeem miles from any Star Alliance programme for these services.

We reviewed the new Moxy hotel in Bergen, part of Marriott Bonvoy, in 2022 – click here and photo above. It’s an expensive, but very pleasant, city and this is one of the few ‘redemption hotels’ in town.

Comments (43)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

    Very timely re Norse.

    Was chatting to someone yesterday about them. He was thinking of using them to go to BOS and I said I thought they were in the process of canning the route.

    I guess the people who booked with them will have issues getting them to rebook them onto other carriers.

  • Bagoly says:

    “tickets had been on sale from 1st April.”
    Indeed a challenge for brevity v avoiding ambiguity.
    “tickets for travel from 1st April had been on sale” ?

  • ADS says:

    i assumed that the Bergen flights would be operating on a W routing … but from the flight timings it looks like they’re using a Bergen based plane … and according to Wikipedia SAS have “Minor hubs also exist at Bergen Airport, Flesland, Göteborg Landvetter Airport, Stavanger Airport, and Trondheim Airport”

    which goes some way to explaining why SAS struggle to be profitable

    • Nick says:

      That’s mainly interesting because most of their LHR and MAN flights are actually operated with aircraft and crew based here. (Well, Ireland technically, but they start their day in the UK.)

  • Super Secret Stuff says:

    I’m surprised Norse has started Manchester or Edinburgh yet

  • Dan says:

    I thought Norse would be interested in flying Bucharest to NYC, but a local LCC just launched the route

  • Krishnan R. Iyengar says:

    I disagree with the statement saying, “[Norse] pulling flights [to the US] from Gatwick doesn’t necessarily mean the airline is in trouble”.

    While they seem to have learned the lessons from Norwegian’s long-haul (mis)adventure – i.e. not doing any cash flow management, being solely matket share focused without having a strong balance sheet to be able to back this up financially and sustain significant start-up losses over an extended period of time, having their finger in every pie imaginable, Norse’s cardonal mistake seems to be to have spread themselves too thinly, compounded by their all too frequent schedule changes. What Norse should have done instead of starting low-cost transatlantic flights to the US from various, relatively small and highly seasonal European points at often suboptimal frequencies of only one or two flights a week(as exemplified by Athens-JFK) at the same time when they started flying from Gatwick is to fully concentrate on building up the heavily travelled and really lucrative routes, such as JFK, LAX, Miami and Orlando out of Gatwick and Paris (either CAR or Orly), serving each of them daily, every single day of the week in summer and during the X-mas / New Year and Easter holiday periods, with Gatwick-JFK and CDG/ ORY – JFK warranting a second daily frequency during the peak summer period (obviously at better times than those currently scheduled for their second daily Gatwick-JFK service). And for a newby like Norse to succeed in the Caribbean, they needed to have established a strong relationship with a big tour operator specializing in this region.

    Actually, the way things seem to be going at Norse at the moment actually indicate to me that the airline is in real trouble, big time. I wouldn’t be surprised if they throw in the towel at the end of the forthcoming summer season, possibly selling their Gatwick slots (the only relatively plentiful slots they hold on this side of the big pond of any value) to someone like BA, possibly including their leases on the twelve 787-9s (not including the additional trio of 787-8s Norse currently subleases to Air Europa) where BA because of its far greater economic clout, especially as a leading IAG member airline, could probably negotiate significantly better terms with lessors, with these aircraft being suitable replacements for BA’s very long in the tooth, Gatwick-based long-haul fleet of twelve 777-200ERs.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.