Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Which airports are the winners and losers of the post-pandemic travel boom?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

As we headed into 2025, a flurry of emails from airport press offices hit my inbox with news of record passenger numbers.

Heathrow, Stansted, Manchester and others all crowed of reaching new highs and smashing pre-pandemic records. “London Stansted soars to new heights with record-breaking 2024” said one; “Heathrow ends record-breaking year with busiest December ever” said another.

Covid’s dampening effect on travel had, it seemed, well and truly come to an end. Or had it?

Which are the UK airport winners and losers of the post-pandemic travel boom?

Sometimes silence speaks louder than words. Whilst a handful of airports were celebrating, I knew others were languishing, stuck in a rut and unable to find a way out. The collapse in London City Airport’s numbers is widely known, but what about other airports?

I had to wait for the Civil Aviation Authority to publish full-year numbers for UK passenger airports before I could take a closer look, but the numbers are finally in. For this analysis, I have looked at passenger figures for the past ten years, from 2015 to 2024.

The winners

Let’s start with the winners. As I noted above, numerous UK airports smashed records for overall passenger numbers. Looking at data over the past seven years (from 2018 onwards), 12 airports reported their best performance in 2024:

  • Heathrow (83.9 million; previous high 80.9 million)
  • Manchester (30.8 million; previous high 29.4 million)
  • Stansted (29.7 million; previous high 28.1 million)
  • Edinburgh (15.8 million; previous high 14.7 million)
  • Bristol (10.7 million; previous high 9.9 million)
  • Belfast International (6.8 million; previous high 6.3 million)
  • Liverpool (5.1 million; previous high 5 million)
  • Leeds Bradford (4.2 million; previous high 4 million)
  • Bournemouth (1.1 million; previous high 950,000)
  • Sumburgh (290,000; previous high 270,000)
  • Teesside (230,000; previous high 226,000)
  • Biggin Hill (8,300; previous high 6,495)

Some of these are unsurprising. Heathrow easily beat its own low-balled forecasts and swept to a decisive 83.9 million passengers, approximately three million more than its previous record of 80.9 million in 2019.

Manchester and Stansted, both owned by Manchester Airports Group (MAG) also set new records. Although their overall figures are lower than Heathrow, they actually managed to grow at a faster rate; 4.7% compared to 2019 for Manchester and 5.5% for Stansted.

Which are the UK airport winners and losers of the post-pandemic travel boom?

Bristol appears to be doing very well, with steady growth over the past decade from 6.8 million in 2015 to 10.6 million in 2024, an increase of 56%. Belfast International recorded similar growth of 53%, to 6.8 million passengers, as has Bournemouth, from 705,000 a decade ago to 1.1 million in 2024 (a 54% increase).

Teesside International Airport (formerly Durham Tees Valley Airport) recorded the biggest ten-year growth of any airport on this list with a 62% rise in passenger numbers, albeit to a grand total of just 230,000!

Biggin Hill, which does not offer any regularly scheduled commercial flights, has gone from 644 passengers in 2015 to 8,300 in 2024. I assume this is down to increased use by private jets.

The losers

Not all airports have benefitted from the growth in passenger numbers. Whilst some are doing just fine, others are doing less well.

The biggest surprise on this list is Gatwick. It remains 7.8% down, with just 43.2 million passengers in 2024 versus 2019’s 46.6 million.

Overall available seats at Gatwick have reduced from 53.2 million in 2019 to 51.2 million in 2024, a reduction of 3.7%. This is less than the 7.8% reduction in bums on seats, so in addition to fewer seats being open for sale it appears that load factors have also gone down.

What is driving this? Virgin Atlantic accounts for just under 1 million of those missing passengers; it pulled out of the airport in 2020 and retrenched at Heathrow. Cirium data indicating that it offered 985,000 seats for sale during 2019.

British Airways has also not fully recovered its capacity at Gatwick. It offered just under two million fewer seats for sale in 2024 than it did in 2019: 7.3 million versus 9.3 million.

Other airlines have also come and gone. Norwegian, which pre-covid offered 5.7 million seats thanks to its extensive transatlantic network, has reduced by four fifths and now only fields 1.1 million seats, all of them short haul.

Meanwhile easyJet, Vueling and Tui have grown their schedules at Gatwick, helping to offset some of the losses.

Which are the UK airport winners and losers of the post-pandemic travel boom?

Other UK airports that remain down versus 2019 include Luton (-7%), Glasgow (-8.8%) and Newcastle (-1.1%).

MAG was unable to replicate its success at Stansted and Manchester with East Midlands. It remained down 11.6% versus 2019 and continues a trend that began before covid; passenger numbers peaked at the airport in 2017, at 4.9 million.

I’ve written about London City Airport’s struggles before, but these figures put it in stark focus. It remained down 30.2% over its 2019 figures, with just 3.6 million passengers.

Downward trends at a lot of smaller, regional airports in the UK have continued. Many of these have been charting steady declines over the past decade, even before covid.

Aberdeen and Belfast City both peaked in 2015 and have since slid down; a whopping 33.7% drop in Aberdeen’s case to 2.3 million passengers. I suspect reduced oil and gas demand is at play there.

Cardiff and Southampton have dropped below the million-passenger mark; Cardiff from 1.2 million in 2015 to 870,000 in 2024 whilst Southampton fell from 1.8 million to 850,000. Only time will tell whether the 164-metre runway extension will help there.

Conclusion

In broad terms, what appears to be happening is that airlines are consolidating capacity at some of the largest airports. 60% of the top 10 busiest airports posted record numbers in 2024, whilst smaller regional airports appear to be in decline.

What’s driving those changes? I can think of two possibilities.

The first is the ‘network effect’ of airports that can offer lots of connections, thus maximising the number of passengers they serve. The more connections you can offer the more passengers you can theoretically attract.

The second is that many airlines reduced the size of their fleets during covid and remain under-sized compared to 2019. Faced with a shortage of aircraft, they are prioritising flights to the busiest (ie. biggest) airports and where slots are scarce. Niche airports which may not be as profitable or competitive have been sidelined.

Whatever the reasons, it’s clear that not all airports are making a success of the post-covid environment despite an overall increase in passenger numbers in the UK.

With the post-covid recovery now largely complete, I suspect it will take a few more years to see how things settle. For now, Heathrow, Manchester and Stansted continue to beat pre-pandemic numbers, with all three setting new February records last month.

Comments (97)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Colin MacKinnon says:

    Glasgow has local traffic, Edinburgh is international. Quite simply, tourists in Scotland want to see Edinburgh, Inverness (the Highlands and Nessie) and the Isle of Skye.

    But just wait to the Chinese, Koreans etc start coming in bulk over the next decade! Edinburgh, Venice, Rome etc won’t know what’s hit them! Maybe Glasgow will have to become Edinburgh’s second runway.

    • CJD says:

      If people are coming over to see the Highlands then Glasgow is a much better entry point.

      • Rhys says:

        How many tourists are visiting JUST the Highlands, however? I suspect most will want to see Edinburgh as well.

      • Andrew. says:

        In what way is the 1h15 minute stop-start along the M8 over the Kingston Bridge then up to Perth a better entry point than the 45 minute trip over Forth and up to Perth a better route to the Highlands?

        Glasgow Airport is just grim, you disembark and the persistent odour of boiled cabbage, stale wee and Jeyes fluid just hits you in the terminal building. The place hasn’t had a significant upgrade in over 30 years.

        EDI you step outdoors to the massive “Edinburgh” sign, have the choice of a smooth tram to the City Centre or connect with the train at Edinburgh Gateway or Edinburgh Parkway.

  • Barrel for Scraping says:

    Typical HfP pro-Teesside anti-Newcastle propaganda. Just trying to distract from the amazing cup win yesterday 😁

    • Rob says:

      I was there yesterday, with the Hilton VIP tickets we promoted. Was quite an experience being sat on the very edge of 35,000 Geordies! Unlimited Laurent Perrier Millesime 2015 as well which was impressive.

  • Tony says:

    Gatwick down massively…but they want another runway…FFS!

    • Nick says:

      They need it, and have done for a decade or more. Pax volume may be down, but aircraft movements aren’t – a function of the removal of longhaul flights and replacement by shorthaul ones. No one will put 777s on Spain.

      You can see how it’s a no-brainer from the photo in the article – the runway is there, it’s just too close to the other one to be used simultaneously. Opening it properly will allow for increased efficiency and reduced delays.

      I’d also throw in about EMA that pax volumes may not have recovered but cargo is thriving. Similar to CGN in Germany. Following the weekend’s articles they’re great places to go if you want to see 747s in action!

      • Will says:

        I’d like to know what the cost for the extra runway at Gatwick and high speed rail connection to Heathrow would cost vs extra runway at LHR

        • Rob says:

          The actual runway at Gatwick is low, in the context of things. It’s effectively the cost of building a 2 mile road on a flat bit of land you already own (except for the snag that you have aircraft landing next to you every few minutes!) The bigger money is in the terminal expansion which is needed to handle the additional aircraft.

        • John says:

          There won’t be a rail connection to Heathrow

  • David S says:

    If I get a choice, I try to avoid flying BA from Gatwick. Not terrible but its the BA Boneyard and there are so many more opportunities from LHR

    • Danny says:

      Plus the Euroflyer crew are very hit and miss, especially in Club Europe.

      Yesterday however they had 2 Cantonese speaking crew who were exceptionally good. More often though, Euroflyer recruits crew who couldn’t give a monkeys.

    • jannis says:

      BA businesss class loungein gatwick is much more pleasant than LHR due to less pax

  • Neil says:

    I suppose it’s fair that BHX has not made the list as at 12.85m pax for 2024, that’ is still short of its 12.95m pax record in 2017. Good news is that the last 5 months have been record months meaning 2025 will be a record for BHX at around 13.5m pax placing the airport firmly as the UK’s 3rd largest airport outside london (behind MAN/EDI). BHX was also one of the fastest growing of the top 10 UK airports I believe in 2024 which is notable!

    BHX does however fit the narrative of airlines consolidating with BHX being the primary reason from EMA’s horrific numbers… RYR/EZY/JET2 all consolidating/growing significantly at BHX whilst stagnating/reducing at EMA.

    • Anouj says:

      I would love to use EMA more but the frequency for flights from there is low so it’s difficult to plan say a weekend break. Secondly over winter when i’m more likely to go for some winter sun and actually use EMA over bhx or lhr there’s hardly any flights to anywhere. Also no train connectivity and awful lounge.

  • jj says:

    The winner takes it all.

    Heathrow has nine direct flights to Milan on a Saturday. You get a choice of convenient times, between the calm of Linate and the chaos of Malpensa, and you can travel in Business Class for a small premium.

    My three nearest airports have one direct flight between them. And what sane person wants to fly RyanAir from Bristol at 0730?

    So I’ve used LHR for two skiing trips in recent weeks. The busy get busier and the virtuous circle continues. And that’s why LHR needs another runway.

  • BBbetter says:

    Wish STN got more long haul flights. A QR or EY flight would be very welcome for competition with EK.

    • CamFlyer says:

      Or something useful for going west– perhaps EI to DUB, or JetBlue to JFK/BOS instead of LGW.

      • CamFlyer says:

        Instead of one of the ME3, for going east a flight on Turkish mainline to IST would also be useful. It could potentially share ground handling with the existing AJet operation.

  • Edward says:

    Manchester has got to be the worst airport in the country one big money making machine, the coucil should be put up before the courts to explain this disgusting rip off from car parking to buying a packet of crisps. Avoid if you can horrible place.

    • No longer Entitled says:

      You know what Councils do right? If they are making money through their ownership stake in MAG that should be good for the local community. Especially so if they are making money from people outside of the local community to reinvest in services within said local community.

      • Peter K says:

        Exactly No Longer Entitled. The council’s money is tied up in the airport so it would be fiscally incompetent to not make a profit on the investment.

        In fact it makes sense that the council has a role in a key gateway for tourists to come into the area.

        Could MAN be improved. Yes. Could you say that about pretty much any airport? Yes.

    • Mike says:

      I doubt the crisps are any more expensive than at any other airport and most airports have a drop-off charge

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.