Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

12th October confirmed as launch date for EU’s Entry Exit System (EES)

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

After myriad delays, we have a firm date for the launch of the EU’s Entry Exit System – 12th October.

From this date, everyone travelling into the EU must have four fingerprints and a photograph registered. (Children under 12 are exempt from fingerprinting.)

On every subsequent visit, one of the two – fingerprints or facial scan – must be taken and matched to the details on file.

The only bit of good news is that the launch will be phased. Until 9th April 2026, countries will be allowed to temporarily suspend EES if it is leading to excessive delays. For the first two months, it will reportedly also be possible for countries to operate EES without storing biometric data.

From 12th October 2025 to 9th April 2026, passports will continue to be stamped on entry and exit so that there will be no issues if EES is not in place when leaving the EU.

From 9th April 2026, there will be no exceptions. All non-EU citizens will be required to have their data collected and checked. Passport stamping will end.

It not clear how the recent agreement to allow UK citizens to use e-gates at all European airports adopting EES will dovetail into this. It appears that e-gates will allow you to register your fingerprints on your first visit post the launch of EES, although it will still be necessary to speak to a border control officer who will decide whether to approve your EES application.

EES data will be valid for three years. Importantly, each re-entry into the EU restarts the three year clock unless you receive a new passport.

What about ETIAS, the EU ESTA?

The EES scheme is separate from ETIAS.

ETIAS is the EU equivalent of a US ESTA, which will be required to travel from the UK to 30 European countries.

ETIAS has also been delayed multiple times but is now scheduled to launch after the launch of EES but before the end of 2026 (not 2025 as we originally wrote). The application fee has been confirmed as €20, although only people aged between 18 and 70 will pay.

For comparison, the US has approved plans to increase the ESTA fee from $21 to $40. The UK ETA fee is £16.

ETIAS is linked to your passport. It is valid for up to three years or until the passport expires, whichever comes first.

With a valid ETIAS travel authorisation, you can enter the territory of these European countries as often as you want for short-term stays – normally for up to 90 days in any 180-day period. However, it does not guarantee entry. When you arrive, a border guard will ask to see your passport and other documents and verify that you meet the entry conditions.

Whilst ETIAS will require additional administration, it should not cause delays at immigration because it must be completed before departure, with boarding denied to anyone who has not applied.

You can find out more about the launch of EES on this EU website.

Comments (147)

  • Ben says:

    “ETIAS has also been delayed multiple times but is now scheduled to launch after the launch of EES but before the end of 2025”.

    The ETIAS website says by the end of 2026 not 2025 see https://travel-europe.europa.eu/etias

  • Roberto says:

    Its gonna be carnage. I am travelling on the 11th luckily.

  • TimM says:

    Does the EU have nothing better to do than to introduce more layers of bureaucracy? It used to be the European Economic Community (EEC) for the purposes of tariff-free trade. What went wrong? A commission, a power-less parliament and literally millions of pages of directives are a huge burden of the people of the EU and increasingly others.

    I want to live on a boat in Greece. That is no longer possible. I can alternate between Greece and Turkey, 90 in the previous 180 days is the rule but I have had to read thousands of pages of EU documents down to everything including my washing-up, laundry and how my toilet operates.

    The current EU will go down in history as classic over-reach.

    • VinZ says:

      I think you all voted for Brexit so that’s what it means. Brexit.

      • ayearinmx says:

        So 52% = all. Got it

        • JDB says:

          For better or worse, that’s how referenda work unless a higher threshold is specified.

          52% seems better than the current government having a huge majority being elected on just 33.7% of the vote.

          • Alex G says:

            “52% seems better than the current government having a huge majority being elected on just 33.7% of the vote.”

            It’s worse than that. The current Government was elected by just 20% of registered voters. That’s not just apathy. And it is why protest parties like Reform are doing well.

        • mvcvz says:

          Vastly greater percentage than that which voted for the current UK government. Just saying

      • Richie says:

        17.4 million people isn’t “…all…”.

        • JDB says:

          And the current government elected with only 9.7m votes …

          • Paul says:

            Indeed, electoral reform is desperately needed. There hasn’t been a UK government elected with a majority of the popular vote since 1935!

            In my view, the reason we have such broken politics is because the support enjoyed by successive governments is as shallow as a puddle. When the votes of 60% or 70% of voters are simply ignored, you cannot hope to have support for the policies that are then peddled.

      • Anthony says:

        “All”….get your research done before commenting pal.

        • WearyTraveller says:

          I think he is referring to HfP, most of whom definitely voted for Brexit. Not all for sure but the vast majority of HfP readers are right-wing leaning,

          • E.thomas says:

            Really?
            Are there statistics to support this view?

          • Rob says:

            Given that even Chelsea elected a Labour MP at the last election I suspect it is a heavily left leaning audience, given it is a mainly London one.

          • Richie says:

            @WearyTraveller Your assumption that all right-wing leaning individuals voted for brexit is wrong. Rob doesn’t survey HfP readers for their political leanings.

          • Bagoly says:

            Unlikely to apply to “majority of HfP readers”, but may apply to “majority of vociferous HfP commenters”

          • ADS says:

            Rob, I suspect the 152 vote majority of the Labour MP for Chelsea & Fulham is largely thanks to the good people of Fulham!

      • Greg says:

        And this is just another Brexit Bonus – like paying for EU mobile roaming.

        2 more Boris lies.

        • Ant says:

          You pay for EU roaming? Get Lebera and you won’t have to.

        • JDB says:

          O2 has free Europe roaming.

        • Alex G says:

          1p mobile also offers free EU roaming, and uses the EE network in the UK. I was sad to leave EE after 25 years, but their prices are not competitive for light users.

    • Kraut says:

      Luckily your countrymen made the wise decision to vote for Brexit to save you from being able to permanently live in the hellhole that is the EU. Lol

    • Rui N. says:

      In this case what happened is that David Cameron forced this stuff through the EU, as this was a British idea that Cameron lobbied strongly to implement at EU level.
      The rest you mention is just the consequence of Brexit. Votes have consequences.

    • Shaz says:

      This will significantly REDUCE bureaucracy, won’t it?

      No passport stamping, just a scan of your face (once you register your fingerprints as well for the first time).

      Besides the first few weeks/months, it should massively speed things up. Don’t have to speak to rude or inquisitive border security people either.

  • rev_lou says:

    It’s kinda funny how many British people want more secure borders and to control immigration then complain when the EU introduces measures to secure their borders to control immigration…

    • TimM says:

      I am the opposite. I think people should live wherever in the World they want providing they obey the local laws and pay their taxes.

      It is like this for the rich, why not for everyone?

      • Bagoly says:

        Because all major European cities would have people living on the streets or slums as in Naorobi/Kolkata etc.

    • Pat says:

      Schengen is in tatters because the EU’s external borders are like sieving flour with a fishing net. The authoritarian states that “don’t respect the rule of law” (to use Commission parlance) have the toughest borders, think Hungary and Poland but are in the dog-house for not respecting migrant rights and violating EU law.
      Frontex is a flop. Its real purpose is to give Italian’s something to do.
      Schengen should be suspended for a few years across the EU to catch crims and send back migrants to their places of entry by the Dublin agreement. This is the case in some MS as I write where it’s sporadically suspended.
      The irony is the UK has the crappest borders yet has a huge natural border than is totally wasted.
      Approach EES with the same scepticism that you would if Rt Hon Ms Cooper suggested the solution to the UK migrant crisis is ID cards.

      • J says:

        Of course ID cards are the solution. The UK is so attractive because it’s so easy to live and work illegally… ID cards would make things a lot harder.

        • John says:

          The UK is attractive because lots of people speak (some) English and the people who don’t find the UK attractive, you don’t really hear about in English-language media.

    • Danny says:

      The EU has never had secure borders. The external borders are porous while the internal ones are non-existent. The Schengen agreement means that those with criminal records can travel across the internal borders without scrutiny. Likewise in the EU days, EU citizens could come to Britain for work purposes without needing to go through criminal record checks like they need to do now.

  • paul says:

    Anyone know the date for ESTA price increase to $40 ?

    Flying back from Miami early November so don’t want to get it yet.

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      um you don’t need an ESTA to leave the US only enter it!

      • paul says:

        I need to enter it before I leave it though – we arrive via cruise on November 5th and leave same day.

    • davefl says:

      There is no date yet. Potentially sometime in 2026 but it could happen any time

  • redlilly says:

    Unless I misunderstand the UK ETA, isn’t the EU being way more generous than the UK here. Allowing family members of those with EU citizenship and also EU residents to be excluded?

    Don’t underestimate how expensive these requirements are for some people/families, particularly in Europe where you don’t need a passport to travel around Shenghen. Then add to that some countries have 5 year passports, not 10 year passports.

    We Brits have always needed a passport, so this extra stuff becomes more acceptable.

    • John says:

      ETA, and ETIAS, are only for tourists (and business visitors).

      UK residents will already have a visa, or are Irish, so don’t need an ETA.

      EU citizens have the right to bring their family members with them to live in another EU state.

      When the UK was in the EU, a (for example) German citizen coming to the UK to work, study or be self-sufficient, could bring their non-EU family and they would all have the right to enter the UK. Whereas a British citizen would need to get expensive and onerous visas for their non-EU family to come to the UK (and still do).

      • Bagoly says:

        That harder requirement for a British citizen was presumably only due to a hard-fought British “opt-out” from the general EU rules?

        • James says:

          Any opt-outs would have had nothing to do with that, and what the person is describing isn’t entirely well explained.

          A German citizen living in Germany with their non-EU spouse who is validly in Germany on the spouse visa could bring them to the UK whilst we were in the EU. Similarly, a British citizen with a non-EU spouse on the relevant visa could’ve moved to Germany and taken their spouse with them.

          The non-EU spouse, both then and now, has to first enter the EU validly for residency with a visa, and then once validly resident in the EU they have the same right to follow their spouse to another EU country.

          What that person is describing is missing out that that German citizen will have needed to have a non-EU spouse with a valid visa within the EU first before moving.

          That non-EU spouse does not have an automatic right to be in the EU by virtue of being married to a German or any other EU citizen.

          • John says:

            This is not correct. There is no requirement for the non-EU partner to be living in the EU first.

            Non-EEA spouses *do* have the right to move to any EEA country – as long as they are moving with the EEA spouse, and the EEA spouse is exercising their EEA treaty rights (i.e. they have to be working, or seeking work, or self-sufficient with sickness insurance etc).

            This right does not extend to the home country of the EEA spouse. Which is why the ETIAS is chargeable when going to the EEA spouse’s country.

            However – once the non-EEA spouse has been living in the EEA with their EEA spouse exercising treaty rights – if the EEA spouse subsequently moves back to their home country, the non-EEA spouse also gains the right to move to that country.

      • Cj1882 says:

        £12k its cost for my wife to be here so far. She’s come here and started a business and is effectively paying twice to use the NHS

  • RussellH says:

    I find it very confusing when journalists, of any type, refer loosely to the “EU”, when a different grouping is actually what is being discussed.

    The EES is operatd by the following countries – Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland.
    Four of these are not in the EU, while two EU countries – Ireland + Cyprus – are not included.

    The EES webite should also be clearer, given that they state “The Entry/Exit System (EES) is an automated IT system for registering non-EU nationals”, since citizens of all countries operating the EES are not affected, including the four non-EU members, and citizens of Monaco, Andorra, San Marino and the Vatican are also exempt.

    • John says:

      Well the EU often calls itself “Europe”, despite even “enemies” i.e. Russia/Belarus being in Europe.

  • bh says:

    I wonder how the EU is going to administer the exemptions for immediate non-EU family of EU nationals. I can see thousands of people who are thus entitled to travel to the EU being turned-away by airlines. Surely, they’re not going to need to see (e.g.) a marriage certificate at the border.

    • Richie says:

      Some e-gates have other readers in addition to passporr readers.

    • John says:

      You still have to apply, but you don’t have to pay.

      If you managed to get to a Schengen border without an ETIAS (I guess possible via land), you could probably make a case to be allowed entry, but you definitely will need to show the marriage certificate or other documents proving your relationship

      • bh says:

        That covers ETIAS, but what about EES exemption and use of gates? I think passport (document identification) encoding is to an international standard, so logically they’d store the exemption against the foreign passport; but I’m unclear whether the gates are connected to a central database.

        • John says:

          They would have to be connected, and be able to write to, a central database in order to check you have an ETIAS (since you could apply as late as 2-3 hours before turning up at a Schengen border by air), to compare biometrics to those captured previously, and to record the 90 in 180 days thing.

          Part of the reason for the endless delays seems to be that the immigration computer systems of 20+ countries need to be linked up into one

    • Bagoly says:

      Too true that it is the airline you have to worry about convincing rather than the border guard.

    • J says:

      They manage it with EHICs (I have one, rather than a GHIC because my wife in an EU citizen). Guess it’ll be the same way – you apply and get a different type of document.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.