Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Bits: get 12 Bonvoy points per £1 with the Marriott Amex, Vueling gets the Boeing 737 MAX

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

News in brief:

Earn 12 Bonvoy points per £1 at selected Marriott hotels

The Marriott Bonvoy American Express Card has quietly rolled out a ‘double points’ promotion.

Assuming this is open to all cardholders, you will see it under the ‘Offers’ tab in the Amex app or website. You must opt-in by clicking ‘Save to Card’.

Usually, you earn 6 Marriott Bonvoy points per £1 on the Marriott Bonvoy American Express Card when you pay at participating Marriott Bonvoy hotels. We value Marriott points at 0.5p so this is equivalent to a 3% rebate.

Until 4th September, this is doubled to 12 Marriott Bonvoy points per £1.

Payment must be made by 4th September. Pre-paid bookings made for a later date should trigger the double points, as long as the hotel does actually take the payment in advance, but you can never be 100% certain.

There are participating hotels in Austra, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK.

The full list here is here (PDF).

Our full review of the Marriott Bonvoy American Express Card – which comes with 15 elite night credits each year – is here.

Vueling gets 50 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft

Vueling gets 50 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft

Six years ago, IAG, the parent of British Airways, Iberia and Aer Lingus, and Boeing agreed a huge 200 aircraft order for the 737 MAX. The aircraft was still grounded at the time following the loss of the two Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines flights.

It was widely assumed that the order was one of opportunism. With the aircraft’s reputation at rock bottom the prices that IAG negotiated were expected to be significantly lower than you would otherwise find.

This was the same opportunism that led Ryanair to order 150 Boeing 737-800s in 2002. Ryanair called it the ‘deal of the century’ and the bulk of Ryanair’s financial success in the years since can be traced back to it.

The letter of intent, announced at the Paris Air Show in 2019, was confirmed in 2022 when IAG finalised the order for 50 aircraft plus 100 options. Initially deliveries were expected to start in 2023, but subsequent issues with the aircraft (including the Alaska Airlines door blowout) have reduced Boeing’s capacity.

IAG has now confirmed that it will receive the first of 50 Boeing 737 MAX “from late 2026 onwards.” As widely anticipated, the aircraft are destined for Vueling, IAG’s Spanish low cost airline.

Luis Gallego, CEO of IAG, confirmed that the plan was to transition Vueling into an all-Boeing airline over a six year timeframe.

It will mark the first time in eleven years that an IAG airline will fly Boeing single-aisle aircraft, with British Airways phasing out its last previous generation 737s in 2015.

IAG must have got a fantastic deal on the order because transitioning from an all-Airbus to all-Boeing feet is neither cheap nor efficient, with all pilots and crew having to be retrained. IAG admits this will create short term “inefficiencies”.

Comments (69)

  • Michael Jennings says:

    There is a huge pool of Ryanair 737 pilots out there, some of who are likely to want to go somewhere else and who probably aren’t too hard to recruit. That always worked for Norwegian.

    The 737MAX had a software problem. A huge amount of scrutiny was put into making sure it was correctly fixed. 737MAX aircraft have also now had a huge number of flight hours using the fixed software with no further incidents of that kind, so I think the MAX is now probably okay. At this point I am not particularly bothered flying on them.

    Generally, though, Boeing is not what it was, no, so other problems are always possible.

    • Mike says:

      It had both software and hardware issues. Software bugs do not cause door plugs to fly off. MCAS relied on a single AoA sensor, in an industry built on hardware redundancy , one sensor is a hardware issue. One sensor and bad software, bad hardware design, bad software design.

    • John33 says:

      Ryanair literally said it checks every single 737 MAX that arrives and they occasionally find bolts loose or parts incorrectly fitted. Literally said by O’Leary himself

    • JDB says:

      The MAX may have had a software issue but it’s the reason behind the aircraft needing software to adjust for a fundamentally defective design that’s the problem. It’s a Frankenstein aircraft built to save Boeing the huge cost of designing a new aircraft.

      • Panda Mick says:

        ^^^^^^^ This. It should NOT be flying. Was designed in a time when people entered the aircraft from the ground, not airbridges, which is why it’s flawed. China will have a certified competitor before boeing has a design

        • Pat says:

          And it was never designed for 3-3 C. If carriers want to buy them they need to stick to 2-2 C seats.

        • RC says:

          The Comac design is a pure rip-off of the A320ceo. Though it weighs less so probably has Chinese Tofu aluminium in it. Engines and avionics almost all western though, so effectively China is building an airframe that they add non Chinese equipment to.
          All said, even if it’s an A320 fake copy, that’s still probably better than a geriatric Boeing design that emirates from a time when the UK’s best selling car was a Morris 1100. Now how many Morris 1100 Max do you see in showrooms nowadays?

      • kevin86 says:

        Yes. This is exactly why people don’t buy American garbage anymore. Costs cut to the bone and no quality. Better stuff to be found elsewhere 🚮

  • ADS says:

    “transitioning from an all-Airbus to all-Boeing fleet is neither cheap nor efficient”

    but 50 B737s won’t make Vueling an all Boeing fleet – they currently have 131 narrow body Airbus … so IAG will need to get on and convert some of those options into orders if they are going to make the full switch happen in the coming decade!

    https://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/Vueling%20Airlines.htm

    • Dubious says:

      So much for IAG’s regular touting of group fleet efficiencies.

      • Nick says:

        What you (and Rhys) miss is the large additional efficiency to be gained having a mixed fleet… being able to play the manufacturers off against each other. If Airbus know you’re willing to buy Boeing, they’ll negotiate harder. It’s the same the other way round for longhaul aircraft – BA got a good price for the 77Xs precisely (and only) because they had already ordered A35Ks. It’s judicious timing given the options on A320 (for BA/IB) are running out and Airbus have been playing harder in the last few years with airlines that have all-Airbus fleets.

        • Nico says:

          Agreed, Also you never know what can happen, some diversification can’t hurt even if it has some cost

          • ADS says:

            the diversification / single type fashion swings as CEOs remember fleet groundings … and then time heals and they forget …

            RIP Norwegian – B737max / RR engined B787

        • Richie says:

          Do airlines also take a peek at Comac and Sukhoi offerings?

          • Nico says:

            I’d be surprised given the politics involved

          • Will says:

            Anyone buying Russian or Chinese not only runs the risk of a (relatively) unproven design but opens themselves up to being part of the politics of the day.

            We absolutely should not be permitting sales of Russian or Chinese aircraft in the western world, in a cold or hot war they would effectively be immediately grounded either through software or lack of spare parts.

            We cannot allow that possibility.

            Same with cars, we cannot afford to be in a position where a foreign goverment could use our cars as weapons against us.

      • RC says:

        Not even that.
        The VLG A321s have different engines.
        Which means IAG management don’t even understand the details when they tout this nonsense.

  • Henry Young says:

    Useful intel – all us lifetime 727 MAX boycotters can add Vueling to the list. The one I regret the most is Malaysia because that one was actually useful to me – but Air Asia covers their routes, generally with a worse hard product but better staff.

    • John33 says:

      If you’re that bothered to be boycotting an aircraft type then at least get the numbers right.

    • HampshireHog says:

      Last time I was on a 727-100 it was a Dan Air charter. Air travel was much more dangerous in the 1970’s.

      • Richie says:

        I was in an emergency landing situation earlier this year due to an engine problem, it seems the dangerous occurences can still happen 5 decades later.

  • Gerry says:

    Just for context, US airlines operate approx 650 737 MAX aircraft so there are thousands of MAX flight each day in the US alone.

Leave a Reply to ChrisBCN Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.