Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

BA CEO expects no reduction in elite British Airways Club members

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Ten days ago, IAG (owner of British Airways, Iberia, Aer Lingus and Vueling) announced its first half results for 2025.

I won’t bore you with all the details, just to say that it is doing well, with a 44% increase in operating profit to €1.9 billion. Passenger numbers fell (IAG’s load factor was down 0.9%) but were offset by higher fares and lower fuel costs.

Scattered amongst the financials were some interesting tidbits about British Airways, including how The British Airways Club is doing and what is going on behind the scenes with regards to the IT upgrades that have been touted for years.

BA CEO expects no reduction in elite British Airways Club members

Have The British Airways Club changes affected the airline?

I don’t think I need to repeat our own views of the changes that have happened to The British Airways Club, which by now most of you should be familiar with!

The move to revenue-based tier point earning and the new tier thresholds have led to much gnashing of teeth, not just for Head for Points readers but also more widely, with The Times, Telegraph and many other publications bemoaning the changes and how they affect you.

That said, Sean Doyle says the changes have not materially affected the airline’s overall revenue, although it’s arguably too early to tell:

“Our Club revenue is performing in line with our broader network. So there is no discernible difference between the revenue coming through people who are members of the Club and the revenue coming through our wider network, and it’s growing in line with the capacity that we’ve expanded the airline by.”

It will be interesting to see what happens early next year, particularly from the 1st May 2026 onwards. This is when anyone who earned status under the old system but cannot make it under the new revenue-based model will be downgraded.

Once the key benefits of booking BA – lounge access, seat selection, priority services etc – drop away, will these customers continue to push revenue to British Airways?

What is interesting is that Sean Doyle has confirmed they do not expect to see a big change in the membership levels across the tiers.

This is in contrast to speculation online that the changes were, in part, a way of reducing the overall burden of memberships. Anyone hoping for quieter Heathrow lounges following the changes will be disappointed.

Here’s what Sean Doyle had to say regarding the changes:

“I think we are in a transition phase. What we are seeing is people who were booking high-quality revenue in Holidays are getting tiered earlier, and we expect our tier sizes to be broadly at the same level they were pre-change, but there will be some people who get in there who didn’t used to get, and some people will drop out who were in those tiers historically. So that’s part of the transition that we are forecasting and expecting.”

Fundamentally, a deliberate decision was taken to ‘fire’ some customers and replace them with higher spending ones.

The key is whether giving status to people who previously spent a lot of money but not in the right way will make them spend even more. After all, these people were clearly happy to spend in the first place without the status carrot. British Airways has clearly lost revenue from some people who know they will lose status.

It is also worth noting that BA has a habit of rolling over elite status for selected members who were going to lose it, if it looks like it will be a little thin in certain elite tiers. This isn’t just a BA thing – most airline and hotel groups do the same. If too few people earn Gold, it’s not an issue to roll some over which also helps reduce pressure on the Club lounges.

It’s all about British Airways Holidays

Reading between the lines, the biggest incentive British Airways has is to supercharge its BA Holidays division. Packages are far more profitable for airlines as they can bundle up flights, hotels and more in a single booking, increasing margins in a capital-light way. Compared to selling flights this is a lucrative market.

Although IAG does not break down revenue for British Airways Holidays, it did move the division to IAG Loyalty last year, the group’s high-growth but capital-light (let’s forget The Wine Flyer for a minute!) department.

With aviation capital intensive and highly competitive, it’s clear that IAG sees its future more akin to the US airlines, where profit-making loyalty divisions effectively subsidise the airline operations. With UK credit card margins so low, however, it is never going to become Delta, which receives $2 BILLION from American Express every three months.

One of the changes to The British Airways Club was to increase the incentives to book BA Holidays by uncapping the maximum number of tier points you can earn.

According to IAG Loyalty CEO Adam Daniels, the changes do appear to be having an affect:

“We are seeing an increasing number of the BA Club members start booking British Airways Holidays, and we’re seeing that in terms of the quality of revenue that’s coming as a result. So certainly, those people that are doing that are increasing their chances of retaining and, in fact, going to the next tier as well.”

It’s not clear if those people booking actually understand the new tier point system though. The lead booker does NOT get the tier points – they are spread equally across all passengers including children. Not giving a BA Club number for the other passengers doesn’t change things – the points are still split with non-members losing their share.

Even spending £20,000 with British Airways Holidays would not be enough to obtain Silver status if two adults and two children were travelling.

The only loophole is to book a holiday for one person and book separate flights for other passengers. This appears to be so prevalent that a warning has been added to the BA Holidays T&C about what will happen to you if this is discovered. Booking a room that can sleep four people and only one flight is likely to be a red flag ….

Dynamic pricing and BA’s digital transformation

Sean Doyle has long been talking up the airline’s investment in IT and digital infrastructure, some of which is over 25 years old and in dire need of modernisation.

A new website and app (coming later this year or early 2026) is the most visible part, but BA has also just completed a major behind-the-scenes upgrade of its revenue management system. (Not entirely smoothly – Avios availability has been all over the shop for several weeks, in both good and bad ways.)

Three upgrades have taken place recently:

  • The new revenue management system, which went live in early July
  • A new check-in system, moving from BA’s propriety FLY system to the off-the-shelf Amadeus system
  • A new payments platform

All three are “critical enablers of the broader digital transformation”.

BA CEO expects no reduction in elite British Airways Club members

In terms of what that means for you, the customer, you should expect to see more options to upgrade and more flexibility in how BA prices its flights.

“One of the big benefits of new revenue management system is our ability to implement what we call dynamic pricing. So historically, airlines would be limited to the number of letters in the alphabet in terms of inventory buckets.

And our ability to do trade-up pricing between those selling classes was relatively – I wouldn’t call it clumsy, but limited. Now we can put a lot more step-ups and trade-ups into our pricing ladders. And it’s too early maybe to give you an assessment of the impact. We’re only trialling it for the last three weeks, but my teams are very excited about its potential.”

Airlines were the pioneers of dynamic pricing based on demand, which is why the same flight can cost vastly more or less on different days. What Sean Doyle refers to here is the airline’s ability to offer seats at different prices, with much more granular control. This will allow the airline to step up pricing on an almost seat-by-seat basis rather than in large fare blocks (‘10 seats at £50, next 10 seat at £75’ etc).

“So broadly speaking, we’re on track. We’re very happy with the rollouts that we’ve implemented. And in terms of our kind of expectations versus our original plan, we’re where we need to be.”

Other bits ….

A few more interesting updates I thought worth sharing:

  • The new Avios partnership with LeShuttle, announced two months ago, has resulted in more than 26,000 Avios bookings made and 15 million Avios earned in that period
  • IAG says the new BA lounges in Miami and Dubai are expected to open by the end of the year, well behind schedule, as are unspecified “lounge upgrades at our hubs”
  • British Airways on time performance has increased by 7.7% since last year, to 83.2% of all departures leaving within 15 minutes of the scheduled time. Iberia still leads the group with an average of 89.8%.
  • The half year report says “As of 29 July we are 57% booked for the second half”. Coincidentally, the cut-off was just after BA concluded the most aggressive Avios redemption sale we have seen since the pandemic, with 40% to 45% off many routes.

Comments (227)

  • lesscleverandrew says:

    Presumably elite means gold and up?

    As a silver member who wont get status next year I am busy burning down my avios on BA and plan to book domestic (European) flights on the basis of price and convenience, and for long-haul probably Lufthansa/Swiss for the destinations I plan to visit (on the basis of price and hopefully a LH status match after February 26).

    Mr Doyle is probably right that travellers like myself won’t make a dent but it’s a funny old loyalty scheme that doesn’t incentivize loyalty.

  • Nick says:

    I’ve been saying this since the changes were announced… they were designed to align the scheme to the ‘right type’ of customer, not reduce numbers. There’s a large subset of business customers who spend a lot but don’t fly often so only make bronze or silver if anything, and BA wanted them to have access to Gold benefits (especially FW), rather than cheapskate TP runners. And then if those people then buy BA/BAH for their holidays as well, so much the better. You/I/we don’t have to agree with all of that strategy, but it doesn’t change the fact that’s why they did it. They’re not lying about tier volumes.

    BAH is booming. It’s had over £1b turnover the last couple of years and is still growing fast. So they’re doing something right.

    When/if there’s likely to be space in the lounges, use the new system capability to upsell access. They were never going to get rid of lounges.

    But if you want to understand progress on the IT front, the clowns building it all swore they’d be able to produce a fully working app by the end of 2024. Now look at the new date…

    • lesscleverandrew says:

      Exactly this. As someone who takes 5+ short-haul leisure trips per year, some of them CE, and the infrequent long-haul – I am not the right type of traveller.

      Before COVID I was also doing 5-10 2/3-day European business trips in ET/CE. This + my leisure travel will now not get me silver either. I have no complaints, no whingeing. I have been “fired” and I hear the message loud and clear.

    • Marcw says:

      Agreed. I’ve never renewed Silver so fast. I’m not interested in Gold, however. I’m happy with Silver.

  • DavidB says:

    Come next May those regular Galleries business lounges are going to get crushed by downgraded Golds becoming Silvers, leaving the First lounge pretty sparse.

    • valeoak says:

      I am wondering if one of the Galleries in T5A will be converted to a J-only lounge (in much the same way as the CCR is F-only), leaving the other one (and the lounge in T5B) as the OW Sapphire / BA Silver loyalty lounge (akin to the First Wing lounge for OW Emerald / BA Gold).

  • jj says:

    Many tears are being shed by people who are much less valuable to BA than they think.

    Most economy flights with status-driven lounge access are unprofitable. BA gives them away as a loss-leader to encourage status seekers to switch lucrative premium long haul from another airline, or, under the new scheme, luxury hotel spend into BA holidays.

    Giving away a loss-leader to encourage tier point runs was never a smart business strategy. It had to end in tears.

    • Richie says:

      The BA list of ‘never a smart busines strategy(ies)’ might be long.

    • valeoak says:

      I have sympathy for your basic point (i.e., ultimately, BA’s loyalty scheme needs to work for BA), but I think there is something of a middle ground between giving away double TPs on BA Holidays and a scheme where someone who flies 50 times a year with BA is in doubt as to whether they will hold on to Gold status. Many of us expected the status thresholds to be raised, but not quite like this.

      Moreover, those TP runners you are quick to dismiss were often putting premium cabin travel in BA’s direction when they otherwise would not. Now it may be that the net benefit to BA was still marginal or even negative, but there’s no point pretending it didn’t generate J/F-class travel that otherwise wouldn’t have existed. Given BA’s recognition that the business traveller will be relatively less important to its business post-Covid compared with the premium leisure traveller, the current scheme seems oddly crafted to properly generate loyalty to maximise the benefits there. Given the sums necessary to obtain elite status, how many premium leisure travellers in that spend category that do not currently put much business BA’s way will suddenly be incentivised to do so? And said passengers will almost always be flying in premium cabins anyway, so what serious benefit does status generate for them anyway?

      BA’s previous loyalty programme worked precisely because it was possible to attain serious status in the scheme for a significant number of people that otherwise would not have spent so much time and energy on putting business towards BA. BA is a decent airline, but it is not world class (and arguably there isn’t the market available to it to sustain itself as such an airline: it has to pitch accordingly).

      It’s like F-class. BA’s is good, but it doesn’t compete with its major rivals out there. It generates business because it is relatively accessible. If BA unveiled a new First suite and upped its caviar game, but slapped up the price by a multiple of three and abolished all reward availability, First would fall flat on its face as it still wouldn’t compete in terms of quality, but would have lost its competitive edge.

      As it is, BA will not suffer serious consequences from changing its loyalty scheme because those people will be able to switch to other OW schemes and still put business BA’s way to gain status. But if these other schemes change, then BA may see a bigger hit.

      • Scott says:

        I wouldnt be surprised if a new F suite, with a large price tag, wouldn’t still be filled with those with disposable income / companies with deep pockets, as it would become far more exclusive and the hoi poloi would be kept out.

        BA encouraged me to fly various cabins, perhaps not at a £££££ price tag.
        Couple with that, connecting flights, trains, taxis or Ubers, hotels, eating out and general touristy spend all put into someone’s coffers.

  • Garethgerry says:

    Two things, re BA holidays.

    BA surely don’t want someone to get Gold from one £20k family holiday , hence it all doesn’t go to lead booker.

    BA holidays may be booming but it still feels like an afterthought, add a hotel to flight. I’m not sure what market they are operating in, not sure if they know.

    BA holidays doesn’t offer the service one would expect if you are spending £20k plus on a business class 5 star longhaul holiday.

    Neither do they seem to be able to compete with TUI jet2 etc for family holidays.

    Perhaps their strength is hotels airport cities for weekends away.

    • ME says:

      I am really confused about this emphasis on BA Holidays as well. You would think the Club or whatever it’s called these days would want to attract HNWI right? Well personally I avoid these packages because I’m not looking for a deal. I want to go through my travel advisor, get the best recommendations, know he’s there for me, get the perks. But if they keep pushing TP bonuses with Hols, they will be getting elite club members who are more into the deal than the spend. And Holidays is how we got into this problem in the first place! Make it make sense. FYI I am one RT away from QR Platinum so come December I’ll have Al Safwa access on top of OW Emerald.

      • Rob says:

        I agree. You would be slightly bonkers to book a high value resort via BA Holidays if the alternative is going via an advisor who can liaise re your preferred room, your preferences, probably get you added benefits and ensure you get reward points / status credits where available.

        • ADS says:

          I always got the impression that BA Holidays were more competing with EasyJet holidays and Jet2 holidays !

          • Scott says:

            I like the fact I can pay a deposit, and then pay over a few months with a BAH rather than blow say £3-£4k on my credit card then and there.
            Not if I can do anything similar with say Finnair if I were flying to Asia a few times a year.

          • Toilet Paper Man says:

            TUI is definitely a big competitor for BA Holidays.

        • Cicero says:

          Exactly

      • JDB says:

        I think there’s quite a big group of people who fall between the cheap and cheerful and those who choose to book via a full service travel advisor. BAH fills that gap quite neatly and there’s no problem liaising with a hotel directly to fine tune arrangements. This is actually preferable than going via a middleman.

        We occasionally use a travel advisor to book itineraries or places where they can add value or access services that I can’t. Otherwise I don’t want to incur the inbuilt cost of their commission for something I can very easily do myself at a lower cost.

    • Rob says:

      The strength, at least pre covid, is that a package would be cheaper than just booking business class BA flights, because BA Hols was a dumping ground for unsold capacity.

      We have done MANY articles on BA sales where the cheapest return flight to New York was more expensive than the cheapest BA Hols ‘flight and 3 x 4-star hotel nights’ package.

  • Bifters says:

    I buy my own travel for my business. I’ve certainly started buying more ‘holidays’ – flights and hotel for my trip. So I get good TP BUT clearly 1) BA has won in making me spend more with them and 2) my OnBusiness points are going nowhere fast.

  • NorthernLass says:

    As TPs will now be awarded based on spend, when will they post in respect of a BAH, after the balance is paid or once the last element of the BAH is completed? Previously TPs posted 3/4 days after each flight was taken, regardless of the duration of the holiday.

    • Rob says:

      A few weeks after the holiday is completed.

      • DMW says:

        If the holiday ends on say 29 Mar and you get the tier points mid-Apr, BA website says tier points will count towards year of travel rather than year of award. Fine so far. But any clarity on bonus tier points? Can’t find anything about them on line

      • NorthernLass says:

        Thanks. They seem to be appearing as per the old system on the BAH I’m currently undertaking, but I suppose that’s because I booked it before the new system went live?

        • NorthernLass says:

          As in, after each flight is completed, the TPs are clearly reduced to the new level!

  • Scott says:

    Im curiosity as to where these profits are coming from.

    Supposedly, a load of “cheapskates” have gone elsewhere, and business travel isn’t anywhere what it used to be pre-Covid / companies paying less etc.

    Are people now working along the lines of:
    “I’ll now pay £3k for CW ex-LHR rather than say £1200 ex-DUB as I’m not getting the 40TP e/w from DUB-LHR, so no point in taking that routing for TPs, and by paying that extra £1800, I’ll not have to pay £100 for a seat when it gets me a silver card in 3 trips”?

    • Richie says:

      You can get a BA flight from LHR departing tomorrow for £66, the opportunities for Bronze and Silver sector collectors are still there.

    • jj says:

      Scott, Tier point runs and ex-EU departures belong to people with more time than money. BA wants customers with more money than time.

      My wife would rightly be furious if I attempted to start a holiday in Dublin. I am not alone.

      • Throwawayname says:

        @jj , this only applies to those based in London. For literally everyone who’s anywhere else (UK regions, EU, intercontinental markets), BA is at best no more convenient than any of its competitors, at worst much less convenient (whether it’s needing multiple trains from Birmingham or connecting from Italy and having to endure the hassle of LHR instead of doing a slick connection at ZRH).

        Their standard response is to offer prices that are cheaper than the competition (not just the ‘home’ airlines of a country or those flying direct, but also the other connecting options). By taking status away from a good chunk of those customers, they’re likely to have to make even deeper discounts because now there’s even less incentive to choose them. The focus on holidays is doubling down on that strategy, as they’re not even able to sell holidays in some of those markets and, even where they can sell them, I doubt they’d be able to offer competitive deals.

        It looks like they’re aiming to become a somewhat larger version of Virgin Atlantic.

        • jj says:

          Throwawayname, about half of the UK’s population is within 3hrs drive of Heathrow, and probably more likely 2/3 of the country’s GDP. I’m about 2.5 hours away myself, but it’s much quicker and more convenient to drive to Heathrow than it is to travel to a nearer airport and connect.

          • Throwawayname says:

            It’s very quick and convenient until it isn’t- unless you factor in a huge margin of error, you’re only one lorry jack-knifing on the motorway from missing your flight. There doesn’t even need to be a proper collision as such…and that’s before you think about the cost and hassle of airport parking.

            It’s sort of understandable if you’re out in the sticks somewhere around Grimsby or Plymouth and you can’t get the KLM flights to work so you need to be driving for 1.5+ hour before getting to an airport and then fly with a connection after that, but if you live somewhere like Crewe (for MAN), Birmingham /Coventry, Leeds, or even Bristol, flying from the local airport with a connection is a no brainer, particularly if the direct alternative doesn’t offer any advantages in terms of pricing, product, or routes (well, I suppose LHR might offer more options to the likes of Albuquerque and Des Moines).

          • John says:

            Accidents can happen on the way to your local airport too

          • jj says:

            I’ve never missed a flight due to trouble on the motorway. In contrast, I’ve missed several connecting flights over the years and I’ve been stranded in Amsterdam overnight with no help from KLM. I’ve had connection troubles with Swiss/Lufty, too, and several times I’ve had delayed baggage on connections but never on a direct flight.

            Heathrow is that it has multiple flights per day to any interesting destination, so you can choose the flight that best suits. And, in the Sofitel and La Belle Epoque, it has a hotel and restaurant that means you can start your holiday in style. Parking at Heathrow is easier and cheaper than most other airports – the Silver parking in Bristol lost my car for a couple of hours recently, for example, but Heathrow has plenty of options where you keep your keys.

            Flying from anywhere else gives a sub-par experience , risks severe marital disharmony and usually results in a stern, ‘I told you so!’ It’s really not worth it.

Leave a Reply to Nick Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.