Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

A reader loses arbitration case against British Airways for not refunding seat selection fees

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Are British Airways seat reservation fees refundable?

Last November, I published a long article criticising one of the most egregious money-making schemes pursued by British Airways – the refusal to refund seat reservation fees if you cancel your booking.

It was driven by the case of reader Andrew.  He had cancelled two Avios seats in Club World to the US.  All of his Avios and other charges had been refunded, less the £35 per head administration fee, as usual.

However, British Airways refused to refund £500 of seat reservation fees.

Are British Airways seat reservation fees refundable?

Can you really spend £500 on seat reservation fees for a couple?

Unfortunately, yes.

Rhys wrote this article in May 2019 about ‘fee creep’ at British Airways.

We used an example there of Heathrow to New York, where seat selection would cost up to £364 return for a couple.  However, for the US West Coast, you will pay £139 per person each-way for the upper deck of a Boeing 747 – a total of £556 return for a couple.  Bargain.

British Airways seat reservation fees

There were two issues at stake: is it made clear that your reservation is non-refundable? and is this ‘fair’?

Is it made clear that seat reservations are non-refundable?

Let’s look at the first issue.  When you go into ba.com to select seats, this is what you see (click to enlarge):

Are British Airways seat reservation fees refundable?

The terms and conditions are not shown, but require you to click a hyperlink.  Not ideal, but probably acceptable.  But when you click the hyperlink, you get this:

British Airways seat reservation rules refund

This is meant to be a summary of the key terms and conditions.  At no point does it say that seat reservations are non refundable.

If you click on ‘More terms and conditions’ it DOES bring up a lengthy pop up box of rules.  If you scroll almost to the bottom, it DOES say that seat fees are non-refundable if you choose to cancel your flight.  I would argue, however, that this is too many clicks from the booking screen to be watertight.

Regardless of the T&Cs, is this ‘fair’?

You might say ‘it doesn’t matter if it’s fair’.

Except, under UK contract law, it does.

There are lots of pieces of regulation which could come into play here such as the Consumer Rights Act 2015, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

Here is a very concise summary from the Government’s own website:

Businesses can keep your deposit or advance payments, or ask you to pay a cancellation charge, only in certain circumstances:

If you cancel the contract, the business is generally only entitled to keep or receive an amount sufficient to cover their actual losses that directly result from your cancellation (eg costs already incurred or loss of profit).

Businesses must take reasonable steps to reduce their losses (eg by re-selling the goods or services).

Non-refundable deposits should only be a small percentage of the total price.

Cancellation charges must be a genuine estimate of the business’ direct loss.

A good base line is that a consumer contract can only be imposed if it is ‘fair’.

It is very, very difficult to see how retaining a payment of £500+ for seat selection is ‘fair’ when the airline was happy to cancel the underlying seats without penalty.

Seat selection fees also appear ‘unfair’ in terms of the ‘power’ given to each party.  British Airways, according to the small print, is free to throw you out of your allocated seats for any reason it wants:

“A paid seat request cannot be guaranteed, as it may need to be changed for operational, safety or security reasons, even after boarding the aircraft.”

“Paid seating will not be refunded if you cancel your flight, are involuntarily upgraded or are not suitable to sit in the seat type you have selected.”

“In relation to BA marketed and operated flights, if, in accordance with your fare rules, you choose to move to a different flight, you will be entitled to choose an equivalent seat on your new flight. However if an equivalent seat is not available the difference paid will be forfeited and will not be refunded. In relation to other carrier marketed flights, if you choose to move to a different flight, you will not be entitled to choose an equivalent seat on the new flight and you will not be entitled to a refund.”

Note that, if BA upgrades you, you don’t get a seat refund.  It is difficult to imagine a court agreeing with that, especially if you paid for seats purely in order to be together but – due to the upgrade – you were separated.

Oddly, if the whole transaction was non-refundable (the seat and the seat reservation), you may be able to make a case for retaining the seat fee.  You bought a product in advance at a cheaper price by buying it in advance rather than at short notice, with the trade off that the transaction was non-refundable.  This is seen as ‘fair’ under UK law.  The seat fee could be seen as part of the overall cost.

In the case of an Avios redemption – or a fully flexible cash ticket – it is a different story.  The airline is willing to refund the flight.  It is therefore virtually impossible, in my mind, to put together a ‘reasonable’ justification for keeping the seat selection fees.

A reader decided to test this at arbitration

I said last November that I would be keen to hear from any HFP readers who wanted to take British Airways to CEDR arbitration (here is our guide on how to do it) or, failing that, to MCOL / Small Claims (here is our guide on how to do that) over seat selection fees.

A reader (not Andrew who we quoted above) took me up on the offer.

He lost.

Here is the arbitration judgement in full:

Agreed facts
• The passenger and one other were booked on the Flights.
• The passenger cancelled his reservation for the Flights.

Issues in dispute
• The passenger claims £408.00, as a refund of the seat selection fee he paid to the airline.
• The airline denies liability for the refund sought.

Decision making principles
• In order to succeed in a claim against the airline, the passenger must prove on a balance of probabilities that they are owed compensation under Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 (“Regulation 261”).
• I have carefully considered all of the issues raised and the documents provided. Both the passenger and the airline should be reassured that if I have not referred to a particular issue or document, this does not mean that I have not considered it in reaching my decision.

Reasons for decision

1. The passenger claims £408.00 as a “Refund of Seat Selection Fee from fully refundable ticket”. The airline, on the other hand, states the passenger is not entitled to a refund of the seating charges he paid, as, in accordance with its terms and conditions, “pre-paid seating will not be refunded if the Passenger chooses to cancel their booking”.

2. I am mindful that pursuant to the airline’s Terms and Conditions for paid seating, passengers “will not receive a refund for paid seating if [they] cancel [their] flight”.

3. The passenger cites the Competition and Markets Authority’s Guidance on Cancelling Goods or Services. I am not convinced the charge the passenger paid for seating can be considered a “deposit” or an “advance payment” for any goods or services. I also do not deem that the “seat selection fee” paid can be considered a “cancellation charge”.

4. Rule 2.1. of the Aviation Adjudication Scheme Rules stipulates the types of disputes that I, as an adjudicator under the Aviation Adjudication Scheme can deal with. The passenger’s dispute does not relate to “[d]enied boarding, delay, or cancellation”, “[d]estruction, damage, loss, or delayed transportation of baggage”, “[d]estruction, damage, or loss of items worn or carried by the customer” or “[p]roblems faced by disabled passengers or passengers with reduced mobility”. In that sense, the passenger’s claim can only fall within Rule 2.1.5, namely “disputes arising where the customer alleges that the subscribing company has not acted fairly; that is, where the subscribing company has failed to provide the service as agreed under the contract for aviation services”. In that sense, I am only able to determine if the airline broke a term of its contract with the passenger or if it failed in its duty of care owed to the passenger when providing the contracted services. Yet, it falls outside of my remit as an adjudicator to establish whether the contract between the parties is balanced, fair or reasonable or to rule whether it is legal in accordance with the applicable regulations in the United Kingdom.

5. I find that the passenger was clearly referred to the airline’s full terms and conditions relating to paid seating and that a link to those terms and conditions was displayed at the time of booking such paid seating. I consider that those terms and conditions include a clear and unequivocal statement that passengers “will not receive a refund for paid seating if [they] cancel [their] flight”.

6. Subsequently, given that the passenger cancelled his tickets for the Flights, I consider the airline correctly denied liability for a refund of the paid seating charge the passenger incurred. In that sense and in view of the clear provision in the airline’s terms and conditions stating passengers “will not receive a refund for paid seating if [they] cancel [their] flight”, I find there is no basis on which I would be able to direct the airline to refund the passenger £408.00, representing the seat selection fee the passenger paid to the airline.

7. I anticipate the passenger may be disappointed by my decision but hopefully he understands my reasoning. Whilst I recognise and sympathise with the situation the passenger found himself in, the airline’s terms and conditions relating to paid seating clearly and unambiguously state passengers “will not receive a refund for paid seating if [they] cancel [their] flight”. Therefore, I was only able to conclude the airline acted in accordance with those terms and conditions by not offering a refund to the passenger for the said seat selection fees which the passenger paid. Whist I recognise the passenger deems this provision unfair, I am unable to make a determination as to whether the same is unfair, binding, acceptable, balanced or not to the detriment of the consumer. Should the passenger be unsatisfied with my ruling, he is free to reject the decision and and to negotiate a settlement with the airline or to pursue the matter elsewhere should he wish to do so, including to dispute the validity of the abovementioned provision (or the airline’s terms and conditions as a whole) before a competent body or court.

Decision

• The passenger’s claim does not succeed.

What next?

It is not hugely surprising that the claim failed, unfortunately.

It is not disputed by me, the passenger or the arbitrator that the BA terms and conditions allow it to pocket your seat selection fees if you cancel your flight.  This appears to be the only point that the CEDR arbitrator has considered.

By his own admission, the arbitrator is not allowed to consider whether these terms are ‘fair’ under UK contract law.  Only a court can decide this.

However, I would clearly take issue with the arbitrator’s view that BA makes its cancellation policy ‘clear’ and ‘unambigous’.  It is clear from the screenshots I show above that this is absolutely NOT the case.  I doubt the abitrator actually did anything as obvious as try to make a BA seat booking himself.


How to earn Avios from UK credit cards

How to earn Avios from UK credit cards (April 2025)

As a reminder, there are various ways of earning Avios points from UK credit cards.  Many cards also have generous sign-up bonuses!

In February 2022, Barclaycard launched two exciting new Barclaycard Avios Mastercard cards with a bonus of up to 25,000 Avios. You can apply here.

You qualify for the bonus on these cards even if you have a British Airways American Express card:

Barclaycard Avios Plus card

Barclaycard Avios Plus Mastercard

Get 25,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £10,000 Read our full review

Barclaycard Avios card

Barclaycard Avios Mastercard

Get 5,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £20,000 Read our full review

There are two official British Airways American Express cards with attractive sign-up bonuses:

British Airways American Express Premium Plus

30,000 Avios and the famous annual 2-4-1 voucher Read our full review

British Airways American Express

5,000 Avios for signing up and an Economy 2-4-1 voucher for spending £15,000 Read our full review

You can also get generous sign-up bonuses by applying for American Express cards which earn Membership Rewards points. These points convert at 1:1 into Avios.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 30,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express

80,000 bonus points and great travel benefits – for a large fee Read our full review

Run your own business?

We recommend Capital on Tap for limited companies. You earn 1 Avios per £1 which is impressive for a Visa card, and the standard card is FREE. Capital on Tap cards also have no FX fees.

Capital on Tap Visa

NO annual fee, NO FX fees and points worth 1 Avios per £1 Read our full review

Capital on Tap Pro Visa

10,500 points (=10,500 Avios) plus good benefits Read our full review

There is also a British Airways American Express card for small businesses:

British Airways American Express Accelerating Business

30,000 Avios sign-up bonus – plus annual bonuses of up to 30,000 Avios Read our full review

There are also generous bonuses on the two American Express Business cards, with the points converting at 1:1 into Avios. These cards are open to sole traders as well as limited companies.

American Express Business Platinum

50,000 points when you sign-up and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Click here to read our detailed summary of all UK credit cards which earn Avios. This includes both personal and small business cards.

Comments (140)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Harry H says:

    The biggest lie on the internet; “I have read the terms and conditions”.

    You cannot disagree with anything the arbitrator says, however distasteful the T&C’s may or may not be.

  • Anna says:

    I think the seating fees are an absolute rip off and I never pay them. We’ve always ended up with acceptable seats and last year we were even moved into the F cabin when BA was using it as overspill on a busy flight! However if you accept that the fees are non-refundable at the time of booking, I don’t see that anyone really has grounds for complaint. I know nobody reads the small print but you agree to the Ts & Cs when you tick the box regardless. As Harry T points out, if there are award seats in F it makes much more sense to spend a few more Avios to get seat choice and a better experience.

    • James says:

      Actually, that’s the point of robs article. Just because you tick the box it doesn’t mean that the T&Cs have been clearly laid out to you or that you wholly agree with them all, or that they are enforceable. That is what the Consumer Contract Laww is about. It’s a shame that CEDR did not look at how badly the T&Cs were laid out/not easily accessible considering the CAA etc made so much noise about fares showing the whole final price..

      • Kevin says:

        The fares do show the whole final price. If you want to reserve a seat then this is an optional extra.

        I’m with the CEDR here. It’s not exactly rocket science.

      • Nick says:

        You’re saying it’s a shame CEDR didn’t do something that’s entirely out of their remit and didn’t have any authority to do? Right……

        • ChrisC says:

          If CEDR had done that you can bet that BA would have taken CEDR to court for acting ultra vires.

      • marcw says:

        If you are willing to pay £500 on seat reservation, I would actually read the small print in detail – just in case.
        What happens here is that the passenger thought the seat reservation fees were refundable in case the passenger cancels the flight. But he thought so wrongly.

        • Andrew says:

          It’s not actually clear the passenger ever thought the seat reservation fees were refundable (not that that actually matters when deciding whether the consumer contract is enforceable). I think it’s quite telling that that sentance is missing from the article. More likely he probably just thought he’d chance it.

  • Definitas says:

    CEDR is pretty toothless and from my perspective, a waste of time. If someone is going to go to the trouble of entering into a dispute in which they feel they have a genuine grievance, they will almost certainly be better served by going direct to litigation.

    • Anna says:

      They were fantastic with me last year when BA were refusing delay compensation. I got nowhere in 6 weeks of arguing with BA directly but they caved as soon as it went to CEDR.

  • mark2 says:

    Could we not crowdfund taking this to court rather than ranting?

    • Rhys says:

      Actually I took BA to Small Claims Court!

      • Doug M says:

        Do you know if previously losing a CEDR has any weight against you with the small claim?

        • Rhys says:

          I doubt it. Mine never went to court – it got settled two days before the deadline to set a court date.

      • Chris Heyes says:

        Rhys @ i did the same small claims court, didn’t even get there though BA paid out treble
        but that’s all i’m allowed to say sorry can’t even disclose any details except it was almost a four fig sum they paid

        • Mikeact says:

          Something to do with your disability I guess.

        • Chris Heyes says:

          Mikeact@ spot on “duty of care” silenced by agreed payout (hints in earlier post) lol

  • insider says:

    Whilst the fees do seem eyewateringly large, I suspect the Silver card holders and above are very happy they exist – in general it means that they have more choice seats and feel ‘rewarded’ for their loyalty

    • Paul Stevens says:

      That’s exactly what I was thinking. It makes it a very real benifit

      • Jonathan says:

        Which is exactly BA’s thinking. The purpose of such high seat reservation fees is to put all but the most determined off thus ensuring their status & last minute high fare passengers get the widest choice of seats. Pretty certain they’ll remain at this level even when Club Suite fully rolled out & all seats are much of a muchness.

  • ChrisC says:

    What we don’t know here (maybe Rob does) is what evidence Andrew submitted to CEDR to back up his case and the evidence BA submitted in rebuttal.

    Did he for example include screen shots that showed the number of clicks needed to get to the detailed T&Cs which say no refund. If he didn’t then (a) BA are not going to prompt him to, (b) BA will just send the T&Cs and not show the intermediate steps and (c) the arbitrator can’t go off and do their own research – they can only adjudicate based on the info in front of them

    • ChrisC says:

      And yes I know some screen shots are included in this article but CEDR can only consider what is put in front of them.

      Can screen shots of HfP articles be used in support of a CEDR case?

  • Charlie Whiskey says:

    The claimant certainly should now test this via Small Claims Court procedure.. If needs be, he should start a Crowdfunding page, advertised through HFP and / or FlyerTalk to get the very best legal advice on how to present his case: we could all benefit and perhaps put a stop to BA’s appalling, mean-spirited and “stuff-you” attitude to its customers.

  • Doug M says:

    CEDR does produce some odd outcomes, and I suppose is related to it’s remit and process. I’d have gone to MCOL or small claims I think. I believe evidence points to BA usually settling as late as possible, hoping to erode the claimants will to pursue.
    Given the price I’m surprised people pay the seat fees initially. I like the BA attitude to this as it does benefit status, and that is for me a real benefit.
    I’m sure with CS being so uniform the the desire for certain seats will disappear.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.