Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Heathrow’s third runway is back on as airport wins Supreme Court case

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

The third runway project at Heathrow is back on track this morning after the Supreme Court overturned February’s court judgement.

Back in February, the original Government decision to allow the third runway was overturned in court after an appeal by environmental campaigners. Their case was based on the fact that the Paris climate change agreement had not been fully considered when approval was given.

The Court of Appeal had decided that the Government had given approval without considering its commitment to keep global temperature rises to as close to 1.5C as possible.

The Supreme Court felt that this was not relevant and that the Government had acted lawfully by relying purely on domestic legislation when giving outline planning consent.

What happens next?

Heathrow can now submit a Development Consent Order, which is required for construction of this scale.

There is no guarantee that permission will be obtained, of course, because the Government will still have to factor in its Paris commitments when making a decision.

The Government has gone even further in its climate commitments since the third runway was originally approved, commiting to ‘net zero’ emissions by 2050 and a 68% cut in carbon emissions by 2030. The new runway will need to be considered alongside these commitments.

Environmental campaigners also have option of asking the European Court of Human Rights to overturn the Supreme Court decision.

In a statement sent to HfP this morning, Heathrow said:

 “This is the right result for the country, which will allow Global Britain to become a reality.  Only by expanding the UK’s hub airport can we connect all of Britain to all of the growing markets of the world, helping to create hundreds of thousands of jobs in every nation and region of our country.  Demand for aviation will recover from Covid, and the additional capacity at an expanded Heathrow will allow Britain as a sovereign nation to compete for trade and win against our rivals in France and Germany. 

Heathrow has already committed to net zero and this ruling recognises the robust planning process that will require us to prove expansion is compliant with the UK’s climate change obligations, including the Paris Climate Agreement, before construction can begin.  The Government has made decarbonising aviation a central part of its green growth agenda, through wider use of Sustainable Aviation Fuel as well as new technology.  As passenger numbers recover, our immediate focus will be to continue to ensure their safety and to maintain our service levels while we consult with investors, government, airline customers and regulators on our next steps.”

The third runway is currently planned to open in 2030, with the original 2026 date now seen as unrealistic – unsurprising given that it involves moving the entire M25 motorway into a huge tunnel, totally demolishing two villages (Longford and Harmondsworth) and flattening most of the hotels and offices on Bath Road including the BA head office …..

Comments (35)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Peter says:

    Can the European Court of Human Rights or the Court of Justice of the European Union overrule the UKSC?
    No.

    Source: https://www.supremecourt.uk/faqs.html

  • flyforfun says:

    ” Demand for aviation will recover from Covid, and the additional capacity at an expanded Heathrow will allow Britain as a sovereign nation to compete for trade and win against our rivals in France and Germany”

    So if we weren’t a “sovereign nation” then we couldn’t win trade? Are they hoping to use taxpayer money to subsidise trying to attract trade by give incentives for companies to move or trade here? I thought Schipol was a bigger rival with 7 runways.

    • RussellH says:

      The irony of this is that international trade inevitably acts as a restriction on sovereignty.
      If you want to sell to somewhere else, you have to follow their rules, not yours.
      I have long thought that their is probably only one, true “sovereign nation” out there – North Korea, though maybe even their sovereignty is not totally pure.

  • Mike says:

    OT – BA cancelled Sydney flights before November

    I had managed to get Amex 241 redemption in F for July-August , just been cancelled and have to go in our summer school hols.
    Not Happy

  • Peter North says:

    Halleluiah, I have been holding out for the £525k compo that I will be receiving for my two bedroom flat in Sipson. If Boris wants to come down a lie in front of a JCB as promised, I will happily volunteer to drive over him.

  • Jerry Butler says:

    Come down and lie ….I like what you did there!

  • Optimus Prime says:

    It won’t happen, Boris vowed to lie down in front of the bulldozers (here’s hope…)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.