Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

easyJet quietly drops ‘Hands Free’ and its ‘you can’t use the overhead lockers’ cabin bag policy

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

There are many contenders for the title of ‘most stupid airline policy ever’, but easyJet’s new baggage policy – which launched this February – was in strong contention for a medal.

The airline banned passengers on standard tickets from bringing on larger bags which would have to go in the overhead locker. This was potentially acceptable if the benefit was sold as an extra, but it wasn’t.

Anyone who turned up at the gate with a large piece of hand baggage had to pay £55 to put it in the hold.

easyJet has also dropped its ‘Hands Free’ service which let you check in your hand baggage and which tended to be cheaper than paying for a seat which allowed a free cabin bag.

Change 1: easyJet will now allow large carry-on bags, if you pay

Under the current easyJet policy, which launched in February 2021, the only passengers allowed to bring larger bags onto the aircraft were those who paid for ‘Up Front’ (ie to sit in the first few rows) or extra legroom seats.

There were also exceptions for easyJet Plus (see our review of easyJet Plus here) and FLEXI fare holders.

This led to the ludicrous situation where the overhead lockers in the front of the aircraft were overflowing with hand baggage because anyone who refused to check in their bag had no choice but to pay for ‘Up Front’.

The overhead lockers in the rear of the aircraft were empty.

What happened if you turned up at the gate with hand baggage?

It was impossible to pay to bring a piece of hand baggage on board if it wouldn’t fit under your seat (45cm x 36cm x 20cm).

If you turned up at the gate with a bag which could not fit under the seat in front, you were charged £55 to place it in the hold.

Don’t believe me? Here is what easyJet published at the time:

easyJet quietly abandons its ludicrous 'hands free' cabin bag policy

Passengers who would have willingly (well, perhaps not willingly) paid an extra few £ for the ‘privilege’ of putting a bag in the overhead locker could not do so. They had to buy the full ‘Up Front’ package.

You weren’t necessarily able to buy ‘Up Front’ if you wanted to

‘Up Front’ seats were capped at between 42 and 63 per flight.

This meant that, even if you were willing to book an ‘Up Front’ seat in order to bring hand baggage into the cabin, you may not have been able to do so.

Once the ‘Up Front’ and extra legroom allocation was gone, that was it. No additional passengers would be allowed to bring larger pieces of hand baggage onto the aircraft, even if willing to pay.

You can now pay to take larger pieces of hand baggage on board

With, unsurprisingly, zero publicity, easyJet has scrapped this idea.

The new easyJet hand baggage policy is outlined here.

You can still buy ‘Up Front’ and extra leg room seats, which will include the ability to bring a larger bag on board for free.

For everyone else, you can now add a large piece of cabin baggage by paying for it during booking or later via the easyJet app. You cannot add a cabin bag via the website yet.

Prices allegedly start at £5.99 each way. That said, comments below suggest that the actual cost is £15+ each way, albeit that £15+ is still cheaper than the typical £30+ cost of ‘Up Front’.

Change 2: easyJet has dropped ‘Hands Free’

I never saw the point of ‘Hands Free’, but some readers did find it useful. easyJet would let you check in your hand baggage for £7 and give you free priority boarding on top. You could book a ‘family bundle’ which reduced the cost to as little as £2.67 per bag. ‘Pay monthly’ customers on the ‘3’ mobile network got the service for nothing at one point as part of a tie-up with the airline.

‘Hands Free’ was initially available on a walk-up basis at the airport, but was later changed to require pre-booking.

British Airways Globe-Trotter BOAC suitcase

It was sold to passengers on the basis that they could experience the freedom of walking around the airport without a bag in their hands, or on their shoulders. The real benefit was that it was cheaper than booking an ‘Up Front’ or emergency exit row seat (a requirement to bring a bag into the cabin) and also cheaper than paying to check in a large suitcase.

‘Hands Free’ worked best for people who had small 55cm suitcases (the largest size allowed for ‘Hands Free’) which did not contain laptops and who were happy to queue at a bag drop on departure and wait at baggage reclaim after landing. It was also useful if you were carrying liquids.

It didn’t work well if you had a soft cabin bag (the risk of damage from checking it in was too high), if you were carrying IT equipment which was too fragile to check-in or if you were looking to minimise the time spent hanging around at the airport.

‘Hands Free’ has now gone as this page of the easyJet website confirms.

Conclusion

Banning passengers from bringing larger items of hand baggage on board, even if they were willing to pay to do so, was a strategic mistake. It opened up clear water between British Airways and easyJet.

My wife, for example, is not allowed to check in her work laptop. It must stay with her at all times. If she wanted to take an easyJet flight and there were no ‘Up Front’ or extra leg room seats available, she couldn’t book it. There was no other way of being allowed to bring the bag onto the aircraft, plus a handbag, since her employer would not pay the premium for a flexible ticket.

At the same time as easyJet was stopping you bringing larger items of hand baggage, British Airways was reintroducing free water and light snacks on short-haul flights, along with the launch of the Tom Kerridge pre-order food menu.

By removing the ability to pay to put a bag in the overhead bins, easyJet also put itself behind low cost rivals Ryanair and Wizz Air. It’s hard to understand how easyJet ever allowed this policy to come to market in the first place.

Comments (149)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • nick says:

    Just booked a large cabin bag to Amsterdam from Gatwick return.
    “Prices from £5.99″…… where?
    £13.99 out and £14.99 return…… another £30 !! too much!!!

    • Steve says:

      Hi Nick, just got quoted 28.99 via the app for spain Uk flight, ridiculous.. cheaper to pay for a large hold bag.

  • Alex says:

    Some ludicrous prices for the larger cabin bag showing on some of my future bookings though – one flight is charging £15 for the bag but I could get an ‘up front’ seat for £17 anyway…

  • Su Hore says:

    Hi as 2 elderly people who had normal hand luggage 56cm etc we used to use hands free because carrying bags up/down steps etc was difficult. Yesterday tried to book hands free for our RETURN flight after 3 weeks to Manchester – couldn’t. After 1.5hrs on phone with 3 agents (1 who told us to abandon 1 suitcase, another told us to buy extra leg seats but all gone) 3rd told us to buy extra hand luggage allowance at £20 ahead. So instead of £14, we have to pay £40 and still drag our cases up steps and the put luggage into overhead locker. They’re going the way of Ryanair but more expensive. There was no mention in any of their emails leading up to our RETURN of this change of policy or flexibility as we had missed it by 2 days. They seem to have no duty of care towards passengers.

  • Kathy. M says:

    is it possible to book a spare seat on easyJet so that 2 of us will have an empty seat between us? If so, how do you sort out information on the third (non existent) traveller. As 2 very elderly and still cautious travellers, we would like to take the plunge to start flying again, but are still a bit nervous.
    As answers to this post has included easyJet travellers, hopefully someone knows the answer.

    • Nick says:

      The easyJet website says you can call them to book an extra seat. Always best to do this anyway – if you just book your own then the headcount on board could cause a discrepancy – plus you’ll have paid APD unnecessarily.

    • memesweeper says:

      Book a cello seat if you want to do it without calling up. Poor man’s club europe 🙂

    • TimM says:

      Yes call them to quote for an extra seat between you. However, do not be surprised it is costs more than booking an extra passenger due to loss of revenue on all the extras they would otherwise make.

      I routinely book window and aisle seats for two passengers travelling together either row 1 or otherwise ‘up front’ on the basis that it is unlikely that any sane person would choose to pay a hefty fee to have a middle seat. Of course, it may still be allocated at the airport to someone free-of-charge is the flight near-full, in which case the person with the aisle seat offers to move to the middle. It is not perfect but often works.

  • PL says:

    Easyjet also have a bizarre mask policy. I was travelling recently and the guy in front of me was not allowed through to gate as he had the wrong type of mask on. It was a black cloth type mask covering the nose and mouth that many people wear. Totally fine. He argued the point but did not get anywhere. He had to buy a surgical type mask from a vending machine which ironically does not have such a good fit over the nose and mouth!!

    • Peter K says:

      It depends on the quality of the mask but many cloth masks are a very porous single layer, whereas medical masks are often 3 layer and a much tighter weave.

    • Anthony says:

      I think it’s understandable – some countries have very strict entry requirements with require FFP2 masks and this may include on the flight there. easyjet have obviously just made a blanket rule for easier implementation.

      On our recent flight to Vienna we got an email from BA before hand stating that we required FFP2 type masks for the flight to comply with Austrian law.

    • Mike says:

      Cloth masks aren’t great, they are are a half to a quarter as effective as a medical mask. Even a single use medical mask washed 10 times in soap and water is more effective than a cloth mask. It made sense to use cloth masks at the start of the pandemic when PPE was in short supply, now it doesn’t if the aim is to protect people. Obviously the the best is a N95/FFP2 mask then a medical mask then a cloth mask.

      Personally, a cloth mask is good if you need to wear a mask but don’t want to, you can go through the theatre of it with a cloth mask.

      • John says:

        My wife made cloth masks with a filter inside. Well I have no plans to fly easyjet anyway so doesn’t matter.

    • Mike says:

      That’s not what your link says:

      “The mask you wear should be FFP2 (or equivalent) certified, surgical or cloth.”

      However, some countries have mandated mask types, for example a flight to France requires a surgical mask. Not EasyJet’s rules but the rules of various countries. The obvious thing to do in these circumstances is check.

      • TimM says:

        I read that to mean the mask may either be surgical or cloth but either way must be FFP2 certified (or equivalent – there are various international and national standards recognised as equivalent). When EJ say “should”, I read that to mean you will be denied boarding if your mask is non-compliant.

  • Flightsy says:

    I’d be curious to understand what flights have a large cabin bag priced at £5.99 – I have a one way Edinburgh to Stanstead flight booked for 11 days time and EasyJet are charging £18.49 for a large cabin bag… *eyeroll*

    • Andrew says:

      You could potentially have travelled to London on Lumo for marginally more than Easyjet charge you for taking your cabin bag.

  • bill says:

    I was on an easyjet flight from LGW-ALC last week and the cabin crew told a passenger that the idea to introduce a smaller cabin bag only was that of a crew member. The crew member and passenger both claimed they liked the idea. It was rather bizzare that 95% of locker space was completely empty.

    Now they have introduced the ability to purchase a lager cabin bag as a standalone product – and this is to be welcomed. Bizzarely look at these prices – which don’t make sense:

    IOM-LPL £11.99 for a large cabin bag
    LPL-IOM £15.49 for a large cabin bag

    Furthermore, the removal of the hands free option is effectively just a way of charging people more for taking the trolley case. I would have liked them to retain the hands free option, in addition to the payment to take the bag on board.

  • aDifferentSimon says:

    Didn’t feel ludicrous when I could either pay 35£ for 15kg of hold luggage or £7 for a large cabin bag in the hold

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.