Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Are you a fool to pay £3,700 for ‘Red List’ hotel quarantine if you have miles and points?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

If you are returning to the UK from one of the 10 Southern African countries on the UK Government ‘Red List’, you are facing 10 days of hotel quarantine before you are allowed to return home.

The cost of this is now £2,285 for one person and an additional £1,430 for a second guest.

This assumes you can even get a quarantine spot, since many people are being told that there are no rooms currently available and that they must remain outside the UK for longer.

Frankly, if you pay this, and you have Avios, you’re possibly a mug.

Cancun via Unsplash

Reader Colin dropped me a note to explain what happened when he found himself stuck in South Africa. Frustratingly, he and his wife had only gone there for a 4-night short break. Spending 10 days in quarantine on his return was obviously not part of his plan.

Colin’s original strategy to avoid quarantine was to travel from Cape Town to another African country for 10 days. This would allow him to fly back to the UK with no quarantine required.

Unfortunately, there were no suitable options. Those which did exist were thwarted by visa issues, innoculation requirements, bans on incoming South African travellers, an inability to get a flight back to Europe or, ahem, civil war.

Then he discovered some good news.

The ‘Red List’ quarantine requirements do not apply to anyone who is in transit in the UK.

Colin realised that he and his wife had a choice:

  • pay £3,700 for 10 days of hotel quarantine at Heathrow (which wasn’t even possible due to lack of capacity unless they remained in Cape Town for a few more days), or
  • book a luxury 10 day holiday somewhere, with a flight departing within 24 hours of when they arrived in London from South Africa

Unsurprisingly, he went with Plan B.

Colin booked two flights on British Airways to Cancun, departing from Gatwick yesterday, using Avios.

The transit rules allowed him to land at Terminal 5, spend the night in transit at a Heathrow hotel (he booked into the Hilton Garden Inn at Hatton Cross) and then make his way to Gatwick the following morning.

Instead of spending £3,700 to stay at a mid-range Heathrow hotel, they are spending their time at a 5-star all-inclusive Hilton beach resort.

This would have cost $600 per night for cash – roughly the same price for a couple as UK hotel quarantine – but Colin booked five nights via Hilton Honors for 80,000 points per night, with the ‘five for four’ discount on top. They will follow this by paying cash for additional nights in a mid-range downtown hotel to see a bit more of Cancun before heading home.

His total cost, including the flights, is £600 plus 120,000 Avios plus 320,000 Hilton Honors points.

This compares to £3,700 for the UK hotel quarantine package for two people.

He will arrive back in the UK on the same day that he would otherwise have left his hotel quarantine at Heathrow. The only risk is if Mexico is placed on the UK ‘Red List’ whilst they are away.

Colin and his wife will still be away for a lot longer than their originally planned four day break. They are, however, enjoying themselves in Cancun rather than spending 10 days in a 25 sq m hotel room at Heathrow.

The moral of the story is that if you have any friends or family who are currently in Southern Africa and are planning to pay for UK hotel quarantine, try to talk them out of it. For potentially less money, they can enjoy a foreign holiday somewhere for 10 days instead.

Comments (263)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Brian says:

    I think this article is in quite poor taste. The world is dealing with a variant about which relatively little is known. Encouraging individuals to fly halfway across the world and through the UK to avoid the quarantine is completely in the face of the current laws. Although it complies with the letter of the law, it clearly is in contempt of the spirit.

    We know that travel was blamed for the initial spread and this directly contributed to the shutdown of the industry for a period far longer than most other industries. This kind of action, so blatant and public is the kind of thing that will make politicians take further actions which are visible, but not necessarily sensible.

    • Blenz101 says:

      That has been the case with every other variant. Just because this one was first identified in Africa it’s politically easy.

      It already exists across every populated continent.

      Had the US sequenced and identified it first I highly doubt we would have seen the same reaction with zero evidence to support the actions being taken.

    • G says:

      Shock horror. Omicron is already in the UK and spreading. Omicron was in the Netherlands before the South African / Botswanan authorities informed the WHO.

      Travel bans only delay the spread of viruses and variants. They do not stop it. Travel is singled out for bans because it looks like effective action governments can take because in reality they have little to no control over a virus.

      • meta says:

        It was in the UK as well before being discovered in SA, probably spreading around the globe since October. WHO said as much that travel bans shouldn’t be in place as they only ruin economies and don’t have any effect on spread. Once a variant is discovered in one country, you can be certain it’s already everywhere. Cases of community spread are already being identified without any link to travel.

        • ken says:

          “WHO said as much that travel bans shouldn’t be in place”

          They are a bit more nuanced than that, and the travel bans should be based on risk assessments, that any travel bans should be time limited and ideally reviewed every 2 weeks.

          They also say that travel restrictions should be part of broad public health measures – which have largely gone in the UK from what I see.

        • Alex Sm says:

          Thanks for saying this out loud, one of the few sensible voices here

    • Char Char says:

      The current system is a mess and over reaction, travelling to Mexico is in line with the Govs behaviour and is quite a good one.

  • David says:

    This is an interesting approach – and good for Colin!

    But I don’t understand how it worked in practice… surely Colin would’ve had to go through the UK border on returning from SA, and need to have a quarantine hotel booking to be admitted?

    Or did he manage to re-check in and get his luggage transferred all on the airside in LHR. Forgive me if I’m being dim!

    • Rob says:

      No. If you are in transit you don’t need to book a hotel.

      Amusingly, BA actually lost his luggage and then told him not to worry because it was being sent to his house. He and his wife have therefore flown to Cancun with just hand baggage ….

      • Yorkieflyer says:

        Something still not right here though? In transit only works on same ticket or hbo with BA as they won’t check bags through on different PNR’s

        • TGLoyalty says:

          You’re confusing the U.Ks legal definition of “in transit” and what the airline considers being in transit with them.

          • Yorkieflyer says:

            Indeed but my impression from earlier was that once you crossed the UK border you didn’t pass GO but went directly to jail?

          • TGLoyalty says:

            Ofcourse not. You’re actually allowed to transit.

  • MrW says:

    Hi Rob and Team, thanks for the article. Im currently sitting in Cape Town with a BA flight back to LHR booked for Dec 8th. I had an onwards Flight planned to CDG for 10 days but that has been cancelled now with the new French rules. Ive seen several comments about transfers but its still not clear. Did Colin have check-in bags? How did he get his old ticket and new tickets joined together so that they were on the same itinerary for transit, or is this not needed? I always assumed that to qualify for transit you could not leave “air-side” to collect bags to check in, that the baggage had to be automatically transferred on your ticket. Am I wrong? Any advise would be appreciated . Thanks

    • Rhys says:

      Bags don’t have to be on the same ticket. You only quarantine once you reach your final destination – not the second you step outside the airport!

      • Rob says:

        You can transit between airports without the quarantine kicking in – swapping to Gatwick would only be an issue if, for example, you didn’t have the legal right to enter the UK.

      • MrW says:

        thanks

    • Shaw West says:

      you could arrive in LHR and leave by MAN. As long as you can reasonably isolate

    • SharonC says:

      It’s a bit woolly on the “usually 24hr period”. If you land in the morning of one day, stay at your transit hotel and the don’t fly until lunchtime the next day is that allowable as a transit? I suppose it is if you have your onward ticket?

  • Sandgrounder says:

    Mexico haven’t banned people who have recently been in SA.
    You are allowed to transit through the UK from SA.
    What’s the problem?
    Is anyone annoyed with people transiting the UK and going elsewhere? Because even if they quarantine strapped to a bed in a biosecure research lab when they get where they are going, the risk of exposure to people on the plane from London is the same.
    If Mexico let you in, it’s up to them.

    • Voldemort says:

      I suppose he could have said he was going to Mexico for an eye test and I can be very clear that all COVID guidance has been followed at all times and I am sorry you feel that way.

  • Ignacio Rodriguez says:

    What an irresponsible article encouraging rules dodging and potential virus spreading as well as taking the coronavirus current situation anything but seriously.
    The UK doesn’t ask for fit to fly, same as many other countries, people could have the virus like those 60 passengers in the KLM flight bound for Amsterdam.
    Didn’t you have anything better to write about?
    Utterly disappointed

    • Rhys says:

      Actually, the UK does require fit to fly PCR tests on flights to the UK from red list countries so everyone on the flight will have tested negative.

      • Bagoly says:

        Does NL have the same requirement?
        i.e. did those 60 passengers all have negative pre-departure tests?

        • Polly says:

          Someone on here said it’s easy to buy fake negative fit to travel certs everywhere, it seems…so, who knows if they all got tested or not, pre flight.

          • TGLoyalty says:

            It’s also easy to test negative today and positive tomorrow. It’s about reducing risk NOT erasing it.

            I suspect fully vaccinated people didn’t need a test if they were European citizens when that plane checked in / took off.

    • Andy says:

      It’s not rule dodging though is it? It’s literally following the rules as outlined

    • Voldemort says:

      I suppose he could have said he was going to Mexico for an eye test and I can be very clear that all COVID guidance has been followed at all times and I am sorry you feel that way.

      • Shaw West says:

        there is no restriction on you leaving the UK. This was so last December till April. You could go anywhere as you wish.

  • BuildBackBetter says:

    In a way it’s good for UK government if more people head to Mexico.
    Less hotels at Heathrow need to be signed up.
    If people get sick, they aren’t flying to UK immediately, they’ll be paying for medical care in Mexico and not use nhs.
    If they don’t get sick, then only healthy people get back to uk.

    • GeorgeJ says:

      Yes much safer for the UK. A friend who came back from SA yesterday has reported that it was totally shambolic at LHR with clueless staff allowing everyone to mix and potentially spread infection. He couldn’t even get angry about it as everyone was laughing so much at the chaos.
      I had already offered to let him come and stay with us in Mexico but he decided to put up with quarantine.

  • Guy Incognito says:

    The more people expose these rules for the absolute shambles they are the better. It is a facade of safety.

    • TGLoyalty says:

      The red list hotel quarantine was a shambles of a policy from the start and should be abolished.

    • Bagoly says:

      In particular, had the government allowed some competition between hotels so that the base offer was a more realistic £100 per night and passengers who wanted better room, food etc could buy it, then fewer people would be so motivated to avoid it.

      • Polly says:

        Here in Singapore, we know people who got to chose their hotels, even the Marriott in Orchard. But no balconies allowed. There was no possibility of escaping the stay tho.

        • Polly says:

          I was luckier, having a balcony at my enforced facility last week…. Gosh, was it only last week?? Yep day 9 of freedom….and definitely feels like a holiday now.

        • BuildBackBetter says:

          Strange. I thought covid spreads less in open air.

          • Polly says:

            BBB/HBommie,

            Agree with you. But here masks are worn everywhere, even by the pool if not actually swimming. They “get around it “ by immediately bringing you a glass of water. Thank you! So you can sip for an hour if you like.

            Masks are the main restriction. And everyone is on trace app, so to get into a shop, restaurant etc, must scan in/out. People seem able to cope, as it means everyone can get on with normal everyday activities. Some random testing takes place too.
            Upping the arrivals testing to 7 day testing now. 3 supervised, 4 at home ones…must isolate til you upload the daily tests. Starts Monday at midnight. For VTLs that is, air, sea, and land borders.

  • Colin MacKinnon says:

    Just to let you know, the Real Colin isn’t going to Mexico until later this month – and Mrs Colin would never dream of going as far away as SA for just four days!

    In my opinion, the UK rules are UK rules, intended to protect UK residents. They are not even EU rules anymore! And def not WHO rules.

    • Polly says:

      V funny, the real Colin has now been exposed in Times Money this morning…lovely picture on the beach! Hfp and Rob get a mention and quote…

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.