Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Onboard ‘Flight100’ – the first transatlantic flight powered by 100% sustainable aviation fuel

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

On Tuesday, I was one of an exclusive group of 110 people on board Virgin Atlantic’s ‘Flight100’.

If you haven’t been following along, this was a demonstration flight operated by Virgin Atlantic in conjunction with Boeing, Rolls-Royce and four other companies and universities to prove that current aircraft are able to fly on 100% sustainable aviation fuel. A few weeks ago, I visited Rolls-Royce in Derby to learn more about their testing program.

The Department for Transport, which kicked off the challenge, provided £1 million in funding which Virgin matched.

Since winning the competition to operate the flight in November 2022, Virgin Atlantic and its partners have been beavering away to make it a reality, but also to ensure that the flight would be as safe as any other commercial flight.

Onboard 'Flight100' - the first transatlantic flight powered by 100% sustainable aviation fuel

As this was a demonstration flight, no paying passengers or cargo were allowed on board. In fact, the Civil Aviation Authority would only permit a maximum of 120 people on board who had to have a specific interest in the flight itself. That included staff from all the consortium partners as well as a small selection of broadcasters and journalists such as myself to document the experience.

Whilst we boarded the flight just after 10am on Tuesday, work has been underway for some time to prepare the aircraft. Holly Boyd-Boland, VP Corporate Development and Sustainability at Virgin Atlantic, told me:

“It’s been a process over the last six to eight months, where we have been identifying the fuel and doing a lot of testing, primarily through our partners at Rolls-Royce and in collaboration with Sheffield University.

But getting ready for today and going back a week or so, the fuel arrived from Europe and the US at the beginning of last week and was blended on the Isle of Grain by AirBP last Tuesday. Last Thursday, it was tankered in two specific bowsers up to Heathrow. On Friday we fueled the engines, which took a couple of batches. So we fueled the initial, then did some additional testing, then we fueled the whole thing up. And between Friday and now the aircraft’s been under pretty tight maintenance watch to make sure that it was fit for purpose.”  

Onboard 'Flight100' - the first transatlantic flight powered by 100% sustainable aviation fuel

The fuel used yesterday was a specific blend of two different types of sustainable aviation fuel, in order to create what is called a ‘drop in’ fuel. This means that no modifications need to be made to the aircraft in order for it to fly: it can be used just like normal jet fuel, without having to recertify the engines and fuel systems. Said Corneel Koster, Virgin’s Chief Customer & Operating Officer:

“We knew from full testing on the ground that this blend, which is 88% HEFA, basically fatty acids and waste oils; and 12%, synthetic, aromatic kerosene, which is made from waste from corn. This combination is unique. But we tested this extensively on Rolls Royce on the ground for an entire full flight profile of a flight to New York. And then the next day we tested the normal Jet A fuel and saw that it’s absolutely comparable.”

Maria Laine, President United Kingdom, Ireland & Nordic region for Boeing added:

“That’s the beauty of sustainable aviation fuels. It truly is a drop-in solution. That’s one of the purposes of this flight, to serve as proof that we can easily slide it into commercial operations so that no major impacts to infrastructure or anything else needs to be carried out.”

Onboard 'Flight100' - the first transatlantic flight powered by 100% sustainable aviation fuel

Nonetheless, Virgin Atlantic was still keen to run a little dress rehearsal before the main event on Tuesday, particularly given the exceptionally high interest in the story. Corneel said:

“We were fully certified and ready to fly today, without having done it before. But look, quite clearly the world is watching today. We wanted to make sure that everything goes right. So we de-risked the project and some of our ground procedures by doing a very short, very quiet flight on Saturday as a dress rehearsal, to go above and beyond and to make sure that everything was ready for Tuesday. It was completely uneventful!”

The dress rehearsal paid off. VS100 took off smoothly at 11:49am as expected, and for those of us on board it felt like any other flight to New York. From the flight itself it was indistinguishable that we were running on sustainable aviation fuel. The only giveaway was the excitement on board and the cheer after take-off!

Onboard 'Flight100' - the first transatlantic flight powered by 100% sustainable aviation fuel

Flight100 wasn’t just testing sustainable aviation fuels, however. Virgin Atlantic also incorporated a suite of fuel-saving measures including one of the most direct routings from London to New York that’s possible, saving a predicted 1,000kg+ of jetfuel.

Onboard 'Flight100' - the first transatlantic flight powered by 100% sustainable aviation fuel

Other measures included more efficient ascent and descent procedures and single-engine taxiing at JFK. In total, an estimated 3,242kg of fuel were saved, equivalent to just over 10,000kg of CO2.

After 7:16 hours, we came in to land in an overcast and ice-cold JFK Airport, with the entire flight having operated as expected.

I’d be lying if I said the flight was eventful: as I mentioned above, to us it felt like any other regular service between London and New York. But that’s the beauty of sustainable aviation fuel: it can reduce our carbon footprint by over 70% on existing infrastructure and without needing to re-invent the wheel. This makes it the only practical solution for decarbonising aviation in the next few decades before future technologies such as hydrogen or battery flight become a commercial reality.

What’s next? Supply continues to be a major problem, with SAF currently contributing less than 0.1% of all aviation fuel globally. Scaling up production will be key. Just to get to Virgin Atlantic’s target of 10% by 2030 will require a hundred-fold increase.

Sadly, SAF production in the UK is extremely thin on the ground with no dedicated SAF refineries in operation. The fuel used for our flight was imported from the EU and US. At present, five commercial plants are due to start construction by 2025

If everything goes to plan, though, Virgin Atlantic will be flying with 10%+ SAF in just over six years.


How to earn Virgin Points from UK credit cards

How to earn Virgin Points from UK credit cards (April 2025)

As a reminder, there are various ways of earning Virgin Points from UK credit cards.  Many cards also have generous sign-up bonuses.

You can choose from two official Virgin Atlantic credit cards (apply here, the Reward+ card has a bonus of 18,000 Virgin Points and the free card has a bonus of 3,000 Virgin Points):

Virgin Atlantic Reward+ Mastercard

18,000 bonus points and 1.5 points for every £1 you spend Read our full review

Virgin Atlantic Reward Mastercard

3,000 bonus points, no fee and 1 point for every £1 you spend Read our full review

You can also earn Virgin Points from various American Express cards – and these have sign-up bonuses too.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold is FREE for a year and comes with 20,000 Membership Rewards points, which convert into 20,000 Virgin Points.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 30,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express comes with 50,000 Membership Rewards points, which convert into 50,000 Virgin Points.

The Platinum Card from American Express

80,000 bonus points and great travel benefits – for a large fee Read our full review

Small business owners should consider the two American Express Business cards. Points convert at 1:1 into Virgin Points.

American Express Business Platinum

50,000 points when you sign-up and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Click here to read our detailed summary of all UK credit cards which earn Virgin Points

Comments (123)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • paul says:

    Unsure of the throw std fuel in the tank one day, cooking oil the next, std again after that with no detrimental effect on the engine and other parts?

    It only needs one tiny flaw, one small crack and ……

    No, I think I will wait for the teletransporter rather than risk traveling on chip fat and unleaded.

    • Rob says:

      This is part of the testing, to see what happens when it switches back to standard fuel today.

    • Can says:

      And you don’t think the engine and the engineering behind it was not tested previously? And they approved it without any tests?

    • Rui N. says:

      If you travelled in the past 5 years you already travelled on “chip fat”. Lots of airports already have some blends of SAF in their tanks, and most airlines in the developed world I’ve tried it out in one way or another.

      • Rhys says:

        …less than 0.1% globally.

        • Rui N. says:

          And most of that is used in Europe (a little bit in the US now as well). Several airports across the EU already have 0.5%-1% SAF blended in all the fuel available there.

    • Magic Mike says:

      Most new diesel vehicles can now run on HVO (hydrogenated vegetable oil) with no modifications. This is exactly “std fuel in the tank one day, cooking oil the next”.

      Yes this is a plane not a car but same principle.

    • Numpty says:

      Switching or mixing HVO fuel and diesel is perfectly ok to do. Some Scandinavian countries already sell it as a diesel/HVO blend at the pumps – doesn’t happen in the UK due to suppliers.

      In the case of diesel engines running HVO fuel a lot of engine manufacturers wanted to do a years worth of running on HVO as a test to then be satisfied to warranty/certify its ok.

      HVO fuel is a lot more expensive than diesel, circa 50p per litre.

      The sustainability of biofuels has been questioned in the recent past, including by the EA. A lot of HVO sources are certified as being from sustainable sources, but the audit trail starts to fall apart when the raw feedstock is then listed as coming from Malaysia and Indonesia which infers its coming from palm oil plantations. Plantations that major companies have been heavily investing in, but requires clearance of areas that could have been used for crops as a food supply, or had been rainforest (and the loss of a carbon sink).

      Whether it is ‘waste’ products for biofuel, ‘waste’ products for low carbon concrete. They are all great ideas when the adoption is low, but there is not enough supply of waste products to allow full adoption and be sustainable.

  • Thywillbedone says:

    Can’t abide that bearded buffoon …

    • Michael C says:

      Excuse me!!
      Rhys always seems to be a) a very nice guy, and b) clean-shaven!

  • Chris says:

    Pure virtue signalling. Everyone knows in the new religion you have to display how pious we are. But even by the tenets of wokery, slapping the label “sustainable” on aviation fuel is a bit on the nose.

    …Not that it’s adherents would accept *ANY* practical solution because their real goal is to force through a Marxist style state control of our lives. The threat of future eternal damnation is the perfect scam to do that, copied verbatim from the majour Abrahamic religions.

    I implore you all to reject this nonsense viscerally whether it’s in your own workplaces or on a loyalty points website. The environment is going to be fine. The environmental narcissists are exploiting your reasonability and normal human desire to consider yourself a decent person by framing it in terms of selfish vs unselfish behaviour, when their real agenda is a collectivist VS capitalist economy.

    You have been warned.

    • cin4 says:

      Lol, what makes you think the environment is “going to be fine” exactly?

    • laughingplace says:

      Well put Chris. The scale of the climate doom-mongering is frankly absurd. If the much talked about ‘global warming’, sorry, ‘global boiling’, indeed comes to fruition then here in the UK we have much to benefit from it. Aside from the obvious better weather, improved crop yields, increased tourism, healthier population, less deaths due to cold weather, etc. You never hear the benefits talked about!

      • TimM says:

        I can’t believe such ignorance still exists. The main risk of global warming is not a slight increase in temperatures but a flip to a different system of weather and climate equilibrium that will wipe out almost all life on the planet. The weather instability in recent years, globally, are the first signs of a tipping point approaching. Unless you are a cockroach you should be very worried.

        • Andrew says:

          Not sure it’d wipe out all life on the planet. But the OP and commenter above show that they understand nothing about climate change.

        • Paul says:

          Before the Ice Age it was rather warm – then it got a bit chilly – and now its warming up again (ready for the next chilly bit) and so on.

          Do people really think that by travelling on chip fat we are going to “save the planet”?

          I guess it may stop us all melting in 999,999,999,999 years instead of 1,000,000,000,000 – more than enough time for the elite to be living on Mars or somewhere.

      • Andrew says:

        Parroting Frost’s nonsense on this is really not a good look.

        Telling us that you don’t understand *climate change* at all.

      • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

        That would be improved crop yields for certain types of crops with reduced yields for others

        Less deaths due to cold weather will be countered by more heat related deaths.

    • ChrisBCN says:

      A reminder that stupidity and ignorance are still out there, as ever. Put down the GB News!

    • Scott says:

      Yeah, you tell ’em @Chris – it’s the plandemic, sheeple.

    • can2 says:

      is this serious, or a bad taste of humour?

      • Phantomchickenz says:

        It’s the unfortunate impact of media either with an agenda (Daily Mail), or profiting off division (GB News).

        Wait until they find out that climate change will lead to massive displacement of population. What do they hate less – immigrants or being told the environment is going up the spout?

        • can2 says:

          I’m still in absolute denial that Daily Mail and GB News do not have that much impact…

          • ChrisBCN says:

            Can2, they don’t, but combine it with some of what people see on Facebook, TikTok, Twitter and the impact is amplified. Misinformation and ignorance affects a large minority of people.

    • Dubious says:

      I think you need to look up the Gartner Hype Cycle. There might be a lot of organizations greenwashing but that does not equate to the issue being fake.

  • cin4 says:

    Unfortunately we’re all well aware that this is just run of the kill greenwashing. There is nothing “sustainable” about this fuel.

  • LostInAsia says:

    Rob, Rhys – I think your website has some sort of bug. This article is showing correctly, but where the comments section should be there is in fact a comments section from a Daily Mail article

    • AJA says:

      I assume that you read the Daily Mail ? If not, how would you be able to make such an announcement? Is it that your gullible aunt reads the paper online and she forces you to read the comments on her ipad when you visit?

  • Andrew says:

    Why don’t airlines always use more fuel efficient take off and landings then (and single engine taxiing though can’t imagine that saves much)?

    • ken says:

      Lets guess at £10 per engine per minute.

      Ryanair save 68,000 tonnes of fuel a year by single engine taxiing (by their figures). £40 million a year ?

      Always possible I have got a decimal point wrong !

    • Rhys says:

      Some airlines are starting to do single-engine taxi a lot more frequently

    • ADS says:

      yes, it breaks me that we have to wait for these sort of flights to get more optimised routings

      also, why aren’t all airports using tractors for taxiing – it’s bonkers that we are still using jet engines to move planes around on the ground

  • ken says:

    “single-engine taxiing at JFK”

    Pretty surprised this isn’t standard operating procedure now (after 1-3 min engine cool down), especially taxiing in.

    Or is it just more greenwash ?

  • Paul says:

    British Airways have a UK SAF supply in Lincolnshire, though not dedicated to SAF.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.