Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Bare-bones vs IMAX in the sky: the future of business class seats is diverging

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Comments about new airline business class seat launches on Head for Points often suggest that “all business class seats” are the same and that “innovation is over”.

That’s not entirely wrong. In the last decade or so, we’ve seen the vast majority of airlines and seat manufacturers adopt standard features such as direct aisle access, doored suites, 4K screens and Bluetooth connectivity.

The days of substantial differences in business class cabins, when some airlines offered direct aisle access whilst others stacked passengers eight abreast, are largely over. Less competitive seats are being phased out by airlines such as British Airways, Emirates and Lufthansa, albeit perhaps not as quickly as passengers would like. (Don’t expect the British Airways Gatwick fleet to get decent seats until the aircraft are scrapped.)

MAYA Collins Aerospace

Look down any business class cabin and you’ll likely see one of two configurations – herringbone seats angled towards the window or alternating staggers. That’s because these are the most efficient use of cabin space, maximising both seat density and personal space in a world where direct aisle access is essential, rather than optional.

That’s not to say the seatmakers aren’t innovating. At Aircraft Interiors Expo in Hamburg this year, Collins Aerospace and Stelia Aerospace displayed two very different future seat types showcasing how they are trying to give airlines more choice when it comes to business class seating.

IMAX in the sky

At one end of the spectrum you have a new seat concept called MAYA developed by Collins Aerospace and in-flight entertainment supplier Panasonic Avionics.

Whilst not yet a fully certificated seat – so it does not have the necessary safety clearances to be installed – the two were pitching it as an advanced concept that could be brought to market within a year or two.

Billed as the “future of premium air travel”, the most visible innovation is the curved, 45″ OLED display from Panasonic. This 21:9 aspect ratio screen would allow ultrawide CinemaScope films to fill the full screen with no black bars, a first on board an aircraft.

MAYA seat from Collins Aerospace

In order to accommodate the huge screen, Collins invited Panasonic to join design discussions from the outset rather than simply pulling them in as a supplier further along the design stage.

Ed Dryden, president of Interiors at Collins Aerospace, says that

“Historically, and currently, products are designed in isolation. At Collins Aerospace Interiors we have been focused on shifting that paradigm and actually developing solutions rather than just products.”

All too often, in-flight entertainment screens look tacked-on to a business class seat design, a bit like plonking a TV on a table. With MAYA, the seat was designed around the unique curved screen to deliver an experience more akin to going to the cinema.

According to Ken Sain of Panasonic Avionics:

“It is seamlessly integrated into a reverse herring-bone business suite. Its three-times larger than today’s typical business class screens.”

The sheer size of the screen means you can also use it for multi-tasking. You could watch content in a 16:9 aspect ratio, with the remainder of the screen used for things such as the in-flight map, aircraft cameras or even gaming.

Whilst the seat itself is a more conventional herringbone, MAYA is clearly a fully specced flagship product designed to wow. It could find a home at an airline where customer experience is king.

Opera Essential seat

On the other hand ….. the bare necessities

At the other end of the spectrum you have the Opera Essential seat, on offer from Airbus-owned Stelia Aerospace and pictured above.

As the name suggests, this is a bare-boned lie-flat business class seat that it is calling “the lightest seat offering premium passenger experience”.

Why is ‘lightest’ a selling point? With an increasing focus on sustainability and fuel burn, airlines are keen to reduce the weight of business class seats that can often weigh into the hundreds of kilos. Over the lifetime of an aircraft, every kilo saved can save hundreds if not thousands of tons of fuel and, as a result, CO2 emissions.

We’re already seeing weight play a part in airline seat selection. Finnair’s new no-recline AirLounge seat saves a substantial amount of weight by removing all electrically actuated mechanical parts. It opts instead for a larger flat-bed seat that you can ‘recline’ through the use of pillows, as you would at home on the sofa.

So just how light can a seat get? Stelia is targetting a weight of 65kg per seat – 30% lighter than the standard Opera business class seat for single aisle aircraft.

A number of compromises are made to achieve this weight. For a start, the Essential ditches the door and in-flight entertainment screen altogether. According to independent aviation journalist John Walton this saves “1.5 tonnes of wiring and other associated weight that comes with them.” Doors can add eight to ten kilos each.

(Are passengers really willing to go without IFE? Probably not. In reality these seats are offered to airlines as a basic model but with the option to add back any features which are required.)

Further weight savings are achieved by removing the electronic recline system and replacing it with a manually actuated lever. Some of the heaviest components in an aircraft seat are electrical motors, capable of reclining and unreclining a seat with an adult human still sitting on it. Removing these hardwearing items not only saves on weight but also simplifies maintenance, further reducing costs.

Opera Essential seat

Unlike Finnair’s AirLounge, Stelia has retained the recline mechanism but turned it into a manual system. Pull a lever – a bit like on a car – and the seat will slide forward and flatten. As John Walton writes,

“It’s a matter of pulling up on the lever to slide the seat to the reclined (or fully flat) position you desire, then releasing the lever. Returning to the seated position from flat, there’s a bit of a pilates core muscle trick to finding the precise point at which to place your body weight on the seat in order to activate the slide of the kinematics, but this took only a couple of tries and then we had it down pat.”

Conclusion

The MAYA and Opera Essential aren’t competitors: both are solutions to problems at vastly different ends of the market, with Collins targetting premium, full-service airlines and Stelia the cost-conscious low(er) cost carriers.

It’s easy to imagine a world where both are flying regularly. The Opera Essential could be perfect for an increasing number of long haul low cost airlines such as IndiGo. It has recently announced its intention to launch long haul flights from India with the A350.

It will be interesting to watch which airlines – if any – decide to adopt one of these new seats.

Comments (75)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • TimM says:

    With such an increasing focus on weight, I don’t know why airlines are not routinely weighing passengers at check-in, offering free diet advice from booking and charging for the extra fuel burn over a certain, low, nominal weight.

    • David says:

      Just remove the seat altogether and have us lay on floor. CO2 savings would be substantial.

      • TimM says:

        Mike O’Leary’s suggestion was standing room only flights. The authorities were never going to go along with that. However, I have thought of a couple of alternatives: 1) where people are hung like cattle in a butchers fridge and slid down the cabin as they board or 2) placed in personal ‘coffins’ several storeys high like a morgue or 3) a combination of the two.

    • Tom C says:

      Double-tier points for being less than 15% body fat; forced to stand up and be publicly shamed at random intervals during the flight if you’re over 25% – and banned from ordering dessert. If only RyanAir had a loyalty scheme.

    • Thywillbedone says:

      +1
      If we have to pay extra for the bags we carry-on/put in the hold, we should also have to pay for ‘junk in the trunk’. I say that from the safety of my healthy BMI …

    • AJA says:

      I assume your comment is partly in jest? But expanding on your idea, what is that low nominal weight? Is it based on a person who is 4ft6 or someone who is 6ft tall?

      And what if you weigh less than that nominal weight? Do you get a refund?

      That’s a slippery slope I think we don’t want to go down.

      • Stu_N says:

        Careful what you wish for – the logical conclusion is to put all the 165cm 60kg people in narrower seats with reduced pitch, giving them an equal level of discomfort to that currently faced by 185cm 90kg passengers.

    • Novice says:

      The truth is that until all the rich ppl stop using private jets then really nobody should be allowed to use the save the environment excuse to make a premium product bad.

      Private jets are the worst for the environment. But I don’t see rich people making any sacrifices to their own comfort. They just like to preach. I used to care about the environment but there’s no point. Funnily enough ppl who have kids/grandkids don’t care so why should I? I intend to have no kids ever.

      • HampshireHog says:

        Quite, it’s only the comfortable eco minded middle class people who beat themselves up the UK which produces a tiny fraction of global emissions. Working class folk are more bothered with getting by and rich folk don’t want to consume less

  • BJ says:

    It’s not so much that they are “all the same” but that the differences between them are massively over-played by by you, Rob, other blogger, and many readers here and elsewhere. Same is true of the differences between airlines. It’s all a bit like trying to appraise the differences between Labour and the Tories. My vote’s going to Reform BA.

    • John says:

      I am sorry that you are unable or unwilling to perceive difference.

    • daveinitalia says:

      Labour have done with ‘pledges’ what BA did to the word ‘enhancement’

      • AJA says:

        Sadly, I think the only “change” we are going to see from 5 July is that KS will be PM. And that Labour will be tasked with all the problems of governing. Not much else will change.

        I have more trust in the furniture polish than those Labour pledges coming to fruition.

        • Lady London says:

          What Labour pledges? I’m still waiting to see a proper policy. And one that includes who will be funding what.

          In lacking ibformation to voters it looks like this vote is not much different to Brexit.

    • James F says:

      Are we politicising aircraft seats now?

      Please don’t be “that” person

  • Steve says:

    When the guy in front will light up that cinema the whole cabin will be like on a bonfire night.

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      That was my thought as well. Do you get a free eye test after as well? You’ll need one after looking at that from so close up for several hours.

      Who really needs a 40inch screen on a plane for starters?

      • The Savage Squirrel says:

        It wasn’t that many years ago that the “standard” screen size for your living room, viewed from the other side of the room was 32-37 inch. Now we’re on 40 in a plane seat.

        There’s a reason the seats right at the front of the cinema are the least popular. Being that close to that big a screen for movies sounds migraine inducing, the seat’s own gaming abilities are about ZX Spectrum level, while I don’t think there’s THAT big a market to plug in your laptop and start doing multi window video editing on a plane.

        • Gordon says:

          As soon as I read the size of the tv, that thought hit me!
          The recommended viewing distance from a 45 inch TV Is around 1.7 metres. The problem is, when viewing too close, you are looking all over the screen trying to capture all the motion.

          • kiran_mk2 says:

            It’s an 21:9 ultrawide screen so 45″ would be equivalent to a 30-32″ 16:9 screen.

        • HampshireHog says:

          We still have 32” screen at home and quite adequate it is

      • TimM says:

        Hence the IMAX reference. I have forever argued that those wanting huge TVs should just sit nearer their existing TV.

        In the absence of an IMAX cinema near where my mother lives, when ‘Titanic’ came out, I insisted we sat on the front row. It worked. She said she thought she was sinking and needed to keep checking her feet 🙂

        I think a 40″ curved display in a business class seat is a great differentiator. Coupled with good headphones, you will be so immersed in a film, you will forget you are actually on a plane. I would pay extra for that.

      • mradey says:

        Wasn’t Rob’s point that the screen could be spilt into sections – a movie playing on 27 inches, your emails (for example) could take up another sections, flight maps somewhere etc etc.

    • AJA says:

      I agree. I think I would prefer the Opera Basics seat without any IFE screen over that seat with the 40 inch screen especially on an overnight flight where I intend to take advantage of the ability to lie flat and go to sleep.

  • Ken says:

    So not IMAX then.

  • Andrew says:

    “by removing all electrically actuated mechanical parts”

    – not quite, the lower part of the new Finnair seat is still operated by an electric motor.

    • Rhys says:

      It’s been a while since I sat in it but I’ll be able to confirm in early September!

  • d3vski says:

    I’ll take the 40inch screen all day long! A flight for me is escapism from reality … I would rather forego the wifi to remain fully disconnected from life.

    (Btw, we had a 65 inch TV in our bog standard superior room paid by points at the Hyatt Regency in Madrid).

  • Alex G says:

    Another new development is JAL incorporating speakers into the headrest on the A350. Could be a great idea. If it works, AA should follow. It would end their practice of collecting of collecting the headsets 40 minutes before landing in case anyone tries to steal them.

    Incidentally, I recently flew back from HND on the Finnair A350. Best night’s sleep I’ve had on a plane. A much more spacious bed than F on BA. Also enjoyed sitting in a variety of positions during waking hours.

  • Colin MacKinnon says:

    Basic would do us. I usually read – unless I can find a weird foreign film. Mrs Mack downloads her movies and watches on her iPad.

    I liked the Norwegian flights – I think it was – where there were no IFE screen but great with-if where you downloaded into your own device.

    That way you wouldn’t get seat-shifted because of duff screen!

    First time I went business class I thought it weird that some people just put in eye masks and slept – no booze or food.

    Now I’m getting that way myself!

    • Harry T says:

      I pay for the seat to sleep and not have a bad back! Plus the food often isn’t very good anyway, especially if flying a European carrier.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.