Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

BIG NEWS: BA moves to revenue-based tier status for Bronze, Silver, Gold and Gold Guest List

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

As we have been predicting for some time, British Airways has announced the move to revenue-based tier status.

The net effect is that earning Gold status will now be very, very difficult, bordering on impossible, for leisure travellers.

Some changes are unexpected – the speed of the launch (1st April) and a rebranding of British Airways Executive Club to ‘The British Airways Club’. Whilst a bit more 21st century, it’s ironic given that only ‘executive’ travellers are now likely to qualify for the higher tiers.

British Airways Club membership cards

Here are the new British Airways status thresholds that kick in from 1st April 2025:

  • Bronze: 3,500 points
  • Silver: 7,500 points
  • Gold: 20,000 points
  • Gold Guest List – new member: 65,000 points (with at least 52,000 earned through British Airways-marketed flights and British Airways Holidays)
  • Gold Guest List – renewal: 40,000 points (with at least 32,000 earned through British Airways-marketed flights British Airways Holidays)

There will be milestone bonuses of 2,500 Avios at 5,500 tier points, 4,000 Avios at 11,000 tier points and 5,000 Avios at 16,000 tier points which will be triggered on the way to Gold. Assuming 1p per Avios of value these are not exactly generous.

These changes were made “based on our Members’ feedback” according to BA’s press release so if you don’t like them, you only have yourself to blame.

What is a ‘point’?

1 point = £1 of spending on British Airways-marketed flights.

ONLY the base fare and BA-imposed surcharges are included. Airport charges, Air Passenger Duty etc are NOT included. Seat selection and luggage fees ARE included.

On a £11,990 fully flexible ticket to New York in Club World, virtually all spend (£11,687) would qualify towards status. On a £387 economy flight to New York, only £189 of spend would count.

There are other ways of earning ‘points’

You will be able to earn up to 1,000 points per year by purchasing Sustainable Aviation Fuel credits. You will get 1 tier point and 10 Avios per £1 spent on SAF credits.

You will be able to earn up to 2,500 points per year via spending on the British Airways Premium Plus American Express credit card. It isn’t clear what the ‘conversion rate’ will be – I suspect something close to 1 point per £10 spent.

You will earn 1 point per £1 spent at British Airways Holidays. For high end leisure travellers this could be an attractive way of earning status. However, BA has potentially messed this up because tier points will be split equally between all travellers. You can’t book a £20,000 holiday for a family of four and get Gold – in fact, at 5,000 points each, you wouldn’t even all get Silver.

(What you COULD do is book a BA Holiday – flight and hotel – for one person, and then have the rest of your family book their flights separately. This ensures that you receive all the tier points.)

One upside is that there will no longer be a minimum stay requirement for earning via BA Holidays.

What happens with partner flights?

You will earn tier points based on a percentage of miles flown for non-alliance partners.

For Malaysia Airlines, for example, it will increase from 2% of miles flown on a discounted Economy ticket to 30% of miles flown for a fully flexible First Class ticket.

This structure means that it is VERY unattractive for people buying flexible tickets to choose a partner airline over British Airways. For low cost premium cabin tickets it is probably roughly equal – eg Heathrow to Kuala Lumpur in discounted Business Class on Malaysia Airlines would earn 1,600 tier points under the new structure which is roughly what a £2,000 sale cash ticket on BA would earn.

Some airlines are rewarded more generously. Qatar Airways, for example, earns 25% of miles flown in deeply discounted Business Class. This is double what you receive for flying Malaysia Airlines.

There will be bonus tier points for the first few months

Flights booked BEFORE 14th February for travel after 1st April will earn bonus points. It isn’t clear if these are one-way or return, I suspect one-way:

  • Euro Traveller: 50 points
  • Club Europe: 100 points
  • World Traveller: 70 points
  • World Traveller Plus: 140 points 
  • Club World: 210 points
  • First: 330 points

These are bizarrely small numbers based on the new tier thresholds. 420 bonus tier points for a Club World return flight isn’t going to make much impact on hitting 20,000 tier points for Gold.

What happens with existing bookings for travel after 1st April?

It’s not clear. We are told:

“Customers who already hold bookings for travel after 1 April 2025 will be awarded Tier Points based on a conversion of the existing method. Any existing bookings will earn proportionally the same number of Tier Points, or more, as they would today.”

The implication is that it will be based on the same % of status as you would need today. A flight earning 140 tier points (currently 23% of Silver or 9% of Gold) will presumably earn somewhere between 23% of the new Silver threshold (7,500 points) or 9% of the new Gold threshold (20,000 points).

The implication is that this only applies to existing bookings made before today. If you book today, you will be on the new system for travel from 1st April.

What happens with existing BA Holidays bookings for travel by 30th June?

People have booked with BA Holidays expecting double tier points (for trips taken between 1st April and 30th June) based on the current tier point system.

On paper you won’t be worse off. The tier points you would have got will be multiplied by 13.5 and then doubled. Trust me that this is fair.

The bigger issue is that if you will need additional tier points for status, the gap is bigger. For example, if your BA Holiday would have got you halfway to Silver it still will – but you’d still need to spend £3,750 to earn the other half of the points needed.

British AIrways Club status changes

Are ‘soft landings’ remaining?

It isn’t clear. However, a BA employee has told me that they will be removed. If correct, a Gold member will now drop directly to Blue.

What is happening to Lifetime Gold?

Your existing tier points will be converted. Take a look at the FAQ here for details.

Conclusion

This is, clearly, a pivotal move by British Airways. It is effectively washing its hands of the leisure market and going all-in to attract the dwindling band of full fare business travellers.

With Gold now available for just over one and a half £12,000 fully flexible Club World return flights to New York, it is clear who the target market now is.

Realistically, it will now be impossible to earn Gold for small business travellers, economy travellers or self-funded leisure travellers. Even Silver will be a major stretch. British Airways Holidays spend could have offered a lifeline, but by splitting the tier points equally among all travellers it’s not going to make any real impact.

It’s not clear to me why BAEC members asked for this, since it was done ‘based on member feedback’ according to BA but that’s people for you ….!

It will also be virtually impossible for corporate travellers to earn Gold status based on economy travel. This leads to the question of why you’d even want to push for status – if the only people who can earn status are flying in Business Class, they don’t need Silver status anyway as they have the benefits. Gold doesn’t add much on top.

The long term issue remains. Business travellers have their flights paid for by their employers. Many of these are tied to BA or oneworld via a route deal. Many get huge end-of-year rebates which means their headline spend is not what they actually pay – in reality business travellers with a high rebate will need to spend LESS to earn status than leisure travellers. BA is rewarding ‘loyalty’ from people whose loyalty is contractually enforced on them.

Remove status from those people who DO have a choice of airline – leisure travellers, small business owners – and their reasons for flying British Airways shrink dramatically.

What I don’t understand is why the offsets for leisure and SME travellers are so half-hearted. Capping credit card tier points at 2,500 is pathetic – just 12.5% of what you need for Gold and still leaving you £5,000 of ‘before taxes’ BA spend short of Silver. American Airlines now lets you earn status based ENTIRELY on credit card and partner spend if you wish. If someone wants to put £200,000 through their BA Amex to earn Gold status, why not let them?

The British Airways Club, of course, is not the only game in town for earning oneworld status. I suspect that most people will now find it easier to earn Silver or Gold-equivalent status via another oneworld airline – you would get virtually the same benefits except for Gold access to additional Economy Avios inventory. We’ll be looking at these options in detail as we get nearer to April.

As a starter, remember that oneworld member Royal Jordanian will give you 12-months of BA Bronze-equivalent status for just $49 if you have hotel or airline elite status elsewhereclick here to read more.

You can find out more about these changes on this special page of ba.com.

Comments (3839)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • BrancasterLancaster says:

    As others have pointed out – their club, their rules and I can see the positives (for them). A revenue-based system will stop people being able to game the system – and I’m sorry, but that’s what “tier point runs” are. Are you truly a loyal, frequent flyer with an airline if all you’re doing is exploiting loopholes? It will also thin the herd. This is an extreme way of doing that, but it will reduce the number of elites.

    That being said, overall I think these changes are pretty short-sighted and might come back to bite BA’s behind. Revenue based status is fine, but the thresholds and earning rates are absurd. It’s like they looked across the pond and lifted the model without thinking about whether it needed adapting to meet local conditions.

    I’m someone who naturally hits silver, sometimes gold, through business (small business owner) and leisure travel. These tiers are now totally out of reach for me. So, as many others in these comments have said, why should I stay loyal? Well, I simply won’t – I’ll be choosing my airline in the way I chose everything else. And based on price and quality of product I’m afraid BA doesn’t come out on top all that often.

    I doubt we’ll see a reversal of this, a la “Brunch”, but looking into my crystal ball I can imagine that in a couple of years we’ll start seeing changes/promotions to try to entice those like me back into the fold.

    • TracyTangerine says:

      I completely agree – I get that they probably needed to change the system, the lounges were jammed full – the first lounge latterly and so they probably had to address how to reduce the gold card members especially. But the earning rates are absurd as you say – the difference between silver and gold seems pretty extreme. I’m also a small business owner who definitely chose BA over other airlines to get tier points when I probably had better (and possibly cheaper) business options with other airlines.

      There’s no chance of me spending £20k a year on flights and so like you I’ll be making choices based on quality and value for money especially when I go long haul which I plan to a few times this coming year.

      Think they will find they’ve shot themselves in the foot with this as next year or 2’s booking unfolds.

      But as someone who has been teetering on the brink of not being able to make gold or silver the last few years, weirdly it’s perhaps going to be a relief not to be chasing tier points all the time and shopping around instead.

  • andy says:

    i actually like the new rules. it will re-introduce the ‘status’ feel of the program. The program has turned into a bit of a charade now. everyone with a heartbeat has a lounge access. Try getting into the BA lounge at T5 at peak times 6am. It is so crowded. Same with the fast track security. It has now turned from something ‘exclusive’ to something that everyone has.

    On more routine flights in the uk, half the plane is gold card holders. There is no premium feel at all for anyone silver and lower.

    So to that end, as someone else said, their game their tier points. If you do not like it take the money elsewhere. I suspect over time it will either allow BA to spend more on improving the existing premium offering for the ones that do have status (less likely) or allow them to not downgrade the existing offering further (more likely). Nothing premium in egg mayo sandwich at the BA lounges in Edinburgh for example

    • Dubious says:

      Fair point, however I question what has driven the influx of status holders in recent years? Was it due to the BAH type arrangement? If so why not simply rollback on that?

      As an outsider (I gave up on the Executive Club a few years ago) this feels like it’s ‘throwing the baby out with the bath water’.

    • John says:

      Don’t be fooled. BA aren’t going to be enhancing anything. You thinking caviar and top class food and drink is the model going forward. This is all cost cutting – you think BA haven’t spent thousands of hours modelling and approving this value engineering exercise. The only thing they can’t control is the hordes of folk from US who get status with CC spend. The smaller lounges of the future will be more packed than ever.

    • DD says:

      I agree. I’ve never gamed the system or taken flights for tier point runs. For the first time, with the 2500 points from the BAPP, and booking 2-3 city breaks through BA Holidays each year (which in my experience is always cheaper than EasyJet and Jet2 by at least £150) for the first time I will get Bronze. It’s absolutely ridiculous to see the majority of these comments from disgruntled Gold members who are annoyed they can no longer retain Gold for c. £3500! BA is not a charity – who can honestly say this was fair and reasonable? My CEO pays sometimes £12-£16k for last minute return First flights and he is GGL – why should he be in a similar category to someone paying relative peanuts to retain status? Of course it should be based on spend. Spend the money and you’ll get your status. Also I find all the comments about going elsewhere silly… who else will people fly with which covers the entire world directly from the UK? You wouldn’t want to transit through the US – you have to collect your bags and pass immigration – it’s not smooth in the slightest.

      • Jonathan says:

        I agree with you, why should someone who buys a fully flexible ticket be earning the exact same status points as someone who’s bought a dirt cheap Business class ticket (or even first) ?!
        Economy fares have already been like this for many years now, fully flexible earn more than the very cheapest, and there’s even a middle ground between the two earning areas as well !

        BA’s route network is one of the strongest in the world, but some parts of the world are just nearly impossible, mainly due to competition from more local carriers, but also just how far away they are. The ME3 carriers and TK have some of the strongest networks by a long shot, plus they all guarantee a great on board experience, unlike BA’s intra and extended Europe offering…

  • TomB says:

    On reflection, even though I lose out from this as someone who puts economy work flights through BA because of the status perks, I can see why they’ve done it and have mixed feelings.

    – The lounges are overcrowded, but when travelling economy, it doesn’t bother me that much. However, when I’ve paid for my own flights in premium cabins, it does annoy me, and I can see why people would avoid BA for this reason.
    – I am just as annoyed as everyone else, but come on, “I’ll just use Priority Pass instead” – we all know these lounges are absolutely horrific. Indeed, one of the biggest disappointments of BA/OW status is finding out there is no dedicated lounge and having to share with one that has PP access. Honestly, I would rather just go and use a nice bar or restaurant in the airport than use a PP lounge. I’m not trying to be a snob I’m just being honest, it’s not relaxing or a pleasant experience when you can’t even find somewhere to sit down.

    So overall, yes, I will lose out, and I’m disappointed. BA will also lose out on revenue from me as I will go with other carriers now – I’m sure they will make it back in other ways though. However, I do also see why they’ve done it, and ironically, by restoring exclusivity, it might make people more likely to choose BA for premium cabins in the long run. Also, we shouldn’t complain too much, because it looks like it will still be easy to accumulate avios and book reward flights AND I’m sure this community will find ways for people to get the status without spending £££ if they are determined.

  • Maz says:

    Has it been confirmed officially @rob that there is no soft landing ? – I just achieved gold this year and will expire Dec 2025.

    • Jonathan says:

      He’s mentioned a number of pages back that it’s been confirmed by a BA employee called Nick, who’s high ranking within BA

      • Maz says:

        Ok so not officially then just word of mouth or speculation (albeit perhaps strong speculation) at this stage.

  • TomB says:

    On reflection, even though I lose out from this as someone who puts economy work flights through BA because of the status perks, I can see why they’ve done it and have mixed feelings.

    The lounges are overcrowded, but when travelling economy, it doesn’t bother me that much. However, when I’ve paid for my own flights in premium cabins, it does annoy me, and I can see why people would avoid BA for this reason.

    I am just as annoyed as everyone else, but come on, “I’ll just use Priority Pass instead” – we all know these lounges are absolutely horrific. Indeed, one of the biggest disappointments of BA/OW status is finding out there is no dedicated lounge and having to share with one that has PP access. Honestly, I would rather just go and use a nice bar or restaurant in the airport than use a PP lounge. I’m not trying to be a snob I’m just being honest, it’s not relaxing or a pleasant experience when you can’t even find somewhere to sit down.

    So overall, yes, I will lose out, and I’m disappointed. BA will also lose out on revenue from me as I will go with other carriers now – I’m sure they will make it back in other ways though. However, I do also see why they’ve done it, and ironically, by restoring exclusivity, it might make people more likely to choose BA for premium cabins in the long run. Also, we shouldn’t complain too much, because it looks like it will still be easy to accumulate avios and book reward flights AND I’m sure this community will find ways for people to get the status without spending £££ if they are determined.

  • Dubious says:

    Rob – I can’t keep up with all these comments. Are you able to put a digest through one of the AI tools to create a summary of the various reactions?

    • AJA says:

      A summary of the reactions is 3 or 4 people ok versus 1200 waving arms in the air and wailing bad BA and either cancelling flights or saying they’re never flying BA again.

    • Dim Sum says:

      Summary ?

      99% of people think its bad.

      1% think its great. But are likely biased because their flights are paid for by their employers and/or they have reached the lofty heights of GfL or GGLfL and so there’s a distinctive whiff of “I’m alright jack”.

  • rosswill says:

    I look forward to reading an analysis of where to credit flights in the future for the most cost-effective route to maintain a certain level of FF status. Understandably this site is more rewards based than loyalty based writing but for me personally the two are linked at least to some degree. I’ve been earning around 2,000 TP with BA for the past 10 or more years and enjoyed free seat assignment in all cabins across one world plus when travelling PE or Y I value fast track, priority check-in and boarding and last of all lounge access. I frequently have a choice of which airline to choose and typically fly over 100,000 miles per year for both work and personal journeys yet won’t make anything like the £25k spend required to keep Gold with BA from April 26 when my current status expires. My first mid-haul with BA is 9th Jan and will have to think carefully about where best to credit this return journey and then which FF program will enable me to maintain some of the benefits I currently enjoy. I wonder if we will see some more status match offers over the coming months. I’m not one of those saying “I’ll never fly BA again” as it will always come down to schedule, availability and price (always has in fact) but I do think other carriers will see a lot more of my cash in the next few years and I’ll certainly be a lot less Oneworld focused going forwards.

  • DC says:

    Having spent the past 24 hours digesting the news and reading all the comments, I’m torn by BAs decision.

    My emotional state of mind is angry with what they have done, simply as it appears their decision placed zero recognition of loyalty provided to them by their customers for the past decade(s) or so….Having been a member since 2001 I have regularly chosen BA over others due to being a BAEC member for instance.

    My rational state of mind however is now kicking in. Considering I never fly economy I will continue to receive all the “perks” but simply without status (seat allocation aside I guess)….and probably be able to enjoy said “perks” in a less crowded environment.

    Having said that my anger with this decision and lack of status moving forwards will mean I certainly look at other carriers, with price being a major factor on choosing my premium cabin option. This point alone, for me, is the risk BA are taking here as my status loyalty has now gone so unless they become competitive on price AND product, they are risking revenue earnings.

    • John says:

      When you have to spend £500 to sit together on a long haul flight – enjoy the perk !

      • DC says:

        Perk being written as “perk” to highlight the sarcasm of the quality of the “perks”…..

      • George says:

        You don’t have to pay it. There are other airlines available.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.