Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

London City Airport gears up for larger aircraft – we see the first E195-E2 land

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

On Wednesday I was invited to London City Airport to see the arrival of the first Embraer E195-E2 aircraft.

At first glance the E195-E2 looks very similar to the E190 aircraft used by British Airways. Compare the two side by side and you’ll see that the E195-E2 is noticeably longer at 41m and – with a 35m wingspan – wider.

The E195-E2 is one of the tools that London City is using to increase capacity at the airport and hopefully get passenger numbers growing after a torrid few years.

E195 london city airport

The E195-E2 we saw on Wednesday was operated by Helvetic Airways. Helvetic is primarily a wet lease operator for SWISS, using an all-Embraer fleet.

With 134 seats, the E195-E2 has the lowest fuel consumption per seat of any aircraft type operating at London City.

At the moment the E195-E2 will be used by SWISS on busy flights where the extra seats can be sold – you are more likely to see it on a Monday and Friday, for example.

This is only part of the E195-E2 story

At the moment the E195-E2 is simply being used to add extra seats on existing routes when SWISS needs them.

However, there is more to come.

Embraer has developed an automatic take-off system for the E195-E2 called E2TS – the Embraer Enhanced Takeoff System.

This is not yet certified for commercial use, but once switched on (it is already embedded in the aircraft, but not used) it will allow for a huge step-change in range.

To save me getting too technical you can learn how it works in this article. Basically, with the take-off automated to use the most efficient trajectory, the aircraft can take off with more fuel.

E195 helvetic london city airport

With E2TS in use, the E195-E2 will be able to fly for 4,000 km from London City, even after adjusting for the aircraft modifications needed to handle the steep approach.

The London City team are very excited about the potential of this. Suddenly destinations such as Istanbul, Casablanca, Gran Canaria, Athens and Cairo will be possible for the first time. It already has airlines keen to move in when the technology is approved.

Looking further ahead …. the A320neo?

As we covered in this article in January, London City has submitted an application to the Civil Aviation Authority for permission to handle the A320neo aircraft.

This would be a game changer for the airport, allowing ‘standard’ single aisle aircraft to land and depart. BA Cityflyer would potentially be able to retire its Embraer fleet and replace them with the same type that British Airways is using at Heathrow, albeit with some modifications.

The airport sees real benefits from this – allowing more passengers to travel with fewer flight movements, and opening up many new routes. The A320neo is substantial quieter and more fuel efficient than previous generations of short-haul aircraft.

In order for A320neo aircraft to use London City, the Civil Aviation Authority has to approve a new approach angle for the airport. This will mean aircraft flying lower than currently happens. Airbus has not yet commented on what modifications may be required to the aircraft or what weight restrictions may be needed.

It is expected that the CAA will take at least 18 months to make a decision, but if the A320neo is approved then London City may finally be able to turn the corner.

Comments (36)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Lumma says:

    Are they going to extend the terminal to cope with these extra passengers? Even now, the number of toilets is too low and there’s not many places to sit

    • Swiss Jim says:

      You just need to know where to go. Never understood why everyone crowds into the main seating area. Other than a lack of sense to walk a little further…

    • Rob says:

      Terminal is running well below its 2019 levels at the moment.

  • TimM says:

    From the linked article, lowering “the chance of human error” with automated take offs is another step towards pilot-less aircraft. Air traffic controllers have long said that they do all the work – pilots merely follow their instructions.

    The cockpit could be replaced by a screen in the galley with one member of cabin crew nominated the legal captain. Think of the extra seats that could be added – and with the best views! However, air traffic control could also be automated and optimised. These humans are, after all, only following algorithms.

    • The Original David says:

      And what do he cabin crew do when a pitot tube gets blocked or an angle of attack sensor fails and the automation switches off?

      • Dubious says:

        “cabin crew” ? I suspect in that future concept will be a vending machine for food and drink and some robotic arms to enforce you to stay seated at the appropriate times.

      • Chrisasaurus says:

        Well, recent history suggests “pull back on the sidestick until the aircraft stalls and falls from the sky”

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      “ATC Do all the work”

      Utter rot.

    • davestat says:

      Don’t tell a certain Irishman 😉

  • Jenny says:

    Pep more flights out of LCY where passengers and/or luggage have to be offloaded when the weather isn’t just so, as the runway isn’t really long enough. It was bad enough when they did the densification of the existing aircraft. This is only going to make the problem even worse. I’ve stopped flying from LCY as a result.

    • Tom says:

      Jenny, I have never seen pax or bags offloaded at LCY. Not on airlines I use.

      But I do avoid flying at peak times for other reasons.

  • Jonathan says:

    If approved, would it be the whole A320 family, since this’d a real game changer, being able to take the largest A321s around, they’re also able to stretch further away airports

    • Rob says:

      They have only asked for the A320neo it seems.

      • Nick says:

        There’s a significant enough performance difference between A320neo and A321neo that makes it impossible for the larger one to use LCY even on paper, and that’s before we get to the (X)LR’s extra fuel weight. It’s the same at FLR, where no airline uses it either. In theory the A319neo could do it but no one actually bought those because they’re rubbish in other ways.

        For a number of reasons I doubt either will be used in reality, particularly for BACF. It’s a huge gamble for LCY too because the modifications to make them like any other airport effectively kill their USP. There’s a limit to the number of people willing to pay the premium to fly from there.

  • Chris R says:

    For the A320 I thought they would need to make significant changes to the apron and gate layout. It’s tight as it is with the Embraers

  • NorthernLass says:

    Any chance of the BA service to JFK ever resuming?

  • EvilDoctorK says:

    An issue with these larger aircraft types is they don’t fit on the original terminal contact stands at LCY ( Gates 2 – 9 ) .. The Airbus 220s ( ITA Airways and Swiss use them ) as well as these E195 E2s will be consigned to gates 21-24 .. or end up on the further bus stands

    The main gates at LCY can’t take anything bigger than the Embraer 190s that Cityflyer and most other airlines use

    ( I wonder if they changed the configuration to parking stands that require pushback if they might fit them .. but that would add a bit of operational complexity I guess )

    • Rob says:

      They were doing a parking test on one of the gates on Wednesday as it happens. City also has four new parking stands which are constructed but not yet commissioned.

  • CamFlyer says:

    I’m flying from LCY on Swiss this week. Scheduled for A220 outbound (and onwards connection), E2 on the return– I’m excited to try out the new aircraft.

    • Tom says:

      I took a Delta A220 from LAX to SFO last year and it was one of the nicest domestic US flights I have taken. Not saying that much of course.

      • CamFlyer says:

        I’m a fan of the A220 as a passenger, though perhaps biased from hearing airBaltic management sing its praises!

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.