Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

12th October confirmed as launch date for EU’s Entry Exit System (EES)

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

After myriad delays, we have a firm date for the launch of the EU’s Entry Exit System – 12th October.

From this date, everyone travelling into the EU must have four fingerprints and a photograph registered. (Children under 12 are exempt from fingerprinting.)

On every subsequent visit, one of the two – fingerprints or facial scan – must be taken and matched to the details on file.

The only bit of good news is that the launch will be phased. Until 9th April 2026, countries will be allowed to temporarily suspend EES if it is leading to excessive delays. For the first two months, it will reportedly also be possible for countries to operate EES without storing biometric data.

From 12th October 2025 to 9th April 2026, passports will continue to be stamped on entry and exit so that there will be no issues if EES is not in place when leaving the EU.

From 9th April 2026, there will be no exceptions. All non-EU citizens will be required to have their data collected and checked. Passport stamping will end.

It not clear how the recent agreement to allow UK citizens to use e-gates at all European airports adopting EES will dovetail into this. It appears that e-gates will allow you to register your fingerprints on your first visit post the launch of EES, although it will still be necessary to speak to a border control officer who will decide whether to approve your EES application.

EES data will be valid for three years. Importantly, each re-entry into the EU restarts the three year clock unless you receive a new passport.

What about ETIAS, the EU ESTA?

The EES scheme is separate from ETIAS.

ETIAS is the EU equivalent of a US ESTA, which will be required to travel from the UK to 30 European countries.

ETIAS has also been delayed multiple times but is now scheduled to launch after the launch of EES but before the end of 2026 (not 2025 as we originally wrote). The application fee has been confirmed as €20, although only people aged between 18 and 70 will pay.

For comparison, the US has approved plans to increase the ESTA fee from $21 to $40. The UK ETA fee is £16.

ETIAS is linked to your passport. It is valid for up to three years or until the passport expires, whichever comes first.

With a valid ETIAS travel authorisation, you can enter the territory of these European countries as often as you want for short-term stays – normally for up to 90 days in any 180-day period. However, it does not guarantee entry. When you arrive, a border guard will ask to see your passport and other documents and verify that you meet the entry conditions.

Whilst ETIAS will require additional administration, it should not cause delays at immigration because it must be completed before departure, with boarding denied to anyone who has not applied.

You can find out more about the launch of EES on this EU website.

Comments (186)

  • riku says:

    >>It not clear how the recent agreement to allow UK citizens to use e-gates at all European airports adopting EES will dovetail into this
    In Helsinki the EES machines and e-gates are not the same thing. The EES machines with their fingerprint readers are in a large group before the e-gates and do not have gates. Their function is to take fingerprints and update a database with passport and fingerprint data which is then read at the e-gates 20 meters away.
    If you are exempt from EES (eg EU passport holders), then you walk directly to the e-gates.
    If you have to use EES then you visit one of those machines first, then go to the e-gates. The e-gates do not have fingerprint readers.
    The EES machines have been there for several years now, roped off with nobody using them.
    As for passport stamping, if that is needed then there is a separate pool of e-gates were the e-gate does the photo check but there is a manned desk where the passport is stamped. Citizens of UK, Japan, South Korea etc can use these gates. This has been in place for many years already.

    • JimBurgessHill says:

      I’m keen to understand how it will work for holders of EU residency permits who will be exempt from EES? Perhaps there will be a means of the e-gates reading the biometric permit?

      • James says:

        At least in Germany, if you have a residence permit you scan that at the e-gate first and then your passport.

    • VP1964 says:

      Flying into the Zurich last month (not EU but part of Schengen obv) the EES machines were operating to collect data – eligible non-EU inc UK had to get facial pictures and passport scans. Then you went to the usual queue for an immigration officer to get passport scanned by them and stamped. I’d imagine they’d do something similar with an e-gate inserted in the process.

      FWIW, it was pretty shambolic. Not obvious from signage or the staff directing the crowd, who should to EES and then the faster queue and who went straight to the slow queue. Expect it’ll be chaos when launched.

      There was not a lot of

  • CheshirePete says:

    I thought the Fee was always advertised as €6 or something. The whole thing is typical EU bureaucracy which funnily enough the UK was party to these new arrangements before we left!

    • davefl says:

      It was supposed to be 7 euro when 1st proposed but they changed it in the announcement yesterday.
      The UK has one now and is already charging the US,Canada, EU and more £16

    • VinZ says:

      I had to pay £16 for a UK ETA for ny two nephews coming to visit. Is that fair then?

      • Charles Martel says:

        If they’re not British or Irish citizens why should they be exempt?

        • VinZ says:

          They shouldn’t. But why moan about something the EU is introducing, which would cost €20 for a ten-year visa if timed correctly, when the UK is doing the same for a hard two-year one? Plus, this was a British choice, not a European one.

      • John G says:

        No it is not fair. They or their parents should have paid, not you!

  • CB Root says:

    The official EU site (europa.eu) says ETIAS will launch in Q4 26.

  • david says:

    $40 for the ESTA. Wow. Nearly a 100% increase.

  • TD says:

    “ETIAS has also been delayed multiple times but is now scheduled to launch after the launch of EES but before the end of 2025.”

    Just checking the date here. Others have reported that the ETIAS will come into effect between October and December 2026 once the entry-exit system is up and running.

    • JimBurgessHill says:

      The ETIAS aspect won’t start until last quarter of 2026 as confirmed clearly on the official EU site https://travel-europe.europa.eu/en/etias

    • Barrel for Scraping says:

      Feels like this article was put together in a rush, ETIAS is definitely not coming until the end of 2026 and there’s a good chance it will slip further into 2027. It’s also important that the exceptions to EES are listed – there’s no automatic link between EU residency permits and a non EU passport. I also think those with a visa that lets them stay longer than 90 days shouldn’t use this system either. This article clarifies nothing

      • Rob says:

        Our interest is only as it impacts UK residents on UK passports without an EU spouse, which ironically excludes me.

      • Scott says:

        The article confirms a lot more than your post payaso.

  • Thywillbedone says:

    “While we’ve been exceptionally busy importing the dregs of humanity from every corner of the globe, we need to be absolutely certain at some random point in the future when you’ll be moving from A to B …”

  • Michael C says:

    I also read in one of the comments an exception for “family members of EU nationals” – wonder how that’s shown/proven?

    • Nick Burch says:

      I think it’s only family members of EU nationals who hold a residency permit for an EU country. If you’re living in the UK with your EU spouse, it doesn’t seem to help you…

    • NFH says:

      I believe that any proof will be required only at the time of application in order to be exempt from the €20 ETIAS fee.

      At https://travel-europe.europa.eu/etias/ltr/faq#exemptions-and-specific-cases it states:

      Applicants with family-member status do not have to pay the EUR 20 application fee. Their application will also not be checked against screening rules on illegal immigration.

      These exemptions apply to you if you meet the following conditions:

      1. you are a family member of a European Union citizen and Directive 2004/38/EC applies to you, or a family member of a national of Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, or Switzerland who enjoys the right of free movement equivalent to that of EU citizens.
      Important: This only concerns family members of citizens of the forementioned countries travelling to or residing in a country other than that of their nationality;

      This is no doubt because of the wording of Article 3 of Directive 2004/38/EC.

      Therefore when a family member applies for ETIAS, it makes sense always to give the first destination country as one other than the family member’s country of citizenship, otherwise the €20 fee will apply.

      • dsm83 says:

        If I understood the EU site correctly, you actually need a separate ETIAS to enter the home country of your spouse (or other eligible family member). So if I was going to any country other than Italy I need an ETIAS but don’t pay the fee as a family member. If I was going to Italy then I’d need a different ETIAS, paying the fee as I’m not covered by the family member exemption. Which is ludicrous really and going to catch so many people out.

        Fortunately for me I collected my Italian passport in May and can avoid the whole thing.

        • NFH says:

          Really? Please could you quote which part of the EU web site suggests that you need a separate chargeable ETIAS to enter the country of a family member’s citizenship in addition to a free ETIAS to enter the rest of the Schengen area? My understanding is that ETIAS, once issued, is valid for the entire Schengen area irrespective of any fee waivers.

          • John says:

            Example 1

            You are a Mexican citizen. You are the spouse of a French national, and you want to visit her in France, where she lives.

            In the ETIAS application form do not declare yourself as a family member, as Directive 2004/38/EC does not apply to you. You need to apply for an ETIAS travel authorisation without family-member status and pay the fee of EUR 20.

            Please note if you declare yourself as a family member in the ETIAS application form, your statement will not be considered truthful. In this case, your ETIAS travel authorisation may be revoked and you may be denied entry at the border of France.

            Example 2

            You are an American citizen. You are 19 years old and the son of a French national, and you want to visit your father in Spain, where he lives.

            When filling in the ETIAS application form, you may declare yourself as a family member, as Directive 2004/38/EC does apply to you when travelling to Spain. You will not need to pay the fee of EUR 20. You will be required to prove your family status at the border of Spain, otherwise you may be denied entry and your ETIAS travel authorisation may be revoked.

            Please note, in this example, your ETIAS travel authorisation is not valid for travelling to France.

            If you wish to travel to France, you will need to apply for a new ETIAS travel authorisation without declaring family-member status and pay the fee of EUR 20. This ETIAS travel authorisation will be valid in all the European countries requiring ETIAS, regardless of your status as a family member.

          • NFH says:

            Thanks @John. I had missed that example. They ought to state this in the main guidance, not merely in the examples.

            The most stupid thing is that, if one enters the Schengen country of the EU family member’s nationality via a different Schengen country, then there’s no need to apply for a second chargeable ETIAS in addition to the existing free ETIAS. They ought to just exempt family members from the ETIAS fee in all cases to avoid complications and misunderstandings. It seems that Surinder Singh rights don’t apply to ETIAS, only when moving to the EU family member’s home country.

        • Londonsteve says:

          This is exceedingly daft and makes it massively more complicated. What justification is there to charge a family member for an ETIAS when they’re travelling to the home country of the family member but not do so when travelling to any other Schengen country? And how do they propose to police this considering the open borders of Schengen? So if you wife is French and you get an ETIAS to travel to Belgium it’s free, but if you stray over the border into France you have no authorisation to be there and could be in breach of immigration law?? As the spouse of a French citizen??!

      • Rob says:

        Cool, looks like I get off then!

  • Paul says:

    Not sure why coverage of the EU entry and border control is always so negative! Even the tone here is doom, gloom and despondency. If it means U.K. passport holder queue then that is no more than we voted for and we knew what we were voting for! Didn’t we?
    The EU is simply doing what we were always told they could not, securing their borders.
    Without doubt my worst experiences of border control in Europe have all taken place at Heathrow.

    • Annih says:

      If you believe that then seriously you need help. For all the law abiding people you get more red tape but for the illegal migration this won’t change a thing.

      • VinZ says:

        Same as in the UK. So why so much hate for the EU?

        • Ant says:

          Where was the hate for the EU? I think Annih comment applies to the EU and UK, both seem intent on making it harder for legal and easier for illegal immigration.

          • Andy Davies says:

            Most illegal immigration is people who come via normal routes overstaying… in comparison despite what Farage, the Mail and others would have you believe very few people come in via irregular routes

          • memesweeper says:

            Correct Andy

            To cut illegal migration the best step the UK could take would be to pay more attention to those who do not leave, not those that are trying to enter.

      • Matt says:

        Very true

    • paul says:

      Follow up your complaint about negative posts – with a negative post. Well done lol

    • Alan says:

      Yep exactly. Seems perfectly reasonable proposals and was a clear outcome of the vote so not sure why all the moaning from folk who wanted to have their cake and eat it.

      • John G says:

        It is perfectly reasonable. I voted for us to leave the EU and knew this was a consequence. It is a popular narrative that those who voted to leave didn’t know what they were voting for. I get that because the “out” politicians focused very narrowly on certain positive elements and ignored the negatives but you need to give people more credit to understand the consequences of their actions. Of course, some really didn’t understand but that is always the case with democracy!

        It works both ways too. I had “in” colleagues tell me I wouldn’t be able to travel to the EU after Brexit! Maybe if they knew this wasn’t true they would have voted differently.

      • Charles Martel says:

        Etias wasn’t proposed by the EU until 2016 so it was hardly a serious consideration at the Brexit vote. That aside I don’t mind the principle of ETAs, my objection is that the cost is obviously an abuse of a monopoly position. It doesn’t cost €20 to validate someone’s passport, nor does it cost ACRO £65 to print someone’s criminal record (or not) on a sheet of paper. These services should be provided at cost and not used to prop up unsustainable public spending elsewhere.

        • JDB says:

          It may not cost €20 to validate someone’s passport but it certainly costs that to set up, maintain and operate the central system and individual countries have to pay their own local costs of implementing the system. The UK ETA at £16 is priced on a cost basis. Nobody is making any money on these border systems by abusing any monopoly position.

          • Bagoly says:

            Exactly – the difference between marginal cost and average cost.

          • Charles Martel says:

            Fag packet maths: 428,483,244 entries in 2024, say each person enters from outside the Schengen twice a year so 214,241,622 unique entries, and each ETIAS valid for three years so (214,241,622 / 3) 71,413,874. At EUR20, this would raise around 1.4bn a year.

            The eu-LISA (Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice) that covers the ETIAS and EES systems has commitments of 316.7m in 2026, and 309.9m in 2025, a modest 2.2% increase. Elsewhere in the Border Management heading of the European Commission budget the “Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund” head has increased to 2,068.6m in 2026 from 1,863.6 in 2025 an 11% rise (and increasing by 25% from 1,496.4 in 2024).

            It’s not the IT cost that this increase is covering.

    • Iain says:

      I certainly did.

    • Iain says:

      9 years later and people still crying

      • Rhys says:

        Unsurprisingly, given that the OBR estimates it will will trim the UK economy by 4% long-term!

        • Iain says:

          The 4% projection has long since been debunked.
          Next you’ll be quoting Khans ludicrous “Sadiqeland” projections! (The one where UK in the EU out performed even the USA!)

        • Garethgerry says:

          There has been lots of forecasts of impact, but now 5 years later not one reliable analysis. Doubt if there ever will be given Covid, and every country different response to Covid. So people just quote the predictons that fit their own biased

        • Pat says:

          Who cares about economic forecasts when you have a climate crisis? It’s odd you don’t feel as passionate about the predictions of the climate catastrophe. 1/10 of global emissions are from tourism. Average UK emissions is 11.7 tonnes. Global average is 4 tonnes. We need to get it down to under 2 tonnes to have a chance of slowing down the catastrophe by 2050. 1 tonne is the emissions of a flight to NYC. Your emissions must be hundreds of tonnes.

    • Bervios says:

      Securing their air borders. Land borders are what are causing the issues.

    • Londonsteve says:

      Mine too, to be honest. Until 2019 I only had a UK passport, after that I became a dual UK/EU national. I’ve never once had a question from an EU border official on entry to any country, pre or post Brexit when travelling on either passport. Whenever I travel back to the UK from Europe via one of the short sea routes (while seeking entry with a UK passport, naturally) I receive the Spanish inquisition about where I’ve been, how long I’ve been away, the purpose of my trip, what I do for a living, where I live, what I’m carrying in the car and more, sometimes quite invasive questions. I’m a UK citizen returning home, if my passport is genuine and not on a watch list, surely the only relevant issue is if I’m bringing anything in excess of the duty free allowance (which they’re free to check) and that’s it. It sometimes feels like the Spanish inquisition. When arriving at a UK airport of course, I scan my passport on an e-gate and the doors open…. The contrast in treatment is staggering.

Leave a Reply to riku Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.