Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

My experience with Amex Platinum’s new insurance provider

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

In January 2025, American Express moved from AXA to Europ Assistance to provide travel insurance benefits for holders of The Platinum Card.

It’s fair to say that this has not gone as well as it could. We have heard numerous reports from readers of Europ attempting to refuse payment for valid claims.

For example, car hire claims were being refused because the rental was not paid on an American Express card, even though this is not a requirement of the policy.

My experience with Amex Platinum's new insurance provider

We damaged a rental car in Germany last month – not deliberately for the purposes of this article! – so I had a chance to put Europ to the test.

Europ Assistance makes it easy to submit a claim

The first thing I should say is that Europ has an efficient online portal for managing American Express Platinum insurance claims. You can find it here.

I had delayed filing my claim, even though it was for a chunky amount (€765), because I couldn’t face the hassle. It turns out, all credit to Europ Assistance, that there wasn’t any.

Obviously car rental claims are more ‘open and shut’ than a medical claim, but the process was still very simple.

Three documents were required. Helpfully Sixt had sent me the bill for the damage and the description / photo of the damage as two separate PDF files, which is how Europ requires you to upload them. Sixt had also emailed me a PDF of my original invoice. This meant that I had everything I needed.

The whole process was completed online. Completing the form took less than ten minutes. I was told that I would receive an initial response within five days.

A couple of oddities

The only issue is that I received an email from Europ a few minutes later saying that my claim was ‘saved but not submitted’. This made no sense because the tracker on the Europ website clearly showed my claim as ‘submitted’.

I suspect that the email was triggered in the few minutes when I left the half-completed claim form open in another window whilst I downloaded PDFs of the documents requested.

I had paid for my rental and the damage (which Sixt had sent me a payment link to pay – it didn’t automatically charge the same card) on The Platinum Card. However, during the claims process Europ Assistance asked for my bank account details because it is not allowed to pay claims back to an Amex card!

On the upside, this meant the Membership Rewards points earned from paying Sixt €765 were not going to be lost due to a later refund to my card.

On the downside, I was concerned that the 2.99% foreign exchange fee I had paid to Amex on the €765 would not be refunded. Was I on the hook – assuming no movement in FX rates – for a €23 loss even if my claim was paid in full?

Also on the downside, I would be on the hook for an FX fee from HSBC when I received money from Europ Assistance if it paid me back in Euro to my current account.

As a reminder, for car rental claims there is no requirement to have paid for the original rental or any damages with an Amex card, although I always do so because I believe it may speed up settlement of any claim.

My experience with Amex Platinum's new insurance provider

What happened next?

I submitted my claim on 11th August.

Three days later I received an email asking for more documents:

  • the original rental agreement
  • proof of payment of the damages claim

It’s not clear why these documents were not asked for originally. I had the PDF of the rental agreement from Sixt, and handily the Amex website lets you create a PDF statement part-way through a billing period, so it was easy to get that. I submitted both documents on the same day.

The Amex statement showed the Sterling charge (£687.83) so Europ now knew what I had actually paid, including the 2.99% Amex FX fee. I was wondering if they would reimburse me based on the Euro claim or what I paid in Sterling.

The next day ….

Less than 24 hours after submitting the additional documents, I received the following:

“Dear Customer,

We are pleased to inform you that your refund request has been approved.

According to the conditions of your insurance, we will proceed with the payment of the following amount:

• REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT: 687,83 GBP

• PAYMENT DETAILS: Vehicle damage

The amount will be credited to the indicated bank account within approximately 7 days.

We appreciate the trust you have placed in our company, and we send you our warmest regards.

Refunds Department”

The full amount, including the Amex 2.99% FX fee, was being refunded. I also got 688 Membership Rewards points on top!

Conclusion

Whilst I had a number of complaints from readers about Europ Assistance after they took over the handling of American Express claims, my own experience was totally positive.

My claim was approved in under four days and I will be fully reimbursed.

I accept that this is the plainest of plain vanilla claims – Amex guarantees to pay for car rental damage, I had some car rental damage, Amex paid me – but I can only judge by my own experience and this one worked out well.

PS. I should clarify the exact small print of the Amex car rental cover. It will pay out £50,000 for theft or damage to the vehicle, and £500,000 ($1 million in the US) for damage to another person or their property.

It does NOT apply to commercial vehicles, motor homes, caravans and trailers. The Platinum cardholder must be named on the rental agreement. You are covered for rentals in the UK as well as abroad. Full terms are in the Platinum insurance policy document.

Comments (178)

  • RichardL says:

    Similar, but easier experience for us. Avis supplied the report and images as the same PDF so uploaded the same file twice and added the rental information too.
    Both the rental and the damage were paid for via Monzo Flex / Mastercard, not Amex.

    Claim submitted Saturday 2nd August.
    Claim approved Thursday 7th August (4 working days).
    £455 returned Tuesday 12th August. (7 working days total).

    No additional information requested and a super simple process.

  • James says:

    Does Amex gold also have the car hire cover?

  • JDB says:

    The switch from Axa to Europ Assistance isn’t really the issue, although recent commentary would suggest it hasn’t been a positive development.

    Far more significant have been posts on this site, particularly re the travel disruption section (Amex calls it Travel Inconvenience) where the cover is limited to only £300. One very recent example of a family missing their connection in Madrid being stuck with the choice of abandoning the trip (which entitled them to a refund) or being stuck with thousands of pounds of costs not covered by Amex to get their holiday back on track. That’s terrible. That level of cover is totally out of line with any other bank/card policy and leaves people naked.

    Other cover levels, the hugely restrictive pre-existing conditions situation (and read the definition of them very, very carefully) are similarly poor and the requirement to use the card for some sections can be problematic in certain family situations and it’s easy enough to make a mistake. Again not a requirement of any other policy to use their brand of card.

    Not really a policy one can rely upon.

    • NFH says:

      Why could you not rely on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? Failing that, you could rely on Article 19 of the Montreal Convention, for example if the connecting flight was a separate booking. I’ve successfully the latter several times when I’ve missed a connecting train as a result of a delayed flight, but the same principle applies irrespective of the type of connecting onward transport.

      • JDB says:

        The family had separate tickets. Realistically, the prospects of a successful Article 19 claim are very low and carry the risk of costs and, as a practical matter, is beyond the capacity of the average passenger.

        • NFH says:

          I agree that Article 19 is more difficult for the average consumer to prove. But based on your previous posts, I have the impression that you’re much more legally minded than the average consumer. And you can often use ADR services instead of the courts.

          • JDB says:

            It’s because I have some knowledge that I know how difficult A19 claims are and how airlines will resist them. District Judges will struggle with such claims and they are really beyond the ken of ADR services. You are also in the instant case asking people to take a £4,000 risk plus then £500 of court fees and a huge amount of work, all for a most uncertain result.

            In essence, using the law after the event isn’t the answer – you just need a decent insurance policy that covers travel disruption properly in the first place. There are plenty of those, but Amex Plat isn’t one of them.

          • NFH says:

            Why not try an Article 19 claim via Aviation ADR or CEDR? Except notably for Vueling, most airlines flying from the UK to Madrid are part of an ADR scheme.

          • JDB says:

            @NFH – nor is Iberia part of any ADR scheme in the UK. They routinely instruct, even for the smallest claims, a largish firm of London solicitors and specialist aviation counsel. They’re not much good but that would be quite daunting and they throw up lots a bad arguments to muddy the case. It creates a lot of work.

            The concepts of A19 are too difficult for ADR and defences much easier than 261.

            It really is a road to nowhere and quite a sterile argument when all you need to do is to buy a decent travel insurance policy.

          • NFH says:

            Interesting about Iberia. I had remembered Vueling as being the only one that has neither a UK registered office (at which to serve a County Court claim) nor membership of an ADR scheme, but I forgot that Iberia, despite having a UK registered office, is not part of an ADR scheme. Definitely a shortcoming to bear in mind with any vulnerable itineraries.

    • Bob says:

      I was not aware of that problem. This reduces significantly the value I will place on the insurance element if the Plat card as will need to take out another policy.

    • jk says:

      what is a better policy to cover these misconnects then? genuine question, sounds like I need it.

      • JDB says:

        Fairly much any policy – look at NatWest, Barclays, HSBC Premier, Nationwide Flex Plus or Virgin. Each of those offers much better travel disruption cover but obviously you need to check that any policy meets all your other needs, especially re pre-existing conditions.

        • HampshireHog says:

          Also much policies with regard to pre existing conditions. HSBC lists many common conditions as included and Nationwide has a health screening with adds a modest extra premium in most cases

        • Throwawayname says:

          I have an Aviva policy whose wording specifically articulates that it covers failed connections. I have been lucky enough to not need to use it until now, but Aviva do tend to be among the more sensible insurers in general.

  • Rich says:

    I’m currently having an issue with a claim via AIG because I used an Avis key dispensing kiosk at Lisbon airport and so had no pick up paperwork, vehicle condition report etc. to send to them, just the booking confirmation. Computer says no!

  • Chris R says:

    Car rental aside, my one gripe with the Plat travel insurance is having to pay with the (a) card. I don’t know any other insurance policy (whether via a bank account or not) that stipulates such a clause. This is a pain whenever Amex isn’t accepted or when making group bookings with family/friends.

    • blue_wolf says:

      Not every type of insurance requires it to be paid for by Amex. And if Amex is not accepted by the supplier, grab a screenshot, and you are covered if you pay with a different type of card.

    • NFH says:

      I wouldn’t mind if it required only GBP denominated expenses to the paid for with an Amex card, but non-GBP is unreasonable because of the 3% surcharge.

      • JDB says:

        Their card, their rules and the concept of FX fees effectively being compulsorily incurred is accepted by the FOS.

        I feel it’s actually tougher that a cardholder or another covered person could so easily make a mistaken choice of card and find themselves uncovered for big sums. And it does happen.

      • Matt says:

        I assume the reason they require it to be paid on the card is to reduce fraud. Also they make interchange and FX fees when you put it on the card…

        It doesn’t have to be the Platinum Card, but any Amex card. I tend to use the cashback card so it mitigates some of the FX fee

        • JDB says:

          The Gold card as well. It’s odd that they offer this Plat policy with the card when it’s the least desirable Amex card to pay with.

  • Jez says:

    Axa are just as bad as Aviva for claiming, hence we got rid of both our Amex and world elite Master cards due to bad insurance experiences. Obviously hsbc insurance was terrible long before Amex’s new underwriters.

    • JDB says:

      Amex hasn’t changed underwriters, nor anything else on its very outdated policy! They have only changed administrators of the policy from Axa to Europ Assistance.

    • Heathrow Flyer says:

      That surprises me re HSBC – I’ve had several claims over the last two years and found Aviva have paid out very quickly on each occasion.

    • Kevin C says:

      HSBC insurance comes with the platinum account itself not the world elite card.

      When I had to use the HSBC insurance I thought they were pretty good.

      • Liam J says:

        Agreed. I had issues on the phone calling Europ Assistance trying to describe a medical issue for my wife before going to a doctor overseas. The person struggled to understand me (neutral southern accent) or the medical condition. Called Aviva (HSBC Premier) and call was answered quickly and zero communication issues. They also processed my claim very easily too. HSBC also have an existing conditions declaration line you can call and they will consider existing conditions. In my case they were all accepted.

    • Ruralite says:

      I’ve claimed via Aviva with insurance through my First Directory account (which is part of HSBC ultimately ), albeit 3 years ago, & they paid out promptly & in full. The only issue with the policy is it only covers a maximum 31 day trip with no option to pay a supplement to increase the length of cover.

  • C says:

    Annual fees for the Amex card have gone up, but we are still capped at £50,000. Prices of cars have gone up so we have to accept lesser upgrades or drive cars otherwise we could’ve gotten a free upgrade for.

  • Andrew says:

    £600+ for an alloy wheel scuff? It’s about £100 usually though admittedly I don’t have diamond cut wheels. (Just the lovely Alfa telephone dials…)

    • yonasl says:

      I must agree that the damage to the alloy is minimal and the tire is in perfect state which makes me wonder if the damage was always there. I would go ballistic if they tried to charge me £700 to replace a single wheel based on some scratches (they must be getting that for each person renting that car I believe).

      Always make photos of the car before picking it up. Specially the wheels and mirrors.

      • Rob says:

        Given that the car was driven to a hotel, parked for 4 days and then returned I am tempted to agree with you. However it was valet parked and, of course, I had the insurance regardless.

        • Danny says:

          Barely any damage there… Seems to me they knew about it already and made an effort to make you cough up

          • Dragonlady says:

            Complete scam IMHO. This is never £600+ worth of damage ( and the tyre is totally un -damaged ? Total nonsense ) .The issue is that people who have ‘ cover ‘ don’t dispute ridiculous charges like this because ultimately they’re not paying so the rental companies continue to behave in this manner ( and I’m betting the ‘damage’ won’t be rectified before the next customer picks up the car).

          • Dragonlady says:

            Complete scam IMHO. This is never £600+ worth of damage ( and the tyre is totally un -damaged ? Total nonsense ) .The issue is that people who have ‘ cover ‘ don’t dispute ridiculous charges like this because ultimately they’re not paying so the rental companies continue to behave in this manner ( and I’m betting the ‘damage’ won’t be rectified before the next customer picks up the car).

      • Nick G says:

        Totally agree. That damage looks old otherwise the tyre would be scuffed. The rubber ridge on the edge of the tyre would also be cut. The fact that the company reimburse you shouldn’t stop you going round a car with a fine tooth comb taking your own photos and a video, plus getting staff to record it on the collection sheet. There’s no way at all they would replace that alloy with a new one following that charge…..just record it as existing damage.

        • GM says:

          Imagine the very most they would do would be touch it up superficially. You can even hide the damage on diamond cut alloys with a bit of a paint job. Such scam artists. Was glad I had taken photos and a video when I last hired a car from Avis. The guy pointed at some tiny ding in the rear passenger door and I could show him the exact same one from pickup. Like they cared so much about their Suzuki Vitara (I was driving to a hotel and back, basically – just wanted something cheap)

      • Thywillbedone says:

        Regarding taking photos of the vehicle on pickup: I always do this regardless of the fact I have excess car hire insurance. I simply don’t want to deal with the hassle of making a claim later. And my working theory is that if they see you take extensive video or pictures in advance, they are far less likely to try-on a damage claim later.

        Clearly, many people with comprehensive insurance via Amex Plat, won’t bother to inspect the vehicle in advance knowing they have protection in place. Car hire companies notice this I suspect and then feel free to lob in spurious claims for prior damage.

        Incidentally, I once hired from Hertz in LA (2015 or so?) and you drove the car through some sort of scanner on the way out which automatically took full imagery of the car. Not seen it anywhere since – perhaps because it removes a valuable revenue stream?!

        • L Allen says:

          I have always, without fail, taken extensive photos when hiring a car. I don’t care what insurance I have, it’s the principle that matters to me. I’m not going to facilitate a scam claim for damages. I remember holidays where the much of the first reel of camera film was pictures of the car!

        • JDB says:

          The pre-prepared video/stills is becoming more usual. We have had this recently in Spain and Argentina – very thorough, well structured and documented. The photo booth had been in operation at Heathrow for meet & greet parking for many years.

        • Rob says:

          Hertz is bringing in AI scanners in the US. These can effectively spot damage which is virtually invisible to the naked eye – even specs of dust are resulting in bills. The bills are sent long after you have returned the car and there is no right of appeal.

          • JDB says:

            It’s particularly disadvantageous with a one way rental where there is an AI scan on return when there hasn’t been one on pickup.

          • The Savage Squirrel says:

            Guessing they’ll also make sure it’s like the “AI” X-ray diagnosis programme someone tried to sell a few weeks ago that was so obviously wrongly overdiagnosing that it was laughable.

Leave a Reply to Nick G Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.