Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Bits: British Airways Summer 2026 long haul changes, Norse slashes its ‘own brand’ routes

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

News in brief:

British Airways announces Summer 2026 long haul changes

We published an article yesterday on the launch of Bangkok flights for Summer 2026. Gatwick to Bangkok is going year-round – it is currently winter-only – and BA released Avios seats for April to early August 2026 in one go yesterday.

This isn’t the only change for Summer 2026.

New flights:

Jamaica – London Gatwick to Kingston will increase from three to four flights per week

Miami – London Heathrow to Miami will return to two flights per day, presumably taking back a flight currently operated by American Airlines

Dallas Fort Worth – London Heathrow flights will resume after a year where American Airlines took over BA’s historic slot

Las Vegas – London Heathrow to Las Vegas will increase from 10 to 13 flights per week

San Diego – London Heathrow to San Diego will increase to 14 flights per week

Austin – London Heathrow to Austin will increase to 14 flights per week

Bahrain – London Heathrow to Bahrain will become daily from the current three flights per week

Riyadh – London Heathrow to Riyadh will increase to 14 flights per week, as BA looks to compete with Virgin Atlantic and the upcoming launch of Riyadh Air

Jeddah – London Heathrow to Jeddah will increase to five flights per week

Doha – BA will increase flights across both main London airports to 14 per week

Airport changes:

New York JFK – the service between London Gatwick and New York JFK will be removed. A ninth (!) Heathrow service will replace it.

It is not entirely clear where the aircraft to operate these new flights will come from. Some are likely to be Boeing 787 aircraft returning to full operation following upgrades to their Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines.

British Airways Summer 2026 long haul changes

Norse Atlantic cuts its network following IndiGo deal

With both Airbus and Boeing struggling to meet their commitments for new aircraft deliveries, a new trend is springing up.

A number of ‘challenger’ airlines are moving away from operating their own flights to leasing out their aircraft to others. It allows airlines to launch new routes now instead of waiting a few years for the delayed aircraft on order.

Norse Atlantic is at the forefront of this in Europe, with Iceland’s Play doing the same for short haul. Indian carrier IndiGo has been keen to launch flights to Europe, and is already using one Norse Atlantic aircraft to fly to Manchester and Amsterdam.

Next year another five Norse Atlantic aircraft will join them. Half of the 12-strong Norse Atlantic fleet, which is exclusively comprised of Boeing 787 aircraft, will be with IndiGo, along with their flight crew.

This means that next summer Norse Atlantic will only operate:

  • Athens to New York JFK
  • London Gatwick to Los Angeles, New York JFK, Orlando
  • Rome to Los Angeles, New York JFK

It is cutting:

  • Athens to Los Angeles
  • Berlin to New York JFK
  • London Gatwick to Miami
  • Oslo to New York JFK
  • Paris CdG to Los Angeles, New York JFK

Hat-tip to @SeamM1997 on X.

Comments (86)

  • Pat says:

    another berlin to new york failure

  • Jonathan says:

    It surprises me the increase in flights to the U.S., when more and more people are turning away from tourism there, of course there’s a lot of expats on these routes as well, however nowhere near enough to fill the sheer number of seats available.

    I won’t go any further than this, we all know how strict and thorough border control at the U.S. has become in 2025, and how many genuine travellers are being turned away, or getting into far worse trouble…

    • BlairWaldorfSalad says:

      I’m surprised based on costs. The US is becoming out of reach for European salaries, and Vegas is even toppy for US salaries. Surprised where they think the extra demand is coming from.

      • Mark says:

        Went back to the US for the first time in a while over the summer. It’s not just higher prices but the effective 20% tip surcharge that is applied to EVERYTHING now!

        • david says:

          I found it cheaper than previous stays. There is many more “offers” as in early birds, lunch set menus then I ever remember seeing before. If your not the saving way inclined, then I guess it maybe different. Tip on self service machine was a step too far. Like come on now.

        • BJ says:

          Eat where tips are discretionary or not necessary. Look out for the places frequented by cops and fire crew.. Tgere’a a market near Penn Station in Manhattan for example that’s great.

      • BJ says:

        It’s too expensive because Brexit trashed Sterling and it hasn’t recovered.

        • Charlie says:

          I’d argue it is less to do with Brexit and more to do with higher cumulative inflation in the U.K in general. 2005 to 2025 and U.K cumulative inflation is close to 100%, where as the U.S. is closer to 65%. As long as your U.K. income has kept pace, then arguably you are in a better position today – even though you are not getting as many dollars for your pounds. For example, if your U.K. income doubles today, and Sterling devalues by half against the dollar, then you are in exactly the same position. It is just easier to blame many things on Brexit…. 🙂

          • Londonsteve says:

            I’m surprised that cumulative inflation in the UK has been 100% over the last 20 years although if it’s factoring in property prices and rents, I can better believe it. Largely nobody has had a 100% pay rise over this time, in fact, many people have had very little increase in pay. From 2008 to 2020 pay rises were rounding errors, post Covid the brief labour shortage has increased salaries by a modest margin but on average I reckon pay has gone up by 40% across the board during the last two decades.

    • Thegasman says:

      https://on.ft.com/4p22i1s

      Interesting article on US tourism from today’s FT. TLDR – it’s defied the negative expectations so far but mainly thanks to luxury & domestic demand.

      • jj says:

        The gasman, my TLDR is that, in a surprising development, metropolitan liberals boycotting the USA because of Trump learn that their views are not reflective of the wider UK population.

        • John says:

          Except that’s not what the article says and Thegasman already summarised the article accurately.

          • jj says:

            Except that’s exactly what the article says. European foreign citizens travelling to the USA this year are down by just 2.3%. If that’s a boycott, I’m Donald Trump.

            Considering how weak the principal European economies have been this year and how much inflation the USA has seen in the travel sector, that’s an extraordinary performance and suggests that no more than 1-2 potential travellers out of every 100 have been discouraged by Trump.

            I could point you to dozens of comments made on HfP over the past year that have confidently predicted a slump in the number of Brits visiting the USA. Hasn’t happened.

          • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

            @jj but many people will have booked and paid for their summer trips long before the election and are simply unable to cancel and eat the lost cost.

            I have friends visit Chicago and Sanfrancisco for events in May and June and only went because the trips had already been paid for.

            I did cancel my trips to the same events following the election but that was because everthing was either cancelable for zero or minimal costs or I was prepared to lose the BA Hols deposit. At the end of the day I lost £ 35 for cancelling an avios flight.

            I did go to NYC in February but that was only because I couldn’t cancel.

            Friends in Germany, Netherlands and Norway have basically done the same as me.

            The real impact will be on next years tourism.

          • jj says:

            @BA Flyer, you’re an outlier that gets lost in the rounding.

            The FT got its data from thee US Department of Trade, here: https://www.trade.gov/i-94-arrivals-program

            Brits are the dominant European visitors to the USA, and, so far this year, 2.7% more of us have gone than last year. If there’s been a boycott, it’s been spectacularly unsuccessful.

            Of course, the Germans, French, Dutch and Irish are shunning the USA; the Canadians are, too. They’re all upset that Trump has hit their wallets. But the Mexicans love him – their visits are up14% this year.

            Truth is, a boycott was never going to happen. Brits don’t let toxic governments get in the way of a good holiday: look at the Middle East, Turkey, South Africa, much of Asia. Trump’s a saint compared with most of those regimes, but people flock there.

        • Ken says:

          Ah the old metropolitan liberals trope…

          “while the number of foreign citizens flying into or out of the country has fallen in almost every month this year”.

          The whole article is about how domestic tourism has bridged the gap.

          it may however be that price is the bigger factor than Trump, however the vast majority of polls indicate Trump is unpopular in the UK

          • jj says:

            @Ken – we Brits are bridging the gap caused by Canadians deserting the States in droves.

    • Alan says:

      Aren’t they just bringing back (in the main) the operation of flights they’d in effect leased out to American?

      They have combined operations agreements so just sell each others tickets and make money from overall sales. Who knows maybe they had to pay American to fill in for them?

      • Sean says:

        This isn’t about bringing Brits to the US. It’s about bringing Americans to the world. Every BA flight to the US I’ve taken this year, the passengers seem to be overwhelmingly American.

    • John says:

      More Americans travelling abroad?

    • Richie says:

      Perhaps the tourism is Americans visiting the UK and also short haul connections at LHR. DT visiting next month will be all across US tv news, free tourism advertising.

    • Man of Kent says:

      Don’t forget that flights to the US also have to come back so there may be the demand from US travelers coming to the UK or connecting onwards.

    • LD27 says:

      Having bought flights to US for this coming weekend and succeeded getting a new passport using one day fast track this week, I was rather concerned when I had to complete a new ESTA form (via the new App). I realised Cuba was back on the list of State Sponsors of terrorism, but hadn’t realised the date in question had reverted back to visits since 2011. The drop down box now includes 9 countries and information is requested for dates and reasons for visits. Filled in dates and reason for visits and went to bed with fingers crossed. ESTA status updated overnight and thankfully was approved.

    • Ghosty says:

      I flew back from Vegas Tuesday with my grandson, unfortunately, or so I thought in economy.
      The cabin was at best half full. Having an entire center row to sleep laying down was a pleasant surprise.
      The outward flight 3 weeks earlier was full and again the immigration entry at Vegas is by far the worse I have ever experienced. I was spoiled at Singapore in March

  • Mark says:

    I always wondered why someone would fly on the LGW JFK route given how many flights they run with club suite daily from LHR. So not surprised this has been dropped

    • BlairWaldorfSalad says:

      Rachel Reeves. The press ran that scandalised news story about her flying “first class” when in fact she was in old Club World LGW-JFK

      • Tom says:

        If she paid the same as Club Suite from LHR, I consider that more of a waste of taxpayer’s money than flying First, personally!

        Maybe if we allowed the Chancellor to fly First there might be some more competent candidates…

        • The Original David says:

          She wasn’t Chancellor at the time. If only her poor decision-making had been limited to choosing to fly from the wrong airport, we might all be in a happier place…

          • BlairWaldorfSalad says:

            David, Tom – I expect to see you at the next HfP party for a fuller discussion on our chancellor (and indeed wider cabinet)

      • Barrel for Scraping says:

        To be fair to the press an older version of Club World was used as First Class in ‘Come Fly With Me’ so they were to know no better

    • Lumma says:

      Someone who lives in Crawley?

    • ed_fly says:

      The JFK-LGW flight have been a handy option for twin centre trips / back up option for not getting an Avios return for the Gatwick USA/Caribbean routes.

    • Alex G says:

      LGW is more convenient than LHR for a lot of people. And most people on the plane are not in Club.

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      Because LGW is more convenient for many people. Plus the timings may have been better for them.

      The LGW service suffered greatly because BA would cancel it at the drop of a hat and just shunt people over to LHR.

  • BJ says:

    What about the Norese MAN-BKK flights, are those gone too or will they return as a winter only route?

  • Mark says:

    I think there must be some unreported service/frequency reductions next summer. As well as these additional flights BA is reducing A380 utilisation to support cabin refresh work.

    Getting the four 787s stored awaiting RR engines seems a prerequisite to this plan working but it seems to need more and I’m not entirely clear what that is – potentially delivery of new 787-10s with crew bunks and GE engines? No aircraft on club suites fitment?

  • Yasin says:

    They need to start flying to Tanzania- the tourism from UK is increasing on quite a big scale.

    • Dev says:

      Do a LON-MBA-ZNZ-LON triangle flight. Hit both destinations in one go and blow both KQ and TC out of the water with tourists.

      (Admittedly on the Kenya side for the coast, you have budget options and luxury AirBNBs masquerading as uber luxury hotels but nothing in between for the mass market premium leisure traveller).

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      Depends how big that big scale is.

      A 100% of small numbers is still a small number. even a 1000% can still be a small number

      There needs to be a critical mass of people wanting to fly there before the likes of BA will start flying.

      There also need to be things like airport resources and suitable hotels for staff to stay in on their layovers etc.

    • revkev7 says:

      Having a good few days in Kigali and staying at the Marriott which offers excellent restaurants, leisure and club facilities. RwandAir have two direct flights to the UK some nights. Most BA routes to this part of Africa are now codeshare with Qatar. I doubt they will sadly not return to Entebbe and Dar es Salaam!

  • George K says:

    I will miss the LGW-JFK flight. I do hope it returns one day. If I can fly from Gatwick with BA I will pick it over LHR every time, even though it’s further away.

  • James C says:

    I still hope for LHR-SEZ to return.

Leave a Reply to Man of Kent Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.