Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Job opening: BA wants a new loyalty head

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

No idea what happened to the old BA loyalty head …. but if you’re looking for a new challenge then this could be the job for you.

British Airways is recruiting for a new Loyalty Manager, which I believe is the most senior loyalty role within the airline – IAG Loyalty is separately run.

Let’s look at what you get to do. Most of it seems to involve a creating a new ‘transformation plan’ ….

British Airways is recruiting a loyalty manager

The full job description is on ba.com here.

We’re seeking an experienced airline Loyalty Manager to maximise the value to BA of Loyalty by optimising the Loyalty Programme (The BA Club) and uses of the Loyalty currency (Avios).

You’ll define the Loyalty strategy, building positive relationships with key stakeholder and developing and inspiring the team to success.

What you’ll do

  • Be accountable for defining and implementing BA’s strategy and approach to Loyalty
  • Lead a team of 5 providing coaching, expertise & guidance to deliver optimal results
  • Create a long-term vision for Loyalty, aligned with IAGL, and put in place a transformation plan to achieve this vision
  • Deliver significant commercial and customer benefits through transformation
  • Balance trade-offs between commercial and customer outcomes from Loyalty
  • Lead Loyalty governance and stakeholder management within BA including managing IAGL relationship; and informing or reaching agreement with other BA stakeholders (Customer, PR, CLT, etc.)
  • Lead creation of monthly CEOs Loyalty Board content and material
  • Review and monitor Loyalty performance from all angles: customer, commercial, and internal BA/IAGL including Loyalty ‘trading’
  • Make Loyalty a data-led discipline where decisions are always quantitative and objective with clear rationale
  • Act as the central point for Loyalty within BA, representing to IAG, joint businesses, oneworld, etc
  • Oversee Loyalty tech changes, including managing a budget, developing business cases, and delivering changes and improvements on schedule

Your Experience

  • Education to degree level and/or equivalent experience
  • Proven experience of getting things done and driving beneficial change, ideally including tech or product changes
  • Expert knowledge of Loyalty and its role in airline commercials
  • Expert knowledge of wider airline commercial and customer strategy
  • Practical experience with data and analytical tools and techniques, and articulating argument using data

At British Airways, you’ll not only be shaping the future of our programmes—you’ll be shaping the future of travel itself

You’ll be based in Waterside. No salary is given but no-one ever joined British Airways for the money.

Historically this job – and the CEO role at IAG Loyalty – has been filled by a BA ‘lifer’ with no experience of loyalty. The job description implies that the net is being cast more widely this time which can only be a good thing.

Applications close on 9th September. I suspect I know who will get it if British Airways is serious about looking externally, but it never hurts to throw your hat in the ring if you’re in the industry.

Comments (174)

  • Chris W says:

    So who is in this role currently? Were they the architect of the revenue based status earning? Are they leaving because the job is done, or being forced out because of how it went?

  • Alan says:

    It was all looking so good. Knowledge of industry, well just need to ask on hear for any advice needed. But the need to have a degree! What is with this modern thinking that everyone needs to get a degree? You can be a perfectly good employee without a degree.

    • Peter A says:

      Standard HR requirement for most roles these days.

      • AndrewF says:

        As someone in HR, it’s not always “HR” who require this. I’ve had many a conversation with hiring managers who insist on a degree that goes along the lines of (and I’m paraphrasing) “Are you seriously telling me someone without a degree but with loads of experience couldn’t possibly do this role?”

      • Throwawayname says:

        Definitely not HR requirement in 2025, maybe it used to be one 20 years ago.

        The recruitment policy at my employer goes even further – we don’t ask for sector-specific experience unless it’s relevant to a particular role. E.g. when trying to hire an accountant, management are actively discouraged from selecting anyone based on whether they used to work for KPMG, a car dealership, or the NHS.

    • Ready2go says:

      That was my first thought too… cutting off nose to spite face… BA obvs never heard of social mobility! There’s a level of arrogance by any company/hiring manager that add needing a degree to a role profile. Why someone with 25 year old textiles degree would be more qualified than someone without any degree and a passion for travel/customer loyalty is beyond me

    • Steve says:

      Maybe they’re attempting to find someone who can understand those complex phrases like “and/or”?

      • Throwawayname says:

        @Steve, that’s definitely what they think they’re saying, but many/most candidates who don’t have a degree will be discouraged from applying because of the way it’s phrased/framed. That statement isn’t quite the same as saying that they expect a good overall standard of knowledge.

        • Chris says:

          Oh come on, it’s very clearly written

          If you can’t decipher that you don’t deserve the job, regardless of what your background is

          • Throwawayname says:

            Gosh, I am not talking about deciphering the literal meaning of the sentence, but about reading between the lines. Even as a person holding more than one degree, this might have discouraged me from applying because I don’t really fancy getting entangled into an organisation which is classist and backwards-thinking in general.

            Of course, I’m in no danger of being dissuaded by the text in question because I already know what the culture is like at the airline and don’t need to use that artefact as a shortcut for testing such hypotheses.

        • kevin86 says:

          “ but many/most candidates who don’t have a degree will be discouraged from applying because of the way it’s phrased/framed”

          Then they’re idiots who can’t read properly and shouldn’t be applying for the job anyway

        • Steve says:

          Firstly, I think you’re very much aware that the long list of people whining about this read that passage and genuinely believed it said that a degree is compulsory.

          Secondly, I refer you back to my original point. While I fully admit I phrased it in a snarky way, the absolute refusal of a seeming majority of the population to read anything properly before forming their opinion and spouting off to the world is utterly depressing. This is a trivial thing of course, but this rapidly accelerating attitude is a genuine threat to the world. We don’t have the likes of Trump and the Far Right because everyone’s suddenly become more racist or thick etc, it’s because people can’t be bothered to think any more and constantly misunderstand and misinterpret anything and everything – generally “conveniently” in a way that reinforces their internal bias.

          I think your “reading between the lines” is pretty ridiculous, but I don’t really care either away as that wasn’t my issue!

          Rant over, and apologies for extrapolating a silly little thing into an existential crisis!

          • Throwawayname says:

            Haha, I certainly can’t disagree with the assertion that we have a real issue with reading comprehension in this country (the Americans have always had it, but they’ve really stepped up recently with masterpieces such as Qanon and Birds Aren’t Real).

    • kevin86 says:

      There isn’t a need to have a degree specified on the ad

      • Alan says:

        So what else does ‘education to degree level or equivalent’ mean?

        I left education at GCSE level and progressed through the ranks of the company I work for. (I don’t say online what I do). I’ve reached what I think is a quite successful level.

        My company also talks about only wanting people with degrees, some are good but others I can tell very quickly are not.

        • kevin86 says:

          “So what else does ‘education to degree level or equivalent’ mean?”

          Good god.

          What does “and/or” mean?

        • Steve says:

          It means that you either need a degree, or relevant experience (not quite sure why you cut the word “experience” from your quote?) that you can demonstrate is equivalent to having a degree.

          Can you be more specific with what you’re not understanding? It seems pretty self-explanatory to me?

          • kevin86 says:

            Oh I understood clearly. It was in response to the question of “why does it say a degree is necessary?”

            Except it doesn’t

        • The Savage Squirrel says:

          “So what else does ‘education to degree level or equivalent’ mean?”
          Except that’s simply not what it says. It says: “Education to degree level and/or equivalent experience”. Sorry that was too complicated for you.

    • JDB says:

      Rather than necessarily having a graduate, I would rather employ someone who is literate/articulate and numerate.

      I can’t believe how many CVs or cover letters from graduates can’t even manage to get spelling/grammar/vocab right and if one can get over that only to find they struggle to articulate and/or have poor basic interpersonal skills.

      The person who left school to do something enterprising or altruistic will often make the better employee. But not many big companies or their recruiters think like that.

      • kevin86 says:

        That’s not just graduates though. The number of emails I see from senior people who don’t know the difference between loose/lose, their/there/they’re and think that everything ending with a S needs an apostrophe….

        • JDB says:

          @kevin86 – that’s exactly what I said. Being a graduate these days doesn’t appear to require basic standards of English or maths. It’s also quite embarrassing just how many youngsters whose parents didn’t necessarily have English as their first language speak and write far better English than some who did.

          • kevin86 says:

            You only have to read some of the comments on websites like this to see how bad some people’s grammar and general grasp of the English language is.

          • ChrisBCN says:

            Their is to many people who don’t seem to understand basic English phrase’s any-more. Loosers, the lot of them.

          • ChrisBCN says:

            If you can’t spot my seven mistakes, maybe you are one of them 😜

          • RussellH says:

            It is not just in English, either.
            I read a couple of German blogs occasionally, and while the spelling is mostly OK (German spelling is, after all, much more consistent that English spelling), the grammar is frequently dreadful.
            [Writing as someone who learned German as a foreign language to a high enough level that I could, had I ever wanted, to apply for a German degree course.]

          • ChrisBCN says:

            RussellH – 3 mistakes. Always be careful when criticising others!

  • apbj says:

    “Balance trade-offs between commercial and customer outcomes”

    “Make Loyalty a data-led discipline where decisions are always quantitative”

    Gold help us…

  • kevin86 says:

    “The job description implies that the net is being cast more widely this time which can only be a good thing.”

    Just because it has been advertised externally doesn’t mean that an internal candidate hasn’t already secured it.

    • Chris W says:

      Would they want it though? Surely anyone with any loyalty experience knows how unpopular the recent changes are.

      Or perhaps now it is an easier job given the damage has already been done?

      • JDB says:

        Unpopular yes, but only with a certain cadre, far from universal.

      • John says:

        An impossible task given that “cost cutting is in our dna” and the failure to deliver any customer benefits from the hugely overhyped “investment”‘ over the past 3years followed by the destruction of BAEC into BAC for those who travel under corporate contracts.

    • Rob says:

      I suspect IAGL would like BA to raise its game in hiring. Everyone has experience of dealing with ‘counterparts’ at work who are massively less smart / experienced / commercial than they are.

      • JDB says:

        BA has some very smart and well paid people in roles they consider more mission critical such as regulation, commercial, revenue etc but elsewhere often poorly paid and tough working conditions although many coasters attracted by benefits. Those perceived as high flyers can progress very quickly.

        • Rob says:

          Fairly low bar for that though! I suspect there are under 100 people out of 40,000 at BA who earn the average of what my team get.

        • cranzle says:

          Can you share some real figures for vaguely accurate job roles, purely for interest.

          At at estimated £75k, it strikes me just how low UK salaries have fallen behind US salaries.

          • Throwawayname says:

            The median US salary is $62k, which is something like £45k. That’s just over 20% higher than the median UK salary. Once you start looking into things like the length of the working week, unpaid overtime etc, the difference starts looking tiny.

          • Pat says:

            but those jobs get no benefits. travel is my biggest discretionary spend, and flight costs would plummet and i assume management get confirmed seats, silver status and decent priority, plus hotel costs would be cheap too as airline staff opens other doors.

      • kevin86 says:

        “ Everyone has experience of dealing with ‘counterparts’ at work who are massively less smart / experienced / commercial than they are”

        Not just counterparts. I’ve dealt with CEOs who were utter morons.

      • Fred Hopkins says:

        How rude! I don’t know why you always defend IAGL. Their leadership team is poor, their tech products substandard, their culture contrived their customer teams seem to overlook their core audience – the customer.

        • Rob says:

          I don’t disagree with any of that, but it is still a more commercial group of people than you find in BA and more willing to hire from outside rather than internally. Except when it comes to the CEO, who is always a BA lifer ….

          Remember that BA, at heart, is a safety-first environment and (correctly) they don’t want people in the airline who value money above all else, especially savings on maintenance etc ….

          It’s a fundamental problem you can’t undo that the best customers of BA/IAGL will be people who earn more (and arguably therefore more talented) than the people who work in BA/IAGL. This will never change and cannot change, since BA can’t afford to pay investment banking / consultancy / IT salaries to 40,000 people ….

        • JDB says:

          @Fred Hopkins – have you actually met any of BA’s leadership team? Or are you guessing?

          How is the company (both BA and IAG) consistently managing to run an airline(s) that’s far more profitable than peers like AFKL or the LH group (and others that went bust like Swissair/Alitalia/SAS etc) if management is so rubbish? A network airline is a miserable industry to be in when you are up against heavily subsidised competitors or LCCs.

          • Fred Hopkins says:

            Yes I have thanks and possibly more directly than you might imagine.

  • AJ says:

    The incumbent might’ve just been close to retirement or close to a move anyway. Now he/she has done “The Club” move, which would have been someone else’s strategy, and all that aggro (rather than presiding over a programme that has been static for 20 years – low pressure gig), the juice isn’t worth the squeeze now. Especially as the next bit of the strategy is probably revenue-based Avios redemptions – where this programme will truly die.

  • Spaghetti Town says:

    What sort of salary could this job offer?

    • Rob says:

      £75k I reckon.

      • D says:

        No HSBC prem for them.

      • JDB says:

        I think that’s probably not too far off. I suspect some are perhaps reading the role as being rather more senior than it is, perhaps because it has the word ‘manager’ in it! BA employs hundreds of those. The advertised role isn’t very senior at all.

      • Mr. AC says:

        Wow. So they cannot possibly personally relate to anyone that could ever qualify for Gold based on personal spend under the new system, and yet they’ll be defining benefits, service, thresholds, etc.

        • kevin86 says:

          That’s the same for most companies though. The CEO of a coffee company won’t understand that a lot of people don’t want to pay £8 for a Frappe

      • VR says:

        £75k is low for a Head Of role, with 5 direct reports. Even for outside London.

        I’d say north of £85k.

        A quick search on Glassdoor and found the average of some “Head Of” roles at BA to be 86K–£93K per year.

      • Lady London says:

        £75,000 ?

        If they actually want anyone with a hope of getting anything done with all the silos and treacle, who would actually commit to staying in the job for more than 1 or 2 years or so, then I estimated the floor rate at value £150k 84% of which I’d want guaranteed.

        £75k lòoks like an internal candidate.

        This, despite the job description looking awfully like a puppet bean-counter.

        I’d really like to know who is running Qatar’s program as they seem to be doing well for the airline. I’d love to know who they are and where they come from. As I think Qatar has bought well.

        And if anyone knows the real story on was previous incumbent hired to to do the hatchet job on the BA Executive Club and leave, or if they are leaving being thought to have messed up, then please share in Comments. Pretty please (my guess is the former not the latter).

        • Pat says:

          @LL i’m not sure you realise the life of a gay man is a LOT of travel spend, no kids and no intention to have any, and being shacked up with a paid guy in the city, working for BA ticks all the boxes

      • Joe says:

        Thank goodness I moved to the US. Make money and move back and live like a king. Salaries are a joke at this point in the UK

  • Chris says:

    Only problem with this is BA/IAG don’t understand what the word “Loyalty” means. So not a great start to their recruitment campaign.

    • JDB says:

      Well there are some here who consider themselves loyal because they have followed The Sun guide to getting Gold for £3k. They expect(ed) that cheap ‘loyalty’ to continue to be rewarded.

      BA and those spending large sums of money with the airline see it differently.

      There is more than one side to this debate.

      • Charlie Whiskey says:

        I wonder, JDB, if you could let us know the position you hold in BA?

        • masaccio says:

          I think JDB is spot on. I hold little bitterness towards BA that my bare minimum efforts at status will no longer be rewarded.

        • JDB says:

          I have never worked for BA although I was one of a team of advisors to the airline at the time of privatisation and for many years thereafter for BA, other airlines and airports. I’m still closely in touch.

          The publicly available facts speak a very different story to that posited here by some who criticise management they know nothing about, say BA/IAG know nothing about loyalty when they patently do. Such armchair criticism appears to be based on personal gripes rather than any analysis of the facts or understanding of the industry and clearly come mainly from people who haven’t run a business or had sufficiently senior roles that might enable them to understand the complexities thereof.

          The number of people claiming BA doesn’t understand loyalty is pretty remarkable but I suspect their vision is a programme that suits their book rather than one that’s commercial and designed for a wider range of customers which is what BA needs.

          These sort of casual and mindless criticisms beg for balance.

      • Nick says:

        Yes there are, the likes of some SME company owners, who’ve spent hundreds of thousands of pounds, over decades with them, flying fairly regularly every year, but never on fully-flex tickets, who now find it almost impossible to gain gold. There loss, not mine.

  • David S says:

    I find it worrying that not a single person here knows who the previous incumbent was. You want someone doing the job (or their manager) who is visible both inside and outside the company and not hiding away in head office.

    • Chris W says:

      Yes that is quite odd. The person who oversaw the biggest change to BA loyalty in what, a decade is unknown by the media and most loyal members and is departing less than 6 months after the changes came into place.

      Very odd

      • JDB says:

        The changes to BAC took place at a far, far higher level than this role which isn’t at all senior.

    • JDB says:

      I think you may be overestimating the seniority of the role. Is it actually meant to be an externally facing role? The job spec doesn’t suggest so.

      • VR says:

        Agree. This person will be someone who will be focusing on execution rather than dictating the strategy etc.

    • kevin86 says:

      A person on £75k should be known outside of the company? Really?

Leave a Reply to Only fools and horses Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.