Forums › Other › Flight changes and cancellations help › Lost at CEDR with BA – what next? › Reply To: Lost at CEDR with BA – what next?
Hi Jerry. I have gone to CEDR twice before, once against TUI and once against BA and was successful on each occasion. I am aware that CEDR say there is no right to appeal but on the BA case which was to do with downgrading from First to Club on a 2-4-1 reward flight, CEDR found in my favour but then made a hash of calculating the 75% reimbursement due. This included some real schoolboy errors in the reimbursement calculation and their decision that the companion voucher passenger was not due any reimbursement! I successfully got CEDR to review the adjudication decision and they rectified their errors and I was fully 75% reimbursed for the downgrade. My case was definitely helped by the schoolboy error in the calculations. So, if you think they have made an error in their decision then it would do no harm to try to challenge it with them. Good luck!
@Magarathea Thank you for this information. Prompted by you I see that CEDR will entertain complaints (made within 2 months) based on the criteria below (apologies for formatting errors, original link below).
I would probably have to argue (f) to complain. Is it irrational to adjudicate that the airline’s T&C over-ride the legislation?
CEDR Complaint issues suitable for review:
a) Where the process followed in your case was not in line with the process as provided for in the CEDR Aviation Adjudication Scheme Rules;
b) WhereyourcasehasbeenwithdrawnfromtheSchemeforareasonotherthanthose permitted by the CEDR Aviation Adjudication Scheme Rules (e.g. your case has been deemed ‘out of scope’ by CEDR when it should be ‘in scope’);
c) Where the quality of service by CEDR staff has been unsatisfactory (e.g. timeframes have been outside those set out in the Scheme Rules, treatment by CEDR staff has been unsatisfactory);
d) OthermattersatthediscretionofCEDRortheCivilAviationAuthority;
e) Inreachingthedecisioninyourcase,theadjudicatorignoredrelevantinformation
and/or took into account irrelevant information;
f) In reaching the decision in your case, the adjudicator made an irrational
interpretation of the law.
https://www.cedr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Aviation-Complaint-review-process-oct-21.pdf
The Adjudicator’s name is on the Adjudication. CEDR doesn’t claim it’s adjudicators are lawyers.
New to Head for Points?
Welcome! We’re the UK’s most-read source of business travel, Avios, frequent flyer and hotel loyalty news. Let us improve how you travel. Got any questions? Ask them in our forums.
Latest Forum Posts
-
Spaghetti Town on Chat thread – Wednesday 2nd July
-
titaniumostrich on Royal Jordanian status match
-
titaniumostrich on Chat thread – Wednesday 2nd July
-
tootsci on Tirana – much to see/do?
-
tootsci on Chat thread – Wednesday 2nd July
-
runnerbean on How do i get to Thailand using Avois and a companion voucher??
-
zapato1060 on LHR-CMB/HKT-LON: Best way of booking reward flights
-
JDB on BA Shopping not honouring points
-
Guernsey Globetrotter on Chat thread – Wednesday 2nd July
-
JDB on Tirana – much to see/do?
Check reward flight availability instantly for free!
Booking a luxury hotel?
Our luxury hotel booking service offers you GUARANTEED extra benefits over booking direct. Works with Four Seasons, Mandarin Oriental, The Ritz Carlton, St Regis and more. We've booked £1.7 million of rooms to date. Click for details.