Forums › Other › Flight changes and cancellations help › Lost at CEDR with BA – what next? › Reply To: Lost at CEDR with BA – what next?
Hi Jerry. I have gone to CEDR twice before, once against TUI and once against BA and was successful on each occasion. I am aware that CEDR say there is no right to appeal but on the BA case which was to do with downgrading from First to Club on a 2-4-1 reward flight, CEDR found in my favour but then made a hash of calculating the 75% reimbursement due. This included some real schoolboy errors in the reimbursement calculation and their decision that the companion voucher passenger was not due any reimbursement! I successfully got CEDR to review the adjudication decision and they rectified their errors and I was fully 75% reimbursed for the downgrade. My case was definitely helped by the schoolboy error in the calculations. So, if you think they have made an error in their decision then it would do no harm to try to challenge it with them. Good luck!
@Magarathea Thank you for this information. Prompted by you I see that CEDR will entertain complaints (made within 2 months) based on the criteria below (apologies for formatting errors, original link below).
I would probably have to argue (f) to complain. Is it irrational to adjudicate that the airline’s T&C over-ride the legislation?
CEDR Complaint issues suitable for review:
a) Where the process followed in your case was not in line with the process as provided for in the CEDR Aviation Adjudication Scheme Rules;
b) WhereyourcasehasbeenwithdrawnfromtheSchemeforareasonotherthanthose permitted by the CEDR Aviation Adjudication Scheme Rules (e.g. your case has been deemed ‘out of scope’ by CEDR when it should be ‘in scope’);
c) Where the quality of service by CEDR staff has been unsatisfactory (e.g. timeframes have been outside those set out in the Scheme Rules, treatment by CEDR staff has been unsatisfactory);
d) OthermattersatthediscretionofCEDRortheCivilAviationAuthority;
e) Inreachingthedecisioninyourcase,theadjudicatorignoredrelevantinformation
and/or took into account irrelevant information;
f) In reaching the decision in your case, the adjudicator made an irrational
interpretation of the law.
https://www.cedr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Aviation-Complaint-review-process-oct-21.pdf
The Adjudicator’s name is on the Adjudication. CEDR doesn’t claim it’s adjudicators are lawyers.
New to Head for Points?
Welcome! We’re the UK’s most-read source of business travel, Avios, frequent flyer and hotel loyalty news. Let us improve how you travel. Got any questions? Ask them in our forums.
Latest Forum Posts
- Cranzle on Chat thread – Monday 2nd December
- R2 on Qatar Airways Privilege Club – UEFA Champions League
- R2 on Qatar Airways Privilege Club – UEFA Champions League
- Youllnever on Post new Amex statement credit offers here!
- Retron on Struggling to inherit Avios points
- NorthernLass on The ‘How to book the return leg with 2-4-1 companion voucher’ thread
- bennymoon on The ‘How to book the return leg with 2-4-1 companion voucher’ thread
- OhOneTwoFour on Nationwide Flex Plus
- strickers on VPN recommendation (East Asia)
- strickers on Chat thread – Sunday 1st December
LIMITED TIME OFFFER: Get 80,000 WELCOME BONUS POINTS (worth 80,000 Avios) and £400 dining credit with The Platinum Card
Check reward flight availability instantly for free!
Booking a luxury hotel?
Our luxury hotel booking service offers you GUARANTEED extra benefits over booking direct. Works with Four Seasons, Mandarin Oriental, The Ritz Carlton, St Regis and more. We've booked £1.7 million of rooms to date. Click for details.