Reply To: HND to LHR BA0006 26th Nov 13:15 cancelled

[JDB]

@Lady London – I think that in mentioning £500, you are trying to justify that per person so that the £1,000 pill will be swallowed!

Article 9 is supposed to provide indemnification so you can’t really use the idea that if they had booked two rooms at £500 then it might have been OK because they in fact only booked one. You make the same erroneous link as @AJA that there is somehow a connection between any alleged failures by BA to provide the passenger with their rights and the test for reimbursement of expenses.

It feels a little unseemly to use the post as another diatribe about BA with elements that don’t accord with the facts previously posted, particularly when the OP has had the honesty and good grace to shoulder some of the blame…

It’s quite difficult to see CEDR requiring much more than BA’s offer and at MCOL I think you would be at serious risk of costs for unreasonable conduct.