Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Claiming compensation for flight delays

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

A few weeks ago I wrote about the ‘Huzar vs Jet2’ legal case.  This has brought substantial clarity to the rules covering ‘EC261’ compensation for delayed flights.

As a reminder, you are due the following compensation if your flight from an EU airport on any airline, or to an EU airport on an airline licensed to fly within the EU, is delayed:

Flights under 1,500 km with a delay of 2 hours or more are entitled to €250

Flights between 1,500 km and 3,500 km (or any flight over 1,500km within the EU) with a delay of at least 3 hours are entitled to €400

Flights of 3,500 km or more (unless entirely within the EU) and a waiting time of 4 hours are entitled to €600

Where rerouting is offered and results in the passenger arriving within 2, 3 or 4 hours of the scheduled arrival time, depending on distance, the compensation payable is halved

Delays lasting more than 5 hours give passengers the option to withdraw from the flight altogether and be flown back to their original destination

Wikipedia has a long article on EC261 if you want to go into it in more detail.

The Huzar case clarified that airlines are NOT allowed to use ‘mechanical failure’ as an excuse to avoid payment.  The Court of Appeal has now ruled that this does not count as an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ which allows an airline to avoid compensation payments.

If you are due compensation, you need to decide whether to pursue the claim yourself or to outsource it to a third party.

What I did not mention when I wrote about the Huzar case, and as a press release last week reminded me, a number of groups have sprung up over the last year or so to help reclaim money you may be due.

Flightright, for example, will handle the process on your behalf in return for a 25% fee.  Given that the compensation figures are not huge (from €250 per person) this is arguably not a bad deal in return for getting the entire process off your shoulders.

euclaim offers a similar service, albeit with a slightly higher fee.  An online search will bring up some other alternatives.

You can also try the DIY approach.  MoneySavingExpert has a guide to making your own claim if you want to go through the process yourself, although that won’t help if the airline refuses to pay and you need to use the Small Claims Court.  I don’t have any personal experience of claiming EC261 compensation, luckily, so I don’t know how drawn out the process could be.

In theory, ‘Huzar vs Jet2’ should mean that more airlines begin to settle claims directly.  It will take a few months to find out if this is actually the case in reality.

Comments (37)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • James says:

    Raffles, I hope you don’t mind a small punt, I created an entirely free page on my site which allows you to enter all your details about your delay and then print off the resulting letter. I hope the reader of your site might find it useful! (link on my name, otherwise http://www.flyingabroad.co.uk/travel-compensation)

  • Rich says:

    I had a claim the year before last after a long delay on a short journey (LBA -> BRU).

    I booked the flight with BMI but it was bought out by BA by the time I flew. Long story short, I ended up with one letter from BMI telling me to get in touch and another letter from BA telling me to get in touch with BMI!

    Eventually BA settled using Avios. I’d rather have Avios than cash (depending how many it is, obviously).

  • Ollie says:

    I don’t suppose there is a law coving outside of the EU currently? I fly back to LHR from Uganda recently with Qatar via Doha. The flight was delayed by 6 hours which meant I clearly was going to miss my connection but thankfully they managed to arrange for me to catch the next flight. When I finally arrived in Doha I noticed that my original connection had strangely also been delayed for 5 hours – I sent a letter to Qatar expecting something in return (maybe even a few Avios) and got absolutely nothing in return aside from a rather short letter. Last time I’ll be using them again!

  • Mark Ross says:

    I recently had a 3 hour delay with BA technical fault plus a shambles rebooking, this was the response.

    In accordance with Regulation 261/2004, compensation is payable in some instances of cancellation. However, compensation is not payable if the cancellation is due to ‘extraordinary circumstances’.

    There are examples of what can constitute “extraordinary circumstances” set out in the Regulation 261/2004, including technical issues. In the regulation technical issues are referred to as “unexpected flight safety shortcomings”. The reason for the cancellation of your flight was a technical issue of this nature, and therefore, compensation would not be payable in accordance with the regulation.

    The issue of what constitutes a technical fault amounting to an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ was recently considered by the Court of Appeal in the case of Huzar v Jet2.com. However, this is being appealed to the Supreme Court. In the circumstances, we are postponing consideration of your claim for compensation until the Supreme Court has issued its decision.

    Once the decision is issued, please contact us with your case reference so that the circumstances of your cancelled flight can be reviewed in light of the Supreme Court decision.

    If court proceedings are issued at this time, we will ask the court to stay them pending the decision of the Supreme Court.

    Thank you once again for contacting us. I do understand that this is not the answer you were hoping for and I’m sorry to disappoint you on this occasion.

  • Frankie McPolin says:

    Hi Raffles
    I spoke to BA only last Thursday about my claim for a 23 hour delayed flight to Phoenix on 23rd May this year. They said all claims are on hold until this Huzar case goes to the next level of court. Were they incorrect in telling me this?

    After the call BA emailed me this

    Your claim for compensation has been refused because flight BA0289 on 23 May 2014 was delayed due to an unexpected flight safety shortcoming, which prevented the aircraft operating as scheduled. Under EU legislation, British Airways is not liable for a compensation payment in this situation.

    During our final safety checks, we noticed a fault of hydraulic leak. As this had been maintained in accordance with the manufacturers guidelines, this constitutes as extraordinary circumstances and could not have been avoided.

    Unfortunately airline operations are subject to circumstances outside the airline’s control. British Airways takes all reasonable measures to avoid delaying a flight in such circumstances. Consideration is given to whether there are any operational options available before a decision to delay is made. We are sorry that the delay was necessary in this case.

    • James says:

      Given that in an airline of BA’s size technical problems occur every single day I would dispute their claim of extraordinary circumstances. Extraordinary circumstances is extreme weather etc, not broken airplanes as has been shown in Huzar vs Jet2

  • Francesca Yardley says:

    Recently had a delayed flight with BA from Moscow to LHR. In total the delay was 14 hours. I had to buy a new ticket home (BA would not rebook me unless I had a connecting flight) and didn’t care that I had Gold status. I tried making a claim online but Roubles isn’t recognised as a currency and nor are replacement flights. I’ve tried BA’s claim line every day since last Monday and never once got through (I can’t even get to hold most of the time). Also tried submitting a claim online in EUR with a comment that the amounts are in roubles and it said I would get a claim number within 48 hours but never received anything. They don’t half make it difficult 🙁

  • Oh! Matron! says:

    Has a Virgin Little Red flight From MAN to LHR a few months ago. Plane cancelled due to staff sickness. They actually flew the plane to LHR but with no Pax. Virgin settled quickly

  • Victor says:

    Hi,

    Wondered if you could help with this…

    I recently flew on a flight from Madrid to London (LHR). the BA aircraft scheduled to operate my flight was struck by lightening on landing in Heathrow on an earlier sector. Consequentially my flight was delayed by 3 and a half hours. On making a claim to BA, they have that this constitutes extraordinary circumstances.

    My take on it is that BA have a large fleet and it was their choice not to move around the fleet in order to allow an aircraft to operate my sector (which is 2 sectors after the incident). That is they have a choice on how to utilise their fleet, and because they chose to prioritise other flights, I was delayed. Do you think this is a valid claim, does anyone else have a similar claim?

    • Rob says:

      This is roughly what the Huzar case was about. However, in that case, it was a maintenance issue that delayed the plane. The court felt that Jet2 should have alternative aircraft available to cover maintenance.

      In this case, whilst I accept that BA should (indeed does) have spare aircraft ready to go at Heathrow, a lightening strike probably does count as extraordinary circumstances.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.