I have tried to avoid running speculative articles about the British Airways data breach, since few of us can speak with real expert knowledge and even fewer know how the company really operates.
The Sunday Times, however, had a very interesting piece this week which I thought was worth quoting. They spoke with a consultant called Ben Oguntala who actually worked on fraud prevention at BA’s Waterside head office and who quit after his guidance was ignored.
“Oguntala, 44, founder of the card security company Payments & Co, said he was hired to help improve card payment security. But he discovered the airline had failed the international standard for card payments, called the payment card industry (PCI) data security standard, last year. The failure was not reported in the airline’s annual report.
One internal document presented at a BA meeting in April this year states: “British Airways holds a lot of sensitive payment card data. BA are subjected to the international security standard — PCI data security standard.
“By achieving compliance BA are proving to themselves, their customers and their supervisory bodies that BA are suitably protecting payment card data from malicious attack . . . In December 2017, BA failed to achieve PCI compliance.”
The document warned that an outdated system, ArcSight, was being used to store security data relating to card transactions. It is described in the document as “redundant”, “severely undermined” and “prone to failure”. The document is marked IAG GBS, which is the global business services division of BA’s parent company IAG.
Oguntala said he was shocked at the lax security surrounding credit and debit card payments at BA. “The security was woeful,” he said. “There was card data everywhere and there were no proper controls on where it was going and who was getting access.”
Oguntala, who worked for a team that reported to BA’s information security and compliance manager, considered the entire payment system needed to be radically overhauled — with a new security protocol known as tokenisation. He said he left after his advice was rejected.”
As I said above, this is a quote from an article in The Sunday Times and I have not done any additional verification, but it does have a ring of truth to it.
The full article is here but behind a paywall.
The Times suggests £1,250 per head compensation for the BA data breach
Will there be any cash compensation for the data breach?
Without wanting to dampen your hopes, I have very little faith that the £475 million legal suit against British Airways, highlighted in The Times yesterday, will go anywhere.
The (ironically named, for those of us in the loyalty sector) firm of SPG Law is apparently planning a class action lawsuit. SPG Law is part of a large US law group and so has experience in the class action field, although they are rarely seen in the UK.
Apparently I would be due (£475,000,000 divided by 380,000 people) £1,250 for the “inconvenience, distress and misuse” of my private information.
More accurately – if we look at the figures for the recent US class action lawsuit brought against British Airways for comparison, where the lawyers took 28% of the settlement as their fee – SPG Law would receive £120 million and I would be due £900.
In reality, we don’t know how the courts will interpret the new GDPR rules on fines for data leakage. British Airways acted promptly and has not sought to hide anything, it seems, so it would expect a substantial discount for good behaviour.
The original story in The Times is here but, again, is behind a paywall.
(Want to earn more Avios? Click here to visit our home page for the latest articles on earning and spending your Avios points and click here to see how to earn more Avios from current offers and promotions.)