Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Norwegian secures a Government bail-out, whilst easyJet puts a UK-wide deal at risk

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

The first European airline bail-out (if you don’t include the nationalisation of Alitalia, which was already doomed!) has been finalised.  A 2nd bail-out, for Finnair, is expected to be agreed imminently albeit the Finnish Government is already a 56% shareholder in the airline.

Norwegian has agreed a deal with the Government of Norway to provide a credit guarantee of NOK 3 billion (£225m).

This means, effectively, that Norwegian can arrange a bank loan which will be underwritten by the Government.

Norwegian

An additional NOK 3 billion will be offered to SAS, small domestic airline Wideroe and other carriers.

It is not a slam-dunk for Norwegian, however.  According to Reuters reports, the initial tranche of NOK 300 million depends on commercial lenders providing NOK 30 million as the Government will only fund 90% of the guarantee.

To access an additional NOK 1.2 billion, Norwegian has to persuade its banks to postpone loan repayments, including interest, for the next three months.  The final NOK 1.5 billion requires the airline to raise additional money for shareholders to improve its debt to equity ratio.

Even if these criteria are met, NOK 3 billion (£225m) is a modest sum of money in airline terms.  It is unclear what the Norwegian cash burn currently is, however, given that 90% of staff have been placed on unpaid leave and virtually all non-Scandinavian routes temporarily closed.

As an additional trade off, all airlines receiving money will be forced to operate selected domestic routes in Norway – selected by the Government – irrespective of whether they are commercially viable.

The bottom line is that there is no guarantee that Norwegian can tick all the boxes required to receive the money, or that it will be enough.

Is easyJet putting a UK airline bail-out at risk?

Plans for a Government-led UK airline – and indeed airport – bail-out are progressing, but it isn’t easy.

British Airways took a firm stand early in the process by stating that it had no interest in a bail-out, whilst adding that if there was one it would obviously jump in.  You could see this as altruism on the part of the airline, but you could also see it as an attempt to drive Virgin Atlantic into bankruptcy.

British Airways and its parent IAG were very publicly against any Government help for Flybe.  By coincidence, as soon as Flybe failed, British Airways regained 12 Summer slot pairs at Heathrow which it was forced to divest as a condition of buying BMI.  I imagine these slots are worth, conservatively, £100m between them.

The complex structure of IAG also makes a bail-out difficult.  British Airways is, of course, a Spanish-owned company.  Should the UK Government be supporting Spanish businesses?  On the other hand, you can be sure that the Spanish Government has bigger problems at the moment, especially post-Brexit, than propping up a UK carrier.

I would have expected an easier ride from easyJet.  Whilst, on paper, the company is financially stronger than IAG it is likely to be grounding more of its fleet.  It also has little to gain from seeing Virgin Atlantic fail, except potentially a handful of extra London Gatwick slots.

easyJet seems to have played its hand badly, however.  This week it paid out dividends of £174 million, of which £60 million goes to Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou and his family, at the same time as seeking Government funds.

To add insult to injury, it has insisted that cabin crew sign up to a new agreement which includes fundamentally detrimental changes to terms and conditions.  Whilst the request for three months unpaid leave is being mirrored elsewhere, easyJet wants to impose other changes which will run until November 2021 – over 18 months away – including removing free cabin crew meals, scrapping 2021 pay rises and unfavourable changes to working patterns.

easyJet is now in the bizarre position of having over 17,000 of its own staff petition the Government to REFUSE a bail out of the airline.

It is worth contrasting this with the situation at Virgin Atlantic.  Looking at what I have seen posted by staff on social media, there is a genuine desire amongst crew and management to pull together to ensure that the airline survives.

Despite all this, I would expect a multi-billion pound set of loan guarantees to be announced over the next few days.  There may also be an element of direct compensation as the Foreign Office has now advised all UK residents not to travel if possible.

Comments (139)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Shoestring says:

    It’s not Spanish-owned if the shareholders are not Spanish

    • Frenske says:

      Operational HQ is in London. Stocks are listed in Madrid as well as in London. So you are right IAG is hardly a Spanish company.

    • Roger,* says:

      Pedantry. BA’s parent is Spanish. I WAS a shareholder in a British company. I am NOW a shareholder in a Spanish company.

      BA is an operating subsidiary of a Spanish company with much Spanish management input (to say the least).

      • Nick says:

        No, the vocal CEO is Spanish. Not many of BA’s managers are Spanish (Google them if you want!) One director is South American, one is Swiss, one from the US; of the next level down very few even speak Spanish, let alone hold that nationality. At IAG the proportion is slightly higher, but even then not universal, and they have very little involvement with day-to-day management of BA, despite sharing an office. The IAG CEO is Irish, the CFO British.

    • ChrisC says:

      In their capital markets presentations they clearly state that IAG is a Spanish Company.

      BA is as British as Boots, Harrods and ASDA – I.e. not very British at all and all foreign owned.

    • Alex Sm says:

      Isn’t it a bit weird that so many cornerstone British businesses are owned by the Spanish (not Germans, not French, not Italians, but Spaniards…)?

      BA, O2, Santander, even Heathrow itself if I am not mistaken

      • Lady London says:

        +1 I have always wondered why there was so much money in Spain to make these acquisitions

        Qatar origin of funds is easier to explain, not just Harrods and Aspreys but many others

  • Trevor says:

    I heard the CEO of Easyjet challenged regarding the dividend and he said that it was in place before the problems and it was legally obligated to do it even though they would rather not.

    • Roger,* says:

      I believe that’s the legal position – once the shareholders have agreed, it’s s done deal … though it doesn’t seem to apply to hotels group IHG who have just abandoned their final dividend.

      • Chrisasaurus says:

        The second part casts doubt over the first part there imho

        • Roger* says:

          Indeed, that’s why I mentioned it. 😉

          Declaration of interest: I hold shares in IHG (and for that matter, IAG).

  • Matty says:

    Didn’t easyjJet’s share price jump 20% yesterday? BA was up around 10%. There must be a whiff of something around the corner.

    I thought it was still early days and the outlook for airlines was still going to get worse before it got better. Clearly those taking a punt think otherwise.

  • Henry says:

    I purchased some IAG shares on market close Thursday at 196.
    Woke up Friday to a nice 10% gap up.
    I’m super bullish the chart from the 190-150 per share region.

  • Heathrow Flyer says:

    easyJet are handling this terribly. In order to be seen to be reacting quickly the board are moving in haste and being opportunistic at the same time. Trying to shoe-horn in measures they’ve been negotiating on for years including crew food, fatigue and rostering.

    It’s a cheap move and one that now, in light of yesterday’s govt announcement, makes them look greedy and crass.

    Also, the timing of the divided is unfortunate. There must have been some legal mechanism by which it could have been held back?

    • Simon Barlow says:

      or Stelios can pay his dividend into a hardship fund for his staff?

  • IslandDweller says:

    Up to now, I’ve had a positive view of easyjet. But they have handled this crisis badly.
    I was away last week, and tried to change my flight to get home earlier. Despite easyjet spin that changes were free, in fact the fare difference they were asking was astronomical. Another friend was in Spain. His flight home cancelled by easy yet they provided no assistance or guidance whatsoever on alternative options to get back to UK.

    • Lady London says:

      Did you not know that if you have to phone easyJet to either change or book, the price list their phone agents are obliged to apply has a gap of at least £20 or 24 euros over the price you see and can buy the same flight or change for on their easyJet website or app? This change was sneaked in last October/November.

      Take particular note any Flight Club members – they are rolling this into the ‘fare difference’ they ask you to pay.

      It can be a lot worse. If changing a flight you can be asked to pay 4 or 5 times the amount you can buy that same flight for on the internet at that very moment. Because if you are formed to phone in then the agent is using a different price list that you can’t see.

      There are very few exceptions possible so you are being gouged if you phone in.

      Phone in extra cost as such was at one point around £7 or 10-11 euros or so. Sometimes it seems that’s in the loading above, sometimes they’ve added it as an extra cost as well. The phone in price list is stated by easyJet to be ‘dynamic’ meaning ‘we can charge what we like at any time and you can’t challenge it even if I’m charging you 4 times more than the purchase price on the internet while we’re speaking:’ and user has no access to it.

  • ChrisC says:

    EasyJet are an awful company in this. BA better but Alex Cruz need to take a salary cut.

    Yet all the venom is being directed at Richard Branson who isn’t operationally involved in VS at all

    And given what’s happening certainly isn’t worth as much as he used to be.
    .

    • Doug M says:

      Branson likes publicity and puts himself around as the figurehead of VS. You can’t have it both ways.

    • AJA says:

      Alex Cruz definitely should take a pay cut. It’s not a good look when you’ve just asked pilots to take unpaid leave.

      Branson gets the bad press because he is the billionaire figurehead even if he doesn’t actually have much to do with Virgin. He certainly gives the impression that it’s still his airline. It goes with the territory.

  • Grainne says:

    I have a selfish reason for wanting Virgin to survive – miles, flights booked and just made Silver.

    I also flew to and from NYC over the weekend though, and it breaks my heart to think of the lovely crew and other staff potentially losing their jobs. I got the same impression from them though. They were very much doing their best to be positive and work together. The lovely member on reception at Revivals in LHR T3 had been with them for 18 years and said they’ve been through hard times before and they’re all determined to get through it. Hope they can. And I actually do hope the government help out, and I say that as an NHS worker wondering if I’ll survive this alive.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.