Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Why the disappearance of First Class is down to bad marketing, not lack of demand (Part 1)

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

This is a two-part guest post by Oliver Ranson, who runs the fascinating Airline Revenue Economics blog on Substack (free to subscribe, click ‘Let me read it first’ to skip the sign-up page).

He published this article a few weeks ago and we thought it was worth sharing. You can read Oliver’s previous HfP article, How we built the first business case for the award-winning Qatar Airways Qsuite“, here.

You can sign up to receive Oliver’s future articles by email here. There is no charge. Over to him …..

British AIrways A380 First Class
British Airways A380 First Class

Back in the 80s and 90s British Airways ads used to joke that it was too expensive for your business to NOT fly First Class. Like many jokes it contained a grain of truth – flying First, arriving refreshed, sealing the deal and leaving a happy customer sounds much better than losing a client because you are tired and not at your best.

But these days business class offers flat beds and plenty of space to sleep, work or relax. At the same time, the number of First Class seats offered and sold has clearly fallen – airlines like Air France and China Southern only use one row.

Even BA, along with Emirates the world’s largest first operator, cut the number of plush seats from 14 (three to five rows) to eight (two rows) when they installed Club Suite, a business product with doors, on their 777s.

Qatar Airways, who advertise excellent service, have all but abandoned First and offer the Qsuite business class (which I helped develop) instead. Singapore Airlines, another carrier renowned for service, experimented with cabin-like seats on their A380s (see my Subtack article here) but also have a more traditional product on their 777s.

Many industry commentators say that business is now so good that passengers no longer want or need the perks of First. I disagree.

Looking under the hood, I think that what is really going on is that airlines have forgotten how to sell First Class and make the classic mistake of promoting features rather than benefits. Read on to find out why .…

Qatnas refurbished A380 first class
Qantas A380 First Class

Why is the revenue contribution of First Class important?

When airlines design the best possible LOPA (LOPA = Layout of Passenger Area, ie the seat map) they start with maximum possible density and only deviate when there is a strong revenue case to do so. This means the base case is all-economy, as few loos and cabin attendant seats as practical, and small galleys.

When it comes to First Class though, it is easy to forget the part about looking for strong revenue cases because both capex and opex are high.

First Class suites are heavy – they weigh 100kg or more against 9kg for a typical economy seat and 6kg for the lightest. This means that First Class operators suffer high penalties in respect of fuel burn. The extra weight also constrains the aircraft’s payload-range, which determines how far the aircraft can fly with different passenger complements. Some desirable long-range destinations may be out of scope with suites at the front.

Complex maintenance also has tough implications for opex. The seat’s electric actuators, which generate motion on command, can break. Plush trim and finish like leather and chrome might damage easily and need replacing.

Compounding the matter is high capex – one seat can cost $100,000 or more.

Airlines are often so cost-focused that some meetings between planners and their suppliers might need to be carefully managed to even consider the revenue side. In a busy office with many competing projects it is easy to imagine how other less difficult tasks might take priority.

Even if planners do look at revenue there is a risk of underestimating how much First Class can really contribute if the pricing department do not understand or are unsure about how to monetise the willingness of passengers to pay.

What is First Class in today’s market? It is a time machine

Everything you can see in this seat map I have outlined in this handy table, which shows how First Class features are different from those in business and explains how they benefit a passenger.

While business offers a comfortable journey, First offers a luxurious experience where the passenger has a higher degree of control over how they spend time on the flight. When the flight is over, many passengers travelling in First will have enjoyed a few hours extra productivity or leisure activities than they would have done if they had flown in business. In this sense, First Class is a time machine.

The macroeconomic environment for First Class travel is excellent

Billionaires might fly private and people employed by billionaires might fly in comfy business. First Class is a service for millionaires.

Fortunately for First Class operators the number of millionaires is now greater than ever before, with significant increases across each region of the world. Check out the chart from The Economist below, which shows among other things that in China there were hardly any millionaires 20 years ago but now there are more than four million. Due to economic growth, fundamental First Class demand – based on ability to pay – is only likely to increase over time.

We know from other industries that wealthy people spend what they have to when they see value. Luxury hotels and expensive restaurants thrive, shiny Apple gadgets fly off the shelves and neither Gucci shoes nor handbags fail to find customers.

The traditional market for First is not just limited to the wealthy. Companies should also be buyers. The issue is that, in Europe and the Americas, many businesses state that they do not see value in First Class and are concerned that the optics of executives flying in lavish conditions are unfavourable. That does not necessarily mean that they are no longer a market – but it does mean that the airlines are not convincing them to buy.

Meanwhile in Asia and other emerging markets it is still socially acceptable to flaunt status-symbols and First Class travel may be the ultimate example of conspicuous consumption. While university researchers in the west often fly economy due to budget constraints, top Chinese scientists are shuttled around the world in First.

It is no co-incidence that most of the world’s First Class operators are in Asia, which I have shown in the table below along with some airlines who I think would be good candidates for First Class.

We have split this article due to length. Click here to read Part 2. Thank you.

Comments (82)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Qrfan says:

    “first class is for millionaires”. I don’t understand how you can possibly justify that statement. Even at the pricey end of the market it’s a few thousand more than a business class ticket. Often the difference is much less. You seriously do not need to be worth millions to spend an extra few grand on a holiday. I can’t take an article seriously with such ridiculous unsubstantiated drivel.

    • ChrisC says:

      Yes it’s a ridiculous statement.

      I’ve flown F on BA twice and I’m not a millionaire. The closest I’ve come to being one is scoffing some millionaires shortbread!

      One was a £460 upgrade from CW to F at the airport.

      The other was an ex INV – JFK where it was a couple of hundred quid more than CW.

      • Bimbo says:

        100%

        (that millionaires shortbread made me chuckle 😂)

        • meta says:

          Also F is sometimes cheaper than J on almost all airlines.

      • Brian says:

        Have you only flown long-haul twice, though? Presumably the article is referring to people who always fly first class, rather than just twice because it happens to cost a couple of hundred pounds more.

    • TGLoyalty says:

      His point is ALWAYs flying that class not just when it’s a “deal”

      • WaynedP says:

        Nail on the head.

        It must surely be vastly more important for airlines’ profitability to get component details of first class offering spot on for returning customers, not for once-in-a-lifetime aspirational FC travellers like me.

        • meta says:

          I would never pay for full-price F, but have progressively been flying more and and more in F thanks to miles and sometimes for cash, especially when the prices are less then £2k. It’s not longer that aspirational, especially on BA. Once you’ve done it twice on BA it wears off. Of course, it took time to get to that point.

    • Littlefish says:

      I guess what the author is suggesting is that if you put sufficient price premium (Dom Perignon, Louis Vuitton); then there is an airline ‘First’ market out there to sell to and you need to polish the product but really really reset the marketing.
      So, £10,000 and up (or at least trending Air France La Premiere to lower rung in the market!).
      Now maybe the author is wrong, but it does merit a little thinking through I’d say :). Not sure it’ll be on next month’s BA Board agenda though!!

      • Oliver Ranson says:

        TGLoyalty & WaynedP – regular FC travellers are for sure the main target market, buy regular can mean once a year for 20 years as well as 20x in one year. Thanks for commenting.

        meta – I’m delighted you have been able to get some great deals. Wishing you many more.

        Littlefish – you have it right-on – the product is fine, the marketing is the issue.

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      I guess I mean rich people rather than plutocrats Qrfan. A couple of grand on a holiday is still a big chunk of change though unless you have a good income – perhaps you could do an accounting fudge and say the buyer is a millionaire in terms of human capital?

      “Ridiculous unsubstantiated drivel” – that’s a bit harsh isn’t it? How about “informed nonsense” instead. After all, talking nonsense is a key skill in the old biz-dev, helping build rapport with the customer and all that.

      ChrisC – check out part 2, where I outline just the pricing strategies you experienced – it’s good for the airline, even from a relatively low base fare, if the seat would otherwise go unsold. Plus reduces the number of free-upgrades due to the inevitable overbooking.

      Bimbo – I had a chuckle too!

      Brian – I think it is important for the airline to address both regular and non-regular travellers. Today’s student can be tomorrow’s business traveller. Today’s struggling business owner can be tomorrow’s successful entrepreneur. The chap who used to sell pianos in the Concorde Room told me that many people he meets don’t have any money to spend on pianos because they are spending all their income growing their business with frequent travel. Plus, people tell their friends – one good experience can result in a lot of extra ticket sales.

  • The Savage Squirrel says:

    Some of the data used here is flimsy to say the least. In a world where “millionaire” as defined in the article basically means anyone who owns either a pension pot or their near-London home without a mortgage, it’s hardly an indicator of spending power. If I describe your millionaire as … a pensioner with an annual income of £40,000 now they’re hardly a likely First Class customer; and there are many more of this type of millionaire than there are the popularly imagined mansion-and-a-Rolls type.

    • John says:

      Furthermore, from the description of the chart, it looks as if this might not be corrected for inflation.

      Obviously, as you go from 2000 to 2019, you’re gonna get about 45% more millionaires due to inflation alone ($1m in 2019 dollars is equivalent to $0.68m in 2000 dollars).

    • John says:

      Well I suppose I’m a millionaire then, but it’s mainly because I don’t waste money on things that don’t add much value for the price. Such as paying for F when J or sometimes Y is perfectly fine. Paying double the J price for F is certainly something I’ll never do unless my financial position significantly changes.

      As long as I sort my sleeping out in the days before a trip, I feel refreshed after a long-haul Y just as much as a long-haul J. And not sorting out my sleep makes me feel awful even if I fly in F. This may change as I approach my 40s.

      • LostAntipod says:

        It will change when you hit your 40s, believe me. I emigrated to the UK in Y at 35, I visited Oz at 37 in Y, and since then it’s only ever J or F. Its made a huge difference to the length of jetlag while in Oz , which is precious time for me on a 7-14 day trip. Some people can sleep in Y , I’m not one, and at 6’3 I can only just cope with TATL in Y.

        • LostAntipod says:

          Plus the better quality of champagne in F can help the hangover 12 hours later 😉 ;). Thanks for the Krug, Qatar 🙂

        • The Savage Squirrel says:

          The key point there though is you said “J or F” i.e. they are basically interchangeable to meet your needs. Not “it has to be F as it’s so much better than J”.

          • LostAntipod says:

            I was responding to the OP that at some point longhaul Y will likely loose its tolerability. I didn’t say F and J were interchangeable. All my F travel has been avios, upgrades, or buy CW get one leg F….

    • Ken says:

      Indeed.
      After tax income would be a much better metric, and basically we have moved to a world were plutocrats can afford private jets, but individuals need a decent net income before they will choose first class.

      The same thing happened with first class ocean travel well before people started flying, so it shouldn’t be a surprise.
      Good article but bringing companies like Apple into the argument is self defeating. Spending £1k on a phone that you use for hours every day for 3 years (and will have at least some residual value) is a works away from dropping £5k on an eight hour flight.
      Also, how much more refreshed are you flying F rather than J from London to the US east coast. It’s marginal really.

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      Savage Squirrel & John (1) – I guess that the key point is that the number of rich people and so the size of the total FC market has gone up.

      I hear you on the numbers – I like numbers too. I try to write my articles more about the big ideas and save and number-crunching until I work with somebody who either has or can buy the relevant data – having all the relevant data sources together would be quite a bit more than I can afford!

      John (2) – I hear you – for sure plenty of prosperous people fly EY. LostAntipod – I hear you too! Many of my friends who would “never” spend that kind of money suddenly changed their minds as we all got older.

  • Bimbo says:

    I can’t help myself, but the comparison table is pretty inaccurate. I get it’s hard to compare wildy different offerings across all the airlines, but even then it clearly shows that the differences between F and J are miniscule. A few inches there and then, or non-important argument of table size and whether you’ll fit both laptop and papers – is that really a user need or just scraping the barell to find any details. Similar with buddy dining, you don’t get that in all F cabins anyway but you get in in some J – e.g. B6, QR (that’s even for more than a buddy) etc…. Also, getting off the plane first in F is not always the case, depending on the layout and airport.

    Maybe it’s only me, but I think I have flown both cabins extensively enough to be able to say the differences are often in unimportant details. I don’t feel more refreshed after a flight in F, I don’t need have both the papers and laptop on the table. The exclusivity and privacy in F is only valuable on day flights and not so much on night flights… And nowadays, J is often better on some airlines than F on others – so hard to generalize. But that only proves how J developed to be in a close match with F.

    • dougzz99 says:

      In terms of refreshed I think the B787 and A350 with lower (but higher) cabin air pressure and better humidity contribute hugely. Surprised people obsess over seats and other things, and aircraft type mentioned so infrequently. I’d take CW on a better plane over CS on a B777.

      • Bimbo says:

        Oh yeah, totally agree with 787 and A350 – but being in F or J on the same plane doesn’t make a difference these days (at least to me)

      • Littlefish says:

        Bingo! This is a big reason I prefer Virgin over BA (better cabin humidity and pressure … no 777s); but then again, to the well targeted First type customer ready to drop multiples of £10k that minor detail should be easily swerved around.
        I will say … 1 WC in a F-cabin utterly and totally takes away from a ‘First’ product. Imagine the Presidential suite at the Waldorf sharing WC/showers with the Penthouse suite.

      • LostAntipod says:

        Spot on Doug 👍

        • Oliver Ranson says:

          Agreed. And the aircraft experience itself will only get better over time – I am sure of that.

          New aircraft like the A330neo and A350 are equipped with advanced technical backbones that collect and crunch all sorts of data in real time, from when passengers are sleeping based on light use and pressure pads in the seat (tailoring whether drinks runs should be offered now or later) to how long people watch IFE content, helping the airline source/develop better content beyond the standard Hollywood offerings.

          So in the future airlines can provide better services more tailored to the passengers’ actual journeys on the flight in question. I wrote about these in my article Revenue Generating Seats, Galleys and Lighting: https://revman.substack.com/p/revenue-generating-seats-galleys

  • Manny says:

    Article Error
    You say Qatar Airways with a photo of Qantas First Class product. Great reporting.

    • Rob says:

      Entirely my fault. Pic is wrongly labelled in our image library. I was a bit suspicious as I’ve flown Qatar A380 F 🙂

  • Bagoly says:

    It looks as though the cost-focus types have browbeaten Oliver on one point:

    The hardware for First may be 100kg v 9kg in Economy.
    But the density of people is less in First.
    Say 3 people * (9 + 80) in Economy is 267kg, whereas (100 + 80) = 180kg in First.
    So the payload-range argument does not look valid.

    Of course, if they are empty, then the fuel cost is higher.

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      Thanks for commenting Bagoly. You are quite right – it is so easy to get browbeaten on the cost side. Especially when you speak to Boeing (cost and pilot focus) rather than Airbus (revenue and passenger focus).

      It is an interesting point. You could say that the last few rows of EY are harder to sell than the first row of FC, so the FC seats are more likely to be occupied and the EY passengers’ weight might matter a bit less than you might think.

      This is aligned with how airline revenue management does it’s thing – they work a demand curve so while it is rare that a flight has zero passengers a flight with 100% is not as common as you might think.

      As an interesting aside, most passengers can be on full flights even if most flights are empty. To see why, consider an airline with 100 seats and 100 flights. Let 60 of flights have ten seats sold and 40 flights have 100 seats sold.

      Total pax = ( 60 x 10 ) + ( 40 x 100 ) = 4,600
      Full flights = 40%
      Pax on full flights = 4000 / 4,600 = 87%

  • Trent says:

    It lost me at LOPA. Layout of Passenger Accommodation. That’s all.

  • ChrisBCN says:

    This is such nonsense with various stupid statements presented as fact. Hfp surely you know this is nonsense!

    • Rob says:

      Oliver is generally recognisd in the industry as one of the leading experts in this field. Doesn’t mean you have to agree with him, of course, but he’s spent many, many years doing this stuff, including the orignal business case for Qsuite.

      If I want an article backed up with no real industry knowledge at all I’ll write one myself 🙂

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      Sorry you didn’t like it ChrisBCN. I know I can’t please all the people all the time.

      To make it up to you, how about this little factoid: BCN has two exciting airline startups in it.

      One is Inflight VR, who before the pandemic had thousands of VR headsets out flying with airlines as an IFE solution.

      The other is a company called Caravelo, who produce the subscription service that Alaska Airlines announce the other day. I have an article about subscriptions called Netflix and Spill – maybe you will prefer that one – https://revman.substack.com/p/netflix-and-spill

  • Thegasman says:

    Interesting article as long as you recognise it’s an opinion piece with some data thrown in rather than a “scientific” study on the economics. I’d certainly value some more content like this on a slow news day.

    The only thing I would really disagree with is the use of millionaire as a sign of affluence. Obviously having $1million net assets makes you comfortable but you realistically need $10million these days to fulfil the lifestyle of a “millionaire” as that’s putting you in the $250k+ income bracket. Obviously if you earn $500k & have $1million in assets then you still can be pretty extravagant but $1 million would generate about the same income as a couples state pension these days!

    • Mike says:

      Yup totally agree – it’s pretty hard these days not have a million pounds by the time you hit mid 50s – when you consider your pension pot plus house prices

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      Thanks for commenting Thegasman and Mike – when I read the paper each morning the first thing I turn to is the opinions so no wonder my writing feels the same way!

      Sorry about the millionaires wotsit – it seems to have flummoxed a few of us.

      I suppose that I mean the people who have done well financially. I live in Newcastle and there is quite a lot of FC demand here from people who own shops in the Metercentre shopping complex. The family’s of Germany’s mittelstand might be a similar group.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.