Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Manchester Airport announces closure of Terminal 1 after £440m Terminal 2 expansion

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

It may have been delayed by the pandemic, but the end is in sight for the £1.3 billion transformation of Terminal 2 at Manchester Airport.

This morning, the airport has announced that it is progressing with the final phase of rebuilding in Terminal 2. This will allow Terminal 1 to be closed upon completion in Summer 2025.

Building work began on the new look Terminal 2 in 2017, with the first phase – including a new pier – opening in April 2019, alongside a new multi-storey car park.

Manchester Airport Terminal 2 final phase expansion

The new-look Terminal 2 finally opened in July 2021, becoming the largest terminal at the airport.

Enabling work has already begun for the final phase of work.

What will happen in the final phase of work?

Costed at £440 million, the project will:

“transform the passenger experience at the UK’s third largest airport, with new spacious facilities, state-of-the-art technology and equipment, and an exciting array of shops, bars, restaurants and airport lounges.”

In particular, the work will see:

  • Doubling the size of the existing departure lounge, with a wider selection of shops and food and drink outlets
  • The construction of an additional security hall, fitted with next-generation security scanners.
Manchester Airport Terminal 2 final phase expansion
  • A new pier, matching the look and feel of the first pier that opened in 2019
  • A new dual taxiway system to improve airfield efficiency, with flexible aircraft stand
  • More than doubling the terminal’s hold baggage capacity to over 5,000 bags per hour, with two new teardrop check in islands

Upon completion in 2025, around 80% of all passengers will use the expanded Terminal 2. Terminal 1 will close, although as it will be 63 years old by that point, it is probably about time.

Charlie Cornish, CEO of Manchester Airports Group, said in a statement:

“Manchester Airport is a key economic asset for the North, and this investment will maximise the contribution it makes to creating a balanced and globally competitive UK economy.

“Our £1.3bn transformation programme demonstrates our long-term commitment to providing a great airport experience for passengers who travel through Manchester. I’m delighted to be announcing the go-ahead for the final phase, which will open in 2025, connecting the people and businesses of the North to dozens more global destinations, and creating jobs and stimulating increased levels of trade and tourism.”

Comments (91)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Blair Waldorf Salad says:

    I predict spring 2028. This will greatly devalue the existing on-site airports that now will only be convenient to T3. The new Ibis and HI at T2 really need a pedestrian route into T2. I was looking at them from behind last week. They could have rear exits running into the T2 car park and from there a sign on the ground to the lifts.

  • TimM says:

    Nobody will miss Terminal 1 in its current state.

    I am however concerned about the extreme walking distances involved in T2 – the price to pay for even more over-priced shops and catering outlets to walk past. I can see how they fit the MAG business but it is not a terminal designed for the convenience of passengers.

    • Nicholas Wood says:

      Agreed – several small terminals are much better for local passengers than one monster one. But I think they have ideas about turning it into a hub in its own right.

    • vlcnc says:

      MAG is the worst Airport operator group I’ve experienced in any country by far. They’re consistent in their awfulness.

      • Matarredondaaa says:

        Agree as hate Stansted which is the same, miles of corridor with so called duty free shops and good outlets before being crammed into a small waiting area.
        Book the Spire lounge to avoid but now various holiday companies such as TUI and On the beach offer admission as part of the deal the bucket and spade brigade get everywhere
        Last Thursday two even picked up 2 bottles of beer to walk through the terminal with to the boarding gate but thankfully were stopped by security before exiting the lounge and nightly cross they were!

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      The long distances are more a function of plane wing lengths than anything else. an A320 has a wingspan of 36m for example. Ten side by side gates need 360 m (and that allows no “spare” room between them)

      An A330 has a wingspan of 60m.

      So airports might as well put something in what would otherwise be wall space.

      And of course you can just walk past the shops. And if there were no shops / coffee places people would complain about that too.

      • TimM says:

        The geometric solution to this is to have a circular passenger terminal with spokes of it to the planes, much like those at AYT. Then the greater wingspan planes only need to be parked a little further from the centre of the circle. Multiple such hubs, eg. for aircraft of different wingspans, could be connected with light transit.

  • Harry T says:

    They only need to spend about £400 million of the budget on training their security staff properly.

  • Karl says:

    Awaiting complaints about security/lack of BA flights……

  • Oliver says:

    Feel like it is just refurbishing the old part of T2, then reconnect to the new one. Got a gate at the old part last time, they just boarded up the old shops and restaurants.

  • AJA says:

    Is the £440 million on top of the £1.3 billion or the final part of the total £1.3 billion bill?

    Assuming the airport has spent £900 million so far, that is an awful lot of money, which does not appear to have resulted in much customer satisfaction given the negative opinions so many people seem to have about the MAN experience.

    • Rob says:

      Included in the £1.3bn.

      You don’t get a lot for £1bn these days though. The new Peninsula hotel at Hyde Park Corner, which is meant to open very soon, has reportedly cost £800 million excluding land costs. Admittedly this includes a number of ‘for sale’ apartments alongside the hotel rooms.

      Simply working airside at an airport seems to double your construction costs overnight, given the need for vetting of all staff, inspection of all supplies and the need to know where every single sharp object (screwdriver etc) is at all times.

    • Save East Coast Rewards says:

      To be fair I’ve not heard much about MAN T2 so maybe that is a better experience now. Unfortunately BA still uses T3

      • Blair Waldorf Salad says:

        T2 is to be blunt very common. It looked nice when it first opened but the prominent presence of a JD Sports gives you a hint of what’s to come in the food court areas. MAN might have smoothed the customer experience by shifting LCCs to T2 and light refurb of T1 for full service airlines, and allowing for connections.

        • No Longer Entitled says:

          Need PremiAir to reopen and then you can avoid the JD Sports crowd.

        • Mike says:

          Doesn’t Liverpool have a JD Sports?

        • Mikeact says:

          J D Sports ? Jeez, I certainly won’t be using Manchester.

        • Brian Pickles says:

          Rather a snobby comment, what’s wrong with JD Sports? I’d rather have that than a terminal full of shops selling £1000 handbags like T5!

          • Save East Coast Rewards says:

            T5 had a JD Sports ow. I nearly choked on my LPGS when I was told about it 😂 Then when I walked past it to the gate it was one of the busier shops.

            A few years ago one opened in T2 (it appeared in the Heathrow Rewards newsletter) and is now in T5. I think it works well if there’s a balance of shops to suit everyone. If the only shops are sports shops and souvenir tat then it would have a downmarket feel but T5 has plenty of high end shops so appealing to a wider audience makes sense

  • AlexF says:

    And meanwhile BA will probably stay in T3 without their own lounge.

    • Stagger Lee says:

      I was in the T3 lounge a couple of weeks ago and looked over to the old BA lounge space which has now been turned in to a regular seating area for anyone to use.

      I understand why they closed it but it was a really nice chilled place to start off a trip

      • Blair Waldorf Salad says:

        Especially when AA flew direct from T3 and the security fast track would be quiet compared to T1. Then up to the BA lounge where you could see the AA plane arrive.

      • Londonsteve says:

        Why did BA shutter their MAN lounge?

      • NorthernLass says:

        It’s still a really nice space as not many people seem to know about it! You can regularly get a full row of seats to yourself there while they’re packed in like sardines downstairs …

        • Stagger Lee says:

          Yeah it did look pretty quiet and I’d definitely recommend it for anyone without lounge access.

        • Scott says:

          Either that or the corridor down by 142 and 143 which is empty unless there’s the one FR flight a day from there or BA are using it.
          You could even walk down the stairs by 143 and sit in the little domestic area that is hardly used.

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      I’ve only arrived in MAN off BA and it’s not a nice experience.

      A single luggage belt then a walk outside mostly in enclosed in all weather to get to whatever terminal is next to it and then another long walk (seeming double backing) to get to the train station.

  • DaveJ says:

    Mike Hunt will be pleased

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.