Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

BIG NEWS: BA moves to revenue-based tier status for Bronze, Silver, Gold and Gold Guest List

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

As we have been predicting for some time, British Airways has announced the move to revenue-based tier status.

The net effect is that earning Gold status will now be very, very difficult, bordering on impossible, for leisure travellers.

Some changes are unexpected – the speed of the launch (1st April) and a rebranding of British Airways Executive Club to ‘The British Airways Club’. Whilst a bit more 21st century, it’s ironic given that only ‘executive’ travellers are now likely to qualify for the higher tiers.

British Airways Club membership cards

Here are the new British Airways status thresholds that kick in from 1st April 2025:

  • Bronze: 3,500 points
  • Silver: 7,500 points
  • Gold: 20,000 points
  • Gold Guest List – new member: 65,000 points (with at least 52,000 earned through British Airways-marketed flights and British Airways Holidays)
  • Gold Guest List – renewal: 40,000 points (with at least 32,000 earned through British Airways-marketed flights British Airways Holidays)

There will be milestone bonuses of 2,500 Avios at 5,500 tier points, 4,000 Avios at 11,000 tier points and 5,000 Avios at 16,000 tier points which will be triggered on the way to Gold. Assuming 1p per Avios of value these are not exactly generous.

These changes were made “based on our Members’ feedback” according to BA’s press release so if you don’t like them, you only have yourself to blame.

What is a ‘point’?

1 point = £1 of spending on British Airways-marketed flights.

ONLY the base fare and BA-imposed surcharges are included. Airport charges, Air Passenger Duty etc are NOT included. Seat selection and luggage fees ARE included.

On a £11,990 fully flexible ticket to New York in Club World, virtually all spend (£11,687) would qualify towards status. On a £387 economy flight to New York, only £189 of spend would count.

There are other ways of earning ‘points’

You will be able to earn up to 1,000 points per year by purchasing Sustainable Aviation Fuel credits. You will get 1 tier point and 10 Avios per £1 spent on SAF credits.

You will be able to earn up to 2,500 points per year via spending on the British Airways Premium Plus American Express credit card. It isn’t clear what the ‘conversion rate’ will be – I suspect something close to 1 point per £10 spent.

You will earn 1 point per £1 spent at British Airways Holidays. For high end leisure travellers this could be an attractive way of earning status. However, BA has potentially messed this up because tier points will be split equally between all travellers. You can’t book a £20,000 holiday for a family of four and get Gold – in fact, at 5,000 points each, you wouldn’t even all get Silver.

(What you COULD do is book a BA Holiday – flight and hotel – for one person, and then have the rest of your family book their flights separately. This ensures that you receive all the tier points.)

One upside is that there will no longer be a minimum stay requirement for earning via BA Holidays.

What happens with partner flights?

You will earn tier points based on a percentage of miles flown for non-alliance partners.

For Malaysia Airlines, for example, it will increase from 2% of miles flown on a discounted Economy ticket to 30% of miles flown for a fully flexible First Class ticket.

This structure means that it is VERY unattractive for people buying flexible tickets to choose a partner airline over British Airways. For low cost premium cabin tickets it is probably roughly equal – eg Heathrow to Kuala Lumpur in discounted Business Class on Malaysia Airlines would earn 1,600 tier points under the new structure which is roughly what a £2,000 sale cash ticket on BA would earn.

Some airlines are rewarded more generously. Qatar Airways, for example, earns 25% of miles flown in deeply discounted Business Class. This is double what you receive for flying Malaysia Airlines.

There will be bonus tier points for the first few months

Flights booked BEFORE 14th February for travel after 1st April will earn bonus points. It isn’t clear if these are one-way or return, I suspect one-way:

  • Euro Traveller: 50 points
  • Club Europe: 100 points
  • World Traveller: 70 points
  • World Traveller Plus: 140 points 
  • Club World: 210 points
  • First: 330 points

These are bizarrely small numbers based on the new tier thresholds. 420 bonus tier points for a Club World return flight isn’t going to make much impact on hitting 20,000 tier points for Gold.

What happens with existing bookings for travel after 1st April?

It’s not clear. We are told:

“Customers who already hold bookings for travel after 1 April 2025 will be awarded Tier Points based on a conversion of the existing method. Any existing bookings will earn proportionally the same number of Tier Points, or more, as they would today.”

The implication is that it will be based on the same % of status as you would need today. A flight earning 140 tier points (currently 23% of Silver or 9% of Gold) will presumably earn somewhere between 23% of the new Silver threshold (7,500 points) or 9% of the new Gold threshold (20,000 points).

The implication is that this only applies to existing bookings made before today. If you book today, you will be on the new system for travel from 1st April.

What happens with existing BA Holidays bookings for travel by 30th June?

People have booked with BA Holidays expecting double tier points (for trips taken between 1st April and 30th June) based on the current tier point system.

On paper you won’t be worse off. The tier points you would have got will be multiplied by 13.5 and then doubled. Trust me that this is fair.

The bigger issue is that if you will need additional tier points for status, the gap is bigger. For example, if your BA Holiday would have got you halfway to Silver it still will – but you’d still need to spend £3,750 to earn the other half of the points needed.

Are ‘soft landings’ remaining?

It isn’t clear. However, a BA employee has told me that they will be removed. If correct, a Gold member will now drop directly to Blue.

What is happening to Lifetime Gold?

Your existing tier points will be converted. Take a look at the FAQ here for details.

British AIrways Club status changes

Conclusion

This is, clearly, a pivotal move by British Airways. It is effectively washing its hands of the leisure market and going all-in to attract the dwindling band of full fare business travellers.

With Gold now available for just over one and a half £12,000 fully flexible Club World return flights to New York, it is clear who the target market now is.

Realistically, it will now be impossible to earn Gold for small business travellers, economy travellers or self-funded leisure travellers. Even Silver will be a major stretch. British Airways Holidays spend could have offered a lifeline, but by splitting the tier points equally among all travellers it’s not going to make any real impact.

It’s not clear to me why BAEC members asked for this, since it was done ‘based on member feedback’ according to BA but that’s people for you ….!

It will also be virtually impossible for corporate travellers to earn Gold status based on economy travel. This leads to the question of why you’d even want to push for status – if the only people who can earn status are flying in Business Class, they don’t need Silver status anyway as they have the benefits. Gold doesn’t add much on top.

The long term issue remains. Business travellers have their flights paid for by their employers. Many of these are tied to BA or oneworld via a route deal. Many get huge end-of-year rebates which means their headline spend is not what they actually pay – in reality business travellers with a high rebate will need to spend LESS to earn status than leisure travellers. BA is rewarding ‘loyalty’ from people whose loyalty is contractually enforced on them.

Remove status from those people who DO have a choice of airline – leisure travellers, small business owners – and their reasons for flying British Airways shrink dramatically.

What I don’t understand is why the offsets for leisure and SME travellers are so half-hearted. Capping credit card tier points at 2,500 is pathetic – just 12.5% of what you need for Gold and still leaving you £5,000 of ‘before taxes’ BA spend short of Silver. American Airlines now lets you earn status based ENTIRELY on credit card and partner spend if you wish. If someone wants to put £200,000 through their BA Amex to earn Gold status, why not let them?

The British Airways Club, of course, is not the only game in town for earning oneworld status. I suspect that most people will now find it easier to earn Silver or Gold-equivalent status via another oneworld airline – you would get virtually the same benefits except for Gold access to additional Economy Avios inventory. We’ll be looking at these options in detail as we get nearer to April.

As a starter, remember that oneworld member Royal Jordanian will give you 12-months of BA Bronze-equivalent status for just $49 if you have hotel or airline elite status elsewhereclick here to read more.

You can find out more about these changes on this special page of ba.com.

Comments (3791)

  • Lou says:

    On my first trip since the announcement. The number of people who I’ve bumped into who are angry about the changes is staggering, and these aren’t your Flyertalk folk

  • Garethgerry says:

    $6.5 is circa £5k couldn’t get first to SA for less than that , first for next December is £6k, hard to get business for much less than £4 k . OK may be cheaper in thier winter but that’s not when leisure travellers go.

    By they way your 240 pts each way highlights teir point inflation, in 90s it was 120 business, 160 first. It was only 180 Concorde to New York.

    • Throwawayname says:

      You can get there for well under two grand in March on ET which is an excellent airline.

      • RC says:

        Agreed. ET seats in biz a bit old skool but very well cushioned. Lottery on seat type but so is BA. Crew is experienced enthusiastic and ‘real’. Real contrast to other airlines’s inexperienced crews to CT (here’s looking at you virgin and BA) who seem to view passengers as an inconvenience on their way to two days of partying and sun bathing. At least the Lufthansa crews keep it professional.

        I think another poster harking back to tier point levels (35 years ago) could be a little too outdated. Let’s then have the same availability, and 1990 much much much lowertaxes and other bs charges on redemptions too!

        • JDB says:

          It wasn’t me talking about 35 years ago, but it wasn’t all as wonderful as you suggest! Economy and business fares in Europe were significantly higher in absolute terms than today – an Apex (the cheapest Y ticket back then) to Nice or somewhere in Italy was £249 – £289, so over £500 in today’s money and Club was more than double. The positive aspect of that is that the EC261 compensation levels are set off those prices which is why they seem too high today.

          As for Air Miles, they were much harder to earn and while availability was better long haul it wasn’t short haul. The BA scheme was barely developed so most people collected on BA flights via AA which was much more advantageous and had the RBS AAdvantage credit card. When the BA scheme got going it was harder to get gold as once you reached silver, points were reset to zero and then you had to reach the gold threshold.

          • Roy says:

            Wasn’t there a time when you had to purchase a full fare ticket and send off the boarding card stub just in order to be eligible to join BAEC in the first place?

          • RC says:

            ‘ It wasn’t me talking about 35 years ago’
            But you just have.
            It’s an out of date comparison anyway. The world has digitised and airlines can’t use a brand to mask a rubbish product anymore. The change at BA seems to assume it can – without the actual delivery quality of a JAL, or Delta.

            Unless flying in ‘coalers’’ (747-100s) was your thing. No doubt sitting next to ‘the lady’.

          • JDB says:

            @RC – well today’s Times article on how well BA is doing references Lord King (although it incorrectly refers to him as the CEO), so they are going back almost 45 years. He was incredibly cantankerous, but very effective.

            In the investment world, it’s particularly valuable to have long term knowledge of companies and markets – yes, 35 years plus, so I’m not sure why you diss references to past events; they are rarely irrelevant and often quite the opposite.

    • RC says:

      All rather shows how BA manages to fund so many greater fools to pay that. Obvs good business to charge the max punters will pony up for, but a little research will get Lufthansa or Swiss First class for little more than BA want for their outdated 1990s seat on the A380 and already worn out 787s they send down there.
      Tbf I’m making a point that many punters are price insensitive enough just to pay up whatever BA plucks from the air. So for those, gutting exec club probably does make business sense.

      • Scott says:

        Most people tend to just stick to what they know.
        Heinz, Kelloggs, Cadbury, BA, M&S etc. Might not be the best out there, but they’re companies/ brands we’ve grown up with, used all our lives, have the well known names etc.
        It’s like supermarkets. A lot of us shop at the same one. “Eugh, Aldi. Can’t be shopping at that place”.

      • Roy says:

        I’m not sure most people would swap a direct flight for an indirect one, even with better hard and soft product. For most people flying is about getting from A to B, even if they prefer to do so in comfort.

        • Throwawayname says:

          That’s a very simplistic view- ET and BA both offer indirect flights from MAN to JNB, the fact that the latter charge more than double cannot be attributable to the superiority of LHR as a connection point over ADD (never mind the fact that I think that ADD’s a lot better!).

  • TomFE says:

    Partner and I have greatly reduced number of flights over the last couple years to reduce our carbon footprint. Now down to roughly 3 flights per year I was happy with silver or bronze as we always fly CE/CW either cash or reward flights. The thing that annoys me is seat selection and the prices BA charge for it. I wouldn’t mind being blue on the new system if seat selection was free in CW/CE. You win some, you lose some.

  • Garethgerry says:

    It all depends how you value a direct fligh

    also when I Google london capetown in March with EK it comes out at over 4k return business , 2k each way

  • Garethgerry says:

    Once again if BA was so bad, why did all of you bother with chasing executive club status. Why weren’t you all flying cheaper and better airlines you’ve suddenly identified, save yourselves money and get better service.

    • Davey11 says:

      Because the BAEC was really rather good.

    • Throwawayname says:

      I’ve always been doing that. Even when I was living in London, the closest I got to BA would be flying Iberia to Madrid on the odd occasion.

      Regardless of that, the BAEC did work well for a lot of people, particularly those based near LHR. It became less attractive with the revenue-based Avios earnings, and it’s now completely useless. As I said upthread, I am watching this with interest and hoping that a lot of folk in the regions finally desert BA and create more demand for full service carriers to fly to BHX, MAN, LBA, EMA, BRS etc.

    • Scott says:

      For me, Avios gave me the opportunity to fly CX, QF F etc.
      Lounges make things a little more relaxing and it’s nice having food and drink on rap even if I don’t really partake in a lot of it.
      Selecting a nice window or aisle seat at the time of booking is good.
      RFS flights have saved me a hit over the years
      Etc.

      Not all travel is with BA.

      AA, AY, QR, QF, CX, AS etc. all earn tier points and Avios.

      I do fly different airlines as they’re on my doorstep.
      Happy with Ryanair from MAN. Quite often a fraction of the price of BA and a superior experience a lot of the time.

      Fly Finnair from MAN and LHR more than BA, at least towards the Scandic areas.
      Ryanair takes me to GOT for less than an Uber to the city centre.

      Yes, there are some who would rather pay £400-£500 in CE via LHR than £17 with FR, but even with lounge access, tier points etc., there’s no justification in that price difference for me especially with seats that are no better
      (well, sometimes do pay £245-£280 with AY when I can get the A350 from LHR as that is worth it in business class rather
      than an A319 etc.)

    • Bertie says:

      Exactly and the new spend thresholds really aren’t that huge. In the real world loyalty is rewarded, someone spending £20k is more valuable than someone doing 10 £250 CE returns to SOF.

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      Because BA isn’t as bad as some noisy people make them out to be.

      ALL airlines have their issues with delays, cancellations, lounges, onboard food and bags.

      But some only seem to think these issues only affect BA.

      For example I have friends in AMS who waited 4 days this week for the bags that KL decided to leave behind in Valencia to be delivered to them.

      Sometimes there may be no choice left for a CE meal but try AY and there is only one choice in the first place on SH flights.

      However bad they are in processing some complaints there are other airlines which are far, far worse – and in some cases with no opportunity to take them to arbitration or MCOL.

      The grass isn’t always as green as some would make it out to be.

      • Throwawayname says:

        I don’t think that anyone is suggesting that BA are a truly horrible airline. Their principal issue is that they’re rather mediocre while simultaneously seeming to believe they’re better than the competition. They’re also based at an airport which is prone to disruptions and isn’t good for connecting passengers,.

        Consequently, while they’re not incredibly horrible, anyone not flying from/to London would be a fool to choose them unless they were significantly cheaper than the competition, and anyone flying to/from London isn’t really guaranteed a great experience either.

        The FFP was a way to retain pax despite those shortcomings….now that it’s gone, BA will need to be selling tickets even cheaper.

  • James says:

    I may be wrong, but travelling for business is not the same game it was pre Covid – no longer can you really justify business class for European flights (nor would you really want to) and the days of buying a ticket the day before you travel are long gone. I also enjoy the handy emails that I get from the travel booking provider that tell me how much my team could have saved if they had booked x flight instead of y flight.

    Unless it’s working on something that could run over, in general I won’t book a fully flexible ticket, the business would rather pay say £150 to refund the ticket than an additional £1000 for flexibility. Equally travel costs are monitored now like a hawk, and this isn’t just at the firm I work at, speaking to friends at other finance firms, consulting, legal, tech etc – it’s a trend there as well.

    Quite simply, this isn’t the 90s anymore with big expense accounts, sure I have the power to direct my spend to certain brands, which makes travelling a little less painful, but if I’m getting nothing from those brands now when doing so, I’ll just go for the best product.

    In the past two weeks I’ve completed 4 long haul club world trips with BA. Old Club seats on 3/4 flights, no one once came and welcomed me aboard as GGL, and the experience waiting for bags at T5 continues to be painful.

    In contrast I flew Cathay and Qatar a few times in November and December, on board product and experience miles ahead. Just need to find an airline that delivers a similar experience going west and I can’t see myself proactively choosing BA if I’m not getting much back.

    • RC says:

      Closest thing to that is Delta (on Delta metal).
      And I stress ‘closest’. Not the same as.
      On one stop connection then Lufthansa.

    • Throwawayname says:

      Air France may not be the absolute best airline in the world, but they do have a really decent business class product going West (and indeed South – while BA fly to half a dozen places in the whole of sub-saharan Africa).

      • Gerry says:

        I’ve done a bunch of long hauls on Air France this year (US and Africa) and really enjoyed their business class. Food is delicious, service is very polished, I like the CDG lounges. I’m really excited each time I get to travel on AF, whereas flying BA feels like taking a bus.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.