Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Marriott buys citizenM hotels (now 37 brands, but who’s counting?)

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Regular readers should be fairly familiar with the citizenM hotel brand, given the amount of coverage we’ve given it on Head for Points over the past few years.

citizenM first started as an airport hotel brand, opening its first property at Schiphol Airport in 2008. The select-service capsule-style rooms made a lot of sense for ‘value conscious’ passengers on early morning departures or very late arrivals.

citizenM’s selling point was small and cheap rooms, at hotel which had plenty of personality, good in-room tech, funky lobby lounges and often cool rooftop bars.

Marriott buys citizenM, which will become the chain's 37th brand

It turns out there is also a significant market for the concept in city centres, with citizenM branching out and opening hotels in Europe and the United States.

There are four in London, three of which we’ve reviewed:

The brand, which operates a total of 36 hotels comprising 8,544 rooms, seemed ripe for acquisition as Hilton, Marriott, Hyatt et al set their sights on the ‘select service’ market.

‘Select service’ brands offer well-priced rooms to guests with limited amenities – think smaller rooms, and no gyms, spas, pools or laundries. It’s a market that citizenM pioneered and has since been copied by the big chains, including Marriott’s own Moxy brand.

Well, if you can’t beat them, buy them! Just weeks after IHG acquired the smaller Ruby chain and Hyatt took control of the me and all brand from its partner Lindner, Marriott has just announced it has ‘reached an agreement’ to buy citizenM.

Interestingly, Marriott is only buying the brand itself – for $355 million. The existing owner will continue to own the actual hotels (or hold the leases, if they do not own the building outright). As a result, Marriott will get $30 million per year in franchise fees from the existing hotels and three ‘under construction’ for an immediate 8% return on investment.

The seller may receive up to $110 million in further payments based on the future growth of the citizenM portfolio.

Marriott buys citizenM, which will become the chain's 37th brand

What is surprising is how long it has taken for one of the big hotel chains to snap citizenM up. Hyatt, IHG, Marriott and Hilton have been hoovering up small brands like this for the last five years. It’s a bit of a loss for Hyatt, which could have significantly boosted its European portfolio, especially in London and Paris, for a modest cost.

Anthony Capuano, President and CEO of Marriott International said:

“We are thrilled to add citizenM as a unique, differentiated offering to our select-service brand portfolio as we continue to strengthen Marriott’s foothold in this valuable market segment around the world.”

Here’s how citizenM CEO Lennert de Jong explained the transaction:

“With the strength of Marriott’s development engine, we look forward to the prospect of many additional citizenM properties in new destinations around the world. We will continue to own our real estate and operate all our hotels. This relationship will allow us to work together to maximize returns.”

A more honest comment came in a separate email from Rattan Chadha, the founder of the chain:

“Our relationship with Marriott brings the opportunity to enhance occupancies, improve our revenue streams, and reduce our reliance on online travel agents.”

Fundamentally, the $30m which will be paid per year in franchise fees should be netted off with gains elsewhere. Assume a small uplift in occupancy frombeing part of the Marriott ‘system’, a decent shift in bookings from expensive online travel agents to marriott.com and a cut in directly employed sales and marketing staff and it should all net off – and the founders still have the $355m for selling the name.

It isn’t clear how citizenM will be integrated into Marriott Bonvoy. We can only hope that Marriott does not repeat the mistake it made with Four Points Flex and only give 0.5 elite nights per night (and nothing for a one night stay) and a reduced five points per $1 spent. Given the rates charged by Four Points Flex, especially the London Euston site, this is a joke.

Assuming the transaction gets waved through, Marriott now expects to grow the number of rooms it offers by 5% this year.

Comments (14)

  • Daniel says:

    I used to like staying in citizenM hotels but they have become astronomically expensive in some markets in recent years. Hopefully now they will be more attractively priced with points, although annoyingly for me I have few Marriott points and much more in IHG/Hilton!

    • tw33ty says:

      The prices for such small rooms are often more expensive or the same than other chain hotels in the likes of Paris / London, but without the global footprint to make me want to put stays their way as I’ll get better loyalty opportunities elsewhere.

      The only thing that will make me book maybe the odd stay with them, is if Marriott don’t do the same as they done with four points flex on points and nights. But, I think they will go down that route.

  • executiveclubber says:

    The better days of Citizen M are behind it – rooms are feeling tired, the brand hasn’t evolved and breakfasts are vastly overpriced with a mediocre offering. It’s a shame as their hearts seemed in the right place, but it wasn’t quite guest-oriented enough

  • Carlbob says:

    Big CitizenM fan, so can only hope that Marriott don’t mess this up…

    • JDB says:

      I have only ever stayed in the Copenhagen CitizenM and I thought it was very good for what I needed and offered excellent value. It did feel quite individual, something I fear will be corporatised away by Marriott. It should all work out though – as with the big brewers acquiring craft breweries, they soon cease to have anything ‘craft’ about them and open a gap for new entrants. A newer, better son of CitizenM will probably emerge!

  • PH says:

    Similar target market to Sonder… cost conscious digitally savvy travellers under 40 from urban areas who value authentic experiences but sometimes find Airbnb a hassle/unpredictable but are comfortable / preferusing local food delivery, laundry, fitness class etc apps rather than having those amenities provided by the hotel in a generic way

  • Throwawayname says:

    I have to say that I can’t see the point of these places. You’re paying Novotel prices for an Ibis-sized room in exchange for some slightly funkier public areas.

    Of course it must appeal to quite a few others because evidently the relevant chains have been gaining some traction.

    • The real Swiss Tony says:

      Yep, doesn’t work for me. I mean if the price is good enough then I’ll take it, but the expectation is that you’re working from the lobby amidst funky music and other people’s conversation which I just can’t hack.

    • JDB says:

      Trouble is, these Novotel or Ibis type hotels and their other chain brethren are usually so depressingly clinical and soulless with a commensurately by rote service style. Often lots of low ceilings and dingy areas.

      It was admittedly only one CitizenM experience but the overall environment was just so much more agreeable, someone had really thought about the design/layout and the charming and remarkably numerous staff felt naturally hospitable/service focussed.

  • daveinitalia says:

    I’ve heard Hilton Garden Inn described as a ‘select service’ brand before, but this is your description:
    ‘Select service’ brands offer well-priced rooms to guests with limited amenities – think smaller rooms, and no gyms, spas, pools or laundries

    It just goes to show how confusing these descriptions are. For example every HGI has a self-service laundry (quite handy if you want to travel light and don’t want to pay hotel laundry prices), HGI (and Hampton) have gyms and a few even have pools and a spa (HGI Mestre, Lecce are two in Italy I can think of)

  • Barrel for Scraping says:

    Thanks to HfP I knew this was a brand that wasn’t for me. Awful rooms where the bed is against the window and the bed is the width of the room so you are boxed in. Tiny washbasins that aren’t even in the bathroom and prices that are anything but budget. Premier Inn is a normal hotel room with a decent bed and bathroom. If you want to save money go with them!

  • Phil says:

    I’ve stayed in four different citizenM hotels, Glasgow, Amsterdam Zuid, Copenhagen and Rotterdam.

    The beds are typically big and extremely comfortable.
    The showers are powerful.
    They are well located.
    The public spaces are good for doing some work, or meeting friends before heading out.

    Generally I’ve always found them to be good value. I’d rate them higher than HI, Novotel and DoubleTrees type properties for short stays in those locations.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.