Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

We try out Qatar Airways’ new Starlink wifi – a genuine game-changer

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Last year, I wrote that 2025 would be the year of unlimited, fast and free inflight wifi. Qatar Airways is at the forefront of this charge, at least when it comes to long haul services, thanks to its progress installing Starlink wifi.

Starlink is a network of over 7,000 satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) that supplies satellite internet services around the world. Whilst it initially launched as a terrestial home internet system, it is now available for aircraft installation.

Satellite wifi for aircraft is nothing new – the first such system went live in the year 2000 – but Starlink and other Low Earth Orbit systems (like OneWeb and Amazon’s planned Project Kuiper) offer higher speeds, more bandwidth and lower latency. In short, it is faster and more reliable.

Using Starlink wifi on Qatar Airways

Qatar Airways is one of the first airlines to install Starlink connectivity, although United Airlines and Air France have also announced plans to do so.

So, does it live up to the hype? Rob and I travelled to Doha last week for meetings with Qatar Airways (flights were provided) and we deliberately chose Boeing 777-300 day flights in both directions so we could give it 12 hours of testing.

What is it like using Qatar Airways’ new Starlink wifi?

I am not exaggerating when I call the new Starlink service a genuine gamechanger. For the first time, it makes browsing the internet as easy at 35,000 feet as it is on the ground.

For premium passengers, it is perhaps the biggest gamechanger since flat beds in business class. For economy passengers, it is the biggest change since individual IFE screens were introduced.

Once you have flown a long haul aircraft with Starlink, you will not (if given a choice) book anything else.

Did I mention it’s free too? Starlink insists that airlines cannot charge for it. It is SO good that airlines are voluntarily ripping out their expensive existing systems, and giving up the revenue they generate, to give customers free Starlink wifi. Well, forward thinking airlines anyway ….

Connecting is a doddle, with no annoying pop-ups or interstitial pages. You do not need to sign in with your Privilege Club account or enter a password. All you do is connect to the ‘Oryx Comms’ network and you are instantly online. It is incredibly frictionless.

It’s also ‘gate to gate’. You can connect the second you board and you can keep going until the aircraft parks up. Literally not a second is wasted.

Once online you can browse as if you were at home, and I genuinely mean that.

Actually, I don’t mean that. Unless you are spending a fortune for your home wifi, Starlink is better.

Qatar Airways advertises it as being ‘up to 500 megabits per second’. I managed to get 200 mbps exactly on our outbound flight:

Qatar Airways Starlink wifi

200 mpbs is faster than our WeWork office which in theory is specifically wired to serve tech-driven companies. It was fast enough to deal with anything I threw at it, including a YouTube stream and other high-bandwidth applications.

Both Rob and I spent the entire flight working on our laptops as if we were in the office. We even skipped our second meals because we were getting so much done!

For the first time ever, there was no noticeable difference in connectivity between being at home in London versus flying at 35,000 feet and we could accomplish anything we needed.

Bar a couple of glasses of champagne as we worked we were genuinely as productive as we would have been in the office – perhaps more so, given the lack of other distractions.

Even more convenient was the fact that connecting required no convoluted process. You just connected to the network and that was that – no faffing with seat numbers, surnames or logins.

The service is so good that it is all the more unfortunate that some countries do not allow satellite internet in their territories. Unfortunately, this is out of Qatar Airways’ control – it is dependent on each country’s regulator to permit or deny the service, and some countries (such as India) are particularly aggressive in blocking satellite internet.

Fortunately, we were able to stay connected for the entire duration of our London – Doha – London flights.

There was no disruption from other passengers using the service either to stream content without headphones or making phone or video calls, although the Boeing 777 is a fairly noisy aircraft. In fact, everyone was remarkably well behaved!

Qatar AIrways Starlink wifi

Which aircraft currently have Starlink wifi?

I can only describe the rollout as ‘record pace’ given the first installation was complete in late October 2024. I doubt any other airline will be able to match the speed of Qatar Airways’ roll-out.

The good news is that the Boeing 777-300ER fleet is now virtually complete with the 777-200LR and A350s next.

When both fleets are complete the vast majority of Qatar’s long haul services will feature fast and unlimited free wifi. So far, Qatar Airways has committed to installing Starlink on its Boeing 777, 787 and A350 fleets. Here is the progress so far:

  • Boeing 777-300ER: 45 aircraft complete
  • Boeing 777-200LR: 1 aircraft currently in testing
  • A350-900: 1 aircraft currently in testing (the first A350 globally to have Starlink)

The full Boeing 777 fleet is due to be complete by Q2 or Q3 this year, whilst the A350 fleet will be completed by Q2 2026. The Boeing 787-8 fleet should be done by the end of 2026 followed by the Boeing 787-9 fleet.

Because the A350 and 777-200LR installation programme has only just begun, you will need to book a Boeing 777-300ER service if you want to be 100% certain of Starlink.

Qatar Airways has yet to announce whether it will install Starlink on its eight A380 aircraft and I suspect it will depend on the long-term fate of these planes. Whilst they were due to be retired during covid, delays on the Boeing 777X program (of which Qatar Airways has almost 100 on order) meant they were pressed back into service.

How does Qatar Airways’ Starlink wifi work?

In addition to experiencing the new wifi service on board both our flights, we had a tour of the hangar at Hamad International Airport where Qatar Airways is installing the Starlink antenna. Sadly no photos were allowed so you’ll have to use your imagination!

There are other benefits to installing Starlink beyond customer satisfaction. The dual-antenna system weighs just 10kg, less than one sixth the weight of the previous wifi system which came in at a hefty 65kg.

Why is Starlink so much lighter? Part of it is because it uses two so-called ‘phased array’ antennas.

Most current inflight wifi systems use what are called ‘Electronically Steered Antennas’. These are large, heavy antennas that physically move within the small bump on the roof of the aircraft. As the aircraft flies it must maintain a line-of-sight connection with the satellite, and it does so with 180-degrees of movement thanks to its electric motors.

Phased array antennas work in an entirely different way. Crucially, they remove the need for heavy moving parts. A phased array antenna is made up of many mini-antennas which can be individually controlled to steer a beam of radio waves in the direction required.

For Starlink, this means refocusing on a new satellite every minute or two as one of 7,000 satellites orbit the earth at a speed of around 7.7km per second, or one orbit every 90 minutes.

I’m told that Starlink has made the installation of the new system incredibly simple, and far quicker than previous systems. The kit for each aircraft literally turns up in a crate, ready to go. Whilst the aircraft we visited were having longer engineering checks done at the same time, it can take as little as two days to install and fully test the system.

Starlink provides the full kit, from the antenna that is mounted on the top of the rear fuselage to the six cabin routers. Each system has double the capacity required: there are two antennas, two power supplies and six routers. If one antenna goes out of service, the other antenna (and routers) should be able to maintain a stable connection, albeit at a lower overall bandwidth.

Conclusion

Both Rob and I agreed that Qatar Airways’ new Starlink service was a leap forward in onboard wifi, and indeed in the overall aircraft experience.

Previous systems have been slow, expensive and difficult to use. Starlink is the opposite: it’s free, fast, gate to gate and simple to connect to.

The biggest takeaway is that we are leaving the era of differentiated wifi services onboard and on the ground. With Starlink, airlines will be able to offer the same (better, actually) wifi speeds you would expect at home, in the office or anywhere else on the planet.

It may even change booking patterns. Your boss may have considered a day flight a waste if you lost a day of work, but with Starlink you can be as productive as you are in the office (we proved that!).

The downside, of course, is that there is no longer an excuse for being offline, either from your employer or your family!

Unless other airlines catch-up – and, in time, they will have no choice – Qatar Airways now has a huge competitive advantage.

You can find out more about Qatar Airways’ Starlink service on its website here.

Comments (215)

  • David Cohen says:

    Also a shout-out to Hawaiian Airlines who also have all of their A330s equipped with Starlink. In fact, I think they were done before Qatar were.

    Having down a few BA and Lufthansa flights recently with their pitiful excuse for in-flight internet, I think there will be very quickly a tipping point where carriers have to have this (or a competitor like Kuiper) installed to remain competitive. It really is essential in 2025.

  • NFH says:

    Unless you are spending a fortune for your home wifi, Starlink is better.

    Hyperoptic has supplied me with 1Gbps (1000Mbps) at home since 2014. I currently pay £25 per month, after prices fell over time because of competition from Community Fibre. I wouldn’t describe £25 per month as a fortune.

    Nevertheless I agree that 200Mbps is impressive on board an aircraft. I’m very critical of 5* hotels that supply much less than 100Mbps, particularly in large cities where domestic connections are typically hundreds of Mbps.

    • Bigmaggot says:

      It’s clear there is a general misunderstanding about internet speeds and general usage experience!

      People are so obsessed with bandwidth speeds which doesn’t really affect these days how quickly your internet is if you have a fiber connection, you should be more interested in latency which is how quickly data arrives! The latency speeds of the highest and slowest bandwidth with the same provider is exactly the same.

      Your internet experience will likely be the same on the highest and slowest package. It would only make a difference if you are uploading/downloading very large files all the time.

      Browsing HFP, watching Netflix, sending WhatsApp will all be exactly the same with the “fatest” and “slowest” package!

      WeWork and 5* hotels will likely have higher bandwidth speeds, but they will likely be throttling you to a slower bandwidth speed which doesn’t matter. Again, test latency as that is how quickly things arrive.

      When running speed tests take note of the latency, or for latency speeds of your favourite website speed on a windows device, run “ping http://www.headforpoints.com -t”.

      • Bigmaggot says:

        ping command remove http://, this got added when submitting post

      • NFH says:

        I fully understand what bandwidth and latency are, as well as how to measure both.

        C:\>ping http://www.headforpoints.com

        Pinging http://www.headforpoints.com [2606:4700:20::ac43:4b99] with 32 bytes of data:
        Reply from 2606:4700:20::ac43:4b99: time=2ms
        Reply from 2606:4700:20::ac43:4b99: time=2ms
        Reply from 2606:4700:20::ac43:4b99: time=2ms
        Reply from 2606:4700:20::ac43:4b99: time=2ms

        Ping statistics for 2606:4700:20::ac43:4b99:
        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
        Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 2ms, Average = 2ms

        C:\>ping http://www.bbc.co.uk

        Pinging gtm-live.pri.bbc.co.uk [212.58.236.1] with 32 bytes of data:
        Reply from 212.58.236.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=249
        Reply from 212.58.236.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=249
        Reply from 212.58.236.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=249
        Reply from 212.58.236.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=249

        Ping statistics for 212.58.236.1:
        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
        Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 1ms

        • Rob says:

          You don’t know how to explain it to a non-tech audience though, because that means nothing to me 🙂

          • Bigmaggot says:

            The millisecond (ms) value is how quickly the site responds and is a better indicator of how quick your internet connection is at responding to requests. Bandwidth isn’t the limiting factor anymore how quickly your webpage load.

            If your internet connection was a car, Ferrari vs Fiat and both were limited to 100mph (bandwidth) and your acceleration was latency. Which one would get you from A to B the quickest?

      • will-h says:

        Netflix’s speedtester ( http://fast.com ) tells you latency and is a reasonable test

        • Rhys says:

          And is, in fact, what I used in the image in the article.

        • NFH says:

          I’ve copied and pasted the result, removing my static IP address:

          Your Internet speed is
          920
          Mbps
          Latency
          Unloaded
          1 ms
          Loaded
          8 ms
          Upload
          Speed
          820 Mbps
          Client London, GB
          Server(s) Trafford Park, GB | Guildhall Close, GB | London, GB
          Settings 720MB
          1590MB

  • Erico1875 says:

    As Musk has proven with Ukraine war, the threat that they will turn it off anytime a person/company/country don’t comply with his/US Government wishes is a serious negative IMO

    • Novice says:

      I did think of this. Sometimes having remote things isn’t good. Bad actors can hijack systems.

    • Barrel for Scraping says:

      Come on Musk is completely trustworthy. He’s not going to disconnect you on a whim. I mean no chance QR is going to find themselves with non-functioning wifi for political reasons.

      Turning sarcasm mode off – you’d be crazy to depend on something Musk offers based on his recent actions.

    • Rhys says:

      It’s inflight wifi. There will be bigger fish to fry if it gets to that point.

      • BSI1978 says:

        That’s a rather optimistic, at best, take on this given recent and current matters but each to their own.

  • JDB says:

    It sounds as though one needs to live in the country to benefit from faster internet than WeWork/London! 300 Mbps for £19/month or 900 Mbps for £34/month all under the Rural Broadband Initiative.

    It’s a great advance for those that want it, although a few hours of digital detox is really rather welcome. Many firms don’t allow this sort of access for security reasons.

    • Rhys says:

      I could get 1gbps…and I used to…but why pay extra when 200mbps at home is all I need?

  • TimM says:

    We could do with Starlink in Slaithwaite, Yorkshire, where the maximum speed, at any price, is around 8 Mbps. The main issue is that corporates assume everyone has higher speeds so websites are forever getting slower with pointless animations and loading more complex adverts.

    • Erico1875 says:

      We have a TP Link, 4g router using an EE mobile data SIM and are getting nearly 100 Mbbs . Business sim from Amazon was about £200 for 16 months so around £14pm equivelent
      I would check which network is best in your location and go down that path

    • Mike Hunt says:

      But at least you have an ALDI now

    • Rhys says:

      Nobody is stopping you from getting Starlink…

  • Jay says:

    The most likeable thing about this is that it works ALL the time. No ‘it’ll be on once we reach 10k ft’ and rushing to send your last email before you descend.

    • CaptainPtk says:

      The problem is with you / your employed, buddy. Nobody will die without your e-mail.

  • Chris W says:

    The big issue I see with this is cabin noise. people sitting on hours long zoom calls, speaking every few minutes loudly, idiots watching YouTube without headphones, kids playing games online etc.

    A big benefit of seatback IFE is that it cannot be heard without headphones

    I could see a point where people wind up choosing flights without WiFi purely because they are quieter

    • Susan says:

      I completely agree. I would actively choose a flight without wifi for these very reasons. Aircraft are one of the last selfish internet junkie free spaces. Who wants to take a long flight listening to other peoples inane conversations and noise from games ! Sorry but flights should be wifi free, I can see conflict ahead if someone is trying to rest and all they can hear is a selfish person holding a conversation there are already enough reasons on board that people get annoyed at.

    • John says:

      On my last J flight with QR there was no wifi and some kid was watching preloaded videos on a tablet without headphones. Nobody said or did anything

  • Metty says:

    On Qatar Doha to Beijing yesterday, Starlink worked fine for the first hour but that was it as over India? and China it doesn’t work. Mind you the A380 LHR-KUL paid for connectivity was terrible, not worth the $$

    As an aside, although folks are generally rude about QR customer service, our Avios redemption original flight yesterday from LHR was tech/late and was going to misconnect in Doha; as a lowly new Burgundy (lowest) tier member, we had an email, message and phone call to ask if we could go on the LHR DOH flight an hour earlier. As a BA GGL, reactive customer service was ok but I never had anything proactive like this.

    Malaysian have had Starlink for a while (flew A350 KUL-LHR last Nov).

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.