Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Alaska Airlines and IndiGo to start flights to London Heathrow

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

It’s a rare to see a new entrant start flights to London Heathrow, so to have two announcements in the same week is impressive.

(We’re not even counting Riyadh Air, which we know has agreed slots to start flights from late October but has not yet made any announcement. There is also, although we didn’t mention it, Air Peace which will begin flying to Abuja.)

Alaska Airlines plans London to Seattle flights

Airline consolidation has been the story of US aviation for decades, and the latest example is the merger of Alaska and Hawaiian Airlines – just nine years after the former acquired Virgin America.

Hawaiian Airlines has long operated a fleet of long haul aircraft, including A330s and Boeing 787-9s. Whilst the A330s will remain at Hawaiian, Alaska has decide to take Hawaiian’s fleet of Dreamliners and use them to turn its Seattle home into a global hub.

Flights to Tokyo have launched with Seoul following in September and Rome in May 2026. It has now announced flights to London Heathrow and Reykjavik too. Iceland will use a single aisle Boeing 737, however.

Alaska Airlines long haul routes

The exact launch date and schedule are yet to be confirmed, although May 2026 is the target.

Alaska Airlines will become the fourth airline to operate the Seattle route, with British Airways, Delta and Virgin Atlantic already flying between the two airports – and BA operating two daily flights, at least in the summer.

Is there enough demand for a fourth airline and fifth daily flight? Back in 2023 American Airlines pulled out of the route, which it had launched just two years previously.

Alaska Airlines is part of the oneworld alliance, so you will be able to earn and redeem Avios on these flights. It will be interesting to see if it joins the British Airways, American Airlines, Finnair and Iberia transatlantic joint venture, which allows the airlines to co-ordinate schedules and pricing without falling afoul of competition rules. All profits are shared between airline partners according to a secret formula.

If so, might we see British Airways drop down to one daily flight and Alaska Airlines take over the fourth slot? It isn’t clear at the moment who will be providing Alaska’s slots.

Alaska Airlines has just announced a new livery for its Boeing 787-9 fleet (image below). These aircraft were originally delivered to Hawaiian with 34 business class seats and 266 economy seats.

The seats are based on the excellent Elevate Aircraft Seating Ascent product and sport very Hawaiian colours, so it’s expected these will be lightly refurbished to match Alaska Airlines’ brand.

Alaska Airlines Boeing 787-9

IndiGo adds London Heathrow flights

Like Alaska, IndiGo is a newbie to long haul flying, having launched flights to Manchester and Amsterdam just last month.

Initially it is damp-leasing Norse Atlantic aircraft before taking delivery of its own long-haul fleet from 2027. (A damp lease means Norse is providing the aircraft and pilots but cabin crew are from IndiGo.)

It’s not yet clear which Indian city flights will operate from. The existing Manchester route is operated from Mumbai, but reports in the Indian press suggest that Heathrow and future European routes will fly from Delhi.

It’s all oddly vague, given that flights are meant to launch in a few weeks at the start of the winter season on 26th October.

IndiGo is in the process of increasing its Norse Atlantic fleet to six aircraft. The current Manchester and Amsterdam routes operate with just one aircraft on an alternating schedule.

Norse Atlantic’s premium economy cabin (there is no business class) is branded as IndiGoStretch. As our comparison of premium economy cabins shows, this is – hands down – the most generous PE seat on the UK market in terms of legroom.

Service on board is better than Norse Atlantic usually offers. Both economy and premium economy passengers will get complimentary hot meals, but only those in IndiGoStetch get free alcoholic drinks.

Turning convention upside down, meals are vegetarian by default with the option to pre-book a non-vegetarian meal before departure.

IndiGo is not in any airline alliance. Virgin Atlantic has a partnership with the airline but this only covers services which connect to Virgin Atlantic’s Indian flights.

Comments (45)

  • David says:

    Morning. The new Alaska livery is Aurora Borealis not Hawaiian colours. Love it myself.

    • Lumma says:

      At this time of year?
      At this time of day?

    • Paul MCY says:

      The article says that *the seats* sport very Hawaiian colours, and suggests they’ll be lightly refurbished to match the Alaskan (northern lights) brand.

    • masaccio says:

      I love the new livery too. I wonder if Disgusted of Palm Beach will brand removing Inuk Man as ‘woke’ in a Thatcher-like tantrum.

      • AJA says:

        To be fair Thatcher was right about that BA branding fail – it was a mess. There were so many different tail fin designs and, apart from the Chatham Dockyard design originally only painted on Concorde and which was subsequently adopted fleetwide, they failed to give BA a cohesive identity. I recall the South African design was dubbed Air Zulu, which I though was funny at the time but in retrospect would be condemned as imperialist and colonialist.

        • ADS says:

          I loved the different BA tails … but then I like variety!

          • vlcnc says:

            Me too. There was a big idea behind it and the whole push was around “the world’s favourite airline” so it was coherent with a well though-out strategy and messaging. It felt outward looking, dynamic and positive – unlike BA now.

        • HampshireHog says:

          Well I loved project utopia and it was a clever nod to the claim to be the world’s favourite airline. Mrs T’s parochialism jinxed the endeavour which was clearly struggling with criticism from little englanders and look where that view of the world got us. Nods to Nigel over a fag and a warm pint.

  • Expat in SJC says:

    Very excited about being able to fly my adopted airline back to my home country!

    Slots come from either AA or BA – tbc but likely BA will drop frequency.

    Expected that there might be some sort of switch up of cabin config at some point.

    Disappointing to not see Chester the friendly face on the tail incorporated into the new 789 livery.

    There is demand. Various American sites are reporting the stats on demand for SEA-LHR. And, of course, that’s before you consider the demand from those that transit through SEA or other west coast airports. Alaskas network on the West Coast is impressive and there will be a fair number of AS loyalists folks who will now choose AS via SEA rather than UA via SFO which has really been the only alternative if you want to stay on the same metal.

    The other point is this is now a great option for UK -> Hawaii given how much the combined AS and HA dominate the Seattle -> Hawaii market. Even more so when HA join OW later (but more to come on that as the new combined HA / AS scheme launches later this month)

    • Rhys says:

      Why would BA drop a frequency if Alaska is not part of the JV? BA would not benefit from revenue sharing – Alaska would be cannibalising its revenue. (Albeit a friendly oneworld cannibal!)

      • Nick says:

        There are currently no plans for AS to join the joint business. It would take a long time to get it through, they can’t just wake up one day and decide it, and in any case AS have enough on their plate with HA integration.

        Frequency is interesting, it will really depend massively on corporate behaviour. It’s fairly common knowledge that the second BA flight is timed around the schedule of one major corporate… if that company goes to AS, along with much of the regional AS base that connects on BA today and will surely now defect, it’ll have to be removed as it won’t be viable. There’s enough volume for a new flight, not so sure about yield.

    • ADS says:

      yes, the AS network will presumably hoover up lots more connecting passengers through SEA than the former AA service

  • Expat in SJC says:

    Btw typo in this article. Flights to Tokyo have already started (on HA’s AOC until the AOCs are merged).

  • Expat in SJC says:

    And another typo. Only ICN, FCO and LHR are going to be 787. NRT is 330 for now.

  • Chris W says:

    I assume Indigo will be appealing to people in India living outside the main cities who connect via DEL to LHR.

    Nonstop flights from DEL to LHR are already plentiful and dirt cheap on full service carriers. A tatty Norse 787 isn’t going to shake that up

    • apbj says:

      Indigo’s other drawback is that it has partnerships galore on some of its Indian domestic connections (the article mentions Virgin but there’s also BA, Qatar and goodness knows who else) but not on every route, and no frequent flyer partnerships. This means connections are non-earning unless booked as an international connection on the partner code, and many destinations aren’t reachable at all except by booking separately. And if Indigo were to move towards a single deeper relationship or alliance, I’d bet on Virgin/Skyteam rather than BA/Oneworld.

    • Inman says:

      Indigo is probably capitalising on the bad rep which Air India has at the moment and also appealing to the budget-conscious traveller. There’s a lot of potential to gain customers who are flying EY Obviously it won’t be business class passengers or passengers who would spend a few quid extra for a slightly more comfortable ride.

  • Richie says:

    More on the aircraft https://www.hawaiianairlines.com/our-services/at-the-airport/our-fleet/b787 there’s a good number of extra comfort seats.

  • Michael Jennings says:

    As someone who lives in London but comes from Australia and therefore goes back and forwards between the two countries a lot, Alaska to London potentially opens up some possibilities when combined with Hawaiian’s HNL-SYD service. LHR-SEA-HNL-SYD or even LHR-SEA-XXX-HNL-SYD for various values of XXX might make for some interesting stopovers, depending on fares and fare rules.

    • flyforfun says:

      I’ve looked at flights to Australia via North America in the past as something different to via Asia (although going via Taipei a couple of times was new to me after decades of trips back!).

      I’ve never seen great timings, often caught out one way or the over with very long lay overs. And the immigration / transfer process, which I hear is being improved in some locations, has been a negative. Price hasn’t been competitive – but I guess they aren’t really attracting through traffic. I tried to book AA’s Dallas – Brisbane flight, but all it’s routings from London avoided that flight (perhaps a premium flight?).

      Also, the American carriers tend to be a little less comfortable in the back of the plane than their Asian counterparts. Fine if you’re sitting up front, but the food and other amenities tend to be a little nicer on the Asian carries, IMHO. Been a while since I flew AA TATL though, so not sure if it’s improved or not!

      • Michael Jennings says:

        Oh, I wouldn’t recommend it if you are going straight through, but if you want one or more stopovers in the US it can be fun, assuming the price is good and the fare conditions allow it. US Airlines will sometimes allow a couple of stopovers in the US with surprising amounts of sideways movement and backtracking. All the big three fly LAX-SYD, but none of them fly to Australia via Hawaii, so a stopover in HNL on such a routing has been off the table in recent decades. Hawaiian does fly HNL-SYD, so this potentially puts it back on the table. A stopover in SEA might be slightly less painful than one in LAX, too.

        Taipei is a nice city for a stop, I agree.

    • HampshireHog says:

      Don’t forget the painful connection in the US or rather the lack of proper international connections.

    • Andy says:

      I’ve done HNL-SEA-LHR once and decided I was never doing it again as it involved two overnight flights

      HNL-LAX-LHR was much more amenable but did have to get up really early HNL time

      • Novelty-Socks says:

        I’ve done that a couple of times. Was barely worth going to sleep before the early flight from HNL 🥱

      • Rhys says:

        This is the sort of thing that the merger of Alaska and Hawaiian could fix, however, to make sure Europeans can connect easily onwards?

        • Andy Davies says:

          I think it’s a distance plus timezones problem — flight is 5hrs plus Hawaii is three hours (?) behind LA

          So if you leave HNL at 7am you’re not going to land until 3pm in LAX

      • Andrew. says:

        If I’m on the 13:xx departure from Seattle, I don’t try to sleep, just stay in USA mode so the London arrival is at 22:55 Seattle time. Then sleep for for three hours at home as of I’d got the 17:xx flight.

        (Works for me).

  • Chris D says:

    I’ve been tempted to fly Norse PE before, but the lack of WiFi is a dealbreaker (more so than it would be in business class, since I can easily sleep in business).

    I’m surprised it’s treated as such an afterthought in HfP’s original premium economy comparison!

    • Rhys says:

      Can be difficult to compare with larger airlines where different aircraft have different set ups!

Leave a Reply to AJA Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.