Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

How much money will British Airways lose running the ‘Avios only’ flight to Cape Town?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

This is a guest post by Oliver Ranson, who runs the fascinating Airline Revenue Economics blog on Substack.

You can read Oliver’s previous HfP articles, How we built the first business case for the award-winning Qatar Airways Qsuite“, hereWhy the disappearance of First Class is down to bad marketing, not lack of demand” here and a similar article to this one on the Avios-only flight to Dubai here.

You can sign up to receive Oliver’s future articles by email here. You will usually receive the first half by email with the rest available to paid subscribers. The paid level has a seven day free trial, and it is cheaper if you sign up via a web browser rather than the Substack iOS app due to Apple’s cut being added on.

This article has been edited slightly by HfP for house style. Over to Oliver:

How much money will British Airways lose running the ‘Avios only’ flight to Cape Town?

British Airways’ Avios-only flights have become an established feature of the airline’s business. They were first offered in April 2023 and started small – Geneva and Sharm-el-Sheikh were first – operated by two-cabin single-aisle planes without flat-beds.

BA has also run twin-aisle Avios-only services. I costed BA’s Avios-only 2024 autumn half-term special to Dubai when it was released, which HfP also re-published.

An Avios flight to Caribbean sun-spot Barbados flew in February 2025. Abu Dhabi, just down the road from Dubai but probably harder to fill, operated Avios-only in Easter this year.

Now British Airways has launched what may be the most impressive Avios-only flight yet. It is their flight to Cape Town leaving on 20th December this year and returning just under two weeks later on 2nd January 2026.

This really is peak-of-the-peak for leisure travel. Other long-haul Avios-only services were in school half-term holidays.

On Dubai and Abu Dhabi there will have been some corporate traffic displaced by the points bookers. Cape Town is right over Christmas. Almost everyone on these flights will be off on holiday. Fares would have been through the roof.

I have taken the opportunity to build a new-and-improved version of my pricing model to figure out the economics of the Cape Town Avios exclusive. It builds additional elements into the previous model.

Avios Group Limited, the loyalty arm of BA’s parent company IAG, will almost surely be paying British Airways for the seats at market rate. My model estimates they may have had to pay BA more than £1 million to offer the deal.

The idea is that proving to Avios collectors that they can make impressive and aspirational redemptions attracts more people to the scheme.

The Avios business has certainly been booming. Some highlights from the company’s 2024 annual report are:

  • £363 million profit on £1,585 million revenue, earning 22.9% pre-tax margin
  • £301 million revenue growth 2022 to 2023 (23.4%)
  • Avios earning grew 24% in 2024
  • Avios redemptions grew 20% in 2024

Bringing in new customers with the Cape Town flight helps propagate this growth of a high-margin product.

So how much might Avios Group Limited be paying BA? Read on to find out .…

How much money will British Airways lose running the ‘Avios only’ flight to Cape Town?

Why Cape Town & why now?

2025’s Avios-only flights are shown in the table below:

Take a look at the ‘notice’ column, which shows how many days in advance the Avios-only flights were released. All other Avios-only flights in 2025 were released far ahead, between 222 and 317 days. The average is 262 days.

The Cape Town flights have been released 142 days ahead, a bit under five months. There was much less notice than the other Avios-only flights.

Why? I think there are two possible reasons:

  • Other Avios-only flights might have generated large numbers of bookings and cancellations – narrowing the booking window a bit might help cut down on speculative bookings – although the flights sell out so quickly that it makes sense to ‘book now and ask [your partner] questions later’
  • Summer holidays were in full swing on 31st July as state schools broke up on 22nd July but private schools started their holidays some time earlier (my old school on 27th June) – many private school parents may have already finished their summer holidays by 31st July and will be thinking about their next break

It is not clear whether or not BA’s Avios-only flight had a lightly booked load before the announcement. The flight is one of a pair that operates on the days in question. Based on fare class availability, the second flight looks almost booked out. My guess is that BA has moved existing cash ticket holders onto the other flight.

Jetting off to South Africa at Christmas time is a premium price proposition. The sort of thing done by people who do not blink at dropping £25,000 on four Club World seats. (£25,000 is not hyperbole, as I will show below.)

Even with Avios-only flights, Cape Town is still a financial stretch for many. Hotels at Christmas are correspondingly costly – a standard room at the Mount Nelson for the period of this trip would cost you over £20,000. Even a more modest option like The Westin Cape Town is £5,000 per room.

Yet some passengers will find a holiday that was previously financially impossible now within their reach. That will make them feel warm and fuzzy about British Airways. They will keep their co-brand credit card and keep preferring BA for business travel.

Others will genuinely save cash that they would otherwise have spent. They will be grateful and there is a good chance they may spend the money on more BA flights in the future.

How much money will British Airways lose running the ‘Avios only’ flight to Cape Town?

The model I used to cost Avios-only flights to Dubai

If you have read my article on costing BA’s Avios-only flights to Dubai you can skip this section. It explains how that model worked.

I have a little technique I use that takes published fares and calculates a ‘best-guess’ estimate of how much revenue particular flights and routes can generate for airlines. I call it the ‘shelf’ principle.

Imagine you are in a shop looking at the things for sale. Items on the bottom shelf are often the cheapest. You need to look for them and reach down to pick ‘em up. But because they are cheap and the Law of Demand applies, many people will. So items on the bottom shelf sell at low prices but in high volume.

Now consider the top shelf. That is where the priciest items tend to be. Everyone can see them, but not everyone wants them. So the shop puts them above your hands and you need to reach up if you want one. The top shelf has low volume but high prices.

Finally, imagine of the middle shelf. It is eye level and in easy reach – desirable real estate. It has all your favourite brands on, but maybe you do not always buy your favourite. The middle shelf has mid-range volume and mid-range prices.

So ….

  • Bottom shelf – high volume, low prices
  • Top shelf – low volume, high prices
  • Middle shelf – mid-range volume, mid-range prices

All three shelves probably generate the same revenue. Or margin, since this is retail. The key idea is that each shelf contributes equally.

It is the same with a well-run airline fare structure. Our best guess as observers is that each fare class, or revenue booking designator as we say in the trade, contributes an equal amount of revenue.

Drawbacks of my Dubai model

In one respect my Dubai model probably over-estimated the revenue which BA would otherwise have earned on their Avios-only flight to Dubai.

It used London originating fares which should be more expensive than fares from other markets which BA would also have sold. I have corrected for this in the Cape Town model.

In another respect my Dubai model probably under-estimated the revenue opportunity cost. It assumed that all fare classes were represented.

This may have been valid to some extent for Dubai – large corporates and travel agents might have access to discounted fares that book into higher buckets. I do not think it is valid for Saturday trips to Cape Town at Christmas, where I would expect everybody to be paying full whack.

What is BA charging for similar flights around Christmas time?

BA wants the following fares for direct, non-stop flights +/- 2 days to Cape Town. These include BA’s surcharges but do not include UK Air Passenger Duty, other taxes and airport charges:

  • £12,341 to £16,555 in First
  • £6,292 in Club World
  • £4,144 to £5,133 in World Traveller Plus
  • £2,716 in World Traveller

Fares from European airports are lower, reflecting BA’s price premium for passengers starting their journey in the UK. Looking at Paris, Amsterdam and Frankfurt, I see:

  • £13,186 to £17,533 in First – slightly higher than ex-London
  • £5,553 to £9,086 in Club World – potentially around £1,670 lower than ex-London
  • £2,605 to £3,290 in World Traveller – potentially around £310 lower than ex-London

I struggled to price up a World Traveller Plus itinerary from Europe – I tended to get Club World instead.

I then evaluated three scenarios, based on the percentage of travellers who would have bought tickets starting in Europe (not the UK) and so paid a lower fare:

  • 10% demand ex-EU
  • 30% demand ex-EU
  • 50% demand ex-EU

Now for the results. Depending on the scenario, the value of both outbound and return flights together is between £1.2 million and £1.3 million. Click to enlarge:

How much money will British Airways lose running the ‘Avios only’ flight to Cape Town?

Note how due to slightly less favourable inventory availability the pre-Christmas flight is more valuable than the post-New Year flight. This makes sense – not every Cape Town traveller will want to be in Cape Town for so long but Christmas rather than New Year could easily be the priority for most.

We also do not know how many bookings BA has already received for Cape Town Christmas services.

It is possible that it has received many and that there was more favourable (for the consumer) inventory availability earlier in the year. This would mean that my estimate is too high.

There are not many seats left on BA’s second Cape Town flights of the day, suggesting that some passengers may have been moved over.

However my personal experience of evaluating desirable Christmas flights is that fares are always near the top of the range at the time of release. People may buy them in advance or not but the seats are always sold at expensive prices in the end. This gives me some confidence that I should not be out by too much.

But please remember .… it’s only a model! We can be virtually certain, however, that British Airways has sacrificed at least £1m of revenue to run this Avios-only flight.

If you found this interesting, you may enjoy these other articles on my Substack. One article can be read for free and the rest are available via the seven day free trial subscription:

…. or see all my recent articles here.

Comments (38)

  • Erico1875 says:

    £2700 IN World Traveller !
    I can score that off the Christmas destination list😁

    • Nick says:

      Check out the prices just after Christmas (around 28th Dec) and back early New Year. I was quoted £3,919 in economy. 😂

      • Inman says:

        All this assuming you MUST travel in BA.

        • Sandgrounder says:

          Virgin are the same price, connecting flights are cheaper, Ethiopian probably the best but that involves overnight both ways. Nasty.

  • 1958 says:

    Prior to 2012 (approximately), it was relatively cheap to fly long-haul from the UK in the fortnight before Christmas. The hike up in prices occurred from Boxing Day onwards.
    Now, spending Christmas abroad is more in demand. One could speculate on the reasons – but in my experience, there has been a change.

    • Paul says:

      I’d agree, I spent Christmas in Lake Tahoe pre 2012.

      If there are indeed many who’d drop £25k on 4 J class seats and £20k on a hotel, then the Chancellor do should not have to look far come October!

      • The Savage Squirrel says:

        I’d speculate that they might be able to do so exactly because they are particularly adept at avoiding the taxes increased using the “standard” levers that the rest of us pay in full, though…

    • Gerry says:

      … and I also remember, a few years in a row, BA’s 2-4-1 business class promo around Christmas! Those times are gone…

      • Thegasman says:

        Was better than a standard 2-4-1 as the “1” cost was reduced to whatever year it was £2017/8 etc. Don’t think there were any destination exclusions either as we got CPT twice as well as NYC another year where you’d expect lots of spare capacity around NY.

  • e14 says:

    I might have missed this in the article – but how much Avios did this take out of circulation and what were the Fees collected. You can sacrifice revenue to reduce your liabilities.

    • Ken says:

      There is an odd obsession on here to undermine anything BA does.

      You’d keep the liability, in a currency you have absolute control over, on the balance sheet all day long.

      Do the ‘fees collected’ even cover the external charges ?

      • e14 says:

        Ha, actually it’s more about the day job, and interco A&L. Given it’s BA revenue vs. IAG Loyalty my question stands. Here we have a completely visible transaction of some 256 Avios seats each way.

      • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

        No the fees rarely cover the external charges.

        The £25 I pay on a club short haul redemption doesn’t even cover the APD ;et alone airport fees and departure taxes on the return. And a £1 RFS economy barely covers the credit card fees for collecting that £1.

    • Andrew says:

      Indeed. Interesting article about the loss in revenue but no mention of the cash fees paid on all of those avios redemptions plus the value of the avios themselves.

  • Nick says:

    If this was not an entirely new flight, how do we know how many seats were remaining at the time the avios only element was publicised? Perhaps the plane was already two thirds full. And therefore only a third of the seats went avios only.

    • Rob says:

      All existing cash passengers were moved to the other flight, we think.

      • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

        I was going to ask this as well.

        What justifiable reason would they have given for moving people and upsetting their travel arrangements?

        It’s the sort of manoeuvre people can and do complain about “BA cancelled my booking and moved me but the original flight is still going!”

      • Tim says:

        That is the bit that puzzles me. They run a loss making Avios only flight to generate goodwill but in doing so create an equal and opposite amount of illwill by messing about with people’s existing bookings and by cutting cash fare capacity in half.

        • The Savage Squirrel says:

          A problem completely and simply avoided by releasing one flight’s worth of Avios seats distributed between the two flights too. Sure you have to script the promo material that fraction more carefully, but it’s hardly difficult to publicise: “an entire planeload of Avios seats…”

          • CJD says:

            Having 1 flight where every seat can be bought using Avios is a far easier marketing sell though. Your solution is needlessly clumsy.

    • Oliver Ranson says:

      A very good question.

      Flights on the three days before and afterwards are still reasonably wide-open in both directions. The inventory availability is J9 W9 Y9 on all of these flights. With more 9-level availability in further down price points too, but lower price points like I and T closed out.

      The second southbound flight on the same day as the Avios-only flight is currently J1 W9 Y9. So it is almost full in CW but not in WT+ or WT. The second northbound flight is currently J2 W0 Y9 B0. So it is probably almost full in every cabin.

      This is why I think passengers were shifted over. But I don’t know for sure. I can understand existing passengers that were shunted over being miffed.

  • NigelthePensioner says:

    I don’t believe that these avios only long hauls will secure more business for BA. It is a rare occurrence and those with enough Avios to trade for seats will know how long it has taken them to save up those Avios and also the dire premium cabin availability of seats.
    Couple that with the fact that these flights will be full of families all on their “once in a lifetime” trip and trying to milk it for all they can and you end up with a BA version of a charter flight. Ghastly.
    But…….each to their own; we wont be burning any Avios on any of these flights.

    • Rob says:

      You’re looking at this from a pensioner point of view though. If you are a parent, the fact that the majority of these flights take place during school holidays when reward seats are a premium, and are generally to places where reward seats are hard to find, is very attractive.

      For you, I accept the last thing you want is a plane full of kids and to be paying a ‘UK school holiday’ premium for your hotel when you arrive. However, as you presumably have total freedom to travel whenever you want you don’t need these flights.

  • E says:

    I’m not hugely convinced it works as a halo effect – for one it benefits a small number of passengers and in any case “points-savvy” customers fly whenever they want if they book far enough in advance.

    The halo effect of points is in enabling people to fly up front who otherwise would not or could not do so.

    A better option is very limited promotions making this more achievable, or lowering the bar to get status. This way people still have to spend money with the airline and only a minority end up completing the “challenge”.

    SAS million points is one example – suddenly bloggers everywhere are reporting on the airlines they are flying as part of that promotion.

    BA/IAG already do this with the AMEX 241. If they just did the odd “Avios premium sale” once or twice a year with deep discounts on a small number of premium seats in terms of redemptions needed it would be just as effective and cost less than a million in lost revenue.

    • Rob says:

      What IS true is that unless IAGL really times it right (ie don’t give HfP advance notice – which they don’t – and email your entire membership base as soon as it goes live – which they don’t), all the seats will go to people who read HfP and/or follow similar Avios-focused X / Insta channels or Facebook groups, leaving nothing for the general public when they finally hear about it.

    • CJD says:

      ‘enabling people to fly up front’ is such a narrow view of things.

      I’d be travelling as a family of 3, cash tickets in economy are currently over £10k for the 3 of us to fly to Cape Town and back over Christmas. Using Avios the cash component for economy flights comes to £450.

      Are you telling me there’s no halo effect when I could have saved £10,000 cash on Cape Town flights?

      • kevin86 says:

        I think E is referring to whether you’ll now send more business BA’s way as a result of these avios flights, rather than whether you’re happy to save £10k (which is only relevant if you would have paid £10k)

        • CJD says:

          The halo effect comes from collecting Avios, which would allow me to spend £450 cash for flights that would ordinarily cost £10,000.

          That’s a huge saving in cash terms, bearing in mind not everyone is going to have spreadsheets detailing exactly how much ‘value’ they’ve extracted from their Avios.

          It encourages the collection of Avios, which is exactly what IAG Loyalty will want.

  • Garethgerry says:

    We have to take into account the detrimental effect of existing customers being moved to later plane. I find the earlier plane much more convenient enabling me to still get to my house before lunch , 2hr drive. Could have half a plane of pis..d off paying passengers

    “Luckily” for BA bout not for moved passengers, delay is nt enough to trigger compensation

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      Well they gave more than 14 days notice so no compensation but I asked above what reason would BA have given to the passengers they apparently moved for moving them?

  • Garethgerry says:

    I got it wrong , forgot that it won’t be many of the same people on return flight, they will have piss.d off the equivalent of a plane full of paying customers.

    So pi.s off a lane load of cash customers, to please people who many collected avios without spending a pound on BA.

    Need a new Loyalty manager

    • Rob says:

      The people who collect Avios without spending a pound on BA are THE target market!

      As far as IAGL is concerned, the only growth market for them is to sell more Avios to third parties since the amount they can sell to BA is capped by BA’s schedule. Amex etc pay 1p per Avios, IAGL banks a liability of (say) 0.5p and immediately takes the other 0.5p as profit. What’s not to like?

      Technically IAGL don’t care if the Avios scheme encourages more people to fly on BA or not. BA can fill its seats via package holidays, regular sales, heavy corporate discounting whatever – makes no difference to the loyalty side.

      • Garethgerry says:

        What’s not to like is if a plane load of cash customers go somewhere else in future. Without cash customers, no BA or IAGL. No flights for avios, no income from Amex etc. Avios is the tail not the dog, if Airlines forget this it will come back to bite them

        On the otherhand could actually would be very profitablein short term, an Avios ponzi scheme

Leave a Reply to Rob Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.