Quantcast

Has the clamp down on credit card fees changed airline pricing?

From April 6th, UK companies have been banned from imposing excessive credit card surcharges on customers. The airline industry has, of course, been one of the worst offenders here, but has anything actually changed for the better?

If you are flying a legacy airline then, frankly, the answer is ‘No’.

The full Government guidelines are here. They make it clear that a credit card surcharge must only cover the actual cost of the company of accepting a card. The issue, of course, is how much that cost actually is.

In reality, a large retailer like British Airways is probably paying around 1% to Visa / MasterCard and 1.5% to American Express. You can add 1% to those numbers for a medium size business and at least another 1% at least for your local corner shop.

However, a company can add “all genuine relevant costs” to the headline fee to get to the sum surcharged to customers. All other indirect and direct costs linked to accepting credit cards, such as additional website costs, can be included.

Credit cards

Airlines also have a specific burden to bear. The credit card companies have been burnt many times when airlines have gone bust, forcing them to issue refunds. Most will now refuse to hand over the majority of the funds for a transaction until after the flight has taken place. Pay for a BA flight in August today on your debit card, and BA gets the money today. Pay on your credit card and it won’t see most of the money until August (assuming BA has the same deal as smaller airlines). This leads to additional costs relating to lost working capital etc which could arguably also be reclaimed via the card levy.

So, where are we?

Historically, Virgin Atlantic has charged a 1.5% fee for using a credit card. This was great for cheap flights and a disaster for expensive long-haul flights. (And, of course, the more expensive the flight, the more likely you are to want the refund cover that a credit card gives you.) Virgin has not changed their model since April 6th, and doesn’t have to – 1.5% is probably not covering its full costs. However, it is a bit of a shocker to be asked for £75 to cover card payment on a £5,000 flight.

BA charges a flat £4.50 per passenger (although American Express cardholders who live in Ukraine are exempt ….). On a one-way ticket to Manchester this could represent 10% of the ticket price, but BA would argue that, for the average customer, it represents a much smaller percentage which is in line with its costs.

The real troublemaker, of course, was Ryanair. They have simply moved to a £7 per person, per sector, ‘administration fee’, which is payable by everyone, however they pay – although this is included in headline advertised prices. The additional fee for using a credit card over a debit card is only £1 per person per sector, which is bordering on reasonable. easyJet also moved to an administration fee on top of their standard credit card fee.

So, no real change. Is anyone surprised?

Lufthansa's 20% bonus for buying Miles & More miles returns
Free Avios with 3V Virtual Visa – our (updated) list of places where you can use the card
About Head for Points

We help business and leisure travellers maximise their Avios, airline miles and hotel points. Visit every day for three new articles or sign up for our emails via the box to your right.

Comments

  1. Sir Stamford says:

    What I am surprised by is your comment “Most will now refuse to hand over the majority of the funds for a transaction until after the flight has taken place”.

    Cash is of the essence for most, if not all, businesses especially those in sectors with high debt levels and fixed operating costs.

    My experience with businesses within the leisure industry (primarily visitor attractions) is that credit card companies will credit your bank account a few days after the purchase has taken place. It is not relevant whether the consumer has purchased a ticket for a future dated entry date; you get your money now. I can not immediately see why airline transportation companies are treated differently regardless of a small minority of them have previously gone bust.

    Sir Stamford

    • I have a link to a company that sells hospitality packages for major sporting events, and the credit card companies will release almost nothing (80 per cent) until after the event has taken place. The company requires crazy amounts of working capital.

      • Sir Stamford says:

        Having looked, albeit very quickly, at the latest Annual Report and Accounts for British Airways plc (year ended 31 December 2012), I can not immediately see any mention of this change in cash flow cycle given that it has major business implications and I could not see any large increase in trade receivables either (as the amount should be owed by the credit card to the company). Therefore, I am not sure if they have been impacted by this.

        Sir Stamford

        • I agree, BA is stable enough to be able to negotiate a better deal I’m sure. I doubt someone like Jet2 or Wizz-Air gets the same deal, though.

          • Andrew says:

            Interesting point – a quick look at Dart Group (who own Jet2)’s accounts shows in 2012 over 20% of their total assets (by value) were trade receivables. In contrast, this is <5% for BA.

            • Sir Stamford says:

              In the Business and Financial review section of Dart plc’s annual report to 31 March 2012 (page 7 of the annual report), the following was mentioned.

              “The business continues to be funded in part by customer payments received in advance of travel from our leisure customers.”

              My take on this is that credit card companies have not withheld payments until the flight dates.

              It is true that they have a higher level of trade receivables in comparison to BA but you need to consider that Dart plc is a more diverse transportation group which has a substantial package holiday and distribution and logistics business. These revenue streams which would generate a sizeable trade receivables.

              As a matter of comparison, in BA, the airline business makes up 96% of the total revenue in 2012. In Dart plc, the airline business is only 68% of total revenue in 2012.

              Sir Stamford

  2. I’d argue that the important change has occurred in so far as Ryanair and Easyjet’s headline fees are directly comparable across the industry.

    To be frank the scope of covering things like “website charges” is rediculous – if tesco started putting a £7 credit card surcharge online it would be cannon fodder for the evening news. Plus since when has any company itemised it’s final price to that extent – for the consumer the price is simply the price, it’s largely non relevant what the constituent parts of the price are when comparing like for like.

    I think the OFT did well here.

  3. You mention Ryanairs’s flat £7 per booking fee. Easyjet also have a flat fee, of £10 per booking. It is not itemised but the cost of flights varies by the number of seats being purchased simultaneously.

    • Thanks Tim, I missed that because, as you say, it is included in the headline figure and tricky to see.

      • sandgrounder says:

        I think Ryanair charge 2% for a credit card rather than an extra pound. Interesting fact on CC companies holding back funds. This explains a lot, not least the fact that my full journey is shown on my credit card statement, which previously was a bit puzzling.

  4. Phillip says:

    “BA charges a flat £4.50 per passenger (although American Express cardholders who live in Ukraine are exempt ….).”

    There are also no CC fees at all on ANY CC used for certain other European countries! Not sure what the decider is!

    • Ukraine is easy to explain away as the slip of a mouse ….

      Also worth noting that some credit cards do a check against the country you put on the form and the address on your card file. Selecting Germany and using a Visa may therefore get rejected. Amex does not do country checks. (It also doesn’t do name checks – you can use an Amex belonging to anyone who shares your address, even if your name is pre-filled and not deletable in the name box on the payment form.)

      • vindaloo says:

        I’m a Uruguay man myself, but to be honest the “slip of the mouse” argument doesn’t wash too well given that it pre-populates the field with United Kingdom. I think we rely more on the fact that it just works and nobody seems inclined to do anything to fix it!