Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

A few PR thoughts on the BA system outage

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Last week we published something on HfP which, whilst totally innocent, inadvertently had the potential to cause us a PR problem if it had been publicised.  We shut it down quickly with a full and genuine apology to the people concerned and the problem went away.

This is not the first time we have done this.  Our strategy in such cases is to openly and immediately admit our mistakes, make whatever corrections are needed, make sure no-one has lost out and move on.

I only mention this because we all have to do crisis management from time to time.  I dealt with far bigger ones during my 16 years in the City but I followed the same basic principles as I do with HfP issues.

I said on Sunday that I wasn’t going to start talking about the ‘why’ and ‘how’ aspects of the great BA system outage.  I’m not an IT specialist and even if I was I doubt I could add much.  Aimless speculation is just a waste of screen space.

What is clear, though, is that British Airways was totally unprepared for this.

I am 100% sure that British Airways has a plan in place in case of a plane crash.  (Apparently as a ‘media outlet’ I am meant to have a strategy in place for the death of the Queen, although I must admit we haven’t done so yet.  Ideas welcomed on that one.)

Realistically, though, a total BA system outage was always far more likely than the loss of an aircraft.  The new FLY passenger control system fell over numerous times last year, although the system was never down for more than a few hours.  US airline Delta had an identical outage to the British Airways incident last year.  It was, surely, only a matter of time before the same thing happened here.

What we have seen over the weekend, however, is the absence of any planning at all.  The correct solution, of course, would have been simple.  Tell passengers you are truly sorry, that they should make whatever arrangements are necessary to get to their destinations, and that BA will guarantee to refund them.  That’s it.

Would some people have exploited it?  Potentially, but a very minimal cost overall to BA.  What we saw instead was an astounding collection of stories which will no doubt make a great PR case study one day:

BA refused to transfer passengers in London to other airlines.  I know one Gold Guest List member who managed to get himself moved via the GGL hotline to a oneworld partner, but no-one else.  There were flights taking off every 3 minutes on Saturday with empty seats which could have been filled with British Airways passengers, but BA refused to move passengers across. 

(For clarity, my understanding is that airlines do not pay the going rate when this happens.  There is an industry standard in place.  A few years ago Lufthansa moved me from Lufty First Class to Emirates First Class when my Lufthansa connection was cancelled and I promise you that LH didn’t pay Emirates £4,000 per person.)

Outside London,  BA has been moving passengers to other airlines BUT there are reports that Avios redemption tickets are being excluded as they are non-transferable and passengers told to wait for the next day with an available BA seat.

BA is refusing to refund passengers who booked tickets on other airlines using their own initiative.  To quote one Flyertalk user last night:  “I booked a flight back to Glasgow using easyJet from Stansted on the basis that: I couldnt get through on any phone line, I couldn’t get the website to work, Skyscanner was reporting no available seats on BA to Glasgow and we were told not to go to the airport.  Now BA have told me (via twitter DM) that they wont compensate me for my easyJet flight.”

I have independent reports that both the call centre and some airport staff were telling some passengers on Saturday not to try claiming EC261 compensation because the incident was caused by a lightning strike and was therefore “weather related”.  There now seems to be an acceptance that lightning had nothing to do with it.  

However, BA can also claim an exemption for EC261 by claiming “extraordinary circumstances” although any attempt to do that would almost certainly end in court.

Looking again at Flyertalk, BA is not protecting return flights where the tickets were booked as 2 x one-way tickets.   They will rebook your outbound flight from the weekend without charge but – if your inbound was booked separately – you are stuck and will need to buy a new return.

And let’s not talk about the merits of having Alex Cruz wear a hi-viz vest so he looked like a school lollipop man in his TV and video appearances, despite being filmed sitting in an office.   Or BA stating that everything would be OK on Sunday, when 75 flights ended up being cancelled.

It is all trivial and petty.  The impression it gives is that the first priority of the airline is to avoid paying out a single penny more than is necessary which is ironic as the press coverage is focusing on whether cost cutting was the cause of the problem in the first place.

It is also insulting to the thousands of BA staff members, many of whom came in voluntarily to help out, who were trying their best all weekend in the face of a total IT wipe-out.

No-one expected BA to have a few hundred call centre workers on standby.

No-one expected them to be able to rustle up extra aircraft at no notice and be able to keep Heathrow open all night to clear the backlog.

No-one expected them to break the strict rules on pilot and crew working hours in order to get people away.

People understand all this.

What people don’t understand is why a company appears to be putting its unwillingness to pay out compensation ahead of any desire to get its passengers away as quickly as possible.  At the end of the day, the raft of empty seats leaving Heathrow over the weekend belonging to other airlines is the real testament to the way this problem was handled.


How to earn Avios from UK credit cards

How to earn Avios from UK credit cards (April 2024)

As a reminder, there are various ways of earning Avios points from UK credit cards.  Many cards also have generous sign-up bonuses!

In February 2022, Barclaycard launched two exciting new Barclaycard Avios Mastercard cards with a bonus of up to 25,000 Avios. You can apply here.

You qualify for the bonus on these cards even if you have a British Airways American Express card:

Barclaycard Avios Plus card

Barclaycard Avios Plus Mastercard

Get 25,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £10,000 Read our full review

Barclaycard Avios card

Barclaycard Avios Mastercard

5,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £20,000 Read our full review

There are two official British Airways American Express cards with attractive sign-up bonuses:

British Airways American Express Premium Plus

25,000 Avios and the famous annual 2-4-1 voucher Read our full review

British Airways American Express

5,000 Avios for signing up and an Economy 2-4-1 voucher for spending £15,000 Read our full review

You can also get generous sign-up bonuses by applying for American Express cards which earn Membership Rewards points. These points convert at 1:1 into Avios.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 20,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express

40,000 bonus points and a huge range of valuable benefits – for a fee Read our full review

Run your own business?

We recommend Capital on Tap for limited companies. You earn 1 Avios per £1 which is impressive for a Visa card, along with a sign-up bonus worth 10,500 Avios.

Capital on Tap Business Rewards Visa

Huge 30,000 points bonus until 12th May 2024 Read our full review

You should also consider the British Airways Accelerating Business credit card. This is open to sole traders as well as limited companies and has a 30,000 Avios sign-up bonus.

British Airways Accelerating Business American Express

30,000 Avios sign-up bonus – plus annual bonuses of up to 30,000 Avios Read our full review

There are also generous bonuses on the two American Express Business cards, with the points converting at 1:1 into Avios. These cards are open to sole traders as well as limited companies.

American Express Business Platinum

40,000 points sign-up bonus and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Click here to read our detailed summary of all UK credit cards which earn Avios. This includes both personal and small business cards.

Comments (226)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Dave says:

    Re preparation for the death of the Queen: I assume we’ll get an extra public holiday – maybe you could run a piece on how best to find availability for flight and hotel redemptions at short notice…?

    • Fran says:

      No, not this, the exact opposite. Pull all pre-prepared posts and cancel programmed tweets. You do not want to drop anything cheery about ways to travel when half the country is in mourning.

      • Simon says:

        Correct. And check your ad words and search engine optimisation isn’t accidentally making you look like you’re trying to benefit. Don’t launch any competitions until after the state funeral and extend the deadline for any already open. Check advertising on your site carefully as you’ll be tarred with the brush of any mistakes they make.

        And maybe don’t post any new items on the day of the funeral.

        This may all seem like overkill. It probably is. There will be plenty of “we want it to go back to normal” stories in some newspapers. But to be honest no one knows what it will be like. The world’s press will be in London looking for stories to fill rolling news channels. It’ll be like the day before London 2012 combined with the week of Diana’s death and with the Queen Mother’s lying in state. With added social media and a side debate about the new King.

        If you haven’t seen the Operation London Bridge article in the Guardian from a few months back then it’s worth reading.

        • Callum says:

          People really don’t care about the Queen as much as you two think they do! Half the country must definitely will not be in mourning. Saddened maybe, but not distraught. Maybe you’re confusing the UK for Thailand?

          • Ro says:

            I think the news outlets care more than anyone.

          • thereal harry1 says:

            gotta agree whole-heartedly with Callum! 🙂

            I won’t exactly be popping the Champagne as that would be a bit OTT for something so insignificant

            I’ll just be fed up (being something of a quidnunc) that it will be boring story after boring story for a few days before things get back to normal

        • Alan says:

          Thanks for the pointer re the Guardian article, interesting reading indeed.

      • paul says:

        I am dreading it. Not because I will mourn but because of the blanket endless coverage of the minutia of her life, a life of unimaginable privilege. And not just her, but her husband, that too will result in blanket 24hr coverage for several days. Its going to be absolutely horrid.

        • Ro says:

          So true… the coverage devoted to a woman giving birth was beyond believable

    • Jason Scott-Taggart says:

      I fully expect HFP to refresh an article of how inheritance works with loyalty scheme. Just think of the number of miles Lizzie must have accrued and never had a day off to spend!

  • Michael says:

    I flew on Saturday from SEA – EDI via LHR. I arrived at Seattle airport early and BA did move me onto the slightly earlier Virgin Atlantic flight to LHR (was then stuck in London for 12 hours waiting for the EDI connection to take off).

    What surprised me was the sheer number of empty seats on the Virgin plane – it was, at best, half full – considering the BA flight (which was subsequently cancelled) looked close to fully booked according to my ability to pick seats then that was an awful lot of people avoidably stranded in Seattle.

  • Nick says:

    It was an appalling mess and a total PR disgrace & disaster, but, few people will be surprised.

    IMHO it will probably be the ‘straw that broke the camels back’, for many people now, who were already at the end of their tether with the race to the bottom that we’ve seen over recent years, in finally moving their business from BA elsewhere.

    • Paul says:

      I agree but I think Heathrow Airport also showed a complete lack of a plan. 3 hours and more to get out of T5 was rediculous. They and UKBF should also be facing some criticism.

  • TripRep says:

    Rob, I think whilst BA’s deliberately being vague about the real cause of the issue (clearly to deter EU261 claims), it is obvious speculation will only continue, here’s what I posted in the other thread…

    The more I reflect on it the more I think this is perfectly plausible..
    https://headforpoints.com/2017/05/28/british-airways-shut-down-fly-it-failure/comment-page-4/#comment-259510

    Are you going to publish a revamped how to claim EU261 for this event?

    • Will says:

      It isn’t that plausible.
      I did some consultancy at BA maybe three years ago and the vast majority of the servers for business processing were Red hat Linux. They didn’t need patched for ransomware.
      Maybe they patched the Windows servers but that would only have been a small proportion and wouldn’t have caused this issue.

      • TripRep says:

        Fair point about the ransomware just on Windows, but even RHEL Servers need their own regular maintenance patches.

    • Mr Dee says:

      That is unlikely to be true at all if you and parts failing on systems because of a reboot is not something I have heard of just because they are not often rebooted.

      The ransomware issue was due to the NHS not updating their systems and anyone who knows how the NHS manage their systems will understand they are unorganised is some areas.

  • Richard says:

    I assume as the outage started the full extent of what to come was unknown to BA, and it seems their response is typical of the ‘absolute cost-control’ strategy at BA. No one, it seems, has any authority to bend rules that could materially cost BA any more than the lowest achievable cost in any given situation. What this strategy doesn’t measure is the effect of the sustained bad PR that you analyse so well.
    It seems all very short sighted on their part.

  • TripRep says:

    Also there was a discussion the other day on pax being lied to by BA representatives..

    Having seen Alex Cruz on the TV yesterday do you really think he is telling the entire truth?

    I’d of like to see him squirm out of trying to dodge these questions..

    What was the detailed reason for the power surge?

    Is it BAs responsibility to ensure its IT systems are fault tolerant?

    How frequently are BA doing regular tests of its Disaster Recovery plan?

    What spare hardware do you keep onsite at the Data centre?

    Why do you think 94% of Flyertalk members think you should step down or be removed?

  • Phil says:

    If the IT system has been outsourced then there should be indemnities in place to cover costs for a lack of service provided. Unless no one thought to include this in the deal

  • Jason Hindle says:

    I’m sure the power incident, and BA saying Tata to many of its experienced IT staff, is entirely coincidental.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.