Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

CONFIRMED: British Airways closes Gatwick short-haul, all flights removed from sale

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Five days after we exclusively broke the story that BA pilot union BALPA had refused to support the new low cost model proposed for Gatwick Airport, British Airways has officially pulled the plug.

All Gatwick short-haul flying is now suspended. Flights have been removed from sale.

The only exception will be a handful of domestic services to connect to the banks of long-haul Caribbean departures.

British Airways closes Gatwick short-haul, all flights removed from sale

In a statement to Sky News, BA said:

“After many years of losing money on European flights from the airport, we were clear that coming out of the pandemic, we needed a plan to make Gatwick profitable and competitive.

With regret, we will now suspend our short-haul operations at Gatwick, with the exception of a small number of domestic services connecting to our long-haul operation, and will pursue alternative uses for the London Gatwick short-haul slots.”

In a staff email circulated today, quoted by Sky News, BA states that the terms offered to BALPA were:

“the best that could be achieved in order to create a viable and sustainable operation at London Gatwick”.

BALPA’s acting general secretary, Martin Chalk, said:

“We are disappointed that we couldn’t come to arrangements that were acceptable to our members. We stand ready to work with BA to find such arrangements that could be acceptable.”

Why did BALPA refuse to support the new short haul operation?

As we covered here, the cost of pilots for the new Gatwick operation represented one of the few areas where British Airways felt it could reduce costs.

BALPA would never have allowed the airline to hire new pilots on lower pay. The two sides had been working on a deal which would allow Heathrow Airbus pilots – some currently flying, some in the ‘holding pool’ – to be seconded to the new Gatwick airline. Whilst pay would have been reduced, in line with Gatwick’s more seasonal schedule, pilots would have retained their place on the seniority list and would have a guaranteed path to return to Heathrow in the future.

According to a letter circulated by BALPA last week, which we have seen:

“….. we have been trying to insert a clause in the contract of employment which would have protected the contractual rights of LGW-based pilots by placing an obligation on BA to ensure that Newco complies with any collective agreements or procedures agreed between BALPA and BA.”

In plain English, BALPA wanted Gatwick pilots to automatically receive any pay increase or other benefits negotiated by Heathrow crew.

British Airways closes Gatwick short-haul, all flights removed from sale

BALPA claimed that British Airways had agreed to such an obligation but, when it came to making it legally binding, refused.

BALPA continued:

“we have received an email from BA making it clear that the company is not prepared to include the protection clause we require.”

and concluded:

“we can no longer recommend the proposed LGW shorthaul agreement. As such we have terminated the consultative ballot with immediate effect.”

However …..

It seems that, earlier this week, British Airways came back to the table with a new proposal which addressed these issues. The union has refused to support it, however, because there is no longer any willingness from the pilot body to go along with this plan in any form. A revised proposal put together by the union, with improved pay and scheduling, was apparently rejected by the airline.

It is worth noting that there are no dedicated British Airways short haul pilots at Gatwick, all having taken redundancy, transferred to Heathrow or joined the ‘holding pool’, so the closure will not directly lead to any redundancies. It will impact the remaining furloughed Gatwick short haul cabin crew.

What happens next?

British Airways has a few options up its sleeve.

It could try to revive a BA operation at Gatwick with a new non-unionised pilot fleet, but this would break a legal agreement with BALPA over representation. It would almost certainly lead to a strike that would ground the airline.

The slots could be passed to other IAG carriers such as Aer Lingus, Vueling or LEVEL. With minimal UK brand recognition, however, it is hard to see them succeeding where BA could not.

The final option is a sale of the short haul slots. Wizz Air would pay a handsome price for them, and easyJet would also do whatever was necessary to find the money. It would be a once in a generation opportunity to get a dominant position at London Gatwick.

Oddly, according to Cirum data, BA’s withdrawal won’t have much impact on the reach of Gatwick Airport. There are only four BA routes from Gatwick which are not served by any other Gatwick airline – Algiers, Cologne/Bonn, Genoa and Manchester – and Manchester is likely to remain as a feeder.

The BA call centre is going to be busy though. Cirum notes that, purely for July 2022, British Airways has 1,881 short-haul flights scheduled from Gatwick, with 331,000 seats available. If you were planning to call BA about anything, I’d do it now before the cancellation emails start going out ….

You can read more on Sky News here. British Airways has yet to make a statement.


How to earn Avios from UK credit cards

How to earn Avios from UK credit cards (April 2024)

As a reminder, there are various ways of earning Avios points from UK credit cards.  Many cards also have generous sign-up bonuses!

In February 2022, Barclaycard launched two exciting new Barclaycard Avios Mastercard cards with a bonus of up to 25,000 Avios. You can apply here.

You qualify for the bonus on these cards even if you have a British Airways American Express card:

Barclaycard Avios Plus card

Barclaycard Avios Plus Mastercard

Get 25,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £10,000 Read our full review

Barclaycard Avios card

Barclaycard Avios Mastercard

5,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £20,000 Read our full review

There are two official British Airways American Express cards with attractive sign-up bonuses:

British Airways American Express Premium Plus

25,000 Avios and the famous annual 2-4-1 voucher Read our full review

British Airways American Express

5,000 Avios for signing up and an Economy 2-4-1 voucher for spending £15,000 Read our full review

You can also get generous sign-up bonuses by applying for American Express cards which earn Membership Rewards points. These points convert at 1:1 into Avios.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 20,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express

40,000 bonus points and a huge range of valuable benefits – for a fee Read our full review

Run your own business?

We recommend Capital on Tap for limited companies. You earn 1 Avios per £1 which is impressive for a Visa card, along with a sign-up bonus worth 10,500 Avios.

Capital on Tap Business Rewards Visa

Huge 30,000 points bonus until 12th May 2024 Read our full review

You should also consider the British Airways Accelerating Business credit card. This is open to sole traders as well as limited companies and has a 30,000 Avios sign-up bonus.

British Airways Accelerating Business American Express

30,000 Avios sign-up bonus – plus annual bonuses of up to 30,000 Avios Read our full review

There are also generous bonuses on the two American Express Business cards, with the points converting at 1:1 into Avios. These cards are open to sole traders as well as limited companies.

American Express Business Platinum

40,000 points sign-up bonus and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Click here to read our detailed summary of all UK credit cards which earn Avios. This includes both personal and small business cards.

Comments (242)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Lochlann says:

    Any reason why BA couldn’t franchise the brand a la the South African set-up? Or codeshare with Vueling or Level?

    • Jonny Price says:

      A separate franchise airline could be created like Comair (or even like GB Airways!) but it would need to find the aircraft, people and go through the whole set-up process between now and next summer. I also wonder if the pilot agreement would allow this.

  • Graham Walsh says:

    What is classed as short haul? Would flights to Crete for example still leave Gatwick? This year the flights for HER were from LHR but next year move to LGW. I’d much prefer LHR.

  • NFH says:

    Once Crossrail starts running from central London to LHR, travelling the slower and longer distance to LGW for a short-haul flight will be a comparatively unattractive alternative. For short-haul, LGW will become akin to LTN and STN, not unlike how it was mostly a charter flight airport until the early 1990s.

    • ChrisBCN says:

      Nonsense. Farringdon to Heathrow T5 will take 39 minutes, according to the journey time calculator on the crossrail website.

      Farringdon to Gatwick takes 1 minute longer, 40 minutes. I don’t think that’s materially longer.

      London Bridge to Gatwick takes 30 minutes, Paddington to T5 on crossrail will also take 30 minutes.

      Moral of the story – depends where you start from.

      • NFH says:

        Crossrail previously said that Canary Wharf to LHR would take 39 minutes. I see that this has now increased to 48 minutes. Not so impressive.

      • Dubious says:

        It takes 45 minutes by train to get to Gatwick from my house…but 1hr 40 mins by train to Central London and another 40-50 minutes to Heathrow….Gatwick wins…

    • Sarah says:

      Not if you live in South London. 30 mins to Gatwick from Clapham Junction, 20 mins from East Croydon

    • Susan says:

      People do live outside central London dontcha know. My frequent traveller parents on the south coast have a direct train connection to LGW, getting to Heathrow is a pest.

      • Fenny says:

        Although BA probably fly at slightly less antisocial hours, all these journey times are irrelevant for flight times well before the trains start running in the morning. A 5.40am take off might as well be in Edinburgh if you want to get there the same day from anywhere via public transport. Even a 7 am flight from LGW is only of use if you live 5 minutes from a station on the right line.

  • gareth says:

    What will happen to flights I have booked from lgw short hall next year? Moved to Heathrow?

    • John T says:

      Some routes presumably cut permanently. Destinations like ALG probably won’t restart at LHR…

  • Mickey Mouse says:

    Only British Airways could attempt to have one believe that the viability of an entire operation rests solely upon one workgroup…

    • Jonny Price says:

      It doesn’t – but they had already sorted out the other elements. Ground handling was already outsourced, they could recruit cabin crew on market rate contracts, they could even outsource some of the engineering if it was to support a new entity. The one blocker in the way of making the new operation viable was one workgroup – the overpaid pilots.

      And now BALPA is a laughing stock.

      • Rob says:

        You would have said that if the unions had stopped Mixed Fleet – but they should have because it would have saved cabin crew from the new contracts last year.

      • James D says:

        “they could recruit cabin crew” and “they could even outsource some of the engineering” so they hadn’t sorted out other elements. Curious where you get your incorrect information from and why you have a vendetta against the pilots?

        • Jonny Price says:

          What information was incorrect?

          No vendetta against pilots – I was just making the point that other elements of the cost base had been resolved previously. Pilots were the one remaining cost that was uncompetitive.

          Take cabin crew at Gatwick, for example. Unlike the pilots, they were on market rate contracts pre Covid – many were made redundant when they downsized the Gatwick workforce in 2020, but many would get re-employed on similar T&Cs as before (although they would only be flying shorthaul) if the new subsidiary went ahead.

      • Paul says:

        Paid less than Easy for hours worked with an extremely fatiguing (Colgan Air 3407 anyone?) proposed rostering system.

  • Pilot says:

    “and easyJet would also do whatever was necessary to find the money” – What do you think the 1.2bn raise was for? It was intended to buy any available slots from BA pulling out.

    When easyJet announced the rights issue, everyone said, “why now?” – now you have the answer

  • John T says:

    Isn’t this just a negotiating tactic to get BALPA to come back to the table?

  • J says:

    BA’s interest in Gatwick was mostly to wreck Norwegian – which was once a serious threat.

    • Alex Sm says:

      Norwegian will come back

      • Matarredondaaa says:

        Norse Airways the airline going to be doing long haul from Gatwick announced this week they and BALPA had made a comprehensive agreement so wonder if that influenced the union?

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.